$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been the dominant form of HF and is associated with poor prognosis. However, there is no proven treatment to reduce its related morbidity and mortality1,2. The presence of multiple risk factors, including advanced age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity, underlies the complexity and heterogeneity in HFpEF3. In recent years, accumulating evidence has shown that coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an independent and direct risk factor for HFpEF, rather than a comorbidity4,5,6. Coronary microvascular dysfunction involving both functional and structural abnormalities underlies subendocardial ischemia, diffuse interstitial fibrosis, and left ventricular dysfunction in HFpEF7,8. Extensive research has been conducted on the pathological role of CMD in cardiovascular diseases9,10. A clinical study showed that microvascular dysfunction (evidenced by an impaired CFR <2.0) is directly associated with worse left ventricular diastolic function and may be a promising therapeutic target in HFpEF11. Echocardiographic assessment in the prevalence of microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PROMIS-HFpEF) study revealed that 75% of patients with HFpEF had CMD, based on CFR measurements in the left coronary artery12. Furthermore, the abnormal CMD correlated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including significantly increased mortality hazard13,14. Consequently, employing CMD as a key biomarker in animal models greatly facilitates the investigation of HFpEF pathophysiology and assists in validating the successful replication of the disease phenotype.
Currently, methods for assessing coronary microvascular function, such as positron emission tomography (PET), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), fractional flow reserve (FFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) are difficult to apply in rodent studies due to the small size of the animals and the limited availability of dedicated imaging hardware. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is recommended by international guidelines as a tool for interrogating coronary physiology15,16. Moreover, CFR serves as a reliable marker of cardiac ischemia, a gauge of coronary vascular dysfunction, and a valuable prognostic indicator of cardiovascular risk17. Doppler echocardiography for CFR assessment is a validated and reproducible method for evaluating global coronary vascular function in preclinical rodent models. Although prior studies have reported the use of CFR in mouse/rat models of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury18,19, it has never been applied in animal models of HFpEF. Moreover, the CFR assessment method described in this study, which rapidly locates the LCA using color Doppler echocardiography, can be extended to a range of animal models, including those of diabetic cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease, and chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disorders. In the present study, given the absence of epicardial coronary stenosis in the murine model, the reduction in coronary flow reserve (CFR) primarily reflects coronary microvascular dysfunction rather than combined epicardial and microvascular contributions. Thus, CFR serves as a reliable surrogate marker for CMD in this HFpEF model.