A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Effects of Auricular Acupressure Combined with Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

458 views

DOI:

10.3791/69852

January 9th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

This protocol evaluates the effects of combining auricular acupressure with epidural analgesia on labor pain management in term parturients.

Abstract

Labor pain remains a significant challenge during childbirth. While epidural analgesia is highly effective, it is associated with limitations such as breakthrough pain, motor blockade, and epidural-related maternal fever. Auricular acupressure, a non-pharmacological complementary therapy derived from Traditional Chinese Medicine, may modulate pain perception through gate control theory and biochemical mechanisms. This randomized controlled trial assesses whether combining auricular acupressure with epidural analgesia provides superior pain control compared to epidural analgesia alone. Fifty nulliparous women at term requesting epidural analgesia were randomized to receive either true auricular acupressure at specific points (Shenmen, Subcortex, Genitalia, Sympathetic) or sham non-acupoints stimulation. Pain scores were assessed using a Visual Analog Scale at baseline (cervical dilation 2-3 cm), 30 min post-epidural, and at full cervical dilation (10 cm). Secondary outcomes included local anesthetic consumption, incidence of breakthrough pain, and epidural-related maternal fever, Apgar scores, and maternal satisfaction. The protocol emphasizes accurate acupoint localization, blinding procedures, and standardized outcome assessment to ensure reliable results.

Introduction

Labor pain is a natural physiological process caused by uterine contractions and cervical dilation. It is a major physiological and psychological stressor that can trigger adverse neuroendocrine responses, potentially impacting both maternal and infant outcomes1,2. Epidural analgesia represents the most effective pharmacological method for labor pain relief; however, it is associated with limitations such as breakthrough pain, motor blockade, and a well-documented association with epidural-related maternal fever (ERMF)3,4,5. These limitations have stimulated interest in non-pharmacological approaches as potential adjuvants to epidural analgesia6,7,8,9.

Auricular acupressure, a division of Chinese acupuncture, is based on the principle that specific points on the auricle correspond to body organs and funcions6,7. Neurophysiologically, stimulating these points may modulate pain perception by activating the vagus nerve and inhibiting sympathetic nervous system activity, thereby reducing the pain stress response. Previous studies10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 have reported the potential benefits of auricular therapy for labor pain; evidence regarding its combination with epidural analgesia remains limited.

This protocol describes a randomized controlled trial designed to address this evidence gap. The overall goal is to establish standardized methods for evaluating whether auricular acupressure improves the labor experience when combined with standard epidural analgesia. The technique offers several advantages over previous approaches, including rigorous blinding procedures, precise localization protocols for acupoints, and standardized outcome measures. This method will help researchers determine whether this combined approach is effective in improving labor outcomes across various clinical settings.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China (NO.KS25200). The trial was registered in the International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ITMCTR2025000988). This study was designed and conducted according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines18. All participants provided written informed consent. The regents and the equipment used are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Participant recruitment and enrollment

  1. Screen potential participants according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    1. Recruit nulliparous women at term (37-40 weeks) admitted to the delivery ward.
    2. Consider the following inclusion criteria: primiparous women aged 20-40 years, gestational age 37-40 weeks, singleton pregnancy; cephalic presentation; absence of chronic diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, hepatic or renal dysfunction; absence of pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, or hemorrhage; no history of acupressure or acupuncture therapy; normal appearance of both auricles; and no history of allergy to alcohol or adhesive tape.
    3. Consider the following exclusion criteria: fetal distress; use of analgesic medication before or during the study period; and contraindications to epidural analgesia; skin infections on the auricles; known psychiatric disorders; a history of chronic pain or other pain-related condition that may influence pain perception.
  2. Obtain informed consent
    1. Provide the participant with the detailed information sheet. Explain the study's purpose, procedures, and the voluntary nature of participants, including the right to withdraw at any time without penalty.
    2. Allow time for the participants to ask questions and consider.
    3. Obtain written informed consent.

2. Randomization and blinding

NOTE: An independent statistician generates a computer-randomized sequence using block randomization to assign participants to either the auricular acupressure group or the sham group.

  1. Conceal assignments in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
    NOTE: The research nurse opens envelopes after baseline data collection to reveal group assignment.
  2. Maintain blinding of the participant, the outcome assessors, and the data analysts.
    ​NOTE: The acupressure practitioner cannot be blinded due to the nature of the intervention.

3. Baseline data collection

  1. Record demographic data, including maternal age, height, weight, and gestational age.
  2. Assess baseline pain score using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain) at cervical dilation 2-3 cm.

4. Auricular acupressure application

  1. Identify the acupoints according to standard auricular charts and locate Shenmen (TF4), Subcortex (AT4), Genitalia (TF2), and Sympathetic (AH6a) on both ears.
  2. Clean the auricle with a 75% alcohol swab and allow it to air dry.
  3. Apply Vaccaria seeds (Wangbuliu Xing Zi) attached to a 6 x 6 mm piece of waterproof tape to each identified acupoint using sterile tweezers (Figure 1).
  4. Ensure the tape is firmly attached and centered on the acupoint.
  5. Instruct the stimulation technique using the thumb and index finger, pressing firmly on each acupoint until a sensation of distension, numbness, or heat ("De Qi") is felt.
  6. Stimulate each point for 1 min, every 60 min after epidural analgesia.
    NOTE: For the sham group, apply Vaccaria seeds to non-acupoints using identical instructions.

5. Epidural analgesia procedure

  1. Prepare a solution containing 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.3 µg/mL sufentanil.
  2. An experienced anesthesiologist performs the epidural analgesia with patients in the right lateral decubitus position using a 17-G Tuohy needle at the L2-3 interspace. Insert the 19-G wire-reinforced multi-orifice epidural catheter into the epidural space at a depth of 4 cm.
    CAUTION: Maintain strict sterility and monitor for local anesthetic toxicity. Ensure immediate availability of resuscitation equipment.
  3. Initiate programmed intermittent epidural bolus of 10 mL every 50 min. Set the patient-controlled epidural analgesia bolus to 5 mL with a lockout interval of 15 min.

6. Outcome measurement

  1. Assess and record the participant's VAS score at predetermined time points: cervical dilations at 2-3 cm before epidural analgesia (T1, baseline), 30 min after epidural analgesia (T2), and cervical dilation at 10 cm (T3).
  2. Record the total consumption of local anesthetics, the incidence of breakthrough pain, the incidence of epidural-related maternal fever, the Apgar score, and maternal satisfaction.

7. Statistical analysis

  1. Analyze data using SPSS 22.0 and GraphPad Prism 9.
    NOTE: Normally distributed measurement data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and comparisons between groups were made using the independent t-test. Non-normally distributed data are presented as median[interquartile range], and comparisons between the groups were made using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables are presented as rates or constituent ratios, and comparisons between groups were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fiser's exact test. For repeated measurement data, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or a mixed-effects model was employed to account for time effects and group-by-time interactions.
  2. Use appropriate statistical tests (t-test, u-test, chi-square test) with significance level p< 0.05.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

In this study, fifty nulliparous women at term requesting epidural analgesia were included. Figure 2 shows the recruitment flow chart. The age, height, weight, and pregnancy week had no significance between the groups (Table 1). Figure 3 shows the changes in VAS pain scores at different times between groups. The VAS pain score was significantly lower in the auric...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

This randomized controlled trial protocol provides a standardized method for evaluating auricular acupressure as an adjunct to epidural analgesia for managing labor pain. Auricular acupressure is non-invasive, easy to perform, and humane; therefore, it is encouraged by the World Health Organization for the assistance of normal labor and delivery19. The integration of this non-pharmacological intervention with epidural analgesia represents a potential strategy to address known limitations of epidur...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

All authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the support of the grants of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (20224Y0201).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
17-G Tuohy needle Foshan Special Medical, Foshan, China20173084102For epidural puncture and catheter placement.
19-G wire-reinforced multi-orifice epidural catheterFoshan Special Medical, Foshan, China20173084102For continuous administration of epidural analgesic solution.
75% alcohol swabsStandard medical supplier20162140879For skin disinfection prior
to acupressure.
GraphPad Prism software(version 9.0)GraphPad Software,San Diego,CA,USAN/AFor data analysis and graph generation.
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia pumpMCZZB-I; Apon Medical Tech. Co. Ltd., Jiangsu, China20173541272Programmed for intermitten bolus delivery and patient-controlled boluses.
SPSS software(version 22.0)IBM Corporation,Armonk,NY, USAN/AFor data analysis
Vaccaria segetalisHengshui Fengfan
Medical Devices
Trading Co.,Ltd
N/AFor auricular acupressure
stimulation.

References

  1. Lowe, N. K. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 86 (5 Suppl Nature), S16-S24 (2002).
  2. Alehagen, S., Wijma, B., Wijma, K. Fear of childbirth before, during, and after childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 85 (1), 56-62 (2006).
  3. Diez-Picazo, L. D., Guasch, E., Brogly, N., Gilsanz, F. Is breakthrough pain better managed by adding programmed intermittent epidural bolus to a background infusion during labor epidural analgesia? A randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 85 (10), 1097-1104 (2019).
  4. Cartledge, A., et al. Interventions for the prevention or treatment of epidural-related maternal fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 129 (4), 567-580 (2022).
  5. Patel, S., Ciechanowicz, S., Blumenfeld, Y. J., Sultan, P. Epidural-related maternal fever: incidence, pathophysiology, outcomes, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 28 (5S), S1283-S1304 (2023).
  6. Alimoradi, Z., Kazemi, F., Gorji, M., Valiani, M. Effects of ear and body acupressure on labor pain and duration of labor active phase: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 51, 102413(2020).
  7. Jiang, S. L., Jiang, X. M., Zheng, Q. X., Liu, X. W. Auricular bean embedding improves urination in epidural labor analgesia: A single center randomized controlled study. Technol Health Care. 31 (4), 1119-1127 (2023).
  8. Ozgoli, G., Sedigh Mobarakabadi, S., Heshmat, R., Alavi Majd, H., Sheikhan, Z. Effect of LI4 and BL32 acupressure on labor pain and delivery outcome in the first stage of labor in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 29, 175-180 (2016).
  9. Zuarez-Easton, S., et al. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options for pain relief during labor: an expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 28 (5S), S1246-S1259 (2023).
  10. Shaterian, N., et al. Labor pain in different dilatations of the cervix and Apgar scores affected by aromatherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. 29 (9), 2488-2504 (2022).
  11. Arumugam, V., et al. Auriculotherapy for labour pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 17 (5), 158-164 (2024).
  12. Abedi, P., Rastegar, H., Valiani, M., Saadati, N. The effect of auriculotherapy on labor pain, length of active phase and episiotomy rate among reproductive aged women. J Family Reprod Health. 11 (4), 185-190 (2017).
  13. Schlaeger, J. M., et al. Acupuncture and acupressure in labor. J Midwifery Womens Health. 62 (1), 12-28 (2017).
  14. Chen, Y., et al. Acupressure for labor pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acupunct Med. 39 (4), 243-252 (2021).
  15. Dahlen, H. G., Tan, A. L., Mesgarpour, B. Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2 (2), CD009232(2020).
  16. Cao, M. L., Zhang, W. The effectiveness of auricular acupressure on pain management during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 20 (1), e12512(2023).
  17. You, E., Kim, D., Harris, R., D'Alonzo, K. Effects of auricular acupressure on pain management: A systematic review. Pain Manag Nurs. 20 (1), 17-24 (2019).
  18. Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 340, c332(2010).
  19. Mafetoni, R. R., Shimo, A. K. Effects of auriculotherapy on labour pain: A randomized clinical trial. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 50 (5), 726-732 (2016).
  20. Zhang, X., He, B., Wang, H., Sun, X. Auricular acupressure for treating early stage of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, sham-controlled prospective study. QJM. 115 (8), 525-529 (2022).
  21. Xu, M. M., et al. The effectiveness of auricular acupressure on pain management during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 20 (1), e12512(2023).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Pain ControlVisual Analog ScaleMaternal SatisfactionBreakthrough PainAcupoint LocalizationNon Pharmacological Therapy