$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Choledocholithiasis is a prevalent disease in hepatobiliary surgery. Without timely intervention, it may lead to severe complications such as acute cholangitis, obstructive jaundice, and biliary pancreatitis, which can even be life-threatening1. Currently, surgical treatment remains the mainstay for choledocholithiasis. The traditional surgical approach is laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) combined with T-tube drainage, which can effectively remove stones. However, during the indwelling period of the T-tube, complications such as drainage tube blockage, infection, and electrolyte imbalance are prone to occur. Moreover, long-term T-tube indwelling prolongs patients’ hospital stay, increases the medical burden, and brings inconvenience to their daily lives2.
With the advancement of minimally invasive surgical techniques, primary suture after LCBDE has attracted increasing attention. By directly suturing the bile duct wall, this approach avoids T-tube-related complications and shortens patients’ recovery period3. Meanwhile, the application of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS, defined as laparoscopic surgery performed through a single abdominal incision) further reduces surgical trauma, offering distinct minimally invasive advantages and superior cosmetic outcomes4. The cosmetic benefits of SILS are particularly valued by patients, as the single transumbilical incision is well-concealed and results in minimal scarring, which significantly improves postoperative quality of life compared with conventional multi-port laparoscopic approaches5. However, pure SILS is prone to the chopstick effect—a phenomenon of instrument interference—that significantly increases surgical difficulty, especially for delicate biliary tract manipulation. To balance the minimally invasive nature and operational convenience, the single-incision plus one-port (S+1) laparoscopic technique has emerged. This hybrid approach retains the minimally invasive characteristics of SILS while improving the flexibility of instrument operation through an additional auxiliary port, providing better exposure and maneuverability for complex biliary tract operations6.
To strengthen the clinical positioning of the S+1 laparoscopic LCBDE with primary suture, clear practical applicability guidance, patient selection considerations, and technical prerequisites are essential. Patient selection criteria for this technique include: (1) patients with confirmed choledocholithiasis (single or multiple stones) without severe acute cholangitis or cholangiectasis; (2) unobstructed distal common bile duct (CBD) confirmed by preoperative imaging (abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography); (3) no history of upper abdominal surgery that may cause intra-abdominal adhesions; and (4) good cardiopulmonary function to tolerate general anesthesia. Technical prerequisites involve proficient laparoscopic suturing skills, familiarity with choledochoscopic stone extraction, and experience in managing minimally invasive biliary tract complications. Despite the theoretical advantages of the S+1 technique, its safety, feasibility, and long-term efficacy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis still require more high-quality clinical evidence to support7. Therefore, this study aims to systematically explore the clinical application value of S+1 laparoscopic LCBDE with primary suture in the treatment of choledocholithiasis, so as to provide evidence-based reference for the minimally invasive treatment of this disease.