Ethical considerations
This study represents a secondary analysis of fully de-identified data obtained from previously completed observational cohort studies. No new patient recruitment, interventions, or collection of identifiable private information were undertaken for the purposes of this analysis. Because the data were fully de-identified and originally collected under approved protocols, this analysis did not meet the definition of human subjects research, and no additional institutional review board review or ethical approval was required. All original studies received appropriate ethical approval, and informed consent was obtained from participants at the time of initial enrolment.
Study design
This work represents a secondary, retrospective analysis of fully de-identified data derived from two previously completed observational cohort studies examining inflammatory, coagulation, and renal outcomes in chronic and acute clinical settings. The study was structured in two complementary components (Figure 1): a chronic population-based cohort analysis evaluating long-term kidney function decline and an acute ICU cohort analysis assessing sepsis-associated coagulopathy and acute kidney injury.
To address the study objective, complementary analyses were conducted in two populations: (1) a community-based cohort to examine whether baseline inflammation and coagulation biomarkers predict long-term kidney function decline, and (2) a cohort of critically ill septic patients to evaluate the impact of acute coagulopathy on AKI development. By integrating these two analytical contexts, the study aimed to comprehensively assess the joint influence of inflammatory and coagulation pathways on renal injury.
The analysis was conducted in accordance with the STROBE guidelines for observational research.

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the study design and analytical workflow. This figure illustrates the overall study design, showing the workflow of two de-identified cohorts and their analysis linking inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers to kidney outcomes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Chronic Cohort (Population Study)
For the chronic context, data were utilized from a previously conducted prospective, community-based cohort study, analyzed here as a secondary analysis of de-identified data, focusing on adults without baseline kidney failure. The cohort was modeled on the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). A total of 3,678 participants (aged 45–84 years; 52% women) were included after exclusion of individuals with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL·min-1 per 1.73 m2 to restrict analyses to participants without advanced chronic kidney disease at enrollment. Baseline fasting blood samples, collected as part of the original cohort protocol, were used to measure inflammatory biomarkers—CRP and IL-6—and coagulation/fibrinolysis markers, including fibrinogen, Factor VIII activity, and D-dimer. Standardized laboratory assays were employed (e.g., high-sensitivity CRP immunonephelometry and ultra-sensitive IL-6 ELISA), and these baseline biomarker levels were analyzed as exposure variables to evaluate their association with subsequent longitudinal changes in kidney function over follow-up; details including manufacturers, catalog numbers, and RRIDs, where available, are provided in the Table of Materials. Kidney function was assessed at baseline and during multiple follow-up examinations over approximately five years using serum creatinine and cystatin C, as collected in the parent study. eGFR was estimated using the CKD-EPI equations. The primary outcome was longitudinal kidney function decline, quantified as the annual change in eGFR. Secondary outcomes included rapid eGFR decline, defined as a loss exceeding 3 mL·min-1 per 1.73 m2 per year, and incident reduced eGFR, defined as new onset eGFR < 60 mL·min-1 per 1.73 m2 accompanied by a decline ≥ 1 mL·min-1 per 1.73 m2 per year. Baseline covariates, including demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions (e.g., diabetes and hypertension), baseline eGFR, and other clinical variables, were obtained from the original study database and used for statistical adjustment. Participants with conditions or medications that could influence inflammatory or coagulation biomarkers were not explicitly excluded beyond the original cohort criteria; however, major comorbidities and clinical variables were adjusted for in multivariable analyses to minimize confounding. Residual confounding due to unmeasured factors or medication effects cannot be entirely excluded. No new data collection, participant contact, or intervention was undertaken for the purposes of this analysis.
Acute cohort (Sepsis ICU study)
For the acute context, a secondary analysis was performed using data derived from a previously completed observational cohort of critically ill patients with septic shock admitted to a tertiary-care intensive care unit (ICU). The present analysis included 312 adult patients who met Sepsis-3 criteria for septic shock (suspected or confirmed infection with vasopressor-dependent hypotension and elevated lactate levels). Patients with pre-existing end-stage renal disease were excluded from the original cohort. Baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory measurements were obtained from the existing study dataset, which had been collected at the time of ICU admission as part of routine clinical care and the original observational protocol.
The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scoring system was used to define DIC, with a score of 5 or more representing overt DIC14. The ISTH DIC scores were determined on a daily basis during ICU admission using the available laboratory information. The definition and staging of AKI were based on the changes in serum creatinine and/or urine output15, which were defined and staged using the KDIGO criteria. To assess the temporal relationship between coagulopathy and renal injury, subgroup analyses were conducted in patients who developed sepsis-related coagulopathy or fulfilled the criteria for DIC before or at the onset of AKI, based on daily clinical and laboratory evaluations documented in the dataset. Temporal relationships between disseminated intravascular coagulation and acute kidney injury were further evaluated using daily clinical and laboratory data to determine whether DIC onset preceded or coincided with AKI occurrence.
Inflammatory markers (including CRP and procalcitonin), hemodynamic variables, and illness severity scores—SOFA (Sepsis Organ Failure Assessment) and SAPS II—were extracted from the original cohort records16. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of DIC at any point during their ICU course. This analysis involved no additional patient recruitment, interventions, or collection of identifiable information beyond what was available in the de-identified source dataset.
Statistical analysis
All analyses were conducted using previously collected, de-identified data from the parent cohort studies. Approaches to missing data, exclusion criteria, and handling of key variables are detailed in Supplementary Table S1. In the population cohort, baseline characteristics were compared between participants who did and did not develop significant kidney function decline using Student’s t-tests for normally distributed continuous variables, and Mann–Whitney U-tests (Wilcoxon rank-sum tests) for non-normally distributed continuous variables, with normality assessed using standard statistical methods, and chi-square tests for categorical variables, as appropriate. Longitudinal associations between baseline inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers and kidney function decline were assessed using mixed-effects linear regression models with random intercepts and slopes to account for within-participant correlation over time, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, diabetes, hypertension, lipid levels, baseline eGFR, and albuminuria, and adjusted mean eGFR trajectories were estimated using model-derived predicted values across follow-up.
Effect estimates were expressed per standard deviation increase in biomarker concentration. Biomarker levels were additionally categorized into quartiles based on their distribution within the study population, using cohort-specific 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile cutoffs. These quartile groups were used to assess potential non-linear associations and to generate adjusted longitudinal eGFR trajectories using model-derived predicted values from mixed-effects regression models.
Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations with rapid eGFR decline and incident reduced eGFR, with follow-up duration included as a covariate to account for variability in observation time. In the ICU cohort, clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with and without DIC using Student’s t-tests for normally distributed continuous variables and Mann–Whitney U-tests for non-normally distributed variables, based on assessment of data distribution, and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess whether DIC was independently associated with severe acute kidney injury, defined as KDIGO stage 3 AKI or requirement for renal replacement therapy, adjusting for age, illness severity as measured by baseline SOFA score, and relevant comorbidities; multicollinearity among severity indicators was assessed using variance inflation factors. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive performance of admission inflammatory biomarkers (CRP and procalcitonin) for acute kidney injury in the ICU cohort. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated with 95% confidence intervals to quantify discrimination ability. All statistical tests were two-tailed, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, and analyses were performed using statistical analysis software.
Sensitivity Analyses
Prespecified sensitivity analyses were conducted in both cohorts to assess the robustness of the primary findings using the same de-identified datasets. In the population cohort, analyses were repeated after excluding participants with diabetes at baseline and after excluding those who experienced cardiovascular events during follow-up; models were additionally adjusted for baseline albuminuria as a continuous variable. Other outcome definitions were also considered, such as creatinine-based eGFR only and a more aggressive definition of rapid eGFR decrease (> 5 mL·min-1 per 1.73 m2 per year). Sensitivity analyses in the ICU cohort involved limiting analyses to patients surviving beyond 48 hours after ICU admission to minimize potential survivor bias, redefining acute kidney injury based on serum creatinine criteria alone, and further modifying multivariable models to adjust for admission lactate concentration and vasopressor dose.