Cardiac sarcoidosis affects all layers of the heart, mainly affecting the myocardium, and is a serious complication of systemic sarcoidosis10. Approximately 5% of sarcoidosis patients have clinical manifestations of heart diseases, but autopsy studies suggest that the prevalence may be higher, ranging from 20% to 30%11. People are increasingly recognizing that the heart of sarcoidosis patients is prone to being affected. Histological confirmation of CS is the gold standard for diagnosis. However, due to the focal nature of the disease, the sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy is approximately 25% from unselected RV biopsies, and therefore a negative biopsy does not necessarily rule out CS12,13,14. Cardiac magnetic resonance and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography have high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis, but radiation exposure and high cost have hindered their routine use and repeated application1,6. Following the identification of abnormalities on cardiac contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI), we recommended that the patient undergo further assessments, including PET-CT and endomyocardial biopsy. However, the patient declined these examinations due to concerns about radiation exposure (related to PET-CT), potential risks of endomyocardial biopsy, and financial constraints.
Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is predominantly diagnosed clinically. Per Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) criteria, biopsy-confirmed extra-cardiac sarcoidosis plus either rhythm abnormalities (advanced AVB, sustained VT on ECG/Holter) or LV dysfunction (LVEF <40% on echocardiography/CMR) and/or compatible advanced imaging (cardiac PET/CMR) supports a high probability of CS. The World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders (WASOG) criteria align closely with the HRS, while the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) uses major/minor criteria and does not require biopsy-proven extra-cardiac sarcoidosis6,15. Based on this, a highly probable diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis was established for the patient following a multidisciplinary discussion, taking into account the patient's electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, results of cardiac contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI), and past medical history of pulmonary sarcoidosis. The diagnosis could be confirmed by the improvement in relevant examination results after glucocorticoid therapy.
CS is associated with poor prognosis and requires early diagnosis and treatment. Currently, clinical screening mainly relies on electrocardiogram and echocardiography, and for patients with asymptomatic sarcoidosis, the positive rate is low due to the limited positive results of symptoms. In this case, the patient had been diagnosed with pulmonary sarcoidosis for 3 years. As the patient remained asymptomatic, no treatment was initiated, and the patient was followed up regularly. During the current follow-up, repeated mild elevations in hs-cTnT levels were detected, prompting further workup with CMR imaging, which ultimately confirmed a diagnosis of CS. Following treatment per the standard protocol, the patient's hs-cTnT levels showed a sustained decline and returned to the normal range. The level of hs-cTnT reflects the severity of persistent myocardial injury. It is elevated in many patients with heart failure and has prognostic value for the risk of cardiac events, independent of left ventricular function or BNP levels16,17,18. Some studies have reported that the level of hs-cTnT in patients with CS is usually elevated7,8,19. To evaluate the relationship between hs-cTnT and CS, we searched for articles in PUBMED and Web of Science using the terms "high-sensitivity troponin, troponin" and "cardiac sarcoidosis, sarcoidosis", excluding non-English, only abstracts, conference reports, a total of 12 articles were selected (Table 1).
Previous reports have indicated that FDG-PET can reflect the activity of inflammation in cardiac tissues and the involvement of epithelioid cell granulomas20. A study retrospectively analyzed the serum levels of hs-cTnT, ACE, lysozyme, BNP, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and FDG-PET data in patients with CS, finding that hs-cTnT is a reliable indicator for evaluating the activity of cardiac sarcoidosis: the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 75.0%, respectively, and the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 87.5% and 75.0%. Moreover, hs-cTnT had a good correlation with ACE and lysozyme, but no correlation with BNP or LVEF. For example, patients with low hs-cTnT, high BNP, and low EF might be in the terminal stage of cardiac sarcoidosis. At the same time, the combination of high hs-cTnT, low BNP, and preserved EF might indicate that the disease is in the early and active stage9.The main treatment drug for sarcoidosis is glucocorticoid. However, there is currently no clear evidence-based basis for the optimal dosage and duration of glucocorticoid treatment. The total treatment course and the rate of dose reduction vary from patient to patient1,21. Studies have suggested that hs-cTnT is associated with worse left ventricular function, higher incidence of atrioventricular conduction block, and heart failure. Moreover, after glucocorticoid treatment, the level of hs-cTnT decreases compared to before treatment, indicating that hs-cTnT can reflect the activity and severity of inflammatory myocardial injury in CS and can be used as a marker to evaluate the treatment response during glucocorticoid treatment. Even if patients do not have obvious clinical symptoms of cardiac dysfunction, this is helpful for timely adjustment of the treatment plan to reduce the risk of disease recurrence and progression8.
Hs-cTnT can also serve as a biomarker for evaluating the prognosis of CS. A study analyzed patients with CS in the chronic stage who were undergoing treatment. According to the hs-cTnT levels, the patients were divided into two groups. The patients with high hs-cTnT had a higher rate of cardiogenic mortality than those in the normal hs-cTnT group. The patients in the hs-cTnT group had a higher rate of cardiogenic death, ventricular fibrillation, persistent ventricular tachycardia, or hospitalization due to heart failure than those in the normal hs-cTnT group. The proportion of patients with hs-cTnT experiencing cardiac events within 2 years was ≥ 50%. Patients with high hs-cTnT levels had a higher probability of experiencing major cardiovascular adverse events, and even a slight increase in cTnT levels could lead to cardiac events. This indicates that hs-cTnT is an effective biomarker for evaluating the prognosis of CS22. Another study found that NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, and serum creatinine, when analyzed as continuous variables, were respectively associated with the composite endpoint of left ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, or death23. Some studies have reviewed 512 patients diagnosed with CS. The research results suggested that among patients with hs-cTnT levels, the male prevalence was higher, the symptoms of heart failure were more severe, EF was lower, BNP levels were higher, and hs-cTnT levels were significantly associated with a higher incidence of major cardiovascular adverse events9.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 132 patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the relationship between cardiovascular events and prognosis. Results showed that 28 patients experienced cardiovascular events. The patients in the event group had more severe symptoms of heart failure, a higher incidence of ventricular tachycardia, and higher serum hs-cTnT values [0.025 (0.017 - 0.044) compared with 0.011 (0.007 - 0.019) ng/mL, p < 0.001], and the left ventricular ejection fraction was lower than that of the non-myocardial infarction group. Even if the patients were not diagnosed with cardiac involvement at the time of enrollment, these trends could still be observed. Multivariate analysis showed that hs-cTnT was an independent biomarker for predicting cardiac events (hs-cTnT > 0.014 ng/mL: HR: 7.31, 95% confidence interval: 2.20 to 24.28, p < 0.001). The results indicated that hs-cTnT is a useful biomarker for predicting cardiovascular events in patients with sarcoidosis, even in those who did not have cardiac involvement at the initial assessment, and after using glucocorticoid treatment 24. ShoKazui et al. aimed to assess whether the longitudinal levels of hs-cTnT were associated with adverse events in patients with CS. They examined the longitudinal hs-cTnT data of 63 patients with CS who had been treated with prednisolone. The patients were divided into two groups based on the median area under the hs-cTnT curve. The primary adverse events were persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, worsening of heart failure, and cardiogenic sudden death (SCD). During the median follow-up period of 30.4 months, a total of 463 cTnT measurements were collected. The study found that a higher area under the hs-cTnT curve was significantly associated with an increased incidence of major adverse events (P = 0.027). Changes in hs-cTnT levels before and 1 month after glucocorticoid treatment were not related to adverse events (P values were 0.179, 0.096, and 0.95, respectively). The study demonstrated that longitudinal hs-cTnT levels were associated with adverse cardiac events in patients with CS. Continuous measurement of hs-cTnT in CS patients is helpful for the early identification of high-risk patients25.
Most research results indicate that the elevation of hs-cTnT is associated with the severity and poor prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis, and it can be used to guide the reduction of medication and personalized adjustment of the treatment course during glucocorticoid therapy. Currently, there are no studies on using hs-cTnT as a screening method for CS. This case report indicates that hs-cTnT can be used as an indicator to screen for myocardial involvement, especially when there are no obvious cardiac-related symptoms and no significant abnormalities in a conventional electrocardiogram or echocardiography. However, further verification with a larger sample size is needed.