Research Article

In Vitro Evaluation of Oral Irrigator–Assisted Mouthrinse Application on Color Stability of Single-Shade Nanohybrid Resin Composites

132 views

DOI:

10.3791/70650

May 8th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

This protocol describes an in vitro method to evaluate how different mouthrinse formulations and application methods influence the color stability of single-shade nanohybrid resin composites, demonstrating measurable differences between treatment conditions.

Abstract

Color stability is a key determinant of the long-term esthetic performance of resin-based restorative materials. Single-shade nanohybrid resin composites, developed to simplify shade selection, remain susceptible to extrinsic discoloration and routine oral hygiene procedures. This study aimed to evaluate color stability following coffee staining and subsequent use of different mouthrinse formulations applied with or without an oral irrigator. Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated, stained with coffee, and subjected to mouthrinses using either static immersion or oral irrigator–assisted delivery. Color measurements were obtained at baseline, after staining, and after mouthrinse application, and color changes (ΔE₀₀) were calculated for discoloration after coffee staining (ΔE₁), color change after mouthrinse application (ΔE₂), and total color change (ΔE₃) using the CIEDE2000 formula. Statistical analysis was performed using robust three-way ANOVA with trimmed means. Surface morphology was additionally evaluated using environmental scanning electron microscopy. The results demonstrated that coffee staining resulted in a clinically unacceptable color change in all groups (ΔE₀₀ > 0.8). Composite type significantly influenced color change after coffee staining (ΔE₁) and total color change (ΔE₃) (p < 0.001). Mouthrinse type significantly affected color change after mouthrinse application and total color change (ΔE₂ and ΔE₃) (p = 0.001). Application method significantly affected total color change (ΔE₃) (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that within the Charisma Diamond One composite (DO), ΔE₃ values were significantly higher in the oral irrigator group compared to direct immersion (p = 0.001), and within the irrigator group, the DO composite exhibited significantly higher ΔE₃ values than the Vittra APS Unique composite (p = 0.001). These findings demonstrate that composite formulation and mouthrinse application method significantly influence post-staining color stability, with oral irrigator use exacerbating discoloration in certain materials. Clinically, this suggests that restorative material selection and oral hygiene practices should be carefully considered to minimize esthetic degradation.

Introduction

The demand for highly esthetic restorative materials has led to the development of resin composites designed to mimic the optical properties of natural dental tissues. Among these, single-shade nanohybrid resin composites have gained increasing attention due to their chameleon-like blending ability, simplified shade selection, and reduced clinical complexity1,2,3. Despite these advantages, their long-term esthetic performance remains strongly dependent on resistance to extrinsic discoloration caused by dietary chromogens and routine oral hygiene practices4

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This study was conducted at the Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. No human or animal subjects were involved; therefore, institutional ethical approval was not required. The reagents and equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials. Figure 1 illustrates the experimental workflow used in this study. Specimen preparation was first performed to fabricate disc-shaped composite samples (8 mm × 2 mm). Baseline color measurements were then obtained prior to staining. All specimens were subsequently immersed in a coffee solution for 12 days to induce discoloration,....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Specimen Preparation

Color change (ΔE) was evaluated across composite type, group, and different periods (ΔE₁, ΔE₂, and ΔE₃), corresponding to the sequential steps of the experimental protocol (Tables 4 and 5, Figure 2).

EffectQp-value
Composit.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Esthetic outcomes are central to the clinical success of resin composite restorations, as long-term color stability determines their ability to harmonize with surrounding dental tissues. Nanohybrid composites incorporating nanometric and submicron fillers have been developed to improve optical integration, polishability, and resistance to discoloration22,23. More recently, single-shade resin composites have been introduced as a simplified alternative to conventio.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the laboratory staff and technical team for their assistance with specimen preparation and imaging procedures. This study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Marmara University (Project No. 11323).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Aluminum oxide abrasive discs3M ESPE, USASof-Lex XTSequential finishing from coarse to superfine grit
Coffee powder (instant)Nestlé, SwitzerlandNescafé ClassicUsed for preparation of staining solution
Diamond polishing system3M ESPE, USASof-Lex Diamond Polishing SystemFinal polishing procedure
Distilled waterBotafarma, TurkeyDistilled Water Storage and rinsing medium (control solution)
Environmental scanning electron microscopeCarl Zeiss, GermanyEVO MA10Operated at 10 kV
Glass slide (cement glass)AmScope, USABS-50P-100S-22Used to flatten specimen surfaces
Light-curing unitUltradent, USAVALO CordlessOutput verified (~1000 mW/cm²)
Microsoft excel spreadsheetMicrosoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USAExcelUsed for CIEDE2000 calculations
Mouthrinse (Crest 3D White)Procter & Gamble, USACrest 3D WhiteHydrogen peroxide–based
Mouthrinse (Listerine Fresh Burst)Johnson & Johnson, USAListerine Fresh BurstAlcohol-containing
Mouthrinse (Colgate Plax Whitening + Charcoal)Colgate-Palmolive, USAColgate Plax Whitening + CharcoalCharcoal-containing
Mouthrinse (Sensodyne Pronamel)Haleon, UKSensodyne PronamelFluoride-containing
Oral irrigatorProcter & Gamble, USAOral-B Oxyjet MD20Medium pressure setting (~55–65 psi)
Polyester stripExtra DentalUniversal StripsUsed to reduce oxygen inhibition
Resin composite (Charisma Diamond One)Kulzer, GermanyCharisma Diamond OneTCD-DI-HEA-based
Resin composite (Vittra APS Unique)FGM, BrazilVittra APS UniqueAPS technology
Silicone mold (prefabricated)Hagiki, TurkeyTransparentDisc-shaped (8 mm × 2 mm)
SpectrophotometerVITA Zahnfabrik, GermanyEasyshade VUsed for color measurement
StereomicroscopeLeica, GermanyTrinocular stereomicroscopeUsed for defect inspection at 20× magnification
Statistical softwareR Core TeamR version 4.2.2Used for data analysis
Statistical software packageR Foundation for Statistical Computing, AustriaWRS2Robust ANOVA (trimmed means)
Statistical power analysis softwareHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, GermanyG*PowerUsed for sample size calculation

References

  1. Islam, M. S., Huda, N., Mahendran, S. The blending effect of single-shade composite with different shades of conventional resin composites—an in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 17, 342-348 (2023).
  2. Cruz da Silva, E. T., et al.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Coffee StainingSingle Shade CompositeSurface MorphologyEnvironmental Scanning Electron MicroscopyCIEDE2000 FormulaThree Way ANOVA

Related Articles