$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Ureteral strictures are relatively common and pose a significant challenge in urology. They are reported in up to 4.9% of patients following endoscopic procedures for stone disease1,2,3, with even higher incidences among high-risk populations, such as kidney transplant recipients, where up to 7% may be affected4. Although many strictures are caused by surgical injury or medical interventions, non-iatrogenic causes also comprise an important proportion. These include chronic inflammation, urinary tract infections, physical trauma, congenital abnormalities, and radiation therapy5,6. Each of these etiologies can ultimately result in urinary obstruction, recurrent infections, pain, stone formation, and - if untreated - irreversible loss of renal function. Affected patients often experience morbidity and reduced quality of life, as shown in both institutional cohorts and systematic reviews5,7,8. The long‑term burden is substantial; in a multi‑institutional cohort of patients with ureteral strictures after ureteroscopic stone surgery, nephrectomy of the affected side was required in 25% of cases, underscoring the considerable morbidity of this condition9.
This clinical burden underscores the need for robust preclinical models that can enable research on associated biomolecular processes and inform treatment optimization. The most common treatment modalities are endoscopic methods, such as dilation or laser incision, as well as stenting, with surgical reconstruction reserved for more complex cases10. Despite improved early outcomes, recurrence and restenosis remain problematic. Reported recurrence rates after intervention range from 11% to 40%, and many patients require multiple operations or long‑term stenting for durable relief and organ protection11,12. Treatment success is influenced by stricture site, length, etiology, and details of previous treatments; several recent reviews and large cohort studies underline the need for improved techniques and a deeper mechanistic understanding4,5,13.
Effective translational research requires experimental models that closely replicate the fibrotic mechanisms, histopathologic features, anatomical context, and upstream renal processes of human ureteral stricture disease. Among these, rodent models have become reliable platforms to study ureteral fibrosis and renal functional loss and to evaluate anti‑fibrotic interventions and reconstructive strategies6,14,15,16,17. The pathophysiologic foundation for these models was laid by Chevalier et al., who reviewed different strategies of ureteral obstruction, focusing on unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) as a reproducible model of renal interstitial fibrosis and obstructive nephropathy in rats6.
Building on this foundation, contemporary models have refined the level and pattern of obstruction. Vroomen et al. introduced a technically safe approach using irreversible electroporation to induce partial unilateral urinary obstruction with renal scarring14. Similarly, Chen et al. advanced a reversible UUO model enabling dynamic study of fibrosis regression under variable hemodynamic conditions15. Nan et al. and Khater et al. further elucidated the molecular cascades driving ureteral fibrosis progression and therapeutic modulation in partial‑obstruction16,17.
Earlier models that relied on complete ureteral ligation, segmental resection, burying in the psoas muscle, or thermal injury often resulted in uncontrolled, unstandardized degrees of obstruction, extensive ischemia, and necrosis, leading to severe renal parenchymal atrophy rather than graded obstruction. These approaches, as described by Chevalier et al. and Thornhill et al., provided valuable mechanistic insights into obstructive nephropathy, but did not recapitulate the localized fibrotic narrowing characteristic of clinical benign ureteral stricture disease6,18. There remains a lack of simple, standardized rodent models that generate calibrated, non‑transecting segmental strictures with preserved tissue viability and defined degrees of renal urinary obstruction.
To address this gap, this study establishes a standardized surgical protocol for the controlled induction of partial ureteral strictures in rats. The model is designed to be reproducible, anatomically precise, and versatile for use in preclinical research encompassing reconstructive urology, intraoperative imaging evaluation, and tissue‑engineering applications. By minimizing inter‑operator variability and replicating clinically relevant fibrotic narrowing, this model offers a translational platform to advance mechanistic understanding and accelerate therapeutic development for ureteral stricture disease.
In practical use, the degree of obstruction can be tailored by selecting the appropriate calibration wire diameter to match the research question. Larger diameters (e.g., 0.65 mm) approximate mild partial obstruction with near‑physiological urine flow, whereas smaller diameters (0.30–0.20 mm) model high‑grade obstruction with marked flow reduction. Furthermore, this surgical approach can be applied either as an acute terminal model to study immediate hemodynamic and functional changes or adapted for survival experiments to investigate chronic tissue remodeling, fibrosis progression, and long‑term renal adaptation.
In this model, partial obstruction is achieved by tying a 6‑0 ligature around the ureter together with a metal calibration wire of defined diameter and subsequently removing the wire, leaving a residual lumen that corresponds to the wire size. This design enables graded, geometrically controlled narrowing that can be directly correlated with renal functional urinary outflow.