$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Dried recombinant antibody panels were applied to CAR⁺ T cell samples to demonstrate flow cytometry staining workflows. As illustrated in Figure 1, replacing conventional liquid reagent workflows with preformulated dried antibody panels eliminates several preparation steps—including tube labeling (to indicate the panel's antibody composition; each tube still requires the appropriate sample ID), reagent combining, and manual mixing—thereby simplifying the staining process. Tubes include a label that can be scanned with compatible cytometers or read manually, providing flexible options for sample identification.
Representative examples show that the dried immune cell composition panel enables identification of key leukocyte subsets (Figure 2), while the dried CAR T transduction panel allows visualization of CAR-expressing T cells and assessment of transduction (Figure 3). Fc blocking is not required for these panels, and only a single isotype control is needed for all antibodies in the panel. These examples highlight the application of dried panels for multiparametric analysis of CAR T cells and demonstrate how the workflow can be executed efficiently with reduced hands-on steps. The composition of the dried antibody panels used in this study is provided in Table 1.
Figure 4 illustrates the reduction in preparation time for a representative experiment when using dried panels for both less experienced and experienced users. The dried format streamlines staining procedures, minimizes manual handling, and provides practical guidance for workflow implementation and training. Importantly, the use of dried antibody cocktails yielded immune cell subset frequencies comparable to those obtained with conventional liquid cocktails (Figure 5). Additionally, dried antibody panels are stable at room temperature and can be stored at ambient conditions throughout their one-year shelf life, in contrast to conventional liquid antibodies, which typically require cold storage. This stability supports repeated use, long-term studies, and simplified inventory management.
In conclusion, the examples provided demonstrate how dried recombinant antibody panels can be used to streamline the multiparametric characterization of CAR T cells. Overall, this work provides a practical approach for implementing dried antibody panels in flow cytometry-based CAR T cell analysis, with simplified handling, reduced preparation steps, and adaptable panel configurations.

Figure 1: Comparison of manual staining workflow and dried recombinant antibody panels. The traditional manual workflow (top) involves multiple preparation steps, including tube labeling, combining and mixing reagents, and adding samples, which can increase hands-on effort. In contrast, the dried recombinant antibody panel workflow (bottom) uses premixed, dried-down panels that require only the addition of the sample. This streamlined approach reduces manual steps and simplifies the staining process, illustrating workflow efficiency and practical implementation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Flow cytometric analysis of a leukapheresis sample stained with the dried recombinant antibody panel “Immune Cell Composition Cocktail”. (A) Debris was excluded by gating on FSC versus SSC to include all cells. (B) Doublets were removed using an FSC-A versus FSC-H gate. (C) Leukocytes were identified by gating on CD45+ cells, allowing exclusion of residual erythrocytes. (D) Dead cells were excluded using 7-AAD staining. (E,F) CD3+ cells were identified and further classified into (E) T cells and (F) NKT cells based on CD56 expression. (G) T cells were subsequently separated into CD4+ and CD8+ subsets. (H) Within the CD3– population, monocytes were defined by CD14 expression and B cells by CD19 expression. (I) The remaining CD14–/CD19– cells were subdivided into SSC high/CD16– eosinophils, SSC high/CD16+ neutrophils, and SSC low/CD56+/CD16+ cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Flow cytometric analysis of CD19 CAR T cells (FMC63) stained with the dried recombinant antibody panel “CAR T Transduction Cocktail”. (A) Debris was excluded by gating on FSC versus SSC to include all cells. (B) Doublets were removed using an FSC-A versus FSC-H gate. (C) Leukocytes were identified by gating on CD45+ cells. (D) Dead cells were excluded based on 7-AAD− staining. (E,F) CD3+ cells were identified and subsequently separated into CAR+ and CAR− populations. (G) CAR+ and (H) CAR− cells were further subdivided into CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. (I) Within the CD3− population, residual monocytes were defined by CD14 expression. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Time savings achieved with dried antibody panels across experience levels. For non-experienced (left) and experienced users (right), the time was assessed to set up a flow cytometric experiment (dried recombinant antibody panel “Immune Cell Composition Cocktail”, technical triplicates) from the start of the experiment until the start of incubation, including reagent handling, pipetting, and documentation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Flow cytometry analysis of lysed whole blood, overlay of a sample stained with the dried recombinant antibody panel “Immune Cell Composition Cocktail” (blue) and a sample stained with the same antibodies in a liquid format (orange). (A) Debris was excluded by gating on FSC versus SSC to include all cells. (B) Doublets were removed using an FSC-A versus FSC-H gate. (C) Leukocytes were identified by gating on CD45+ cells, thereby excluding residual erythrocytes. (D) Dead cells were excluded using 7-AAD staining. (E) CD3+ cells were identified. (F) These cells were then classified into T cells and NKT cells based on CD56 expression. (G) T cells were subsequently separated into CD4+ and CD8+ subsets. (H) Within the CD3– population, monocytes were defined by CD14 expression and B cells by CD19 expression. (I) The remaining CD14–/CD19– cells were subdivided into SSC high/CD16– eosinophils, SSC high/CD16+ neutrophils, and SSC low/CD56+/CD16+ cells. (J) Frequencies obtained with liquid antibodies and dried reagent panels were compared. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Purpose | V1 VioBlue | V2 VioGreen | B1 FITC | B2 PE | B3 7-AAD PerCP-Vio 700 | B4 PE-Vio770 | R1 APC | R2 APC-Vio770 |
| Determination of cell viability and composition of immune cells | CD45 | CD4 | CD3 | CD56/CD16 | 7-AAD | CD19 | CD14 | CD8 |
| Determination of transduction efficiency of CAR T cells | CD45 | CD4 | CD3 | CAR detection reagent | 7-AAD | / | CD14 | CD8 |
Table 1: Composition of dried recombinant antibody panels used for CAR T cell analysis. This table lists the antibodies included in each dried panel, specifying the target antigen, clone, fluorochrome, and typical amount per tube. Two panels are shown: the “Immune Cell Composition” panel for identification of major leukocyte subsets, and the “CAR T Transduction” panel for detection of CAR expression and T cell subset characterization. The information provides a reference for workflow implementation and optional adaptation with additional liquid-conjugated antibodies.