$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
FSEC alleviates histopathological injury and improves oxidative-stress-related indices in mice with ulcerative colitis
As shown in Figure 2, the normal control group exhibited intact colonic mucosal architecture, with well-organized glands and minimal inflammatory cell infiltration. In contrast, the model group displayed severe mucosal injury characterized by epithelial disruption, mucosal ulceration, glandular destruction, congestion, and marked inflammatory-cell infiltration. Compared with the model group, mice treated with high-, medium-, or low-dose FSEC showed reduced histopathological damage, including less mucosal destruction and inflammatory-cell infiltration. The most pronounced histological improvement was observed in the high-dose and medium-dose FSEC groups and in the CRX-526 positive-control group.

Figure 2: Histopathological changes in colon tissues from mice with experimental ulcerative colitis. Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained colon sections are shown for the following groups: (A) normal control, (B) model, (C) high-dose FSEC, (D) medium-dose FSEC, (E) low-dose FSEC, and (F) CRX-526 positive control. The model group exhibited marked mucosal disruption, glandular destruction, congestion, and inflammatory-cell infiltration, whereas reduced histopathological injury was observed in the FSEC-treated and CRX-526-treated groups. Magnification, ×400. Scale bar = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Oxidative-stress-related indices were subsequently evaluated (Table 1). Compared with the normal control group, the model group exhibited significantly lower serum SOD, CAT, and GSH levels and significantly higher MPO levels (P < 0.01), indicating impaired antioxidant defenses and increased inflammatory oxidative activity. Relative to the model group, FSEC treatment increased SOD, CAT, and GSH levels while decreasing MPO levels, with the greatest changes observed in the high-dose FSEC group. These findings are consistent with improvement in oxidative-stress-related biochemical alterations in experimental UC.
| Group | SOD (U/mL) | GSH (mg/L) | CAT (U/mL) | MPO (U/L) |
| Normal control | 252.06 ± 22.36 | 30.07 ± 1.01 | 10.05 ± 2.01 | 180.05 ± 22.01 |
| Model | 149.07 ± 29.38** | 15.85 ± 5.01** | 5.84 ± 0.91** | 382.65 ± 32.81** |
| High-dose FSEC | 190.76 ± 32.17**,## | 20.11 ± 3.22**,## | 7.86 ± 1.84**,## | 202.65 ± 30.65## |
| Medium-dose FSEC | 161.53 ± 16.27** | 16.83 ± 3.01** | 7.25 ± 1.12**,## | 262.65 ± 35.62**,## |
| Low-dose FSEC | 151.31 ± 28.21** | 16.52 ± 2.72** | 5.45 ± 1.34** | 302.15 ± 45.71**,## |
| CRX-526 positive control | 192.69 ± 30.19**,## | 20.13 ± 3.02**,## | 7.17 ± 1.74**,## | 198.95 ± 30.27## |
| Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6 per group). SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH, glutathione; CAT, catalase; MPO, myeloperoxidase; FSEC, five-flavor Sophora flavescens enteric-coated capsules. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. **P < 0.01 versus the normal control group; ##P < 0.01 versus the model group. |
Table 1: Comparison of serum oxidative-stress-related indices among groups. Serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels were measured in normal control, model, FSEC-treated, and CRX-526-treated mice. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
FSEC modulates inflammatory cytokines and reduces JAK2/STAT3 immunostaining in mice with ulcerative colitis
Inflammatory cytokine levels were measured in colon tissues (Table 2). Compared with the normal control group, the model group exhibited increased TNF-α and IL-1α levels and decreased IL-13 levels, indicating disruption of cytokine homeostasis following UC induction. Compared with the model group, FSEC treatment reduced TNF-α and IL-1α levels, whereas IL-13 levels were partially restored. The high-dose FSEC group and the CRX-526 positive-control group exhibited the most apparent improvements in cytokine profiles.
| Group | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-1α (pg/mL) | IL-13 (pg/mL) |
| Normal control | 31.304 ± 7.301 | 51.705 ± 6.802 | 122.035 ± 15.401 |
| Model | 311.721 ± 50.103** | 263.337 ± 30.103** | 92.535 ± 16.511** |
| High-dose FSEC | 148.429 ± 17.711##,†† | 149.253 ± 16.241##,†† | 105.201 ± 5.205##,†† |
| Medium-dose FSEC | 190.239 ± 26.151## | 162.721 ± 15.281## | 102.215 ± 5.721## |
| Low-dose FSEC | 281.290 ± 6.310## | 167.350 ± 5.610## | 100.262 ± 5.413## |
| CRX-526 positive control | 149.210 ± 17.151##,†† | 147.821 ± 17.131##,†† | 106.301 ± 5.405##,†† |
| ed as mean ± SD (n = 6 per group). TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-1α, interleukin-1 alpha; IL-13, interleukin-13; FSEC, five-flavor Sophora flavescens enteric-coated capsules. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. **P < 0.01 versus the normal control group; ##P < 0.01 versus the model group; ††P < 0.01 versus the medium-dose and low-dose FSEC groups. No significant difference was observed between the CRX-526 positive-control group and the high-dose FSEC group for the three cytokines (P > 0.05). |
Table 2: Comparison of colon tissue cytokine levels among groups. Colon tissue concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1α), and interleukin-13 (IL-13) were determined in normal control, model, FSEC-treated, and CRX-526-treated mice. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
JAK2 and STAT3 expression were further evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. As shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, JAK2 and STAT3 immunostaining appeared stronger in the model group than in the normal control group. In contrast, staining intensity appeared weaker in the FSEC-treated groups and in the CRX-526 positive-control group than in the model group. These observations are consistent with reduced inflammatory signaling in experimental UC following treatment.

Figure 3: Immunohistochemical analysis of JAK2 expression in colon tissues. Representative JAK2-stained sections are shown for the following groups: (A) normal control, (B) model, (C) high-dose FSEC, (D) medium-dose FSEC, (E) low-dose FSEC, and (F) CRX-526 positive control. JAK2 immunostaining appeared stronger in the model group than in the normal control group and appeared weaker following FSEC or CRX-526 treatment. Magnification, ×400. Scale bar = 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Immunohistochemical analysis of STAT3 expression in colon tissues. Representative STAT3-stained sections are shown for the following groups: (A) normal control, (B) model, (C) high-dose FSEC, (D) medium-dose FSEC, (E) low-dose FSEC, and (F) CRX-526 positive control. STAT3 immunostaining appeared stronger in the model group than in the normal control group and appeared weaker following FSEC or CRX-526 treatment. Magnification, ×400. Scale bar = 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
FSEC improves ferroptosis-related marker changes in mice with ulcerative colitis
Ferroptosis-related indices were assessed by serum Fe2⁺ measurement and western blot analysis of GPX4, FTH1, and ACSL4 (Table 3 and Figure 5). Compared with the normal control group, the model group exhibited significantly increased Fe2⁺ levels and ACSL4 expression, together with decreased GPX4 and FTH1 expression (P < 0.01). These findings are consistent with ferroptosis-related alterations in the UC model.
| Group | Fe²⁺ (mg/L) | GPX4 | FTH1 | ACSL4 |
| Normal control | 0.74 ± 0.31 | 0.86 ± 0.05 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.07 |
| Model | 6.13 ± 0.71** | 0.31 ± 0.03** | 0.31 ± 0.03** | 0.75 ± 0.11** |
| High-dose FSEC | 2.79 ± 0.62**,## | 0.69 ± 0.07**,## | 0.66 ± 0.08**,## | 0.51 ± 0.06**,## |
| Medium-dose FSEC | 4.38 ± 1.36** | 0.59 ± 0.05**,## | 0.53 ± 0.05**,## | 0.61 ± 0.08**,## |
| Low-dose FSEC | 5.32 ± 0.48** | 0.45 ± 0.06**,## | 0.35 ± 0.06** | 0.63 ± 0.08**,## |
| CRX-526 positive control | 2.73 ± 0.55**,## | 0.68 ± 0.08**,## | 0.68 ± 0.08**,## | 0.49 ± 0.07**,## |
| a are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6 per group). Fe²⁺, ferrous iron; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; FTH1, ferritin heavy chain 1; ACSL4, acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4; FSEC, five-flavor Sophora flavescens enteric-coated capsules. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. **P < 0.01 versus the normal control group; ##P < 0.01 versus the model group. |
Table 3: Comparison of Fe2⁺ levels and ferroptosis-related protein expression among groups. Serum Fe2⁺ levels and relative expression of GPX4, FTH1, and ACSL4 proteins in colon tissues were evaluated in normal control, model, FSEC-treated, and CRX-526-treated mice. Protein expression values were normalized to β-actin and are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 5: Western blot analysis of ferroptosis-related proteins in colon tissues. GPX4, FTH1, and ACSL4 protein expression was evaluated in the following groups: normal control, model, high-dose FSEC, medium-dose FSEC, low-dose FSEC, and CRX-526 positive control. Densitometric values were normalized to β-actin, and relative protein expression was used for statistical analysis. Compared with the model group, FSEC treatment was associated with increased GPX4 and FTH1 expression and decreased ACSL4 expression, consistent with improvement in ferroptosis-related marker profiles. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Compared with the model group, high-dose FSEC and CRX-526 treatment reduced Fe2⁺ levels, whereas medium- and low-dose FSEC produced less pronounced reductions. GPX4 expression increased across all treatment groups. FTH1 expression increased in the high-dose and medium-dose FSEC groups and in the CRX-526 positive-control group, whereas the low-dose FSEC group showed a smaller change. ACSL4 expression decreased in all FSEC-treated groups and in the CRX-526 positive-control group relative to the model group. Collectively, these findings indicate that FSEC treatment was associated with improvement in ferroptosis-related molecular and biochemical marker profiles in experimental UC.
DATA AVAILABILITY:
All raw data supporting the findings of this study are provided as Supplementary File 1.
Supplementary File 1: Representative raw images supporting Figures 2–5, along with raw numerical dataset underlying Tables 1–3, including the individual measurements for SOD, CAT, GSH, MPO, Fe2⁺, cytokines, and densitometric analyses. Please click here to download this file.