This study was approved by the Ordu University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval No: 09/11/2017–138). The study was conducted in accordance with relevant institutional and national ethical guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. The consent obtained explicitly covers conducting home visits and collecting house dust samples from residences.
1. Study design
This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study of house dust mite prevalence conducted in the province of Ordu, Turkey. Household dust samples were collected from specific indoor surfaces where mite accumulation is commonly expected. Sampling was performed from mattresses, bedding materials (pillows and quilts), carpets, and upholstered furniture located in bedrooms and living rooms. Dust was collected with a portable vacuum cleaner, and samples from different locations within the same household were pooled to form a composite household dust sample.
2. Study population and clinical cohort definition
The study population consists of individuals who visited the Ear, Nose, and Throat and Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinics at Ordu University Faculty of Medicine Education and Research Hospital due to asthma and/or allergic complaints. The inclusion criteria for participants were being 18 years of age or older, consenting to the collection of dust samples from their home environment, and agreeing to answer the questionnaire. Individuals who did not consent to a home visit, did not provide written consent, or for whom sufficient home dust samples could not be obtained were excluded from the study. Clinical diagnoses were assessed based on patients' self-reports and reasons for outpatient clinic visits; no clinical verification or diagnostic testing was performed. Each patient was matched with a household, and analyses were conducted at the household level. Ordu Province is located in the Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey and features a humid, temperate climate with year-round high humidity, conditions that may favor the survival and proliferation of house dust mites.
3. Sampling unit and sampling method
The primary sampling unit for this study was the household. Multiple sub-dust samples were obtained from different indoor locations within each household, with a particular focus on bedrooms and living areas. Although these sub-samples were collected separately, they were pooled and analyzed as a single composite household dust sample in the laboratory to represent overall indoor mite exposure. To estimate mite density, approximately 1 g of dust from each composite household sample was processed using the lactic acid precipitation method. All mites observed in the prepared microscopic slides derived from this dust sample were counted. The total number of mites detected was then expressed as the number of mites per gram of house dust.
Each household was sampled only once, and no repeated sampling was performed. Household dust samples were collected using disposable dust bags assigned to each sampling area, and a portable vacuum cleaner with a suction power of 1200 W. Sampling was conducted at a standardized rate of approximately 2 min/m2 to ensure consistency and reproducibility across all households.
4. Laboratory procedures and mite identification
Once the samples were brought to the laboratory, they were sieved to remove coarse particles. The samples were examined by the lactic acid precipitation method. The lactic acid precipitation method was used to clarify dust samples by dissolving organic debris, facilitating the separation and visualization of mites and enabling reliable microscopic detection and morphological identification. One gram of house dust was added to 5 mL of 90% lactic acid in test tubes. The tubes were gently mixed and incubated for 1 h. After incubation, samples collected from both the surface and the bottom of the liquid were mounted between a slide and a coverslip and examined under a light microscope at 100×, 200×, and 400× magnifications15. Species identification was subsequently performed on dust samples in which mites were detected.
Samples in which mites were detected were defined as “mite positive”. The presence of at least one mite in any developmental stage (larva, nymph, or adult) in a dwelling was considered sufficient for the dwelling to be considered mite positive. For species identification in positive samples, mites visible under a stereomicroscope were collected using a fine-tipped insulin syringe needle after filtration from the supernatant onto filter paper and were mounted in Hoyer’s medium. Prepared specimens were examined under a light microscope for morphological identification. Statistical analyses were performed using statistical analysis software16,17,18,19,20. Specimens were identified to species, genus, or higher taxonomic levels depending on the developmental stage and the availability of diagnostic features. Dermatophagoides spp. includes larval, protonymph, and deutonymph stages that could not be reliably identified to the species level. Oribatida represents mites identified at the order level. Unidentified larva and nymph refer to immature specimens, and unidentified imago to adult specimens, that could not be taxonomically classified due to insufficient or damaged morphological characteristics. The total number represents the cumulative count of all mite individuals detected across positive samples.
5. Survey application and variable definitions
A survey containing questions about demographic characteristics, housing structure, environmental factors, and allergic complaints was administered to participants. Data were evaluated based on participants' statements and were not clinically verified.
6. Statistical analysis
The association between categorical variables was examined using the chi-square test, and the change in mite density according to demographic and vital characteristics was examined using the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the association between the dependent variable (mite positivity) and the independent variables. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.