Method Article

Three-Dimensional Co-Culture Method for the Study of Indirect Interactions Between Different Cell Types Across a Reconstituted Basement Membrane

DOI:

10.3791/70027

April 17th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This article details a straightforward method for the three-dimensional co-culture of two cell types separated by a reconstituted basement membrane that requires little specialized equipment and can be readily analyzed by a variety of experimental techniques.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Three-dimensional (3D) co-culture is a rapidly evolving technique for researchers looking to accurately study cell-cell interactions using in vitro experiments. The limitations of monolayer cell culture, including limited interactions between the cellular and extracellular environment and disturbed cell morphology, are addressed by simulating the in vivo cellular environment. Using a scaffold to provide structural support and including biologically active extracellular matrix components, 3D cultures display behaviours and morphologies more congruent with tissue. Incorporating multiple cell types into this kind of 3D environment allows for the study of cell-cell interactions inside a biomimetic model system. A wide range of 3D co-culture technologies has emerged, each with its own advantages and challenges. Often these technologies require specialized equipment, a complex setup, or specific technical knowledge. As well, there exist a few standardized methods for studying indirect cell-cell interactions between two cell types separated by a reconstituted basement membrane. Here, we describe a 3D co-culture method that requires only fundamental technical skills and uses more widely applicable materials to successfully recapitulate indirect cell-cell interactions across a basement membrane. A monolayer of cells is covered in a layer of extracellular matrix, in the form of Matrigel, and a second cell type is seeded on top. The resultant co-culture is maintained for five days, at which point cells are analyzed for morphological changes by immunofluorescence or extracted from the co-culture for more detailed genomic, transcriptomic, or proteomic analyses. This protocol is ideal for studying the impact of cell-cell communication on cell behaviour when physical contact is prohibited by a basement membrane. As researchers continue to opt for more in vivo-relevant cell culture methods, a streamlined approach is necessary to avoid high barriers to entry.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

In vitro cell culture is a robust, rapid, and widely used research technique. Though traditional cell culture methods are powerful, they differ greatly from an in vivo environment. The spatially restricted nature of monolayer cell culture leads to changes in gene expression, morphology, and biochemistry1,2,3. Three-dimensional (3D) culture techniques address this disparity, as cells are grown in a scaffold that simulates the extracellular matrix (ECM) present in organs and tissues. In 3D culture, cells display morphology and behaviour more like that which is....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This protocol (Figure 1A) outlines a 3D co-culture system designed to recapitulate cell-cell interactions across a basement membrane matrix. Downstream analysis is possible using confocal microscopy (Figure 1B) or by harvesting cells from within the co-culture (Figure 1C). By using a 'sandwich' construction, where a layer of ECM gel is sandwiched between two cell populations, the protocol does not require specialized apparatus and can be performed with foundational knowledge of modern cell culture techniques.

1. 3D Co-culture preparation

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

To demonstrate this protocol's effectiveness for studying the effects of cell-cell interactions across a basement membrane, Figure 2 and Figure 3 have been repurposed from a previous publication (Pallegar et al.16) as representative outcomes. Figure 4 and Figure 5 are novel data and have been generated to show this protocol's adaptability to non-breast cancer cells and the abilit.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The lack of complex cell-cell interactions in traditional cell culture highlights the need for improved organ and tissue models to more accurately study drug responses and disease progression in vivo. The development of 3D co-culture systems has contributed to filling this gap by allowing study of the consequences of cell-cell interactions without the need for in vivo studies9,12. However, many of these methods can be mechanically complex, requi.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Development of the method was partially funded by the Cancer Research Society. GRK was supported with funding provided by the Canadian Cancer Society's Carol Ann Cole Graduate Studentship through the Cancer Research Training Program of the Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute. PMMB was supported by the MOBILITAS program grant (2024) from the Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa). Figure 1 was created using BioRender.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
24 Well Tissue Culture PlateCorning3524
24 x 60 mm Cover GlassUltident Scientific170-C2460
4% Paraformaldehyde in PBSInvitrogenJ61899.AKDiluted to 2% in 1x PBS
4-Well Chambered Culture SlidesFalcon354114
Alexa Fluor 647 AffiniPure Fab Fragment Donkey Anti-Goat IgG (H+L)Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories Inc.705-607-003
Bright-Line HemacytometerHausser Scientific3120
CellTrace CFSE Proliferation KitInvitrogenC34570
Cell Recovery SolutionCorning354253
DAPISigma-Aldrich Canada Co.D9542
Donkey anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, DyLight 594InvitrogenSA5-10168
Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 647InvitrogenA31573
DMEM/F-12, no phenol redGibco21041025
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Media, High Glucose, PyruvateGibco11995-065
Fetal Bovine Serum, Canada OriginGibco12483-020
Flowmi Cell Strainers, 40 µMBel-Art136800040
GE Advanced Silicone Window and Door, ClearHenkel International2811093
Goat Polyclonal Anti ZO-1SantaCruz BiotechnologySC8146Primary antibody, discontinued
Rat Monoclonal Anti ZO-1SantaCruz BiotechnologySC33725Alternative primary antibody to replace discontinued SC8416 anti ZO-1
Mammary Epithelial Cell Basal MediumPromocellC-21210
Matrigel, Phenol Red-free, Growth Factor Reduced, LDEV-freeCorning356231Protein Concentration: 9-9.6 mg/mL
Mouse Monoclonal Anti-VimentinSigma-Aldrich Canada Co.V2258Primary antibody
Newborn Calf Serum, New Zealand OriginGibco16010159
Penicillin-streptomycinGibco15140-122
Phosphate-Buffered Saline, pH 7.4Gibco10010023
ProLong Gold Antifade MountantInvitrogenP36934
Purified Mouse Anti-E-CadherinBD Biosciences610181Primary antibody
Rabbit Polyclonal Anti-Claudin 7 AbcamAB27487Primary antibody
RPMI 1640, GlutamineGibco11875-093
SupplementMixPromocellC-39115
Trypan Blue Stain (0.4%)Gibco15250-061
Trypsin 0.25%-EDTAGibco25200056

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Kapałczyńska, M., et al. 2D and 3D cell cultures - a comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures. Archives of medical science: AMS. 14 (4), 910-919 (2018).
  2. Birgersdotter, A., Sandberg, R., Ernberg, I.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Three Dimensional Co CultureBasement MembraneIndirect Cell InteractionsCell Cell CommunicationExtracellular MatrixBiomimetic ModelImmunofluorescence AnalysisMorphological ChangesIn Vitro Cell CultureMatrigel Scaffold
Video Coming Soon

Related Articles