$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Ethical statement
All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by Fujian Ambry Biotechnology Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee approval number:IACUC FJABR2024031202). Perform all animal experiments in accordance with the approved institutional animal care and use protocol.
SDD and ibuprofen preparation
SDD consists of Shixiao San (9 g), Xiangfu (9 g), Moyao (6 g), Guizhi (9 g), Weilingxian (12 g), Shijianchuan (20 g), Yanhusuo (12 g), Danggui (9 g), Liujinu (15 g), and Xiaohuixiang (5 g). Shixiao San consists of Puhuang (4.5 g) and Wulingzhi (4.5 g). All herbal components were used as concentrated granules and are listed in the Table of Materials. Prepare SDD by dissolving 106 g of concentrated granules in 200 mL of boiling water to obtain a final concentration of 0.53 g/mL crude drug equivalent. Mix thoroughly until the granules are completely dissolved, allow the solution to cool to room temperature, and administer it by intragastric gavage at 2.5 mL/kg per administration. Prepare the ibuprofen suspension according to the required concentration for intragastric gavage. Administer ibuprofen at 0.02 g/kg as the positive control treatment.
Animals and grouping
Use 36 healthy adult female Sprague-Dawley rats of specific pathogen-free grade, aged 2–3 months and weighing 200 ± 20 g, with no history of pregnancy or mating. Maintain the rats under a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle at 22 ± 2 °C and 50%–70% relative humidity, with free access to standard chow and drinking water. After 1 week of acclimatization, randomly assign the rats into six groups (n = 6 per group): blank, model, SDD, TEAP, SDD + TEAP, and ibuprofen groups.
QSBSPD model preparation and administration
In this experiment, the widely accepted model of OT-induced dysmenorrhea was employed. In brief, rat estrous cycles were assessed through vaginal smears. Rats were deemed eligible for inclusion in the study if their estrous cycle duration was determined to be 4–5 days.
With the exception of the blank group, the rats in the experimental groups were administered subcutaneous injection of estradiol benzoate and epinephrine hydrochloride daily for 10 days. After injection of epinephrine hydrochloride at a dosage of 0.9 mg/kg daily, the rats were exposed to various combined stimulation (A: Acoustic stimulation: rats were exposed to acoustic stimuli (90 dB, 1 kHz) for 5 min/time, 3–4 times daily, with a 2-h interval between each time. B: Light stimulation: rats were exposed to flashing light stimuli for 5 min/time, 3–4 times daily, with a 2-h interval between each time. C: Electrical stimulation: rats were subjected to electrical stimulation (biphasic square-wave pulses) at 30–35 V, with alternating current applied for 0.3 s every 2 s. This stimulation was administered for 5 min every 2 h, 2–4 times daily. D: Restraint: rats were placed in a restraint cage constructed from barbed wire, measuring approximately 25 cm in length and 5 cm in diameter. Once inside the cage, the ends were clamped to immobilize the rats and restrict their movement for 2 h, once per day). In addition, on days 1 and 10, the rats were subcutaneously injected with 5.0 mg/kg/day of estradiol benzoate, and on days 2–9, they received 2.5 mg/kg/day.
Starting from the 5th day of estradiol benzoate injection, the rats received intragastric administration of different drugs for 7 days, twice daily at 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., except the ibuprofen group, which received once daily at 10:00 a.m. In the blank, model, and TEAP groups, the rats were administered 2.5 mL/kg of normal saline. In SDD and TEAP+SDD groups, the rats received 2.5 mL/kg of SDD (prepared as 106 g of crude drug dissolved in 200 mL of water, 0.53 g/mL); this dose was converted from the adult clinical daily dose of 106 g based on body surface area equivalence, resulting in a rat-equivalent dose. In the ibuprofen group, the rats received 0.02 g/kg of ibuprofen suspension. In TEAP and TEAP+SDD groups, the rats received TEAP stimulation starting from the 5th day following estradiol benzoate injection. Attach the electrodes to the bilateral Jiaogan, Shenmen, Neishengzhiqi, and Neifenmi auricular points, as defined according to a previously reported standard for rat acupoint localization12. These points are situated in the bilateral ear conchal cavity, innervated by the vagus nerve. The electrodes were connected to an electronic needle therapy instrument, delivering a continuous wave for 20 min (frequency: 20 Hz; intensity: 1 mA), once per day. The TEAP+SDD group rats underwent TEAP after the first SDD gavage every day. The final TEAP stimulation was conducted prior to the intraperitoneal injection of OT.
At 24 h after the last estradiol benzoate injection, that is, on the 11th day, 1 h after the last intragastric administration, except for the blank and TEAP groups, the rats in other groups received 2 U of OT per rat with intraperitoneal injection. The rats in the TEAP group underwent intraperitoneal injection of OT at a dosage of 2 U per rat after the final TEAP stimulation. The rats in the blank group did not receive OT injection. This protocol successfully established a rat model of QSBSPD. The overall animal selection, model preparation, drug administration schedule, TEAP stimulation parameters, and auricular point locations are summarized in Figure 1.
Wright-Giemsa staining
The estrous cycle was determined by Wright-Giemsa staining of vaginal smears. A sterile cotton swab was moistened with 0.9% sodium chloride solution and gently inserted 0.5–1.0 cm into the vaginal canal. The swab was rotated 1–2 times to collect vaginal exfoliated cells, and the sample was evenly smeared onto a clean glass slide in one direction. The smear was air-dried at room temperature. Wright-Giemsa staining solution was added to cover the smear and incubated for 5 min. An equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline was then added to the staining solution, and staining was continued for another 5 min. The slide was gently rinsed three times with ultrapure water, air-dried, and examined under a light microscope. The stage of the estrous cycle was identified according to the dominant cell types, including nucleated epithelial cells, cornified epithelial cells, and leukocytes.
Sample collection
Rats were placed in an anesthesia induction box with isoflurane concentration set at 3% to 5%. After the rats lost consciousness, they were transferred to the operating table and maintained under anesthesia with a mask on. The concentration was reduced to 1.5% to 2.5%. The abdominal fur of the rat was trimmed using scissors and subsequently disinfected with a topical application of alcohol. An incision of 2–3 cm was made along the median abdominal line. One side of the uterus, along with its ligaments, was exteriorized, and the adipose tissue adhering to the uterine surface was excised. The uterine tissue was then carefully isolated. If the rat is still alive after sampling, euthanize it using CO₂ asphyxiation.
Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining
Uterine tissues were fixed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at a thickness of 5 µm. The sections were dewaxed in xylene twice for 10 min each. The sections were then rehydrated sequentially in absolute ethanol twice for 5 min each, followed by 95%, 90%, 80%, and 70% ethanol for 5 min each. The sections were rinsed in ultrapure water. Hematoxylin staining was performed for 5 min, and the sections were rinsed with water until no excess dye remained. The sections were immersed in phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min for bluing. The sections were then stained with eosin for 1 min and rinsed with water. Subsequently, the sections were dehydrated in 95% ethanol for 10 min and absolute ethanol for 10 min, cleared in xylene for 10 min, and mounted with neutral resin. Representative images were acquired using a light microscope or digital slide scanner.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Fresh uterine tissues were rinsed with pre-cooled phosphate-buffered saline to remove residual blood. Each tissue sample was weighed, cut into small pieces, and homogenized in pre-cooled phosphate-buffered saline at a tissue-to-buffer ratio of 1:9. The homogenate was centrifuged at 5000 × g for 5–10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected for subsequent analysis. Levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, PGF2α, and PGE2 were measured using rat ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All reagents and microplate strips were equilibrated to room temperature before use. Standards or samples (50 µL) were added to the designated wells. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated detection antibody (100 µL) was added to each well except the blank wells, and the plate was sealed and incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. The liquid was discarded, and each well was washed five times with diluted washing buffer. Subsequently, 50 µL of substrate A and 50 µL of substrate B were added to each well, followed by incubation at 37 °C in the dark for 15 min. Stop solution (50 µL) was then added to each well, and the optical density was measured at 450 nm within 15 min. Sample concentrations were calculated from the standard curves.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from uterine tissues using a total RNA extraction reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen, and 1 mL of RNA extraction reagent was added. The lysate was incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Chloroform (200 µL) was then added, and the mixture was shaken vigorously for 15 s, incubated at room temperature for 5 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 12 min at 4 °C. The aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube, mixed gently with an equal volume of isopropanol, and incubated at −20 °C for 15 min. The samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was discarded, and the RNA pellet was washed with 75% ethanol. The pellet was air-dried and dissolved in RNase-free water. RNA concentration and purity were determined using a microvolume spectrophotometer. Genomic DNA was removed, and cDNA was synthesized according to the reverse transcription reagent instructions. For genomic DNA removal, total RNA was incubated with the genomic DNA removal reagent at 42 °C for 5 min and then placed on ice. Reverse transcription was performed at 50 °C for 15 min, followed by 75 °C for 5 min to terminate the reaction.
Real-time PCR was performed using a SYBR Green-based qPCR mix. Each 20 µL reaction contained 2 µL of cDNA, 0.4 µL of forward primer, 0.4 µL of reverse primer, 10 µL of 2× SYBR qPCR mix, and 7.2 µL of nuclease-free water. The qPCR was run using the following cycling program: 95 °C for 1 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 56 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 38 s; followed by melting curve analysis. GAPDH was used as the internal control, and relative mRNA expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Each biological sample was measured in technical triplicate. The mean Ct value of the technical triplicates was used to calculate ΔCt and relative mRNA expression for each biological replicate. The primer sequences are as follows: PPAR-γ2, forward 5′-CGGAAGCCCTTTGGTGACTT-3′ and reverse 5′-CTCGATGGGCTTCACGTTCA-3′; COX-2, forward 5′-AACCAGGTGAACTTCGTCTATTAG-3′ and reverse 5′-GGTCGGTTTGATGTCACTGTA-3′; GAPDH, forward 5′-GGTTGTCTCCTGCGACTTCA-3′ and reverse 5′-GGTGGTCCAGGGTTTCTTACTC-3′.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using statistical software. All quantitative data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. For qRT-PCR analysis, technical triplicates were first averaged for each biological replicate, and statistical analysis was performed using the biological replicate values. Comparisons among multiple groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests when the data met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.