This study was conducted exclusively using the commercially available human chondrocyte cell line C28/I2. No human participants, human tissue samples, patient-derived materials, or live animals were involved in this research. Therefore, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approval were not required in accordance with institutional and national guidelines. The tools, chemicals, kits, and reagents used in the protocol are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Cell culture and OA model construction
The human chondrocyte cell line C28/I2 (details provided in the Table of Materials) was obtained from a commercial supplier. To ensure experimental reproducibility, cells were authenticated using short tandem repeat (STR) profiling and routinely tested to confirm the absence of mycoplasma contamination. Cells between passages 3 and 8 were used for all experiments. Cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (all culture reagents are detailed in the Table of Materials) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
To establish the in vitro osteoarthritis (OA) model, C28/I2 cells were stimulated with recombinant human IL-1β. Based on established literature6,7, preliminary dose-response optimization experiments designed to induce a robust catabolic state without excessive immediate cytotoxicity, the cells were treated with 20 ng/mL IL-1β for 24 h.
2. Experimental grouping and transfection
To elucidate the mechanistic pathways, the study was divided into three main experimental modules, each with a minimum of three independent biological replicates:
- SPRY2 Gain/Loss-of-function:
Cells were assigned to Control, OA model, OA + empty vector (NC), OA + SPRY2 overexpression plasmid (OE-SPRY2), and corresponding small interfering RNA groups (si-NC and three specific si-SPRY2 constructs: si-695, si-800, si-896) to screen for interference efficiency.
- miR-590-5p modulation:
Cells were divided into Control, OA model, OA + mimic NC, OA + miR-590-5p mimic, OA + inhibitor NC, and OA + miR-590-5p inhibitor groups.
- Functional validation of the miR-590-5p/SPRY2 regulatory relationship:
To further evaluate the proposed regulatory relationship between miR-590-5p and SPRY2, cells were subjected to miR-590-5p mimic and inhibitor conditions to determine whether miR-590-5p modulation altered SPRY2 expression in the OA model.
For transfection, C28/I2 cells were seeded into 6-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/well. Upon reaching 70%–80% confluence, transfections were performed using a commercial lipid-based transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol and established procedures for small RNA delivery in chondrocytes24. Briefly, plasmids (OE-SPRY2 and NC; 2 µg/well) and oligonucleotides (miR-590-5p mimic/inhibitor and siRNAs; 50 nM) were diluted in reduced-serum medium. The lipid-DNA/RNA complexes were incubated at room temperature for 15 min before being added dropwise to cells in serum-free DMEM. At 6 h after transfection, the medium was replaced with complete DMEM containing 10% FBS, and cells were cultured for an additional 48 h before RNA and protein extraction.
3. qPCR detection
Total RNA and miRNA were isolated using a dedicated miRNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA purity and concentration were assessed using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer, and samples with A260/A280 ratios of 1.8–2.0 were used for downstream analyses. Commercial reverse-transcription reagents were used to synthesize cDNA. The qPCR cycling procedure was as follows: 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; followed by melting-curve analysis to verify primer specificity and the absence of primer dimers. β-actin and U6 served as internal controls for mRNA and miRNA, respectively. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method25. All primer sequences, including those for Col-II, SPRY2, Beclin-1, LC3, Bcl-2, miR-590-5p, and reference genes, are listed in Table 1.
| Primer name | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
| U6 | ATTGGAACGATACAGAGAAGATT | GGAACGCTTCACGAATTTG |
| miR-590-5p | GCGTAAGGCACGCGGTG | AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT |
| β-actin | TGGCACCCAGCACAATGAA | CTAAGTCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCA |
| SPRY2 | TAAGCCACTGAGCAAGGAAGAT | TGGAAGGTAACACCATAAACAAGG |
| Bcl-2 | TGGGATTCCTGCGGATTGAC | TCAGTCTACTTCCTCTGTGATGTTG |
| Beclin-1 | TCCCGTGGAATGGAATGAGA | GTAAGGAACAAGTCGGTATCTCTG |
| LC3-II | CATCCAACCAAAATCCCGGT | GAGCTGTAAGCGCCTTCTAA |
Table 1: Primer sequences used for quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis. Forward and reverse primer sequences used for the amplification and quantification of target transcripts and internal reference controls by qPCR.
Unless otherwise specified, data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by the S-N-K post hoc test. Symbols indicate: *P < 0.05 vs. Control; #P < 0.05 vs. the indicated model or negative-control group; &P < 0.05 vs. OA+Inhibitor-NC.
4. Western blot detection
Cells were harvested and lysed using RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails, following established protein extraction and immunoblotting procedures. After centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C to remove cellular debris, the supernatant was collected, and protein concentrations were quantified using a BCA protein assay kit. Equal amounts of protein lysate (30 µg) were denatured, resolved by SDS-PAGE for 1.5 h, and transferred onto PVDF membranes at 300 mA for 1.5 h26. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation at 4 °C for 16 h with specific primary antibodies (e.g., anti-SPRY2, 1:1000 dilution). After three washes in TBST, membranes were incubated with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Protein bands were visualized using an ECL detection system and quantified using ImageJ software.
5. Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using statistical analysis software. All experiments were performed with at least three independent biological replicates (n ≥ 3), and quantitative data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Before parametric testing, data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and homogeneity of variance was assessed. Statistical significance among multiple groups was evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls (S-N-K) post hoc test for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.