Research Article

Thermal Evaluation Of Microbial Consortia For Drought Tolerance In Lettuce

233 views

DOI:

10.3791/69816

April 30th, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

Corresponding Authors: Georgina del Carmen Mota Valtierra <georgina.mota@uaq.mx>, Ma. Cristina Vázquez Hernandez <ma.vh@roque.tecnm.mx>

In This Article

Summary

This study demonstrates that microbial inoculants, particularly a 67-strain consortium, mitigate water stress in Lactuca sativa by acting as physiological buffers. Using infrared thermography and the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI), we quantified how microbial-mediated Induced Systemic Tolerance (IST) maintains transpirational cooling and prevents homeostatic collapse under severe water deficit.

Abstract

Increased water scarcity represents a significant threat to global lettuce production, reducing crop quality and yield. While producers often resort to overfertilization to mitigate water stress, biological alternatives such as microbial inoculants offer a more sustainable approach. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a 67-strain microbial consortium and a Trichoderma harzianum isolate in enhancing water stress tolerance in Romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. Paspartu) under controlled conditions. Nine treatments were established, combining microbial inoculation with three irrigation levels (50%, 75%, and 100% of evapotranspiration). Crop water status was monitored using infrared thermography to calculate the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) from fluctuations in canopy temperature (Tc). The statistical analysis (ANOVA) of the CWSI showed no globally significant differences between treatments (F = 0.67, p = 0.778); however, distinct numerical trends were observed during peak thermal stress events. Under severe water deficit (50% irrigation), plants inoculated with the microbial consortium maintained lower CWSI values (averaging 0.38) compared to non-inoculated controls, which reached maximum stress thresholds (CWSI = 1.0). Furthermore, microbial treatments demonstrated a faster thermal recovery following acute stress periods. These results suggest that while global variance is high, microbial consortia function as physiological buffers that enhance transpiration efficiency. Infrared thermography proved to be a precise, non-destructive tool for early detection of water stress. This study highlights the potential of beneficial microorganisms to improve crop resilience and provides a standardized protocol for thermal evaluation in horticultural research.

Introduction

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is a high-value horticultural crop characterized by a shallow root system and high-water content, making it exceptionally sensitive to hydric deficit1. Under water stress, plants activate immediate physiological responses, primarily stomatal closure, to minimize water loss through transpiration2. While this mechanism preserves internal water status, it leads to a significant increase in canopy temperature (Tc) due to reduced evaporative cooling3. In greenhouse production and controlled environments, managing these thermal and hydric fluctuations is fundamental to maintaining yield and quality4.

The literature provides evidence of a critical negative correlation between canopy temperature (Tc) and crop productivity under water-limited conditions. This relationship is further substantiated by the identification of multiple quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for Tc that exhibit pleiotropic effects on both biomass accumulation and final yield4. In the field of water stress monitoring, infrared thermography has demonstrated greater sensitivity than the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), enabling the detection of subtle hydric fluctuations that are often imperceptible to traditional spectral vegetation indices. In this context, algorithms based on canopy temperature (Tc) represent a non-invasive, expeditious, and precise methodology for diagnosing tissue water status. Among these, the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) stands out as the most robust and widely implemented parameter for physiological characterization and the optimization of irrigation regimes. The versatility of the CWSI has been validated across a broad range of taxa, including high-value tree and herbaceous crops such as olive, grapevine, sugar beet, maize, rice, wheat, and cotton5.

In contrast, infrared thermography (IRT) has emerged as a robust, non-destructive tool for real-time monitoring of crop water status. By calculating the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) from Tc differences, researchers can quantify stress before visual wilting symptoms appear6. However, despite the precision of IRT, there is a need to explore biological strategies that mitigate the heat accumulation detected by these sensors6. The use of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM) represents a promising biotechnological approach to enhancing drought tolerance7. Microbial consortia, including fungi such as Trichoderma and various beneficial bacteria, can improve water uptake by modifying root architecture and regulating the antioxidant system8,9. The capacity of microbial consortia to function as physiological buffers or biological support systems for crops against abiotic stress is well-documented. Unlike individual inoculants, these complex communities provide a multi-faceted defense mechanism that stabilizes plant homeostasis under adverse conditions10,11. While the discrete effects of isolated microorganisms have been extensively reported, the synergistic resilience offered by diverse consortia(facilitating continuous nutrient flux and thermal regulation)remains a critical area of biotechnological interest12,13. Research integrating multi-strain consortia and evaluating their impact through high-resolution thermographic analysis in Romaine lettuce is limited.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex microbial consortium (67 strains) compared to a single-strain Trichoderma harzianum inoculation in mitigating water stress. Using infrared thermography and the CWSI as primary diagnostic tools, we aimed to determine if microbial inoculation maintains lower canopy temperatures and higher transpiration rates under different levels of water deficit (50%, 75%, and 100%). This research question focused on whether a highly diversified consortium could provide superior thermal and physiological buffering compared to single-strain treatments. It was hypothesized that the microbial consortium would significantly enhance water stress tolerance, particularly under severe deficit (50%), by maintaining lower CWSI values and preserving key growth parameters, specifically plant height and biomass accumulation. This study addresses a research gap by examining the synergistic effect of diverse microbial populations on the thermal regulation and structural development of lettuce under controlled environmental conditions.

Protocol

The experimental workflow for evaluating the efficacy of microbial inoculants in enhancing water-stress tolerance in Romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Paspartu) is summarized in Figure 1. The protocol integrated continuous monitoring of precise irrigation regimes with periodic acquisition of physiological and thermal data. Two distinct microbial products were utilized: (I) microbial consortium, a complex consortium of 67 strains comprising PGPR, actinomycetes, and beneficial fungi, designed to act as a physiological buffer through root colonization and exopolysaccharide (EPS) secretion; and (II) Trichoderma harzianum, a single-strain inoculant of Trichoderma harzianum aimed at inducing systemic resistance and modifying root architecture. The reagents, equipment, and software used are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Microbial inoculation

A standardized inoculation regime was implemented for both microbial treatments, consisting of six soil-drenched applications targeting the rhizosphere using high-precision micropipettes to simulate field-scale dosages. The first phase occurred during the seedling stage at 5 and 15 days after sowing (DAS). At 30 DAS, seedlings were transplanted into larger cavity trays, with the second phase of inoculations performed 1 day after transplanting (DAT), followed by successive applications at 7, 15, and 20 DAT.

For the microbial consortium, dosages were adjusted according to plant phenology: the initial two applications were applied at 500 g/ha (3 mL/plant), followed by a high-concentration dose of 2 kg/ha at transplanting, and concluding with three maintenance doses of 300 g/ha. Similarly, T. harzianum was applied at 1 L/ha during the first two stages, 3 L/ha at transplanting, and 1 L/ha for the final three applications. This phased approach was designed to ensure robust root colonization and to maintain the microbial population's role as a physiological buffer throughout the critical growth and stress-induction periods.

2. Crop preparation

Certified Romaine lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa L. var. Paspartu) were germinated in 311-cavity polystyrene trays (11 mL per cavity) using a professional-grade peat moss-based substrate at a depth of 1 cm. Germination was conducted in a controlled bioclimatic chamber maintained at a temperature range of 15 °C to 22 °C and a relative humidity of 60%–70%. Upon reaching 90% germination (approximately 3–5 days after sowing), seedlings were transplanted into larger trays with a 55 mL root-ball capacity to allow for unrestricted root development (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The trial was organized in a completely randomized design (CRD), with 9 experimental units (trays), and 20 seedlings per tray. This setup was structured to accommodate a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement (3 microbial treatments × 3 irrigation regimes). Detailed substrate physical-chemical properties and specific bioclimatic chamber programming14are provided in Figure 3, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Table 2, and Supplementary Table 3.

Experimental trays were distributed using a completely randomized layout within the bioclimatic chamber to eliminate edge effects and ensure uniform exposure. The chamber was programmed to simulate dynamic field-like conditions, utilizing a high-temperature regime to replicate open-field thermal stress. During the vegetative stage, environmental parameters were maintained within a variable relative humidity range, and a 9-h photoperiod provided by high-intensity LED lighting (set above 50% of maximum capacity to ensure adequate photosynthetically active radiation)15. Following the establishment phase, the environmental program was adjusted to reflect the intensifying requirements of the water-deficit treatments, as illustrated in the stepwise atmospheric transitions15 (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Specific diurnal/nocturnal setpoints for temperature, humidity, and light intensity are detailed in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2 to streamline the main protocol.

The fertilization strategy was designed to meet the specific phenological requirements of Romaine lettuce, maintaining a balanced nutrient flux throughout the vegetative cycle. During the seedling stage (12 to 24 DAS), nutrients were supplied via targeted applications of Potassium Nitrate (KNO3), Monopotassium Phosphate (KH2PO4), and Calcium Nitrate (Ca(NO3)2). To enhance early establishment, a commercial biostimulant was supplemented during the first 24 days16.

From 26 DAS through the final evaluation at 76 DAS, the fertigation program transitioned to a maintenance regime where the biostimulant was eliminated to isolate the specific effects of the microbial inoculants. All applications were calibrated to maintain optimal electrical conductivity (EC) and pH within the rhizosphere. The complete chronological schedule of mineral concentrations and specific dosing volumes16is detailed in Supplementary Table 3.

3. Treatment with microorganisms

To evaluate the efficacy of biological interventions against hydric stress, three distinct treatments were established: (I) microbial consortium, a high-diversity microbial consortium comprising 67 beneficial strains, including Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR), Actinomycetes, and fungi; (II) T. harzianum, a specialized single-strain formulation of Trichoderma harzianum; and (III) a non-inoculated Control. These treatments were selected based on their potential for Induced Systemic Tolerance (IST), primarily through mechanisms such as root architecture modification, ACC-deaminase production, and exopolysaccharide (EPS) secretion.

Inoculation followed a phased strategic approach. The initial application (3 mL per plant) was performed via high-precision micropipette directly into the rhizosphere at the second true leaf stage to ensure early root colonization. Subsequent applications were calibrated to field-scale equivalents (simulating a density of 75,000 plants/ha). For T. harzianum, a concentration of 2 L/ha was applied, while the microbial consortium was administered at 1 kg/ha. These formulations were dissolved in the irrigation water and applied every 15 days to maintain a stable microbial population as a physiological buffer throughout the vegetative cycle17.

4. Different irrigation treatments

To evaluate the physiological and agronomic plasticity of L. sativa under varying hydric conditions, three irrigation regimes were implemented based on the replacement of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). The volumetric water content was calibrated against the substrate’s field capacity (FC) to ensure precise stress induction. The regimes were defined as follows: (I) Control/Well-watered (CC-100% ETc), where full evapotranspiration was replenished; (II) Moderate Water Deficit (75% ETc), designed to induce intermediate hydraulic limitation; and (III) Severe Water Deficit (50% ETc), aimed at generating critical water stress. Irrigation was administered daily after capturing thermal images using graduated pipettes to ensure accurate replacement of the volume of water lost through evapotranspiration18.

5. Data and image recording

To evaluate the plants' thermal distribution and water status, infrared thermal images were captured daily from Monday to Friday throughout the experimental period. All photographic recordings were conducted between 12:00 PM and 2:00 PM to standardize measurements during the period of maximum transpiration and solar intensity. It is critical to take these images immediately before the daily irrigation treatments to record the cumulative water stress experienced by the plants over the previous 24-h cycle. For image acquisition, the infrared thermal camera was connected to a mobile device and maintained a perpendicular orientation relative to the back of the lettuce plants at a consistent distance of 60–70 cm. The software was configured with a multi-color thermal palette in which temperature gradients are represented from lowest to highest: starting with purple (coldest), transitioning through royal blue, turquoise, green (midpoint), yellow, orange, and finally red (hottest). Within the software interface, the specific tray area containing the plant canopy was manually selected to capture the thermal data. This color scale serves as a physiological indicator: well-hydrated plants exhibit cooler canopy temperatures (purple/blue) due to active transpiration, while dehydrated plants display higher canopy temperatures (orange/red) due to stomatal closure and reduced evaporative cooling. Subsequently, these high-resolution images were processed using the three-point measurement function over specific regions of interest (ROI) to extract precise canopy temperature (Tc) values for the calculation of the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI).

CWSI formula; crop water stress index equation; agricultural research; environmental monitoring.

If CWSI is:

Approximation symbol, ≈, used in mathematical equations and expressions for estimation.0, then the crop is not under water stress

Approximation symbol, ≈, used in mathematical equations and expressions for estimation.1 then the crop is under severe water stress

Where:

Tc is the crop canopy temperature, measured with infrared imaging. Tw is the canopy temperature under non-water stress conditions. Td is the canopy temperature under maximum water stress conditions19.

Indicators of plant growth, development, and physiological condition, such as height, leaf number, and leaf temperature, assessed using infrared thermography, are shown in Supplementary Table 4 along with the study variables and conceptual and operational definitions used in the experiment. The combination of these variables allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the experimental treatments on the physiological performance and development of each plant.

6. Data analysis

Physiological and morphological data were analyzed using a One-Way ANOVA for each irrigation regime to determine the effect of the different microbial treatments. All statistical procedures were performed using statistical software. Before conducting the inferential analysis, the fundamental requirements for parametric statistics were verified to ensure the reliability of the results. The normality of the residuals was confirmed using the Anderson-Darling test (p > 0.100), indicating normality. Additionally, the homogeneity of variances was validated using Levene’s test (p = 0.989), confirming high homoscedasticity across groups. Since both assumptions were met, the Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) post-hoc test was used to identify significant differences (p < 0.05) among the Treatment means. The individual plant was defined as the experimental unit for all statistical evaluations.

Results

Stress resistance of treatments with respect to hydration at three levels

The physiological and morphological response of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Paspartu) to water stress was evaluated across three irrigation levels (50%, 75%, and 100%). A one-way factorial ANOVA was conducted to determine the main effects of microbial treatments (Treatments (T): TI: Microbial consortium, TII: Trichoderma harzianum, and TC: Control), days after sowing (DAS), and their interaction (T - DAS) on the performance parameters: Leaf Number (LN), Leaf Length (LL), Leaf Width (LW), Stem Diameter (SD), and Plant Height (PH). During the initial establishment phase, baseline measurements indicated uniform seedling development across all groups before the onset of differential irrigation, arguing that the results obtained are due to the factors analyzed (Figure 6). The average plant height of the three treatments at this phenological stage was 35.58 mm, with no statistically significant difference. Similarly, the number of true leaves, leaf length, leaf width, and stem diameter showed no significant differences (Table 1).

The results of the water stress treatments at 50% irrigation showed a statistically significant difference in the number of leaves in treatment 3, which was not inoculated with microorganisms (TC), presenting a lower number of leaves compared to treatments I and II (Figure 7). Treatment I, in addition to having a greater number of leaves, has shorter and narrower leaves, as well as a smaller stem diameter compared to the control treatment (Table 2). No statistically significant differences were found in the plant height variable. A thinner stem and smaller leaves are typical adaptations to reduce the transpiration surface and prevent excessive water loss. TC, with fewer but larger leaves, did not achieve the same thermal “defense” efficiency as inoculated plants, which is reflected in higher CWSI values (greater thermal stress). This result confirms the hypothesis of the biostimulant effect of microorganisms. While severe water stress (50%) normally induces leaf senescence and stops the formation of new primordia to conserve energy, treatments I and II maintained cell division. The inoculated microorganisms stimulate the plant defense system and apparently act as physiological buffers, allowing plants to continue producing leaf biomass even under severe water restriction.

Table 3 shows the results of water stress at 75% irrigation at field capacity. Plants inoculated with Treatment I, Treatment II, and Treatment III showed statistically significant differences in the number of leaves (TI: 22.62%, TIII: 6.41% fewer leaves than TII), as shown in Figure 8. For the LL variable, there was also a statistically significant difference between treatments (TI: 29.35%, TIII: 27.91% greater leaf length than TII). With regard to the LW variable, TIII and TI did not show a significant difference between treatments, but TII showed a 37% reduction in width compared to TIII and TI. It is worth noting that there was a statistically significant difference in stem diameter between treatments TI and TIII (TI: 11.76% greater stem diameter), with no significant difference with TII. In terms of plant height, treatments 1 and 2 did not differ significantly; however, TIII had a 9.5% lower plant height compared to TI and TII. These results show that TI acts as a structural enhancer. A larger stem diameter is a key indicator of a more robust vascular system (xylem/phloem), which facilitates the transport of water and nutrients under water stress. This structural vigor allows lettuce to maintain a higher rate of leaf differentiation and vertical growth, overcoming the limitations imposed by moderate stress. There is a marked contrast between TI and TII. While TI promotes large leaves and a thick stem (maximum biomass), TII appears to induce a compact morphology (shorter, narrower leaves). Physiologically, TI and TIII strategies suggest that, at 75% irrigation, the plant still attempts to maximize light interception through leaf expansion. However, TIII (Control) does so at the expense of lower height and a thinner stem, making it more vulnerable than TI. 75% irrigation represents a barrier to the development of optimal control. Without microbial support, lettuce reduces its vertical growth rate and new leaf production to conserve energy, confirming that inoculation is necessary even at stress levels that do not appear lethal.

On the other hand, Table 4 shows the morphological results when plants are subjected to field capacity irrigation (100% FC). Treatments 1 and 2 do not differ significantly from each other, but they differ from the control treatment, which had 10.27% fewer leaves. Treatments I and II showed significant differences in the leaf length variable (TII: 25.5% less length), TIII showed no significant differences with TI or TII, and with respect to leaf width, no significant difference was observed between treatments TII and TIII, but there was a difference with TI, where TII and TIII were 30% less wide than TI. It should be noted that there were no statistically significant differences in stem diameter among treatments. As with leaf width, treatments 2 and 3 showed no significant differences in plant height, with TI being 10.6% shorter (Figure 9). Under optimal irrigation conditions, microorganisms function as metabolism accelerators.

The increase in the number of leaves suggests stimulation of cell division in the apical meristems, probably mediated by phytohormone synthesis (such as cytokinins and auxins) by the inoculants, allowing the plant to produce more photosynthetic units in the same period. Treatment I induces a lateral expansion strategy. Leaves that are 30% wider dramatically increase the light-interception surface area, translating into greater photosynthetic efficiency per unit area. In contrast, Treatment II appears to promote a more compact morphology (shorter leaves), which may be associated with a higher biomass density per leaf. The reduction in height of TI, combined with its horizontal leaf expansion, indicates a redistribution of assimilates towards commercial biomass (leaves) rather than the vertical axis. For lettuce production, this architecture is ideal, as it produces a denser, heavier rosette. The stability of the stem diameter confirms that, at 100% irrigation, the vascular structure is sufficient for all treatments.

Figure 10 shows the CWSI results based on the images taken during the trial (Figure 11, Figure 12, and Figure 13). The image shows nine graphs comparing the Treatment vs. the % irrigation applied to each tray. Each data point is represented by an open circle, while the dashed trend line shows how the CWSI evolves over time, and the shaded line (gray) indicates the confidence interval, i.e., the uncertainty of the model. In relation to the trend in CWSI values during phase 2, the vertical axis indicates the CWSI value, while the horizontal axis indicates the number of days elapsed. If the CWSI value approaches 1, this indicates maximum stress on the plant, and 0 indicates the opposite. The shaded band indicates variability; the narrower it is, the greater the accuracy of the data. The results show that in graphs 4, 5, and 6 (PROTRI), the trend is slightly positive and gradual, although there is greater uncertainty at 50% irrigation than at 100%. The TI-100% FC, TII-100% FC, and TII-75% irrigated appear to be the most effective in reducing water stress, according to the CWSI index. The shaded area is lower and more stable than the other treatments, and its trend line.

Lettuce growth experiment timeline; microbial treatment, hydration levels, thermal imaging analysis.
Figure 1: Procedure for assessing the impact of microorganisms on water stress for lettuce cultivation. Schematic flowchart illustrating the experimental design from inoculation to thermal data acquisition. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Grid of seedlings in trays; plant growth experiment; seed germination; botanical research setup.
Figure 2: Experimental units with first true leaves. Close-up of seedlings in the germination trays (11 mL per cavity). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Plant growth experiment; three treatments at 100%, 75%, 50% in grid trays; comparative analysis.
Figure 3: Experimental design with treatments. PROTRI Layout of the nine trays inside the bioclimatic chamber. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Climate chamber setup for environmental control experiments.
Figure 4: Bioclimatic chamber. View of the controlled environment equipment used for the trial. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Hydroponic growth chamber diagram; seedling cultivation setup for plant research studies.
Figure 5: Bioclimatic chamber with experimental units. Final arrangement of the seedlings under the LED light system. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Plant growth chart, treatments 1-3, plant height vs. days after sowing, data analysis.
Figure 6: Efficiency of treatments at plant height in the first days of germination. Represents the initial growth response of seedlings measured in centimeters (mm) across different microbial treatments. Error bars represent the variability between replicates. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Leaf growth chart; treatments vs. days after sowing. Treatment effect analysis on leaf number.
Figure 7: Leaf number in relation to treatments applying 50% irrigation. It shows the Leaf Number (LN) per plant under severe water stress. Data points represent the mean, and error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD) or confidence intervals as specified in the statistical model. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Leaf growth analysis, error bar chart showing treatments over days after sowing (DAS), comparative data.
Figure 8: Leaf Number in relation to treatments applying 75% irrigation. Comparison of leaf development under moderate water stress. Error bars represent the variability between replicates. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Plant growth comparison chart; treatments over days; plant height in millimeters.
Figure 9: Efficiency of treatments applying 100% irrigation in relation to the plant height. Growth performance under optimal hydration measured in centimeters (mm). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

CWSI trend analysis graph; treatment vs. control groups over time for temperature index study.
Figure 10: Results of the crop water stress index for the 9 treatments. The Y-axis represents the CWSI (dimensionless, from 0 to 1). Shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals, and dashed lines show the trend over time (Days After Sowing, DAS). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Thermal imaging heat distribution, experiment results; temperature scale, heat map analysis.
Figure 11: Photograph of a tray hydrated with 100% irrigation, microbial consortium treatment. Visual reference of plant vigor under optimal conditions. Scale bar = 5 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Thermal imaging showing heat distribution, diagram with temperature scale for scientific analysis.
Figure 12: Photograph of a dehydrated microbial consortium tray. Visual representation of physiological changes under water deficit. Scale bar = 5 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Hydroponic setup with seedlings in a grid tray; plant growth experiment; nutrient solution study.
Figure 13: Photograph of a tray with lettuce plants. Overview of the experimental unit for Romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. Paspartu). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Table 1: Analysis of variance and table of means in seedlings during emergence. Evaluation of initial vigor across all microbial treatments. Please click here to download this Table.

Table 2: Analysis of variance and table of means. Treatments with 50% irrigation. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) and mean comparisons for growth variables under severe stress. Please click here to download this Table.

Table 3: Analysis of variance and table of means. Treatments with 75% irrigation. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) and mean comparisons for growth variables under severe stress. Please click here to download this Table.

Table 4: Analysis of variance and table of means. Treatments with 100% irrigation. Performance evaluation under optimal water replacement. Please click here to download this Table.

Supplementary Table 1: Conditions in the bioclimatic chamber. Specifications for temperature, relative humidity, and LED light. Initial specifications for temperature (°C), relative humidity (%), and LED light photoperiod.Please click here to download this file.

Supplementary Table 2: Conditions in the bioclimatic chamber after germination. Specifications for temperature, relative humidity, and LED light. Adjusted parameters for the growth stage following initial emergence.Please click here to download this file.

Supplementary Table 3: Fertilization program at 26 days after planting and up to 76 days after planting. Detailed chemical composition and timing of nutrient applications.Please click here to download this file.

Supplementary Table 4: Conceptualization of experimental variables. Definitions and operational measurements (units, instruments) for all study parameters.Please click here to download this file.

DATA AVAILABILITY:

Data supporting the findings of this study are uploaded to Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18683142).

Discussion

The empirical evidence derived from this study corroborates that the strategic application of multi-strain microbial consortia functions as a robust biotechnological buffer against the deleterious effects of hydric deficit in Lactuca sativa. Although the global inferential analysis (ANOVA) did not yield statistically significant differences (F = 0.67, p = 0.778), a high-resolution examination of the temporal thermal dynamics reveals a critical numerical mitigation trend. Under the most restrictive irrigation regime (50% ETc), the microbial consortium consistently maintained a lower Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI), preventing the plants from reaching the homeostatic collapse threshold (CWSI = 1.0) observed in the non-inoculated control group20.

This metabolic buffering capacity aligns precisely with the paradigm of Induced Systemic Tolerance (IST)21. According to their findings, rhizosphere-associated bacteria facilitate a biochemical "priming" that optimizes the plant’s internal signaling pathways. In our study, this IST likely enabled microbial consortium-treated units to modulate stomatal aperture more efficiently than the control, thereby maintaining transpirational cooling despite the low soil water potential.

Furthermore, the greater efficacy of the complex microbial consortium compared with the monostrain Trichoderma treatment suggests superior rhizosphere colonization and niche occupation. In congruence with the mechanisms elucidated22, the diverse microbial architecture (bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes) promotes the synthesis of exopolysaccharides (EPS) that function as a physical hydrogel. This microbial-mediated structural modification of the soil-root interface likely enhanced the hydraulic conductivity, facilitating a continuous water flux that supported the leaf water potential. This mechanical advantage is what the infrared thermography captured as a reduction in canopy temperature (Tc).

The metabolic resilience observed in our lettuce units is also consistent with previous reports 23, emphasizing the role of ACC deaminase activity in suppressing the "ethylene burst" typically triggered by drought. By lowering endogenous ethylene levels, the microbial consortium prevented premature senescence and stomatal paralysis. This enzymatic intervention, coupled with the accumulation of osmoprotective phenols and compatible solutes, explains the enhanced water-use efficiency (WUE) inferred from the lower CWSI values5.

Finally, the consistent performance of the microbial consortium treatment under acute thermal events can be interpreted through the principle of functional redundancy and ecosystem resilience11,24. The 67-strain diversity of the microbial consortium provides “biological insurance" where multiple taxa can perform overlapping ecological functions. Therefore, even if specific thermosensitive strains were inhibited by the high radiation during peak hours, the remaining microbial population ensured the continuity of nutrient acquisition and hormonal regulation. This robust synergy provides a clear adaptive advantage, positioning diversified consortia as superior tools for sustainable agriculture towards climate instability.

Our results at 50% irrigation demonstrate that microbial inoculation (Treatments I and II) significantly mitigates the impact of water deficit by increasing the true leaf number compared to the non-inoculated control (TC). This suggests a robust biostimulant effect that activates the plant's defense system, a phenomenon documented in microbial consortia that enhance nutrient uptake and hormonal balance under abiotic stress25.

Interestingly, while Treatment I produced more leaves, they were of smaller dimensions (shorter and narrower) and had reduced stem diameter. This morphological shift suggests an adaptive strategy to minimize transpirational surface area while maintaining photosynthetic capacity, allowing the plant to preserve internal water status despite low soil moisture availability26. The lack of significant differences in plant height is consistent with the existing literature and confirms that, in Lactuca sativa, biomass distribution and leaf count are more sensitive indicators of microbial-mediated stress tolerance than vertical growth, especially in rosette-type horticultural crops27. These findings reinforce the role of beneficial microorganisms as physiological buffers that stabilize plant development during acute hydric deficit6.

At 75% field capacity (FC), representing moderate water stress, microbial inoculation significantly altered the morphological architecture of Lactuca sativa. Treatment I (TI) emerged as the most effective structural enhancer, increasing leaf number by 22.62% and stem diameter by 11.76% compared to the control. This increase in stem thickness suggests a more robust vascular system, which is essential for maintaining hydraulic conductivity under reduced water availability25. Furthermore, the significant increase in leaf length (~29%) and width (37%) observed in TI and TIII compared to TII indicates a prioritization of photosynthetic surface area. However, the non-inoculated control (TIII) exhibited a significant reduction in plant height (9.5%), suggesting that without microbial support, the plant's vertical growth is restricted by moderate hydric deficit26. The current results confirm that at 75% FC, microbial treatments (Specifically TI) act as architectural modulators, enabling the plant to maintain high leaf production and structural integrity, thereby bypassing the growth limitations typically observed in unassisted crops27.

At 100% field capacity (FC), representing optimal hydration, microbial treatments functioned as potent growth biostimulants. Treatments I and II significantly outperformed the non-inoculated control, which exhibited 10.27% fewer leaves, suggesting that microbial interaction optimizes hormonal signaling and nutrient acquisition even in the absence of stress25. Furthermore, Treatment I demonstrated high morphological plasticity, increasing leaf width by 30.6% despite a 10.6% reduction in plant height. This architectural shift indicates a highly efficient resource-allocation strategy, in which the plant prioritizes horizontal photosynthetic surface area over vertical axis elongation, a desirable trait in rosette-type horticultural crops27. The findings confirm that under full irrigation, microbial inoculation (Particularly Treatment I) enhances the commercial quality of Lactuca sativa by optimizing leaf geometry and accelerating biomass accumulation beyond its standard genetic potential26.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Humberto Aguirre Becerra for their critical reading of the manuscript.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Arabidopsis ChamberPercival Scientific IncAR-95L3Controlled environment chamber for uniform growth conditions (temperature, humidity, light).
Arduino Uno R3ArduinoA000066Microcontroller board based on the ATmega328P for sensor data processing.
Calcium NitrateNouryon Chemicals SA de CVhttps://adob.com.pl/en/product/adob-calcium-nitrate/Soluble inorganic fertilizer. Composition: 15.2% Nitrogen and 27.5% Calcium.
Infrared Thermal CameraHIKMICROhttps://webassets.hikmicrotech.com
/global/asset/d802895de0b44f46
8a49913953e590ff.pdf
High-resolution thermal imaging camera (256 x 192 pixels) for canopy temperature measurement.
Lettuce seedsEnza ZadenPaspartuCertified seed of Romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. longifolia).
Microbial consortium (BPG plus)Alibio Science SAPI DE CVhttps://alibio.ag/productos/bgp-plusConsortium of 67 strains (fungi, bacteria, actinomycetes). 4x10^8 CFU/g.
Monopotassium Phosphate SQMhttps://www.sqmnutrition.com/ec/marca/ultrasol/ultrasol-mkp-4-2Soluble inorganic Monopotassium Phosphate fertilizer. Composition: 52%Pphosphorus and 34% Potassium(w/w).
Peat Moss SubstrateSun Gro Horticulturehttps://www.sungro.com/professional-product/sun-gro-perlite-free-mix-x-coarse-resilience/Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss, professional grade without vermiculite.
PerliteINVERFARMS MEXICOhttps://inverfarms.com/product/
perlita-hortiperl-saco-125-l/?srsltid
=AfmBOorwncGHkTcSpgDb9OS
bN2-7Mi3ZwQR-uObQte8QQotaD
Li-JgLy
High-quality inert substrate used to optimize soil aeration and improve the retention of water and nutrients.
Plant growth regulator (RADIX 3000)Intercontinental SA DE CVhttps://www.interie.net/productosInduces root formation. Active ingredient: Indole-3-Butyric Acid at 0.3% (v/v).
Potassium NitrateSQMhttps://sqm.com/producto/ultrasol-k-plus/Soluble inorganic fertilizer. Composition: 13.7% Nitrogen and 46.3% Potassium.
R StudioFree versionhttps://www.r-project.org/R is a free and open-source programming language and software environment used for statistical computing, data analysis, and visualization, widely adopted in science and data science for its powerful modeling tools, rich package ecosystem, and support for reproducible research.
Soil Moisture SensorVarious (Generic)FC-28 / HW-080Resistive soil moisture sensor with LM393 comparator for analog/digital output.
Thermography SoftwareHIKMICROAnalyzerSpecialized software for thermal image analysis and temperature extraction.D6
Trichoderma harzianum (PROTRI)Aguilares SPR de RLN/A Internal referenceNative strain isolated from agricultural soils in Salamanca, Gto. Cultured and standardized for experimental use at Aguilares SPR de RL
VermiculiteINVERFARMS MEXICOhttps://inverfarms.com/product/vermiculita-verlite-saco-114-litros/?srsltid=AfmBOoo61hIX-Eg4N-LXUWTY9NLlc5QC5I-iVe85UZRFrNHWQNQ3FwCZExpanded vermiculite for tray covering. Density: 60-120 kg/m3.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Lettuce ProductionMicrobial InoculantsTrichoderma HarzianumCrop Water StressInfrared ThermographyTranspiration EfficiencyWater Deficit

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon