$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Establishment of the lung-on-a-chip co-culture models
Brightfield imaging revealed cell adhesion and growth over time in the lung-on-a-chip co-culture system. Bronchial airway epithelial cells proliferated in submerged culture at the liquid–liquid interface (LLI), forming a uniform layer along the top channel (Figure 6A), while pulmonary vascular endothelial cells expanded to cover the entire bottom channel, forming a confluent monolayer (Figure 6B).
Once the co-culture was established, endothelial cells were monitored at the inlet and outlet regions of the bottom channel, which are the only areas accessible for microscopic inspection. As shown in Figure 7, endothelial cells remained viable and exhibited an elongated morphology aligned with the direction of flow. After 14 days of ALI culture, the epithelial layer in both healthy and COPD models displayed visible ciliary beating (Supplementary Video). As expected, the COPD model exhibited markedly increased mucus production compared to the healthy model (Figure 8), recapitulating key features of COPD pathology.

Figure 6: Co-culture of airway epithelial and endothelial cells in the microfluidic device.
Representative images of primary bronchial epithelial cells on the upper surface (A) and primary pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells on the lower surface (B) of the porous membrane under liquid–liquid interface (LLI) conditions. Scale bar: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Endothelial cells in the bottom microfluidic channel during air–liquid interface.
Representative brightfield images showing pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells at the inlet (upper) and outlet (lower) of the bottom channel during air–liquid interface (ALI). Scale bar: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Mucus accumulation in the airway channel.
Representative images showing mucus production after 14 days of air–liquid interface (ALI) in healthy (A) and COPD (B) co-culture models. The brown layer in the airway compartment represents accumulated mucus. Scale bar: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Quantitative assessment of barrier integrity
Functional assessment of barrier integrity showed lower apparent permeability (Papp) in both healthy and COPD models compared to the positive control (ECM-coated chip without cells) (Figure 9).
In the absence of cells, high Papp values indicated minimal barrier formation. In contrast, in the presence of epithelial and endothelial layers, the fluorescent dextran tracer did not cross the ECM, resulting in markedly decreased permeability and indicating a strong barrier. This effect was observed both prior to ALI and after 10 days of ALI, demonstrating that barrier function is established early during differentiation.
As shown in Figure 10, in the healthy model, mean Papp values before ALI were already below the threshold indicative of robust barrier integrity (1 × 10⁻6 cm/s) and decreased further during ALI culture. In the COPD model, mean Papp values were also within the strong barrier range before ALI and, although slightly increased after 10 days of ALI, barrier integrity remained robust.

Figure 9: Barrier function assessment in the lung-on-a-chip model.
Apparent permeability (Papp) measured in ECM-coated chips without cells (positive control for leakage; black), and in healthy (pink) and COPD (green) co-culture models before and after 10 days of air–liquid interface (ALI). Each dot represents an individual chip. The healthy model includes cells from separate donors, whereas the COPD model uses cells derived from a single patient. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10: Comparison of barrier function in healthy and COPD models.
Apparent permeability (Papp) measured before and after 10 days of air–liquid interface (ALI) in healthy (left) and COPD (right) co-culture models. Each dot represents an individual chip. Values are mean ± SD. The COPD model includes cells from three patients, whereas the healthy model combines cells from different donors. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Immunodetection of tight and adherens junctions
Immunofluorescence analysis confirmed the structural organization of junctional proteins. ZO-1 showed continuous localization along bronchial epithelial cell borders, indicating an intact epithelial barrier (Figure 11A). Similarly, VE-cadherin staining revealed uniform distribution at endothelial junctions, consistent with a confluent endothelial monolayer. Endothelial cells exhibited an elongated morphology aligned with the direction of flow (Figure 11B).
No differences were observed between the healthy and COPD models in the localization of tight and adherens junction proteins. These findings are consistent with the functional barrier data, supporting the presence of a physiologically relevant epithelial–endothelial interface with preserved junctional integrity in both models.

Figure 11: Junctional protein expression in the lung-on-a-chip co-culture model.
Top-view immunofluorescence images obtained after 14 days of air–liquid interface (ALI) showing ZO-1 localization in the airway epithelial compartment (A) and VE-cadherin localization in the endothelial compartment (B). Nuclei are stained with DAPI. The arrow indicates flow direction. Scale bar: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Phenotyping
Immunofluorescent staining of chip cryosections revealed β-tubulin IV-positive cells on the apical side of the membrane, indicating differentiation of airway epithelial cells into ciliated cells, a defining feature of mature bronchial epithelium (Figure 12A). CD31 staining confirmed the presence of a confluent endothelial monolayer along the basal side of the membrane (Figure 12B). These results demonstrate that the co-culture system supports the establishment of physiologically relevant epithelial and endothelial phenotypes in both models.

Figure 12: Immunofluorescence images of lung-on-a-chip cross-sections. Representative immunofluorescent staining of chip cross-sections after 14 days of air–liquid interface (ALI) showing β-tubulin IV expression in the airway epithelial compartment (A) and CD31 expression in the endothelial compartment (B). Nuclei are stained with DAPI. Scale bar: 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
RNA extraction and quantification
RNA isolated from airway epithelial cells yielded concentrations ranging from 59 to 135 ng/µL, with RNA Integrity Numbers (RIN)11 of 7.4–9.6, whereas RNA from microvascular endothelial cells ranged from 12 to 46 ng/µL, with RIN values of 9.6–10, in both models. Data indicated that both models achieved sufficient quantities of high-quality RNA, suitable for downstream molecular analyses.
Supplementary Table 1: Donor information for the bronchial airway epithelial cells. The table represents bronchial airway epithelial cells used in the healthy model.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table 2: Donor information for the pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells. Donor information for pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells used in the healthy model.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table 3: Patient information. The table represents information for airway epithelial and pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells used in the COPD model.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table 4: Overview of key reagents and culture media used in the protocol.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Video 1: Ciliary beating in the airway channel (healthy model).
Representative video showing ciliary beating after 14 days of air–liquid interface (ALI).Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Video 2: Ciliary beating in the airway channel (COPD model).
Representative video showing ciliary beating after 14 days of air–liquid interface (ALI).Please click here to download this file.