Brain metastases are the most common malignant tumors affecting the central nervous system (CNS), occurring more frequently than primary brain tumors. Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the primary cancers that most often metastasize to the brain1. Among these, breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) represent a major clinical challenge, affecting 10%–30% of patients with metastatic disease and showing increasing incidence due to improved systemic therapies and advances in neuroimaging2. The prognosis for patients with BCBM remains poor, as available treatments – including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy – are largely palliative, and neurological symptoms severely impact quality of life3. Although targeted therapies and immunotherapies are being explored as complementary strategies, the clinical benefit of immunotherapy in brain metastases remains limited4,5,6.
Recent work has refined our understanding of brain immunity and renewed interest in functional lymphatic pathways associated with the CNS, including lymphatic vessels in the meninges7 and nasal mucosa8. These structures form a continuous lymphatic network surrounding the brain and extending adjacent to the olfactory bulb and the cribriform plate, ultimately connecting to cervical lymph nodes. This system plays key roles in fluid homeostasis, immune surveillance, and immune cell trafficking between the CNS and peripheral lymphoid organs9. As interest grows in immunotherapeutic approaches for brain tumors and metastases, these lymphatic-immune interfaces are emerging as promising, yet still understudied, routes through which systemic immunity may communicate with intracranial lesions. In addition, the mechanisms governing immune cell recruitment into the brain tumor microenvironment and how these cells interact within this unique environment remain poorly understood. Together, these gaps underscore the need for preclinical models and procedures that allow comprehensive analysis of tumor-immune interactions and support the development of strategies to improve anti-tumor immunity against brain metastases.
Here, we describe a protocol that combines the generation of a reproducible, immunocompetent BCBM mouse model through stereotaxic intracranial inoculation of E0771 cells with the isolation and dissociation of the meninges and olfactory bulb for immunophenotyping by spectral flow cytometry. This approach enables controlled modeling of BCBM to assess the safety and efficacy of therapeutic interventions and allows in-depth characterization of immune and stromal populations at the brain lymphatic-immune interface, providing insight into the cellular players that shape the brain tumor microenvironment and influence treatment responses.
Animal models remain indispensable for studying brain metastases, as many critical aspects of metastatic progression cannot be replicated in vitro. Several in vivo mouse models have been developed to generate brain metastases, each with specific advantages and limitations10. Spontaneous metastasis models, including orthotopic implantation or genetically engineered mouse models, more closely mimic clinical disease progression but rarely generate intracranial lesions, require long experimental timelines, and often yield high variability due to widespread extracranial disease. Systemic approaches, including intracardiac, intracarotid, or tail-vein injections, introduce tumor cells into the circulation and better mimic hematogenous dissemination, blood-brain barrier extravasation, and colonization. However, these models do not capture the early steps of primary tumor invasion and frequently produce extensive and variable extracranial metastases, particularly in the lungs. Among systemic models, intracarotid injection has the lowest variability, but it requires advanced surgical expertise. Alternatively, intracranial injection offers several advantages, including precise control over tumor location, rapid and reproducible tumor development, and reduced variability between experiments. This approach may also be complemented by orthotopic primary tumor implantation followed by surgical resection to more accurately mimic the metastatic course. Although intracranial injection does not recapitulate the full metastatic cascade and is not suited for studying early invasion and dissemination, it provides a robust model to evaluate therapeutic efficacy against established lesions and to investigate interactions within the brain microenvironment. A known limitation is that the injection itself may induce local neuroinflammation, potentially influencing immune readouts, which can be assessed by comparing immune profiles in injected and non-injected mice.
The immune characterization of the meninges and olfactory bulb remains a relatively new and underexplored area of research. Most studies rely on whole-brain or cervical lymph node samples11, which fail to capture the distinct cellular composition and specialized immune functions of these lymphatic-associated tissues. Recovering both structures provides a broader and more informative view of brain immunity. When combined with multiparametric spectral flow cytometry, this workflow supports high-throughput profiling of abundant and rare immune cell populations involved in CNS-peripheral immune communication. This includes quantification of surface and intracellular markers to identify cell subsets, assess activation states, and evaluate treatment-induced changes. Other methodologies for CNS immune analysis not covered by this protocol include immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF), which preserve the spatial distribution of immune cells but are limited by low marker multiplexing, subjective quantification, and underrepresentation of rare cell types12. More recently, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has expanded the ability to profile CNS immune populations by enabling the discovery of cellular states and transcriptional programs at high resolution. Despite offering powerful transcriptomic insight, scRNA-seq is limited by cost, dissociation artifacts, transcript dropout, and loss of protein-level resolution13,14. Flow cytometry, while lacking spatial analysis and being sensitive to dissociation-related effects, offers superior phenotypic resolution through an advanced multiparametric panel and provides robust quantitative immune profiling.
Together, the methodologies described here provide a flexible and powerful platform for modeling BCBM and interrogating immune dynamics at CNS lymphatic interfaces, supporting preclinical development of therapies targeting both the brain tumor microenvironment and its associated immune regulatory pathways.