Research Article

RNA-seq Profiling of Draining and Metastatic Lymph Nodes in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Identifies POSTN as a Prognostic Marker

DOI:

10.3791/69570

January 16th, 2026

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We reveal an extracellular-matrix and PI3K-AKT-centred program underlying lymph-node dissemination in HER2-positive breast cancer and identify POSTN as a poor-prognosis marker, supporting risk stratification and pathway-directed therapeutic strategies.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

HER2-positive breast cancer is clinically aggressive and frequently disseminates to regional lymph nodes, yet the transcriptomic programs associated with nodal spread remain incompletely defined. Here, we profiled matched tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN) and metastatic tumor-involved lymph nodes (TMLN) from six patients with HER2-positive breast cancer using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Differential expression analysis was performed with DESeq2, applying Benjamini-Hochberg correction (FDR < 0.05) and an absolute log2 fold-change threshold (|log2FC| ≥ 1). We identified 237 differentially expressed genes (182 upregulated and 55 downregulated in TMLN vs. TDLN). Functional enrichment analyses highlighted extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction, PI3K-AKT signaling, focal adhesion, and cholesterol metabolism as prominent pathways associated with metastatic lymph nodes, suggesting coordinated ECM remodeling and signaling activation during nodal dissemination. Among the most upregulated genes, POSTN emerged as a key candidate and was further linked to adverse clinicopathologic characteristics. In an independent validation cohort (n = 120), higher POSTN expression was associated with inferior disease-free survival. Collectively, these results nominate POSTN as a potential prognostic biomarker and support ECM-centered and PI3K-AKT-related mechanisms as actionable biological features of lymph-node metastasis in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women and a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with a substantial and rising burden in China1. Approximately 15%-20% of BCs are HER2-positive (HER2+), characterized by ERBB2 amplification/overexpression and an aggressive phenotype with higher risks of recurrence and death2,3. Although anti-HER2 systemic therapy has markedly improved outcomes, a considerable proportion of patients still relapse or develop metastases, underscoring the need for biologically informed risk stratification and new therapeutic options4.

Lymph-node metastasis (LNM) is a pivotal determinant of staging, adjuvant treatment selection, and prognosis in BC; axillary involvement portends inferior survival and facilitates further dissemination to distant organs5,6. Yet robust biomarkers that capture the biology of nodal spread in HER2+ disease remain limited, and current clinicopathologic factors only partially explain outcome heterogeneity7.

Advances in RNA-seq enable transcriptome-wide, high-dynamic-range profiling and are now widely adopted in translational oncology8. However, most expression studies in HER2+ BC focus on primary tumors or unpaired cohorts, whereas comparative profiling of matched tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN) and tumor-metastatic lymph nodes (TMLN) is sparse, limiting insight into molecular programs that underlie nodal colonization and progression9.

Based on the clinical importance of lymph-node metastasis and prior evidence implicating extracellular-matrix (ECM) remodeling and PI3K-AKT activation in metastatic seeding10, we hypothesized that, within the same patient, tumor-metastatic lymph nodes (TMLN) would exhibit a distinct transcriptomic program compared with matched tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN), and that a subset of consistently upregulated ECM-associated genes would be linked to adverse clinicopathologic features and recurrence risk. To test this hypothesis, we profiled paired TDLN and TMLN from six HER2-positive patients to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and pathways associated with nodal dissemination. We then prioritized POSTN and evaluated its prognostic relevance in an independent cohort, linking ECM remodeling and PI3K-AKT signaling to clinically useful risk stratification in HER2+ breast cancer. Details of HER2 assessment (per contemporary ASCO-CAP criteria), sequencing quality control, DEG calling with DESeq2 and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR control, and validation procedures are provided here11,12.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and local regulations governing the use of human biospecimens. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Boai Hospital of Zhongshan (KY-2020-012-124). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before any study-specific procedure.

Study cohorts and samples
The discovery cohort comprised paired tumor-draining lymph node (TDLN) and metastatic lymph node (TMLN) tissues collected intraoperatively from 6 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. For each patient, the matched TDLN was defined as a draining lymph node without histologic evidence of metastasis and served as the within-patient control comparator, whereas the TMLN was pathology-confirmed metastatic tissue. Fresh tissues were briefly rinsed in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), blotted dry, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen within 30 min of excision, and stored at -80 °C until extraction. Inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma, HER2-positive status per ASCO/CAP, availability of paired nodes, and no neoadjuvant therapy. Exclusion criteria were inadequate tissue or RNA integrity number (RIN) < 7.0. One initially screened sample failed QC due to RIN < 7.0 and was excluded, so all discovery analyses consistently use n = 6. The independent validation cohort comprised 120 archival FFPE lymph-node specimens with clinical follow-up and was used for qRT-PCR and outcome analyses. For prognostic modeling, patients were compared by POSTN expression groups (High vs. Low, with a cut-point determined by X-tile), with the Low group serving as the reference comparator. Cases with missing follow-up or incomplete covariates were excluded from prognostic modelling.

Sample-size rationale (Discovery and validation)
The discovery stage used a paired TDLN-TMLN design to maximize within-patient contrast and reduce inter-individual variance while controlling multiplicity at FDR = 0.05. For the validation cohort (n = 120), POSTN expression was dichotomized at the cut-point determined by X-tile (High/Low = 40/80). Given 48 disease-free survival (DFS) events and α = 0.05, a Schoenfeld approximation indicates ≥ 80% power to detect clinically relevant hazard ratios of approximately HR ≥ 2.3 under equal allocation; this is consistent with the observed effect size (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.41-3.77).

Definition of HER2 positivity
HER2 positivity followed contemporary ASCO/CAP criteria13: immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ defined as uniform intense membrane staining in >10% of tumor cells, or in situ hybridization (ISH)-amplified defined as a HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 with an average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 signals per cell. IHC 2+ results underwent reflex ISH with blinded recounting of ≥20 invasive tumor cells to confirm amplification status.

Tissue processing and RNA isolation
All procedures were performed on ice unless specified, using RNase-free consumables. For each sample with ≤ 100 mg tissue, homogenization was performed in 1 mL of acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform reagent (AGPC), followed by addition of 200 µL of chloroform with 15 s vigorous mixing and a 2-3 min room-temperature incubation. Phase separation was achieved by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4 °C. The aqueous layer was then transferred to a fresh tube, and RNA was precipitated with 500 µL of isopropanol after a 10 min incubation at room temperature. Pelleting was completed at 12,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed with 1 mL of 75% ethanol and centrifuged at 7,500 x g for 5 min at 4 °C, air-dried for 5-10 min, and dissolved in RNase-free water. An on-column DNase I digestion was used when genomic DNA carryover was suspected. Visual checkpoints included clear phase separation after chloroform extraction and an intact translucent pellet after isopropanol precipitation. Troubleshooting included repeating the ethanol wash for low A260/230 ratios and extending precipitation or ensuring cooling during pelleting for low yields.

RNA quality control
Quantification used spectrophotometry to monitor A260/280 and A260/230 with targets around 1.8-2.1, complemented by fluorometric measurement for accuracy. Integrity was assessed on a microfluidic electrophoresis system and required RIN ≥ 7.0. Distinct 18S/28S rRNA peaks and the absence of a genomic DNA smear were used as acceptance criteria; samples failing thresholds were re-extracted or excluded.

Library preparation
Stranded mRNA libraries were constructed with poly(A) selection for intact RNA, while rRNA depletion was permitted for partially degraded inputs. The typical input was ≥ 1 µg total RNA per library. Fragmentation was performed near 94 °C for 8 min; first-strand cDNA synthesis at 50 °C for 50 min; second-strand synthesis at 16 °C for 60 min; adapter ligation at 20 °C for 15 min; and PCR amplification used 10-12 cycles adjusted to avoid over-amplification. Cleanups employed bead ratios near 0.8x-1.0x, and the expected library size distribution was 300 bp, including adapters. Library quality was verified by microfluidic electrophoresis; adapter-dimer contamination prompted a stricter cleanup, and excessively broad size distributions were corrected by modestly shortening fragmentation.

Sequencing
Indexed libraries were sequenced in paired-end 150 bp (PE150) mode, targeting 30 million read pairs per library. Run-level quality required Q30 ≥ 90% and stable cluster densities with minimal lane bias. Libraries were randomized across lanes to mitigate batch effects, and run records documented lane assignments and any sentinel controls used to monitor cross-contamination.

Computational analysis and differential expression
Analyses were conducted in R (v4.3.2) on Linux. Raw read quality was assessed with FastQC (v0.11.9). Adapter and quality trimming were performed with fastp (v0.23.4) using automatic adapter detection, sliding-window trimming (window size 4 bp; mean Phred Q ≥ 20), a minimum read length of 50 bp, and poly-G trimming when relevant chemistries were detected. Reads were aligned to the GRCh37/hg19 reference genome using HISAT2 (v2.2.1) with library-appropriate strandness parameters and known splice-site indices. Gene-level counts were generated with featureCounts (Subread v2.0.3) against GENCODE v19 using paired-end counting, chimeric-read handling, multi-mapper-aware settings, and the correct strandness flag. Low-count genes were filtered by requiring counts ≥ 10 in at least three samples. Differential expression (DE) analysis was performed using DESeq2 (v1.40.2) under a paired design (design = ~ pair + condition) to compare TMLN versus TDLN, with default size-factor normalization and log2 fold-change shrinkage via apeglm. Potential outliers were assessed using Cook's distance. Transcriptome-wide multiplicity was controlled using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). Significance was defined as FDR < 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold-change threshold (|log2FC|) ≥ 1. DESeq2's negative-binomial framework provides appropriate mean-variance modelling for count data and stabilizes fold-change estimates in small-to-moderate cohorts. As sensitivity analyses, we re-ran DE testing using edgeR and limma-voom with the same filtering criteria and FDR thresholds, which yielded concordant top-ranked signals, supporting the robustness of the main analysis choices.

Functional enrichment (GO and KEGG)
Functional annotation was performed in R using clusterProfiler (v4.8.3). Up- and down-regulated DEGs were analyzed separately. Gene identifiers were mapped to Entrez Gene IDs (organism: Homo sapiens) prior to enrichment. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment was conducted using enrichGO (OrgDb: org.Hs.eg.db; ont = BP/CC/MF; pAdjustMethod = "BH"; pvalueCutoff = 0.05; qvalueCutoff = 0.05), and KEGG pathway enrichment was conducted using enrichKEGG (organism = "hsa"; pAdjustMethod = "BH"; pvalueCutoff = 0.05; qvalueCutoff = 0.05). The background universe was defined as all expressed genes retained after low-count filtering in the DE analysis. Enriched terms were additionally filtered to retain gene sets with 10-500 annotated genes (minGSSize = 10; maxGSSize = 500). Visualizations were generated using ggplot2 (v3.5.1) and ComplexHeatmap (v2.16.1), including dot plots of gene ratio and -log10(adjusted P) values; the term "immune-response pathways" refers to curated GO modules covering antigen processing and presentation, interferon signaling, and lymphocyte activation.

External database interrogation
Candidate genes were interrogated in external resources to provide orthogonal context. Tumor-versus-normal mRNA expression was queried using GEPIA2 (v2.0) with TCGA breast invasive carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) tumor samples compared against normal breast tissues (GTEx/TCGA normals, as available). GEPIA2-reported expression values (log2[TPM+1]) and its default statistical testing framework for group comparisons were used to generate boxplots and P values for each queried gene. Protein-level localization was assessed using the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) by reviewing immunohistochemistry images and annotations from the Tissue Atlas and Pathology Atlas for breast tissue/cancer and recording the reported staining intensity and cellular compartment (e.g., stromal vs epithelial) when available.

qRT-PCR validation
Independent lymph-node tissues were processed as above to extract total RNA, and cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg RNA in 20 µL reverse-transcription reactions. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using SYBR-based chemistry, with each reaction containing 1x master mix and 0.2-0.4 µM of each primer. Primer specificity was confirmed by single-peak melt-curve profiles, and amplification efficiency was evaluated using dilution-series standard curves, with acceptable efficiencies defined as 90%-110%. Each sample was assayed in technical triplicate; replicates were required to meet a cycle-threshold (Ct) SD ≤ 0.3. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH (or another validated reference gene, where applicable), and relative expression was calculated using the 2^-ΔΔCt method. Normality was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk tests; between-group comparisons used two-sided t-tests for approximately normal data or Mann-Whitney U tests otherwise.

Prognostic analysis in the validation cohort
Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint and was calculated from the date of surgery to the first documented recurrence event or last follow-up (censored). For the primary analysis, POSTN expression was dichotomized at the cut-point determined by X-tile (High vs Low = 40/80); sensitivity analyses used alternative cut-points such as tertiles. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used for univariable comparisons. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were fit to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals, adjusting a priori for age, tumor size, nodal status, histologic grade, and receptor status. The proportional-hazards assumption was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals, collinearity was examined using variance-inflation factors, and influential observations were evaluated using dfbetas. Complete case analyses were performed after excluding cases with missing follow-up or incomplete covariates, as described above.

General statistics and reporting
Unless stated otherwise, data are summarized as mean ± SD or median (IQR), two-sided tests are used, and p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. For transcriptome-wide analyses and enrichment, multiplicity is controlled with BH-FDR, and effect sizes are accompanied by 95% confidence intervals whenever feasible.

Safety and waste disposal
Phenol-guanidinium reagents and organic solvents were handled in a certified fume hood with laboratory coats, nitrile gloves, and splash protection. Organic and halogenated waste were segregated into labeled containers and disposed of in accordance with institutional policies. Biological waste was autoclaved or chemically disinfected prior to disposal, and surfaces and tools were decontaminated with RNase-inactivating solutions. Reagent-specific hazards such as corrosivity and toxicity were documented in laboratory SOPs and observed during all procedures.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Cohorts and clinicopathologic characteristics
The discovery cohort consisted of 6 paired TDLN/TMLN samples, and the validation cohort comprised 120 archival lymph-node specimens with longitudinal follow-up. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics for both cohorts, including age, tumor size, grade, receptor status, and nodal status, are summarized in Table 1.

Sequencing quality and global data structure
All 12 discovery libraries ach...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

HER2-positive breast cancer is characterized by enhanced invasiveness, frequent lymph-node metastasis (LNM), and inferior outcomes despite modern systemic therapy15. Conventional clinicopathologic factors only partially explain prognosis in this subtype, leaving a gap for biologically grounded markers that capture the risk of nodal dissemination16. By comparatively profiling matched tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN) and tumor-metastatic lymph nodes (TMLN) with RNA-...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by Medical Research Projects of Zhongshan Municipal Health and Wellness Bureau (2021J452).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Bioanalyzer2100-BAAgilent, USAEquipment for assessing RNA integrity and quality control.
DESeq2N/AR BioconductorDifferential expression analysis software for RNA-seq data.
FastQC SoftwareN/ABabraham BioinformaticsQuality control software for RNA-seq data to assess sequence quality.
HEK293 Cell LineATCC-CRL-1573ATCC, USAHuman embryonic kidney cell line used for transfection experiments.
qRT-PCR Kit4385616ThermoFisher, USAQuantitative PCR kit for validating gene expression.
RNA Extraction Kit74204Qiagen, GermanyRNA extraction kit used to isolate high-quality RNA from tissue samples.
RNA Sequencing KitRS-122-2001Illumina, USARNA library preparation kit for sequencing RNA samples.
Sequencing PlatformNovaSeq 6000Illumina, USAHigh-throughput RNA sequencing platform for sequencing RNA libraries.
Tissue Freezing EquipmentTFE-300Thermo Fisher, USAEquipment for freezing tissue samples in liquid nitrogen.
Tympanic Thermometer55678-TTThermoScience, JapanAccurate thermometer used for body temperature measurement.

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Han, B., et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022. J Natl Cancer Cent. 4 (1), 47-53 (2022).
  2. Schettini, F., et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 7 (1), 1(2021).
  3. Vahed, S. Z., et al. Introducing effective genes in lymph node metastasis of breast cancer patients using SHAP values based on the mRNA expression data. PLoS One. 19 (8), e0308531(2024).
  4. Lee, J. J., Ng, K. Y., Bakhtiar, A. Extracellular matrix: unlocking new avenues in cancer treatment. Biomark Res. 13 (1), 78(2025).
  5. Kim, G., et al. Differentially expressed genes in matched normal, cancer, and lymph node metastases predict clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 28 (2), 111-122 (2020).
  6. Xu, K., et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals cell heterogeneity and transcriptome profile of breast cancer lymph node metastasis. Oncogenesis. 10, 66(2021).
  7. Chung, Y., Chu, J., Do, S. I., Kim, H. S. Spatial transcriptomic profiling reveals gene expression characteristics in lymph node-positive breast carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 44 (8), 3381-3395 (2024).
  8. Nazemi, M., et al. The extracellular matrix supports breast cancer cell growth under amino acid starvation by promoting tyrosine catabolism. PLoS Biol. 22 (1), e3002406(2024).
  9. Karamanos, N. K., Piperigkou, Z., Gourdoupi, C., Mangani, S. Extracellular matrix matters: matrix-based bioscaffolds in advancing translational cancer research and targeted therapy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 328 (6), C1957-C1963 (2025).
  10. Lin, Y., et al. Identification of potential key genes for HER-2 positive breast cancer based on bioinformatics analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 99 (1), e18445(2020).
  11. Lee, C. K., et al. Tumor metastasis to lymph nodes requires YAP-dependent metabolic adaptation. Science. 363 (6427), 644-649 (2019).
  12. Sleeboom, J. J., et al. The extracellular matrix as hallmark of cancer and metastasis: from biomechanics to therapeutic targets. Sci Transl Med. 16 (728), eadg3840(2024).
  13. Wolff, A. C., et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: ASCO-College of American Pathologists guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 41 (22), 3867-3872 (2023).
  14. Null, J. L., et al. Periostin+ stromal cells guide lymphovascular invasion by cancer cells. Cancer Res. 83 (13), 2105-2122 (2023).
  15. Conway, S. J., et al. The role of periostin in tissue remodeling across health and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 71 (7), 1279-1288 (2014).
  16. Ubellacker, J. M., et al. Lymph protects metastasizing melanoma cells from ferroptosis. Nature. 585 (7823), 113-118 (2020).
  17. Xian, Y., Wang, L. Periostin: a matricellular protein with a multifaceted role in tumorigenesis. Int J Mol Med. 56 (6), 229(2025).
  18. Bozkul, G., Celik, S. S., Arslan, H. N. Nursing interventions for the self-efficacy of ostomy patients: a systematic review. J Tissue Viability. 33 (2), 165-173 (2024).
  19. Nenclares, P., Harrington, K. J. The biology of cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 48 (2), 67-72 (2020).
  20. Wasik, A., Ratajczak-Wielgomas, K., Badzinski, A., Dziegiel, P., Podhorska-Okolow, M. The role of periostin in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in tumors. Cancers (Basel). 14 (17), 4225(2022).
  21. Xu, L., et al. A comprehensive single-cell breast tumor atlas defines epithelial and immune heterogeneity and interactions predicting anti-PD-1 therapy response. Cell Rep Med. 5 (5), 100460(2024).
  22. De Oliveira Macena, Y., et al. The roles of periostin derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor progression and treatment response. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 44 (1), 11(2025).
  23. Brasó-Maristany, F., et al. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer metastasis according to organ site. Mol Oncol. 16 (1), 69-87 (2022).
  24. Englander, K., et al. Factors influencing lymph node positivity in HER2/neu+ breast cancer patients. Curr Oncol. 30 (3), 2825-2833 (2023).
  25. Wu, T., et al. Matrix stiffening facilitates the collective invasion of breast cancer through the periostin-integrin mechanotransduction pathway. Matrix Biol. 121, 22-40 (2023).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

RNA SequencingLymph Node MetastasisDifferential ExpressionPOSTN MarkerExtracellular MatrixPI3K AKT SignalingFocal AdhesionDisease Free SurvivalPrognostic Biomarker

Related Articles