Method Article

Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve in a Mouse Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Doppler Echocardiography

DOI:

10.3791/70135

March 24th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This protocol describes a rapid, non-invasive approach to assess coronary microvascular dysfunction in a mouse model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is determined by Doppler ultrasound-guided localization of the left coronary artery, calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline coronary flow velocity.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes a considerable global health burden and a major clinical challenge due to the absence of effective therapies, and the underlying pathophysiology remains elusive. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), which is highly prevalent in patients with HFpEF, triggers myocardial ischemia that impairs both left ventricular diastolic and systolic function. Given that microvascular dysfunction is a central feature of HFpEF, CMD is now considered an important factor in its pathogenesis. Coronary flow reserve (CFR), defined as the ratio of maximal hyperemic to resting blood flow velocity, is a highly valuable marker of myocardial ischemia. Furthermore, it serves as a comprehensive indicator of coronary vasomotor dysfunction, measuring the combined hemodynamic effects of both epicardial and microvascular coronary arteries on myocardial perfusion. This protocol focused on assessing the changes in CFR in a mouse model of HFpEF using Doppler echocardiography. In this study, control mice showed a greater than twofold increase in peak coronary blood flow velocity with isoflurane-induced vasodilation compared to resting values, whereas this response was significantly attenuated in HFpEF mice. In HFpEF, a reduced CFR predicts adverse outcomes and reflects underlying microvascular dysfunction, positioning it as a key tool for studying disease progression and guiding patient selection.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been the dominant form of HF and is associated with poor prognosis. However, there is no proven treatment to reduce its related morbidity and mortality1,2. The presence of multiple risk factors, including advanced age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity, underlies the complexity and heterogeneity in HFpEF3. In recent years, accumulating evidence has shown that coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an independent and direct risk factor for HFpEF, rather than a comorbidity4,5,6. Coronary microvascular dysfunction involving both functional and structural abnormalities underlies subendocardial ischemia, diffuse interstitial fibrosis, and left ventricular dysfunction in HFpEF7,8. Extensive research has been conducted on the pathological role of CMD in cardiovascular diseases9,10. A clinical study showed that microvascular dysfunction (evidenced by an impaired CFR <2.0) is directly associated with worse left ventricular diastolic function and may be a promising therapeutic target in HFpEF11. Echocardiographic assessment in the prevalence of microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PROMIS-HFpEF) study revealed that 75% of patients with HFpEF had CMD, based on CFR measurements in the left coronary artery12. Furthermore, the abnormal CMD correlated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including significantly increased mortality hazard13,14. Consequently, employing CMD as a key biomarker in animal models greatly facilitates the investigation of HFpEF pathophysiology and assists in validating the successful replication of the disease phenotype.

Currently, methods for assessing coronary microvascular function, such as positron emission tomography (PET), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), fractional flow reserve (FFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) are difficult to apply in rodent studies due to the small size of the animals and the limited availability of dedicated imaging hardware. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is recommended by international guidelines as a tool for interrogating coronary physiology15,16. Moreover, CFR serves as a reliable marker of cardiac ischemia, a gauge of coronary vascular dysfunction, and a valuable prognostic indicator of cardiovascular risk17. Doppler echocardiography for CFR assessment is a validated and reproducible method for evaluating global coronary vascular function in preclinical rodent models. Although prior studies have reported the use of CFR in mouse/rat models of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury18,19, it has never been applied in animal models of HFpEF. Moreover, the CFR assessment method described in this study, which rapidly locates the LCA using color Doppler echocardiography, can be extended to a range of animal models, including those of diabetic cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease, and chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disorders. In the present study, given the absence of epicardial coronary stenosis in the murine model, the reduction in coronary flow reserve (CFR) primarily reflects coronary microvascular dysfunction rather than combined epicardial and microvascular contributions. Thus, CFR serves as a reliable surrogate marker for CMD in this HFpEF model.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All procedures complied with the protocols approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (Approval No. 20011141) and adhered to the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines20. In this study, the HFpEF model was established in six- to eight-week-old male C57BL/6J mice (BW, ~25 g). Throughout the experimental duration, mice were housed in a specific-pathogen-free (SPF) room under controlled conditions of temperature (23 ± 1 °C), humidity (65%–70%), and a 12 h light/dark cycle. All animals had ad libitum access to food and water. After the study, the mice were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane and euthanized by cervical dislocation. The reagents and equipment used are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Establishment of the HFpEF mouse model

  1. Randomly allocate mice into two groups: a control (CTRL) group and an HFpEF group, with eight mice in each.
  2. Employ an established protocol21,22,23,24,25 to induce the HFpEF mouse model as follows:
    1. Feed six- to eight-week-old mice a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% fat) and provide 0.5 g/L N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) dissolved in drinking water for 8 weeks.
      NOTE: Prepare L-NAME drinking water in brown bottles to avoid light exposure and refresh every 2–3 days.
  3. Feed age-matched mice a standard normal diet and provide regular drinking water for the same duration as the control group.

2. Assessing coronary flow reserve by echocardiography

  1. Precede echocardiographic assessment by anesthetizing the mouse via inhalation of 1.5% vaporized isoflurane administered at 1.5–2.0 L/min with 100% O₂ flow in an anesthesia chamber.
    CAUTION: Isoflurane is a volatile anesthetic. Ensure adequate ventilation during operation. Wear nitrile gloves when adding liquid isoflurane to the vaporizer to avoid skin contact.
  2. Confirm absence of reaction to skin pinching and toe or tail stimulation, then position the animal supine on the imaging platform.
  3. Switch the gas anesthesia machine from chamber to mask delivery and maintain a constant 1.5% anesthetic concentration throughout the procedure.
  4. Acquire physiological data (ECG and respiration) by applying conductive gel to the copper sheet (ECG electrodes) of the imaging platform and taping the four paws onto them.
    NOTE: Maintain isoflurane at 1.5% for maintenance and keep core body temperature close to 37 °C using the built-in warming platform. Maintain a target breathing rate of 100–140 breaths per minute to ensure physiological stability during imaging.
  5. Remove chest hair by applying depilatory cream with a cotton-tipped applicator.
  6. Wipe away excess cream and loose fur with water-soaked gauze to prepare for imaging.
    NOTE: Completely remove residual depilatory cream to avoid skin irritation or toxicity.
  7. Apply sterile lubricating ophthalmic ointment to both eyes to prevent scleral drying.
  8. Apply ultrasound transmission gel to the anterior heart area and position the imaging platform at approximately a 30°–45° angle to the horizontal.
    NOTE: Avoid air bubbles in the ultrasound gel.
  9. Place the high-frequency ultrasound transducer slowly on the parasternal line and align it parallel to the thorax to obtain the adjusted parasternal long-axis (PLAX) view of the left ventricle (Figure 1A).
  10. Angle the probe to ensure light contact with the chest wall, avoiding compression.
  11. Press the Bright Mode button to switch to brightness mode imaging.
  12. Adjust the angle of the probe and imaging platform to locate the left coronary artery (LCA).
    NOTE: Identify the left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LA), left ventricular anterior wall (LVAW), left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW), interventricular septum (IVS), aorta (AO), pulmonary artery (PA), pulmonary vein (PV), mitral valve (MV), and papillary muscle within the acoustic window.
  13. Activate color doppler mode by pressing the Color Doppler button on the touchscreen. In real-time display, flow away from the aortic valve (toward the probe) appears red.
  14. Adjust the probe angle and position to visualize the complete LCA from the aortic sinus to the distal branch site while minimizing interference from pulmonary vein flow.
  15. Activate pulse-wave doppler (PW) mode. Position the PW measurement window parallel to the LCA blood flow direction (Figure 1B,C).
    NOTE: Maintain the insonation angle below 60° and apply real-time angle correction by aligning the Doppler cursor parallel to coronary flow.
  16. Select Save Clip to capture the baseline LCA flow velocity waveform.
  17. Increase the isoflurane concentration to 3% and observe the gradual increase in coronary flow velocity.
  18. After 45 s of continuous exposure to 3% isoflurane, select Save Clip to capture hyperemic coronary flow velocity.
    NOTE: Continuously monitor LCA blood flow. If the PW sample volume drifts due to respiratory or cardiac motion, pause acquisition, return to Color Doppler mode to re-identify the LCA, reposition the PW gate, and resume PW mode.
  19. Upon completion, discontinue isoflurane inhalation and remove ultrasound gel. Place the mouse on a heating pad until it recovers fully, then return it to its cage.

3. Statistical analysis

  1. Average measurements from three consecutive cardiac cycles traced in the analysis software to obtain baseline and peak LCA flow velocities. Calculate CFR as the ratio of hyperemic peak diastolic coronary flow velocity to baseline peak diastolic coronary flow velocity (CFV).
  2. Implement a double-blind design between the experimenter and data analyst. Assess normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Analyze normally distributed data using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. Analyze non-normally distributed data using the Mann–Whitney U test.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

In this study, 16 mice (HFpEF, n = 8; CTRL, n = 8) were used. The left coronary artery was identified under color Doppler guidance in the parasternal long-axis (PLAX) view, and coronary flow velocity was measured using pulsed-wave (PW) Doppler. Following the acquisition of sufficient and reproducible images from each mouse at both 1.5% (baseline) and 3% (hyperemic) isoflurane concentrations26 CFR was determined by averaging measurements from at least 3 consecutive cardiac cycles; representative re...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study presents a protocol that uses a non-invasive, straightforward, and reproducible method to assess macro- and microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF animal models. Doppler echocardiography for assessing Coronary Flow Reserve is recognized by the European Society of Cardiology as a validated and reproducible method15. Under normal physiological conditions in C57BL/6J mice, the coronary flow reserve is expected to be ≥2.0. In this study, compared to the CTRL group, HFpEF mice demonst...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare that there are no competing financial or commercial interests.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by the Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists in Nanjing- Key Project supported by Medical Science and technology development Foundation, Nanjing Department of Health (JQX22001); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M731631); Fundings for Clinical Trials from the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University (2024-LCYJ-PY-29); Research Foundation of Jiangsu provincial commission of health and family planning (MQ2024049).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Animal physiology monitorFujifilmVEVO 3100Monitor heart rate,respiration rate and body temperature
C57 miceGemPharmatech Co., Ltd
CameraCanon,JapanEOS R50Record the positions of the imaging platform and the ultrasound probe
Depilatory creamVeet,FrenchHair removal
GauzeCurityCAR-6339-PKSterile
IsofluraneREWARDR510-22-10Anesthesia
N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)Sigma-AldrichN5751HFpEF mice model introduction
Research Diets, 60% fat  Research Diets, Inc.  D12492High-fat diet
Surgical thermostatic heating padGlobalebio, ChinaGE0-20WTemperature control
Ultrasound GelParker LaboratoriesW60698LUltrasound transmission gel
Vevo 3100 preclinical imaging platfornFujifilmVEVO 3100Echocardiography
VevoLAB softwareFujifilmVevoLAB 3.2.6Echocardiography data analysis

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Redfield, M. M., Borlaug, B. A. Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Review. JAMA. 329 (10), 827-838 (2023).
  2. Withaar, C., Lam, C. S. P., Schiattarella, G. G., de Boer, R. A., Meems, L. M. G. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in humans and mice: embracing clinical complexity in mouse models. Eur Heart J. 42 (43), 4420-4430 (2021).
  3. Borlaug, B. A. Evaluation and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol. 17 (9), 559-573 (2020).
  4. Paulus, W. J., Tschope, C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 62 (4), 263-271 (2013).
  5. Shah, S. J., et al. Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF. Eur Heart J. 39 (37), 3439-3450 (2018).
  6. Lee, J. F., et al. Evidence of microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Heart. 102 (4), 278-284 (2016).
  7. Freed, B. H., et al. Prognostic Utility and Clinical Significance of Cardiac Mechanics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Importance of Left Atrial Strain. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 9 (3), 191-200 (2016).
  8. Taqueti, V. R., et al. Coronary Flow Reserve, Inflammation, and Myocardial Strain: The CIRT-CFR Trial. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 8 (2), 141-151 (2023).
  9. Zhao, J., et al. Heart-gut microbiota communication determines the severity of cardiac injury after myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 119 (6), 1390-1402 (2023).
  10. Zhao, J., et al. Excessive accumulation of epicardial adipose tissue promotes microvascular obstruction formation after myocardial ischemia/reperfusion through modulating macrophages polarization. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 23 (1), 236(2024).
  11. Rush, C. J., et al. Prevalence of coronary artery disease and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JAMA Cardiol. 6 (10), 1130-1143 (2021).
  12. Hage, C., et al. Association of coronary microvascular dysfunction with heart failure hospitalizations and mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a follow-up in the PROMIS-HFpEF study. J Card Fail. 26 (11), 1016-1021 (2020).
  13. Allan, T., Dryer, K., Fearon, W. F., Shah, S. J., Blair, J. E. A. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Card Fail. 25 (10), 843-845 (2019).
  14. Kelshiker, M. A., et al. Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 43 (16), 1582-1593 (2022).
  15. Knuuti, J., et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 41 (3), 407-477 (2020).
  16. Vancheri, F., Longo, G., Vancheri, S., Henein, M. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. J Clin Med. 9 (9), 2880(2020).
  17. Zacchigna, S., et al. Towards standardization of echocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular function in adult rodents: a position paper of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial Function. Cardiovasc Res. 117 (1), 43-59 (2021).
  18. Guo, Z., et al. Dynamic assessments of coronary flow reserve after myocardial ischemia reperfusion in mice. J Vis Exp. (198), e65492(2023).
  19. Kelm, N. Q., Beare, J. E., LeBlanc, A. J. Evaluation of coronary flow reserve after myocardial ischemia reperfusion in rats. J Vis Exp. (148), e59675(2019).
  20. Percie du Sert, N., et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18 (7), e3000410(2020).
  21. Schiattarella, G. G., et al. Nitrosative stress drives heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nature. 568 (7752), 351-356 (2019).
  22. Guo, Y., et al. iNOS contributes to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction through mitochondrial dysfunction and Akt S-nitrosylation. J Adv Res. 43, 175-186 (2023).
  23. Xiong, Y., et al. Inhibition of ferroptosis reverses heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in mice. J Transl Med. 22 (1), 199(2024).
  24. Chen, J., et al. Nitazoxanide protects against heart failure with preserved ejection and metabolic syndrome induced by high-fat diet (HFD) plus L-NAME "two-hit" in mice. Acta Pharm Sin B. 15 (3), 1397-1414 (2025).
  25. Lanzer, J. D., et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveal distinctive patterns of fibroblast activation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Basic Res Cardiol. 119 (6), 1001-1028 (2024).
  26. Lenzarini, F., Di Lascio, N., Stea, F., Kusmic, C., Faita, F. Time course of isoflurane-induced vasodilation: a Doppler ultrasound study of the left coronary artery in mice. Ultrasound Med Biol. 42 (4), 999-1009 (2016).
  27. Yang, J. H., et al. Endothelium-dependent and independent coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 22 (3), 432-441 (2020).
  28. Silvani, A., et al. Physiological mechanisms mediating the coupling between heart period and arterial pressure in response to postural changes in humans. Front Physiol. 8, 163(2017).
  29. Mohan, M., Anandh, B., Thombre, D. P., Surange, S. G., Chakrabarty, A. S. Effect of posture on heart rate and cardiac axis of mice. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 31 (3), 211-217 (1987).
  30. Franssen, C., et al. Myocardial microvascular inflammatory endothelial activation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 4 (4), 312-324 (2016).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Coronary Flow ReserveHeart FailurePreserved Ejection FractionDoppler EchocardiographyMouse ModelCoronary Microvascular DysfunctionMyocardial IschemiaVasomotor DysfunctionCoronary Blood FlowIsoflurane Vasodilation

Related Articles