A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Research Article

A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Acupotomy Combined with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Nonspecific Low Back Pain

97 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/69748

⸱

September 15th, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This study evaluates a structured protocol for ultrasound-guided acupotomy combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy for nonspecific low back pain, focusing on pain relief and improvement in lumbar function.

Abstract

Nonspecific low back pain (NLBP) is a prevalent condition associated with pain and functional limitation. This study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and procedural feasibility of ultrasound-guided acupotomy combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) compared with monotherapy approaches for NLBP. A total of 90 patients with NLBP were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 30 each). In the acupotomy group, trigger points within the lumbar erector spinae muscles were identified by palpation and treated using acupotomy. In the shock wave group, ESWT was applied to painful areas using an energy density of 0.10–0.20 mJ/mm2 at a frequency of 10 Hz. In the combined group, ESWT and acupotomy were performed sequentially under ultrasound guidance. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores before treatment and at a 2-month follow-up. Therapeutic efficacy was additionally assessed in accordance with the Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Diagnosis and Efficacy Standard. Baseline scores were comparable among groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, the combined group demonstrated significantly lower VAS and ODI scores, higher JOA scores, and a higher overall effective rate (93.33%) compared with the monotherapy groups (p < 0.05). This study presents a structured protocol for combining ultrasound-guided acupotomy with ESWT for NLBP and demonstrates improved short-term clinical outcomes compared with monotherapy.

Introduction

Nonspecific low back pain (NLBP) is a general term used to describe a type of low back pain in which no clear pathological or anatomical changes can be identified upon diagnosis, and for which there is no definitive clinical cause or objective test findings. If symptoms have persisted for three months or longer, the condition is diagnosed as chronic nonspecific low back pain1. Although most patients with NLBP present with acute and self-limited symptoms, NLBP is often persistent and difficult to treat because of its multifactorial causes2. Approximately 7.3% of the global population is affected by NLBP, and nearly 500 million people take time off work each year due to NLBP, creating a substantial socioeconomic burden3. The incidence of NLBP is closely associated with age, with prevalence increasing significantly after 30 years of age and peaking between 41 and 55 years4. In China, the prevalence of NLBP has increased annually and has shown a trend toward younger patient populations.

Current rehabilitation strategies for NLBP include pharmacological, psychological, and physical therapies5. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an established non-invasive treatment modality for chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions, including NLBP6. Clinical studies have shown that ESWT can increase blood flow in the lumbopelvic region, reduce levels of inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α and IL-1β), and improve pain and functional scores7,8,9. ESWT delivers high-energy acoustic waves to targeted tissues and has been associated with pain relief and functional improvement in patients with chronic low back pain6,7,8,9.

Acupotomy is a minimally invasive intervention derived from traditional acupuncture techniques combined with modern soft tissue release methods10. Acupotomy has been used in the treatment of various chronic pain conditions, including NLBP, neck pain, shoulder pain, chronic headache or migraine, and osteoarthritis11,12. Conventional acupotomy is commonly performed using palpation-guided localization based on areas of tenderness or muscle tightness. However, blind localization may increase procedural variability and the risk of injury to surrounding structures13. Ultrasound can distinguish the fine structures and echogenic changes in subcutaneous tissues, precisely locate muscles, and provide real-time, dynamic observation of muscle changes during movement. Existing clinical evidence indicates14 that ultrasound‑guided acupotomy is superior to traditional manual palpation in improving pain symptoms and enhancing lumbar spine function. Ultrasound guidance enables precise identification of deep myofascial trigger points and real‑time avoidance of blood vessels and nerves, thereby enhancing treatment safety.

The combination of ultrasound-guided acupotomy and ESWT may provide complementary therapeutic effects for patients with NLBP11,13. Although both interventions have been applied individually in the management of NLBP, standardized procedural descriptions for their combined use under ultrasound guidance remain limited6,12. Therefore, this study enrolled patients with NLBP admitted to our hospital between January 2025 and November 2025 to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of ultrasound-guided acupotomy combined with ESWT. In addition, this study presents a structured protocol describing treatment sequencing, ultrasound-guided needle insertion, and procedural monitoring during combined therapy.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University (No. [2024]92). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The research tools used in this protocol are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Study participants

A total of 90 patients with NLBP admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University between January 2025 and November 2025 were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial and allocated to three groups (n = 30 each): the acupotomy group, the shock wave group, and the combined group (ultrasound-guided acupotomy plus ESWT).

Eligible participants were adults aged 18–60 years with a diagnosis of NLBP based on the 2016 Chinese Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute/Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain16 and the 2017 American College of Physicians guideline for low back pain17, a pain duration of at least 3 months, and normal cognitive and communication abilities sufficient to cooperate with treatment and outcome evaluation.

Patients were excluded if they had specific spinal diseases (including infection, tumor, fracture, lumbar disc herniation, ankylosing spondylitis, or spina bifida occulta), severe osteoporosis, severe systemic disease, a history of psychiatric illness, a bleeding tendency or current anticoagulant use, pregnancy or lactation, or a body mass index (BMI) ≥28 kg/m2.

Participants were randomly allocated using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Allocation concealment was performed using sealed opaque envelopes prepared by an independent researcher who was not involved in recruitment or treatment. Due to the nature of the interventions, participant blinding was not feasible, particularly in the acupotomy and combined groups.

2. Treatment methods

All participants received functional and activities-of-daily-living training during the study period. Clinical assessments were performed within 24 h before treatment initiation and after 2 months of treatment using the visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The study workflow and treatment sequence are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.

  1. Acupotomy group
    Have the patient assume a comfortable position, preferably prone, and palpate the erector spinae muscles in the lower back to locate the hardest point, which will serve as the treatment site for the needle knife procedure. After standard skin disinfection and sterile draping, a sterile disposable acupotomy needle was inserted with the blade aligned parallel to the longitudinal axis of the muscle fibers.

    The needle was advanced to the target depth, and the release technique was performed using 2–3 longitudinal cutting motions combined with transverse peeling movements to release adhesions and scar tissue. A sensation of tissue loosening was considered indicative of adequate release. After needle withdrawal, local pressure was applied with sterile gauze for approximately 10 min to achieve hemostasis, followed by application of a sterile dressing. Participants were instructed to avoid strenuous activity for 24 h and to keep the puncture site dry for 48 h. Acupotomy was performed once weekly.
     
  2. Shock wave group
    Participants were positioned prone with the lumbar region exposed. ESWT was administered using a 15 mm probe with an initial energy flux density of 0.10 mJ/mm2 and a frequency of 10 Hz. Treatment intensity was adjusted according to patient tolerance.

    Avoiding direct application over the spine, the probe was moved slowly across the painful lumbar region, delivering 1,500–2,000 pulses to each treatment area. Two to three painful regions were treated during each session. Final treatment parameters were recorded for each participant. ESWT was administered twice weekly with an interval of at least 48 h between sessions.
  3. Combined group
    In the combined group, ESWT and acupotomy were performed sequentially under ultrasound guidance. ESWT was administered twice weekly, and acupotomy was performed once weekly. During the first weekly treatment session, acupotomy was performed 5–10 min after completion of ESWT on the same day. During the second weekly session, only ESWT was administered.

    Ultrasound coupling gel was applied, and a high-frequency linear transducer was used to visualize the lumbar anatomy and treatment region. ESWT was performed under ultrasound guidance. Following ESWT, the treatment area was reassessed. Acupotomy proceeded only if there was no visible redness, bruising, or hematoma and if the participant reported acceptable pain tolerance with a VAS score ≤4. If these criteria were not met, treatment was postponed and documented accordingly.

    For ultrasound-guided acupotomy, the participant remained in the prone position. Following repeat skin disinfection and sterile draping, the ultrasound transducer was covered with a sterile sleeve. The target treatment area within the erector spinae muscles was re-identified under ultrasound guidance while avoiding adjacent blood vessels and nerves. Using an in-plane approach, the needle was inserted at approximately 45° under continuous ultrasound guidance to maintain visualization of the needle shaft and tip.

    The needle was advanced to the target tissue region, and the release technique was performed under real-time ultrasound observation. A successful release was identified by the visible separation of fascial or muscular layers, appearing as hypoechoic clefts, and by reduced echogenicity within dense soft tissue structures. Following completion of the procedure, the needle was withdrawn, hemostasis was achieved, and a sterile dressing was applied. Post-procedure care instructions were consistent with those used in the acupotomy group.

3. Observation indicators

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, disease duration, education level, and BMI, were recorded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the following scales:

VAS: 0–10 points, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates maximal pain;
ODI: a 10-item questionnaire assessing lumbar dysfunction, with higher scores indicating greater disability;
JOA: a comprehensive assessment of symptoms, signs, and daily functional limitation in patients with NLBP, with lower scores indicating greater dysfunction.

All scales were assessed before treatment and after 2 months of treatment.

Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated according to the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Diagnosis and Efficacy Standard17. Outcomes were categorized as invalid, improvement, significant effect, or cure. The effective rate was defined as the sum of improvement, significant effect, and cure. Adverse events were monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. Recorded adverse events included local bleeding, hematoma, infection, skin irritation, nerve palsy, and muscle spasm. Participants were evaluated during each treatment session and instructed to report delayed symptoms during follow-up assessments.

4. Statistical methods

Sample size estimation was performed using software based on an expected medium effect size (Cohen’s f = 0.25), a statistical power of 0.80, and a two-sided significance level (α) of 0.05. The minimum required sample size for three-group comparisons was calculated as 42 participants (14 per group). Considering an anticipated dropout rate of approximately 10%, at least 46–48 participants were required. A total of 90 participants (30 per group) were ultimately enrolled.

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. Normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test. Non-normally distributed data are presented as median (interquartile range) and were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test with Bonferroni correction. Within-group comparisons before and after treatment were analyzed using the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test as appropriate. Categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages and were analyzed using the chi-squared (χ2) test or Fisher’s exact test. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated to three groups, with 30 participants in each group. The flowchart of patient enrolment and allocation is shown in Figure 1.

In the acupotomy group, there were 18 men and 12 women, with a mean age of 47.73 ± 8.68 years. In the shock wave group, there were 16 men and 14 women, with a mean age of 47.70 ± 10.51 years. In the combined group, there were 15 men and 15 women, with a mean age of 47....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Nonspecific low back pain (NLBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by pain and functional limitation without clear nerve root involvement or identifiable spinal pathology18. This study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and procedural feasibility of ultrasound-guided acupotomy combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for patients with NLBP. The results demonstrated that the combined treatment group showed greater improvements in pain and lumbar function scores after...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Acupotomy needleJiangsu Huayou Medical Devices Co., Ltd., Suqian, China0.40 mm × 50 mmUsed for soft tissue release during acupotomy.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy deviceZimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, Tuttlingen, GermanyenPuls Version 2.0Used to deliver extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT).
G*Power softwareHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyNAUsed for a priori sample size estimation and statistical power analysis.
Portable color Doppler ultrasound systemShenzhen Huasheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, ChinaClover 60Used for ultrasound guidance during acupotomy and treatment-site visualization.
SPSS StatisticsIBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USASPSS Statistics Version 26.0Used for statistical analysis of study data.

References

  1. Su TX, Wang X. Research progress on the etiology of Modic low back pain. Med Inf. 2024;37(11):170-174. Doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.11.036.
  2. Feng YZ. Research progress on multidimensional mechanisms of core training therapy for chronic non-specific back pain. Journal of Practical Medicine. 2025; 41 (22) 3625-3630. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.22.022.
  3. Popescu A, Lee H. Neck pain and lower back pain. Med Clin North Am. 2020;104(2):279-292. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.003.
  4. Li H, Tan HY. Progress on the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain. Chin Med Mod Distance Educ China. 2024;22(12):170-173. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2024.12.054.
  5. Kim SK et al. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(12). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019514.
  6. Wu Z, Zhou T, Ai S. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(52). 0000000000036596.
  7. Kabeer AS et al. The adult with low back pain: causes, diagnosis, imaging features and management. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2023;84(10):1-9. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2023.0063.
  8. Liu K et al. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 632 patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03943-x.
  9. Yue L et al. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:5937250. doi: 10.1155/2021/5937250.
  10. Wu DT et al. Progress on acupotomy treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. China J Orthop Traumatol. 2024;37(12):1237-1240. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230977.
  11. Wu LT, Zhou QM, Wang W. Treatment of calcaneal pain by ultrasound localization combined with extracorporeal shock wave and small acupotomy. J Rare Uncommon Dis. 2024;31(8):123-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3257.2024.8.049.
  12. Li XM et al. Observation of the therapeutic effect of minimally invasive needle knife treatment for 43 cases of chronic non-specific lower back pain in coastal stationed officers and soldiers under the guidance of musculoskeletal ultrasound. Chinese Journal of Naval Medicine and High Pressure Medicine. 2025;32 (11): 1226-1231. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311847-20250310-00061.
  13. Zhou FY et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of acupotomy versus acupuncture for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Liaoning J Tradit Chin Med. 2017;44(3):590-594. doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2017.03.049.
  14. Hodges PW, Danneels L. Changes in structure and function of the back muscles in low back pain: different time points, observations, and mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(6):464-476. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8827.
  15. Xie HW. A Study on the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Combined with Ozone Injection in the Treatment of Lumbosacral Posterior Root Syndrome [D]. Shanxi Medical University. 2022. doi:10.27288/d.cnki.gsxyu.2022.000250.
  16. Expert Group of the Spinal Cord Professional Committee of the Chinese Rehabilitation. Medicine Association Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acute/chronic non-specific low back pain in China. Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord. 2016;26 (12) 1134-1138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2016.12.16
  17. Qaseem A et al. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367.
  18. Ma KL et al. Fu’s subcutaneous needling versus massage for chronic non-specific low-back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(11):11785-11797. 2021-11.
  19. Zhu WT, Guo CQ, Zhao L. Clinical study on the combination of ultrasound visualization needle knife and fire needle therapy for the treatment of central lumbar disc herniation. Chinese Medical Emergency. 2023;32 (12): 2107-2111. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-745X.2023.12.010.
  20. Yu YL et al. Effect of motor acupuncture based on movement pattern adjustment theory in the treatment of non-specific low back pain. J Clin Med Pract. 2024;28(21):100-104. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20240783
  21. Li Z et al. Ultrasound-guided needle knife release with different pathways for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2025;45(1):21-26. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.
  22. Lan X et al. A comparison of the outcomes of open trigger release versus ultrasound-guided modified small needle-knife percutaneous release for treatment of trigger digits. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023;28(1):69-74. 523500017.
  23. Liu SR et al. Clinical study on the evaluation of different acupuncture point selection methods in the intervention of chronic non-specific back pain patients using ultrasound shear wave elastography. Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2024;26 (2): 194-198. 1673-842x.2024.02.036.
  24. Corp N et al. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: a systematic review of guidelines. Eur J Pain. 2021;25(2):275-295. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1679.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Acupotomy TreatmentVisual Analog ScaleOswestry Disability IndexJapanese Orthopaedic AssociationTrigger Point TherapyLumbar Erector Spinae