$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The CRISPR–Cas system, derived from an adaptive immune mechanism in bacteria and archaea, has revolutionized genetic engineering by enabling precise genome editing across diverse organisms1,2. A key component is the single-guide RNA (sgRNA), a chimeric RNA that directs Cas nucleases to specific genomic loci; its modular design allows retargeting through modification of an approximately 20-nucleotide protospacer sequence3. Beyond SpCas9, other Cas nucleases with distinct properties have been widely adopted. Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (saCas9) is smaller, facilitating adeno-associated virus (AAV) delivery and thereby expanding delivery options4. Each system requires specific guide RNA architectures, making a versatile synthesis method highly desirable3.
Traditional methods for generating functional guide RNAs include plasmid-based cloning, commercial sgRNA synthesis kits, or direct commercial synthesis of sgRNAs5,6. Plasmid-based cloning requires multiple labor-intensive steps—restriction digestion, ligation, transformation, and colony screening—typically taking over 48 hours2,4,6. Commercial sgRNA kits, while offering a streamlined workflow (<5 h), remain prohibitively expensive for high-throughput applications, typically costing $35–$45 per reaction. Direct chemical synthesis of sgRNAs offers advantages such as high purity, chemical modifications to enhance stability, and reduced off-target effects7; however, it is prohibitively expensive (typically $200–$280 per sgRNA) for high-throughput applications or large-scale screens requiring hundreds of sgRNAs.
In contrast, the one-step overlapping PCR method described here completes template synthesis in under 5 h using standard primers at a cost of approximately $5–8 per sgRNA, representing a substantial reduction in both time and material cost. Furthermore, sgRNAs produced by this method achieve editing efficiencies comparable to those generated by plasmid-based cloning, as confirmed by in vitro cleavage assays. A comparison of these approaches is illustrated in Figure 1.
Overlap extension PCR (OE-PCR) provides a rapid, ligase-independent strategy for assembling DNA fragments8. This approach has been adapted for sgRNA template synthesis using overlapping primers. In a one-step reaction using four partially overlapping primers, competitive binding occurs: the outer primers (AF1 and Tracr-R) define the amplification boundaries, while the inner primers (AF2 and AF3) must be diluted to ensure orderly extension from both ends toward the center. Despite this theoretical framework, a critical parameter affecting assembly efficiency—the optimal primer ratio—has not been systematically investigated. Furthermore, the broader applicability of such OE-PCR methods across different CRISPR systems remains underexplored.
To address these limitations, a study was designed to optimize and validate a one-step overlapping PCR method for sgRNA template synthesis. The optimal primer ratio was established through a structured experimental design, with agarose gel electrophoresis used to identify conditions yielding a single, correctly sized product. Following optimization, the method's versatility was evaluated across two widely used CRISPR systems (SpCas9 and saCas9), with successful amplification of both templates. Functional validation using in vitro cleavage assays demonstrated that sgRNAs generated using this method achieve efficiencies comparable to those obtained via plasmid-based cloning.
To further assess functionality in a cellular context, SpCas9 sgRNA was complexed with Cas9 protein to form ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes and delivered into HEK293T cells via electroporation. Genome editing at an endogenous locus was evaluated using a T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI) assay, with cleavage patterns on agarose gels indicating detectable indel formation in vivo. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that this method reliably produces high-quality, functional sgRNA templates. The following protocol describes the detailed procedure using SpCas9 as a representative example, with primer templates provided for adaptation to other Cas nucleases.