Name: Intraoperative Strategy under Complex Vascular Adhesion for Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Bismuth-Corlette Type IIIb Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2026-02-13T13:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 5 min 22 s
Description: Learn laparoscopic radical resection for Bismuth-Corlette type IIIb perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with severe vascular adhesions. This protocol demonstrates meticulous dissection techniques for successful outcomes in complex hepatobiliary surgery.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

This study was supported by the Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund (Grant No. B2022197).

Prior to the surgery, the patient provided written informed consent. The surgical procedure was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Dongguan Bin-Hai-Wan Central Hospital.
1. Preoperative preparation
<ol>
	<li>Imaging evaluation
	<ol>
		<li>EOB-MR: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with liver-specific contrast agent (gadoxetate disodium, Gd-EOB-DTPA) was performed to assess the location and extent of the lesion. The tumor appeared as an ill-defined mass located in the medial segment of the left hepatic lobe near the hepatic hilum, measuring approximately 40 mm x 30 mm (Figure 1A).</li>
		<li>On the arterial phase, the lesion showed heterogeneous enhancement, with close proximity to the right hepatic artery, although no clear encasement of the artery was observed (Figure 1B). In the portal venous phase, the lesion exhibited progressive enhancement. The right branch of the portal vein was clearly visualized, while the left portal vein branch was poorly defined (Figure 1C).</li>
		<li>MRCP: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) demonstrated a stricture involving the left hepatic duct and the biliary confluence. There was intrahepatic bile duct dilatation, more pronounced in the left lobe. No intraductal filling defects were seen, although the left hepatic duct was poorly visualized (Figure 2).</li>
		<li>CTA: A contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the abdomen was performed to evaluate hepatic arterial anatomy. No vascular anatomical variations were noted. However, the left hepatic artery appeared significantly narrowed (Figure 3A), and the right hepatic artery was in close proximity to the tumor without evidence of encasement (Figure 3B).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiographic drainage (PTCD) 
	NOTE: In this case, the patient presented with progressive obstructive jaundice, with a total bilirubin (TBIL) level as high as 296.50 &#181;mol/L. Imaging revealed biliary obstruction near the hepatic hilum. PTCD was performed preoperatively with the following objectives: to lower serum bilirubin, reduce hepatocellular burden, and improve liver function in preparation for surgery; by relieving biliary pressure and stasis, PTCD reduces the risk of preoperative cholangitis and other bile-related infections; cholangiography during the procedure helps define the level and extent of obstruction, aiding in classification (e.g., Bismuth-Corlette) and surgical planning; establishes external biliary drainage to improve surgical outcomes in complex operations, such as resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
	<ol>
		<li>PTCD was performed by experienced ultrasound physicians under real-time ultrasound guidance.</li>
		<li>Assess coagulation profile (INR, PT, platelet count) and correct any abnormalities. Evaluate biliary dilation and select the appropriate access route (right anterior segmental bile duct). Administer local or conscious sedation anesthesia as needed.</li>
		<li>Puncture was performed subcostally on the right side under ultrasound guidance, targeting a dilated intrahepatic duct.</li>
		<li>Injection of contrast agent was done to delineate biliary anatomy and confirm the site of obstruction.</li>
		<li>A 10 Fr drainage catheter was inserted over a guidewire, enabling partial or complete external drainage of bile.</li>
		<li>Continuous drainage was ensured, and bile output (volume and color) was monitored. Tracking of liver function, inflammatory markers, and bilirubin levels was carried out. Routine flushing of the catheter was performed to prevent blockage or retrograde infection.</li>
		<li>Excessive or rapid bile drainage may lead to electrolyte imbalances or low bile syndrome; drainage volume should be carefully adjusted based on bilirubin reduction. Monitoring for signs of infection was done, and antibiotics were administered if necessary. For long-term drainage, ensure proper catheter care and regular replacement to avoid complications.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Anesthesia preparation
<ol>
	<li>A comprehensive preoperative evaluation was conducted by the anesthesiology team. The patient had no cardiopulmonary dysfunction, allergies, or airway abnormalities. Based on the patient&#39;s condition and expected surgical complexity, general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation was planned.</li>
	<li>The anesthesia team was alerted to potential intraoperative challenges, including: prolonged operative time, intraoperative bleeding due to vascular dissection, and hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressor support</li>
	<li>Anesthesia was induced and maintained using standard agents. Vital signs, arterial pressure, central venous pressure, and urine output were continuously monitored. No anesthesia-related complications occurred during the procedure</li>
	<li>Under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, the patient was placed in a supine position with legs apart, and head elevated 15&#176; (reverse Trendelenburg position).</li>
</ol>
3. Trocar placement
<ol>
	<li>Under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, after establishing a pneumoperitoneum through a periumbilical incision using a Veress needle technique, carbon dioxide insufflation was maintained at 12-15 mmHg.</li>
	<li>A 12-mm trocar was inserted at the umbilicus for the laparoscope to provide a panoramic view of the abdominal cavity. Additional working ports were placed under direct laparoscopic visualization to optimize access and instrument maneuverability, usually as follows: 12-mm main working port in the right midclavicular line below the costal margin, allowing primary dissection instruments and ultrasonic scalpel placement, 5- or 12-mm port in the left midclavicular line below the costal margin for assisting with retraction and exposure of the left hepatic lobe and caudate process, one or two 5-mm accessory ports in the right anterior axillary line and right lower quadrant to facilitate liver mobilization, vascular control, and lymphadenectomy. 
	NOTE: Ports are spaced adequately (typically &#8805; 8 cm apart) to prevent instrument interference and optimize ergonomics. The port configuration allows effective exposure of the hepatic hilum, hepatic arteries, portal vein branches, and bile ducts, facilitating precise dissection during the left hemihepatectomy and caudate lobectomy.</li>
</ol>
4. Surgical procedure
<ol>
	<li>Inspection of the liver revealed no visible tumor on the liver surface.</li>
	<li>The liver was mobilized by freeing the falciform ligament and the second hepatic hilum, fully exposing the second hepatic hilum. The left coronary ligament and the triangular ligament were divided.</li>
	<li>Liver was suspended, and separate adhesions of the gallbladder fossa were done.</li>
	<li>Under ultrasound guidance, an incision of the duodenal lateral peritoneum was made until the inferior vena cava was exposed.</li>
	<li>Lymph nodes of station 13 were dissected, and adhesions around the hepatic hilum were released.</li>
	<li>The lesser omentum sac was incised, and the gastroduodenal artery, common hepatic artery, and left gastric vein were identified and incised. The proper hepatic artery could not be dissected because of adhesion to the surrounding tumor tissue (Figure 4).</li>
	<li>The right gastric vein was ligated and divided, then the hepatogastric ligament was incised.</li>
	<li>The common hepatic artery was isolated and suspended. Lymph nodes of stations 8, 7, and 9 (which are fused) were dissected.</li>
	<li>Isolation and suspension of the gastroduodenal artery was continued. Tumor adhesion to the right hepatic artery was done, and the proper hepatic artery was discovered; blunt dissection was not feasible. Attempt careful, sharp dissection with scissors, which still might be difficult (Figure 5). Intraoperative frozen pathology of adhesions showed inflammatory tissue.</li>
	<li>After cholecystectomy, an attempt was made to separate the right hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery from the cystic artery stump.</li>
	<li>Sharp dissection continued along with ligation of vessels supplying the tumor; dissection remains difficult; continue combined blunt and sharp dissection of arterial adhesions.</li>
	<li>Dissection of the lymph nodes of station 12 was done.Continued combined blunt and sharp dissection was done around arterial adhesions. After evaluation, the proper hepatic artery and the right hepatic artery were freed (Figure 6).</li>
	<li>Division of the distal common bile duct was done, and the distal bile duct margin was sent for intraoperative pathology. The pathology report was negative, and the bile duct stump was sutured.</li>
	<li>Dissection of the surrounding tissue and lymph nodes of the common bile duct was done.</li>
	<li>Continued dissection of the right hepatic artery was done. During dissection, the right hepatic artery ruptured and was repaired with 5-0 vascular sutures (Figure 7). Intraoperative ultrasound confirmed good blood flow, and the dissection continued until the right hepatic artery was completely freed.</li>
	<li>Continued combined blunt and sharp dissection of adhesions around the proper hepatic artery was done to expose and suspend the proper hepatic artery.</li>
	<li>After isolating the left hepatic artery, it was ligated with 7-0 silk and vascular clips, then divided with scissors (Figure 8).</li>
	<li>Continuous dissection of lymph nodes stations 3 and 1 was done, and by now, lymph nodes stations 12, 13, 8, 7, 9, 3, and 1 have been cleared.</li>
	<li>Continuous dissection of the left portal vein was done and tumor invasion found. The root of the left portal vein was ligated with a 7-0 silk suture (Figure 9).</li>
	<li>Ligaments around the caudate lobe were mobilized and ligation/division corresponding to short hepatic veins was done.</li>
	<li>The ischemic line of the left and right hepatic lobes was marked with electrocautery.Intraoperative ultrasound confirmed the middle hepatic vein, tumor location, and portal vein.</li>
	<li>The first hepatic hilum was clamped. Using an ultrasonic scalpel, the liver parenchyma was transected along the pre-marked line.</li>
	<li>Identification of the middle hepatic vein was done, and ligation and division of the segment 4b vein were carried out (Figure 10).</li>
	<li>Continued transection of liver parenchyma along the left side of the middle hepatic vein was done.</li>
	<li>Left and right hepatic ducts were exposed, and it was found that the tumor involved the biliary confluence and the left hepatic duct. Transection of the right hepatic duct, approximately 0.5 cm from the tumor margin, was done along with the transection of the bile duct at the caudate lobe (Figure 11).</li>
	<li>The left portal vein was divided, and the proximal margin of the right hepatic duct was sent for frozen pathology. The result was negative.</li>
	<li>Transection of the caudate lobe liver parenchyma was done, followed by ligation and division of the corresponding short hepatic veins and ligamentous attachments (Figure 12).</li>
	<li>Continued transection of liver parenchyma along the left side of the middle hepatic vein was done until the left hepatic vein was exposed.</li>
	<li>Isolation and division of the left hepatic vein with a stapler was done. A complete left hemihepatectomy and caudate lobectomy were done, fully exposing the middle hepatic vein and inferior vena cava (Figure 13).</li>
	<li>The left portal vein margin was sent for pathology. The result was negative. Suturing of the defect with 5-0 vascular sutures was done.</li>
	<li>Using a bulldog clamp, the proximal and distal portal vein was clamped. Sutures at the defect site were loosened to allow blood drainage to flush potential tumor cells from the portal vein. After flushing, ligation of the sutures was performed, and it was confirmed that no bleeding occurred.</li>
	<li>Irrigation of the liver transection surface and abdominal cavity with warm saline was done, and hemostasis was achieved using bipolar cautery. At this point, lymph node stations 12, 13, 8, 7, 9, 3, and 1 were dissected, and left hemihepatectomy with caudate lobectomy was completed (Figure 14A,B).</li>
	<li>After making a 6 cm incision above the umbilicus, layer by layer through the abdominal wall, a wound protector was inserted, and the specimen was extracted. The specimen was placed in a retrieval bag.</li>
	<li>The jejunum was pulled through the incision and transected 15-20 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz, bringing the distal jejunal limb to the hepatic hilum, ensuring no tension.</li>
	<li>A side-to-side jejunojejunostomy 50-60 cm distal to the proximal jejunum was performed along with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy between the jejunal limb and the bile duct to prevent bile reflux.</li>
	<li>The abdominal incision was closed with interrupted figure-of-eight sutures. Under laparoscopy, the jejunum was opened and alignment of the anastomosis site with the bile duct was done. Single-layer continuous mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis using 5-0 Vicryl absorbable sutures was performed.</li>
	<li>Irrigation of the abdominal cavity with warm saline was done. Drainage tubes were placed near the liver transection surface and hepaticojejunostomy site. The laparoscope was withdrawn, and the release of pneumoperitoneum was done. The trocar incisions were closed.</li>
</ol>
5. Postoperative procedures
<ol>
	<li>Immediate postoperative monitoring: The patient was transferred to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) for continuous monitoring of vital signs, urine output, and neurological status. Hemodynamic parameters, including blood pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, and oxygen saturation, were closely observed.</li>
	<li>Liver function and drain output: Liver function tests (ALT, AST, TBIL, DBIL, ALP, GGT) were performed daily during the first 5 postoperative days. Drainage volume, color, and character were monitored every 8 h to detect potential bile leakage or hemorrhage. Drain fluid was also tested for serum amylase to exclude pancreatic injury.</li>
	<li>Antibiotic and hepatoprotective therapy: Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics (e.g., cefoperazone-sulbactam) were administered for 5-7 days postoperatively. Hepatoprotective agents such as glutathione and glycyrrhizin were used intravenously to facilitate hepatic recovery.</li>
	<li>Anticoagulation and thrombosis prophylaxis: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was initiated 24 h after surgery for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prevention. Compression stockings were also applied as adjunct prophylaxis.</li>
	<li>Nutritional support: The patient was kept nil per os (NPO) for the first 1-2 postoperative days, receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Upon absence of bile leakage or ileus, clear liquids were introduced on postoperative day (POD) 3, gradually advancing to a soft diet.</li>
	<li>Early mobilization: Passive limb exercises were encouraged on POD 1, sitting up in bed on POD 2, and assisted ambulation was initiated from POD 3 to reduce pulmonary complications and thromboembolism risk.</li>
	<li>Drain management: Drains were removed between POD 5 and 7 if the output was serous, less than 50 mL per 24 h, and there were no signs of bile leakage or infection. Drain amylase and bilirubin levels were rechecked prior to removal.</li>
	<li>Bile Leakage and Hemorrhage Surveillance: In cases of bilious drainage or increasing bilirubin, contrast-enhanced CT or MRCP was performed. Suspected hemorrhage (e.g., hemoglobin drop, hypotension) prompted urgent imaging and hematologic intervention.</li>
	<li>Discharge criteria: The patient was discharged after stabilization of vital signs, adequate oral intake, pain controlled by oral analgesics, normalization of liver function tests, absence of active drainage, and independent ambulation.</li>
	<li>Follow-up and surveillance: Outpatient follow-up was scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, including physical examination, liver function tests, CA19-9 monitoring, and abdominal imaging (CT or MRCP). Adjuvant therapy was considered based on final pathology and multidisciplinary discussion; however, the patient declined related treatment.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Razumilava, N., Gores, G. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Lancet%22%5BJournal%5D)">Cholangiocarcinoma.</a> Lancet. 383 (9935), 2168-2179 (2014).</li>
<li>Ribero, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Surgical+Approach+for+Long-term+Survival+of+Patients+With+Intrahepatic+Cholangiocarcinoma%3A+A+Multi-institutional+Analysis+of+434+Patients%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Arch+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Surgical Approach for Long-term Survival of Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis of 434 Patients.</a> Arch Surg. 147 (12), 1107-1113 (2012).</li>
<li>Rea, D. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Liver+transplantation+with+neoadjuvant+chemoradiation+is+more+effective+than+resection+for+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Ann+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Liver transplantation with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is more effective than resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.</a> Ann Surg. 242 (3), discussion 458-461 451-458 (2005).</li>
<li>Ercolani, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Changes+in+the+surgical+approach+to+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma+during+an+18-year+period+in+a+Western+single+center%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Changes in the surgical approach to hilar cholangiocarcinoma during an 18-year period in a Western single center.</a> J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 17 (3), 329-337 (2010).</li>
<li>Li, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Application+of+the+laparoscopic+technique+in+perihilar+cholangiocarcinoma+surgery%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Application of the laparoscopic technique in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery.</a> Int J Surg. 44, 104-109 (2017).</li>
<li>Ahmad Al-Saffar, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Postoperative+factors+predicting+outcomes+in+patients+with+Perihilar+cholangiocarcinoma+undergoing+curative+resection-a+10-year+single-center+experience%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Scandinavian+J+Gastroenterol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Postoperative factors predicting outcomes in patients with Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma undergoing curative resection-a 10-year single-center experience.</a> Scandinavian J Gastroenterol. 60 (1), 73-80 (2025).</li>
<li>Tang, W., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Minimally+invasive+versus+open+radical+resection+surgery+for+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma%3A+Comparable+outcomes+associated+with+advantages+of+minimal+invasiveness%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PloS+One%22%5BJournal%5D)">Minimally invasive versus open radical resection surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparable outcomes associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness.</a> PloS One. 16 (3), e0248534(2021).</li>
<li>Washington, K., Rocha, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Approach+to+Resectable+Biliary+Cancers%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr+Treatment+Opt+Oncol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Approach to Resectable Biliary Cancers.</a> Curr Treatment Opt Oncol. 22 (11), 97(2021).</li>
<li>Zhang, Y., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Total+laparoscopic+versus+open+radical+resection+for+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Surg+Endo%22%5BJournal%5D)">Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.</a> Surg Endo. 34 (10), 4382-4387 (2020).</li>
<li>Gaspersz, M. P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Evaluation+of+the+New+American+Joint+Committee+on+Cancer+Staging+Manual+8th+Edition+for+Perihilar+Cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Gastroint+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.</a> J Gastroint Surg. 24 (7), 1612-1618 (2020).</li>
<li>Bismuth, H., Corlette, M. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Intrahepatic+cholangioenteric+anastomosis+in+carcinoma+of+the+hilus+of+the+liver%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Surg+Gynecol+Obstet%22%5BJournal%5D)">Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.</a> Surg Gynecol Obstet. 140 (2), 170-178 (1975).</li>
<li>Dar, F. S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((National+guidelines+for+the+diagnosis+and+treatment+of+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22World+J+Gastroenterol%22%5BJournal%5D)">National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.</a> World J Gastroenterol. 30 (9), 1018-1042 (2024).</li>
<li>Li, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Complete+laparoscopic+radical+resection+of+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma%3A+technical+aspects+and+long-term+results+from+a+single+center%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Videosurge+Other+Miniinvasive+Tech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Complete laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: technical aspects and long-term results from a single center.</a> Videosurge Other Miniinvasive Tech. 16 (1), 62-75 (2021).</li>
<li>She, W. H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Vascular+resection+and+reconstruction+in+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22ANZ+J+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Vascular resection and reconstruction in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.</a> ANZ J Surg. 90 (9), 1653-1659 (2020).</li>
<li>Nagino, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Clinical+practice+guidelines+for+the+management+of+biliary+tract+cancers+2019%3A+The+3rd+English+edition%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019: The 3rd English edition.</a> J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 28 (1), 26-54 (2021).</li>
<li>Jarnagin, W. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Staging%2C+resectability%2C+and+outcome+in+225+patients+with+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Ann+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.</a> Ann Surg. 234 (4), discussion 517-519 507-517 (2001).</li>
<li>Tanaka, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Incidence+and+management+of+bile+leakage+after+hepatic+resection+for+malignant+hepatic+tumors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Jo+Am+College+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Incidence and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection for malignant hepatic tumors.</a> Jo Am College Surg. 195 (4), 484-489 (2002).</li>
<li>Zhang, X. F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Defining+Early+Recurrence+of+Hilar+Cholangiocarcinoma+After+Curative-intent+Surgery%3A+A+Multi-institutional+Study+from+the+US+Extrahepatic+Biliary+Malignancy+Consortium%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22World+J+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Defining Early Recurrence of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma After Curative-intent Surgery: A Multi-institutional Study from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium.</a> World J Surg. 42 (9), 2919-2929 (2018).</li>
<li>Wakabayashi, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Recommendations+for+laparoscopic+liver+resection%3A+a+report+from+the+second+international+consensus+conference+held+in+Morioka%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Ann+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.</a> Ann Surg. 261 (4), 619-629 (2015).</li>
<li>Shiraiwa, D. K., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+role+of+minimally+invasive+hepatectomy+for+hilar+and+intrahepatic+cholangiocarcinoma%3A+A+systematic+review+of+the+literature%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Surg+Oncol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The role of minimally invasive hepatectomy for hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review of the literature.</a> J Surg Oncol. 121 (5), 863-872 (2020).</li>
<li>Scurtu, R. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Extension+of+Hepatic+Resection+Ameliorates+Survival+in+Patients+with+Type+IIIa+or+IIIb+Klatskin+Tumors+Despite+Surgical+Complications%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Chirurgia%22%5BJournal%5D)">Extension of Hepatic Resection Ameliorates Survival in Patients with Type IIIa or IIIb Klatskin Tumors Despite Surgical Complications.</a> Chirurgia. 112 (3), 301-307 (2017).</li>
<li>Xiong, F., Peng, F., Li, X., Chen, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Preliminary+comparison+of+total+laparoscopic+and+open+radical+resection+for+hepatic+hilar+cholangiocarcinoma+a+single-center+cohort+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Asian+J+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Preliminary comparison of total laparoscopic and open radical resection for hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma a single-center cohort study.</a> Asian J Surg. 46 (2), 856-862 (2023).</li>
<li>Serrablo, A., Serrablo, L., Alikhanov, R., Tejedor, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Vascular+Resection+in+Perihilar+Cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cancers%22%5BJournal%5D)">Vascular Resection in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.</a> Cancers. 13 (21), 5278(2021).</li>
<li>Huang, X. T., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Establishment+and+validation+of+a+nomogram+for+predicting+overall+survival+of+node-negative+perihilar+cholangiocarcinoma%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Asian+J+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Establishment and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival of node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.</a> Asian J Surg. 45 (2), 712-717 (2022).</li>
<li>Xu, Y. W., Fu, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Application+of+intraoperative+ultrasound+in+liver+surgery%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hepatobiliary+Pancreatic+Dis+Int%22%5BJournal%5D)">Application of intraoperative ultrasound in liver surgery.</a> Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Dis Int. 20 (5), 501-502 (2021).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Radical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), especially in Bismuth-Corlette type IIIb tumors, where extended left hepatectomy and caudate lobectomy are required to achieve an R0 margin12,13. This case highlights the technical feasibility and oncologic safety of performing such a complex operation laparoscopically, even in the presence of dense vascular adhesions.
One of the ...

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is the most common subtype of extrahepatic bile duct cancer, accounting for approximately 50%-60% of all cholangiocarcinomas. It primarily arises at the confluence of the common hepatic duct and the left and right hepatic ducts1. Due to its unique anatomical location adjacent to the proper hepatic artery, portal vein, and bilateral hepatic ducts, the tumor frequently invades vascular and biliary structures, resulting in significant surgical challenges2 .
Currently, curative resection remains the only treatment modality associated with long-term survival for pCCA. Specifically, left hemihepatectomy combined with caudate lobectomy and regional lymphadenectomy is considered the standard surgical approach for Bismuth-Corlette type IIIb pCCA patients3,4. The necessity of caudate lobectomy based on anatomical resection principles has been confirmed by multiple studies, demonstrating its role in significantly increasing R0 resection rates and reducing local recurrence5. However, dense adhesion or encasement of the tumor around the right hepatic artery and the proper hepatic artery markedly increase intraoperative risk. The limited operating space under laparoscopy further challenges meticulous dissection and vascular preservation, demanding high technical expertise from the surgeon6,7.
With the advancement of laparoscopic techniques, minimally invasive radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma has gradually been performed by experienced surgeons. Nevertheless, due to high surgical risks and a steep learning curve, such procedures are mainly confined to specialized high-volume centers8. Previous literature has primarily focused on right hemihepatectomy, with relatively few reports on laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with caudate lobectomy, especially in cases complicated by close adherence or adhesion to the proper and right hepatic arteries9.
This study presents a case of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with caudate lobectomy and regional lymphadenectomy for type IIIb hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The major intraoperative challenges included safe and effective separation of the hepatic arteries adherent to the tumor, biliary resection, and hilar dissection. The procedure aimed to achieve oncological radicality while minimizing intraoperative bleeding and complications. This case serves as a valuable technical reference for the laparoscopic management of complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
CASE PRESENTATION: 
The patient was a 53-year-old male laborer who had been living in a rural area with moderate access to healthcare. He presented to the hospital on May 14, 2024, with a 14-day history of progressive jaundice involving the skin and sclera. The patient reported persistent upper abdominal discomfort and fatigue, accompanied by significant yellow discoloration of the skin and sclera. He also noted an unintentional weight loss of approximately 5 kg over the past 3 months. There were no symptoms of fever, chills, or melena.
The patient had no prior history of liver disease, viral hepatitis (HBV or HCV), cirrhosis, or fatty liver disease. There was no known family history of liver or other cancers. He denied a history of smoking, alcohol consumption, or any other chronic underlying diseases such as diabetes or hypertension. There was no prior surgical history.
An abdominal CT scan performed at an outside facility prior to admission revealed a mass-like lesion in the left hepatic lobe near the hepatic hilum. Cholangiocarcinoma was suspected based on imaging and clinical presentation. The initial diagnosis was perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
On physical examination, the patient appeared moderately nourished, with marked jaundice of the skin and sclera. There was no lower extremity edema. The abdomen was soft with mild tenderness in the upper abdomen, without palpable masses. The liver and spleen were not enlarged, and there were no signs of ascites. The patient had not received any treatment prior to admission, and this was his first visit to our hospital.
Diagnosis, Assessment, and Plan: The patient was admitted due to progressive skin and scleral jaundice. On admission, physical examination revealed marked jaundice. Laboratory investigations showed elevated cholestatic liver enzymes and tumor markers: CA19-9 was 116 U/mL, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) 183.00 U/L, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 391.00 U/L, total bilirubin (TBIL) 296.50 &#181;mol/L, and direct bilirubin (DBIL) 183.12 &#181;mol/L. Other tumor markers, coagulation profile, renal function, and transaminase levels were within normal limits. Following admission, enhanced liver MRI with hepatocyte-specific contrast (EOB-MRI) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) were performed, which revealed significant stenosis of the hilar bile duct, consistent with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (also known as Klatskin tumor).
Preliminary diagnosis: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor)
Tumor staging: According to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system10, the tumor was staged as cT2NxM0, Bismuth-Corlette Classification11 Type IIIb (involving the left hepatic duct, with no right hepatic duct involvement)
Initial management: Upon admission, the patient received intravenous cefoperazone to prevent infection, hepatoprotective agents, and supportive care, including fluid and electrolyte management. To alleviate biliary obstruction, the patient underwent percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD).
Reassessment after PTCD: Post-drainage laboratory evaluation showed ALT 43.50 U/L, TBIL 151.76 &#181;mol/L, and DBIL 102.17 &#181;mol/L, indicating sufficient hepatic function for surgical intervention.
Planned surgical procedure: After comprehensive evaluation of the patient&#39;s general condition and imaging findings, the following laparoscopic surgical procedure was scheduled: Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy, Caudate lobe resection, Hilar lymphadenectomy, Cholecystectomy, Hepaticojejunostomy.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Absorbable Suture (Vicryl)</td><td>3-0 / 4-0</td><td>Johnson &amp;amp; Johnson</td><td>V-348</td></tr><tr><td>Anesthesia Gas (N2O + O2)</td><td>Nitrous Oxide + Oxygen</td><td>Airgas</td><td>N2O/O2</td></tr><tr><td>General Anesthesia Drugs</td><td>Various Anesthesia Drugs</td><td>Roche</td><td>Propofol</td></tr><tr><td>High-frequency Cutting</td><td>&amp;mdash;</td><td>Ethicon</td><td>Harmonic ACE+</td></tr><tr><td>Non-absorbable Suture (Prolene)</td><td>4-0</td><td>Ethicon</td><td>PROLENE 8698</td></tr><tr><td>Povidone Iodine Solution</td><td>500 mL</td><td>Betadine</td><td>BP-500</td></tr><tr><td>Surgical Forceps</td><td>Straight, Locking</td><td>Surgical Instruments</td><td>SIC-925</td></tr><tr><td>Surgical Scissors</td><td>Straight, Sharp Tip</td><td>Aesculap</td><td>KLS Martin 5245</td></tr><tr><td>Surgical Sterile Drapes</td><td>40x40 cm</td><td>3M</td><td>Surgical Drapes</td></tr><tr><td>Titanium Clips</td><td>Small size</td><td>Medtronic</td><td>Endo GIA</td></tr></tbody></table>

intraoperative strategy under complex vascular adhesion for laparoscopic radical resection of bismuth-corlette type iiib perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Intraoperative Strategy under Complex Vascular Adhesion for Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Bismuth-Corlette Type IIIb Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a highly challenging malignancy, often requiring extensive hepatic resection to achieve curative treatment. This article presents a case of Bismuth-Corlette type IIIb pCCA in a 53-year-old male patient who underwent a laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy with caudate lobe resection, lymphadenectomy, and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD) was performed to relieve obstructive jaundice and improve liver function. Intraoperatively, the tumor was found to be densely adherent to the proper hepatic artery (PHA) and right hepatic artery (RHA), necessitating meticulous vascular dissection. An intraoperative arterial injury was successfully repaired using microsurgical suturing under laparoscopic guidance. Complete lymphadenectomy was conducted at stations 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 13. The caudate lobe was entirely resected to ensure oncologic radicality. The postoperative course was uneventful, except for a transient bile leak that resolved with conservative management. Final pathology confirmed R0 resection with no lymph node metastasis. This case demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of advanced laparoscopic approaches in complex pCCA, emphasizing the importance of preoperative planning, vascular control, and multidisciplinary collaboration.

The patient successfully underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy with caudate lobe resection, regional lymphadenectomy, and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The total operation time was approximately 480 min, with an estimated blood loss of 300 mL. No blood transfusion was required, and the procedure was completed without conversion to open surgery.
Intraoperative challenges included dense adhesions between the tumor and the proper hepatic artery as well as the right hepatic artery, which re...

The protocol presents a step-by-step laparoscopic protocol for radical resection of Bismuth-Corlette type IIIb perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The procedure integrates preoperative PTCD, complex vascular dissection and repair, and biliary reconstruction for application in high-volume hepatobiliary centers.

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a highly challenging malignancy, often requiring extensive hepatic resection to achieve curative treatment. This ...

This case study presents a laparoscopic radical resection for Bismuth-Corlette type IIIb perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. A rare feature in this case was the severe adhesion between the tumor and major hepatic arteries, significantly complicating vascular dissection. After the ultrasound-guided peritoneal incision and lymph node dissection, the lesser omentum sac was opened and the gastroduodenal artery, common hepatic artery, and left gastric vein were identified and incised.The proper hepatic artery could not be dissected due to adhesion to the surrounding tumor tissue. The isolation and suspension of the gastroduodenal artery were continued. The proper hepatic artery was discovered and blunt dissection was not feasible due to tumor adhesion to the right hepatic artery.Careful sharp dissection was attempted with scissors, though it remained difficult. Adhesions were submitted for intraoperative frozen pathology, which showed inflammatory tissue. While dissecting the right hepatic artery, it ruptured and was repaired using 5-0 vascular sutures.After confirming good blood flow with ultrasound, dissection was continued until the right hepatic artery was completely freed. Then the left hepatic artery was isolated, ligated using 7-0 silk and vascular clips, and then divided with scissors. Next, the left portal vein was dissected continuously and tumor invasion was identified.The root of the left portal vein was ligated with a 7-0 silk suture. Afterward, the middle hepatic vein was identified and the segment 4b vein was ligated and divided. The left and right hepatic ducts were exposed and tumor involvement of the biliary confluence and left hepatic duct was found.The right hepatic duct was transected approximately 0.5 centimeters from the tumor margin along with the bile duct at the caudate lobe. The caudate lobe liver parenchyma was transected followed by ligation and division of the corresponding short hepatic veins and ligamentous attachments. The left hepatic vein was isolated and divided using a stapler.A complete left hemihepatectomy and caudate lobectomy were performed, fully exposing the middle hepatic vein and inferior vena cava. Finally, the liver transection surface and abdominal cavity were irrigated using warm saline and hemostasis was achieved with bipolar cautery. Lymph node stations 12, 13, 8, 7, 9, 3, and 1 were dissected, completing the left hemihepatectomy with caudate lobectomy.The patient successfully underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy with caudate lobe resection, regional lymph adenectomy, and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The total operation time was approximately 480 minutes with an estimated blood loss of 300 milliliters. Histopathological analysis of paraffin embedded tissue sections confirmed a well-differentiated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with perineural invasion with no evidence of vascular tumor thrombus and negative margins at all resection sites.At the 12-month follow-up, contrast enhanced computed tomography scans demonstrated the successful removal of the tumor without significant recurrence or metastasis. Severe vascular adhesions were encountered during the procedure and managed through meticulous dissection and careful vascular preservation. This case highlights that complex perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be safely treated laparoscopically in selected patients.The patient recovered well postoperatively without major complications and achieved an R0 resection.

intraoperative-strategy-under-complex-vascular-adhesion-for

Research

JoVE Journal

Medicine

Here, we present a protocol to perform a modified laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy using improved techniques and instruments.

Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver

Numerous studies have demonstrated the advantages of anatomic resection. Nonetheless, whether anatomic resection can increase R0 resection rates remains controversial. Consequently, the present study describes an innovative procedure involving the en bloc concept combined with anatomic resection in laparoscopic hepatectomy, which can reduce postoperative recurrence and metastasis.

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Programmed surgery based on surgical methods and anatomical markers helps shorten the operation time, reduce complications, and improve the safety of the surgery. This study investigated and summarized the surgical methods and anatomic markers of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with a history of biliary tract surgery.

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with a Previous History of Biliary Tract Surgery

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a highly malignant and aggressive tumor, with radical resection being the only curative treatment available. With continuous advancements in laparoscopic techniques and instruments, laparoscopic radical surgery for pCCA is now considered technically safe and feasible. However, due to the high complexity of the surgery and the lack of evidence-based clinical support, laparoscopic radical surgery for type IIIb pCCA is performed only in a few large...

Complete Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Type IIIb

This article aims to present a novel Laennec's capsule-guided laparoscopic approach for right anterior sectionectomy, highlighting its potential to improve safety, precision, and reproducibility in complex liver resections.

Laparoscopic Anatomical Right Anterior Sectionectomy with a Hepatic Pedicle-first Approach: Technical Details and Representative Case Illustration

We present a laparoscopic technique for anatomic S7+S8d resection with right hepatic vein transection, preserving the inferior right hepatic vein and segment S6. Relying on meticulous anatomical landmarks without intraoperative ultrasound, this approach offers a precise and parenchyma-sparing option for dorsally located right-liver tumors, particularly in settings with limited advanced navigation resources.

Laparoscopic Anatomic S7+S8d Resection Preserving Inferior Right Hepatic Vein and S6 with Right Hepatic Vein Transection

In early gastric cancer, the aim of surgery is to precisely remove the distal stomach including the primary tumor. To do this, accurate localization of the tumor is crucial, especially in totally laparoscopic surgery. This protocol describes a procedure for intraoperative gastroscopy in totally laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy.

Intraoperative Gastroscopy for Tumor Localization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Precise disclosure of methods and protocols is crucial for large scale uptake of stem cell therapies. Here, we present a protocol to isolate adipose-derived regenerative cells, used for a single intracavernous injection as treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) following radical prostatectomy (RP).

Isolation of Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy

Oncologically safe left pancreatectomy requires radical resection (R0), Gerota’s (perirenal) fascia resection, and adequate lymph node dissection. This study describes the technical details of laparoscopic radical left pancreatectomy (LRLP), used in the first international multicenter randomized trial comparing minimally invasive with open left pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, the DIPLOMA trial.

Laparoscopic Radical Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Strategy and Technique Video

The robotic technique shown herein aims at faithfully reproducing the open procedure for radical treatment of cancer of the body-tail of the pancreas. The protocol also demonstrates the ability to master involvement of major peripancreatic vessels without conversion to open surgery.

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

Learn laparoscopic radical resection for Bismuth-Corlette type IIIb perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with severe vascular adhesions. This protocol demonstrates meticulous dissection techniques for successful outcomes in complex hepatobiliary surgery.

Intraoperative Strategy under Complex Vascular Adhesion for Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Bismuth-Corlette Type IIIb Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (Video) | JoVE Journal

Intraoperative Strategy under Complex Vascular Adhesion for Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Bismuth-Corlette Type IIIb Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Explore More Videos