$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Baseline Clinical Characteristics and CTRP7 Expression
A total of 108 subjects were included in the cross-sectional analysis and categorized into three groups: healthy controls (n = 21), patients with T2DM without nephropathy (DM group, n = 39), and patients with DN (DN group, n = 48). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. No significant differences in BMI were observed among the three groups (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were identified in metabolic and hemodynamic parameters. The DN group exhibited significantly higher SBP (140.06 ± 19.53 mmHg) compared with the DM group (127.54 ± 15.38 mmHg) and control group (122.29 ± 14.99 mmHg; P < 0.001).
| Variable | Control
(n = 21) | DM
(n = 39) | DN
(n = 48) | P-value |
| Age (years) | 51.52 ± 10.87 | 56.38 ± 10.95 | 59.73 ± 10.24 | 0.014 |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 24.00 ± 2.73 | 24.46 ± 2.76 | 24.96 ± 3.69 | 0.492 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 122.29 ± 14.99 | 127.54 ± 15.38 | 140.06 ± 19.53 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.63 ± 0.25 | 7.10 ± 1.85 | 7.30 ± 1.70 | <0.001 |
| UACR (mg/g) | 28.20 ± 55.61 | 13.64 ± 9.51 | 198.20 ± 316.35 | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) | 97.64 ± 20.69 | 101.63 ± 25.06 | 97.31 ± 29.33 | 0.726 |
| CTRP7 (ng/mL) | 26.95 ± 11.48 | 59.91 ± 16.48 | 63.03 ± 15.24 | <0.001 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 17.31 ± 6.47 | 37.24 ± 8.26 | 36.32 ± 9.01 | <0.001 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 30.42 ± 8.02 | 65.41 ± 15.32 | 60.26 ± 14.09 | <0.001 |
Table 1: Baseline demographic, metabolic, inflammatory, and oxidative stress characteristics of the study population. Baseline demographic, metabolic, inflammatory, and oxidative stress characteristics were compared among healthy controls (Control, n = 21), patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without diabetic nephropathy (DM, n = 39), and patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN, n = 48). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical comparisons among groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal–Wallis test, as appropriate. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CTRP7, C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-7; DM, diabetes mellitus without nephropathy; DN, diabetic nephropathy; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; IL-6, interleukin-6; MDA, malondialdehyde; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TNF-α, umor necrosis factor-α; UACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
Serum CTRP7 levels demonstrated a stepwise increase across disease groups (Figure 1). The control group exhibited the lowest circulating CTRP7 levels (26.95 ± 11.48 ng/mL), whereas CTRP7 levels increased to 59.91 ± 16.48 ng/mL in the DM group (P < 0.001 vs. control). The DN group showed the highest CTRP7 levels (63.03 ± 15.24 ng/mL). Although the difference between the DM and DN groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), these findings suggest that CTRP7 elevation may occur during early metabolic dysregulation in diabetes. Inflammatory and oxidative stress markers also differed significantly among groups. Compared with healthy controls, patients with DN exhibited significantly higher levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and MDA, accompanied by lower SOD and GSH-Px levels (P < 0.001).

Figure 1. Gradient elevation of serum CTRP7 levels across study groups. Serum CTRP7 concentrations were compared among healthy controls (Control, n = 21), patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without diabetic nephropathy (DM, n = 39), and patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN, n = 48). Boxplots display the median, interquartile range, and full data distribution, with individual participant values overlaid as scatter points. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test followed by post hoc analysis, as appropriate. ***P < 0.001. CTRP7 concentrations are expressed in ng/mL. Abbreviations: CTRP7, C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-7; DM, diabetes mellitus without nephropathy; DN, diabetic nephropathy. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Correlation Between CTRP7 and Clinical Parameters
Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the associations between serum CTRP7 levels and clinical parameters (Figure 2). Serum CTRP7 levels were positively correlated with HbA1c (r = 0.72), indicating an association with chronic hyperglycemia. CTRP7 also demonstrated positive correlations with the oxidative stress marker MDA (r = 0.70) and inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and TNF-α. In contrast, CTRP7 levels were negatively correlated with the antioxidant enzyme SOD (r = −0.25). A moderate positive correlation was additionally observed between CTRP7 and SBP (r = 0.45). These findings indicate that elevated CTRP7 levels are associated with inflammatory and oxidative stress markers linked to metabolic and vascular dysfunction.

Figure 2. Correlation analysis between serum CTRP7 and clinical parameters. Pearson correlation heatmap illustrating the relationships between serum CTRP7 levels and clinical, inflammatory, and oxidative stress parameters in the study population. Correlation coefficients (r values) are displayed within each cell. The color scale represents the strength and direction of correlations, ranging from negative correlations (blue) to positive correlations (red). Parameters analyzed included urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA). Abbreviations: CTRP7, C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-7; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; IL-6, interleukin-6; MDA, malondialdehyde; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; UACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Diagnostic Value and Risk Factors for Diabetic Nephropathy
ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum CTRP7 (Figure 3). CTRP7 demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing patients with DN from healthy controls, with an AUC of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–1.00). In contrast, the ability of CTRP7 to differentiate DN from patients with diabetes mellitus without nephropathy (DM group) was limited (AUC = 0.55), indicating substantial overlap between diabetic groups.

Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of serum CTRP7 for diabetic nephropathy discrimination. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum CTRP7 for distinguishing diabetic nephropathy (DN) from other study groups. The blue curve represents discrimination between healthy controls and DN patients, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–1.00). The red curve represents discrimination between DM and DN groups, with an AUC of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.43–0.68). Sensitivity and specificity are plotted on the y-axis and x-axis, respectively. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus without nephropathy; DN, diabetic nephropathy; ROC, receiver operating characteristic. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
To identify independent risk factors associated with DN, clinical parameters were compared between the DM and DN groups (Table 2). Univariate analysis identified SBP as the most significant factor associated with DN (P = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 3) further demonstrated that SBP (odds ratio [OR] = 1.044, P = 0.004) remained an independent predictor of DN. Although CTRP7 was not independently associated with DN in the multivariate model (P = 0.520), it was retained in the prediction model because of its observed associations with metabolic and inflammatory parameters.
| Variable | DM Group
(n = 39) | DN Group
(n = 48) | P-value |
| Age (years) | 56.38 ± 10.95 | 59.73 ± 10.24 | 0.149 |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 24.46 ± 2.76 | 24.96 ± 3.69 | 0.471 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 127.54 ± 15.38 | 140.06 ± 19.53 | 0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.10 ± 1.85 | 7.30 ± 1.70 | 0.613 |
| CTRP7 (ng/mL) | 59.91 ± 16.48 | 63.03 ± 15.24 | 0.366 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) | 101.63 ± 25.06 | 97.31 ± 29.33 | 0.461 |
Table 2: Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with diabetic nephropathy. Clinical and biochemical variables were compared between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without diabetic nephropathy (DM group, n = 39) and patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN group, n = 48). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical comparisons were performed using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CTRP7, C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-7; DM, diabetes mellitus without nephropathy; DN, diabetic nephropathy; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
| Variable | Beta | OR | 95% CI (Lower) | 95% CI (Upper) | P-value |
| Intercept | −6.602 | 0.001 | 0 | 0.254 | 0.013 |
| SBP | 0.043 | 1.044 | 1.014 | 1.075 | 0.004 |
| HbA1c | 0.038 | 1.039 | 0.808 | 1.337 | 0.765 |
| CTRP7 | 0.010 | 1.010 | 0.980 | 1.040 | 0.520 |
| BMI | 0.010 | 1.010 | 0.878 | 1.161 | 0.891 |
Table 3: Multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of diabetic nephropathy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors associated with diabetic nephropathy (DN). Regression coefficients (Beta), odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P-values are presented for each variable included in the model. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CTRP7, C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-7; DN, diabetic nephropathy; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; OR, odds ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Construction and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Nomogram
Based on the multivariate logistic regression results, a nomogram model was constructed to estimate the probability of DN using SBP, HbA1c, serum CTRP7, and BMI (Figure 4A). Within the model, SBP contributed the highest point allocation, followed by HbA1c and CTRP7. The nomogram demonstrated acceptable predictive performance, with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.710, indicating moderate discrimination ability. The calibration curve (Figure 4B) showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, with a mean absolute error of 0.017. DCA (Figure 4C) demonstrated that the nomogram provided greater net clinical benefit than the “treat-all” or “treat-none” strategies across a threshold probability range of 10%–80%, suggesting potential utility for risk stratification in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Figure 4. Construction of a nomogram model for predicting diabetic nephropathy risk. Nomogram model developed to estimate the probability of diabetic nephropathy (DN) using systolic blood pressure (SBP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum CTRP7, and body mass index (BMI). Individual variable scores are assigned on the points scale, summed to generate total points, and translated into predicted DN probability. The nomogram demonstrated acceptable discrimination performance (C-index = 0.710). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CTRP7, C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-7; DN, diabetic nephropathy; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; SBP, systolic blood pressure. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Therapeutic Efficacy of Dapagliflozin
The effects of 12 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment were evaluated in 48 patients with DN, and significant improvements were observed in renal and metabolic parameters (Table 4). The UACR decreased significantly from 198.20 ± 316.35 mg/g at baseline to 165.33 ± 295.83 mg/g after treatment (mean reduction: −32.87 mg/g, P = 0.011). Serum CTRP7 levels also decreased significantly from 63.03 ± 15.24 ng/mL to 46.63 ± 13.67 ng/mL (P < 0.001), as illustrated in the paired estimation plot (Figure 5). Dapagliflozin treatment was additionally associated with reductions in inflammatory and oxidative stress markers. Significant decreases were observed in IL-6, TNF-α, and MDA, whereas SOD and GSH-Px levels increased significantly following treatment (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, significant reductions were observed in SBP (−8.02 mmHg, P = 0.003), HbA1c (−0.67%, P < 0.001), and BMI (−0.78 kg/m2, P < 0.001). The eGFR remained relatively stable, with a small non-significant decrease observed after treatment (−2.34 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.121), which is consistent with previously reported hemodynamic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors.
| Variable | Baseline | Post-treatment | Mean Change | P-value |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 24.96 ± 3.69 | 24.18 ± 3.77 | −0.78 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 140.06 ± 19.53 | 132.04 ± 16.05 | −8.02 | 0.003 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.30 ± 1.70 | 6.63 ± 1.21 | −0.67 | <0.001 |
| UACR (mg/g) | 198.20 ± 316.35 | 165.33 ± 295.83 | −32.87 | 0.0108 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) | 97.31 ± 29.33 | 94.98 ± 31.07 | −2.34 | 0.121 |
| CTRP7 (ng/mL) | 63.03 ± 15.24 | 46.63 ± 13.67 | −16.60 | <0.001 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 36.32 ± 9.01 | 28.74 ± 7.53 | −7.52 | <0.001 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 60.26 ± 14.09 | 47.43 ± 10.67 | −12.80 | <0.001 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 172.50 ± 33.71 | 206.01 ± 37.11 | 33 | <0.001 |
| GSH-Px (U/mL) | 130.02 ± 29.25 | 155.50 ± 30.65 | 25.9 | <0.001 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 6.43 ± 1.95 | 4.28 ± 1.86 | −2.15 | <0.001 |
Table 4: Changes in clinical and biochemical parameters after 12 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment. Clinical, metabolic, inflammatory, and oxidative stress parameters were evaluated before and after 12 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment in patients with diabetic nephropathy (n = 48). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Mean changes and corresponding P-values are reported for each parameter. Statistical comparisons between baseline and post-treatment values were performed using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CTRP7, C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-7; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; IL-6, interleukin-6; MDA, malondialdehyde; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; UACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio.

Figure 5. Changes in serum CTRP7 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio after dapagliflozin treatment. Paired comparison plots showing within-patient changes following 12 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment in patients with diabetic nephropathy (n = 48). (A) Serum CTRP7 concentrations before and after treatment. (B) Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) before and after treatment. Individual participant values are connected by gray lines to illustrate paired longitudinal changes. Boxplots display the median and interquartile range. Statistical significance was evaluated using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. P-values are indicated within each panel. Abbreviations: CTRP7, C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-7; UACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Subgroup Analysis
Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the consistency of dapagliflozin-associated changes in UACR according to baseline age (<60 vs. ≥60 years), BMI (<24 vs. ≥24 kg/m2), and SBP (<130 vs. ≥130 mmHg). As illustrated in the forest plot (Figure 6), numerical reductions in mean UACR were consistently observed across all evaluated subgroups following 12 weeks of treatment. Statistically significant reductions were specifically noted in patients aged ≥60 years (P = 0.032), those with a BMI ≥24 kg/m2 (P = 0.026), and those with baseline SBP < 130 mmHg (P = 0.019). Although the reductions in the corresponding counterpart subgroups (Age < 60 years, BMI < 24 kg/m2, SBP ≥130 mmHg) did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05), this variation is likely attributable to the limited sample sizes and reduced statistical power within these stratified sub-cohorts. These findings suggest a generally consistent trend of UACR reduction, while highlighting subgroups that may exhibit more readily detectable early responses.

Figure 6. Subgroup analysis of dapagliflozin-associated changes in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Forest plot summarizing subgroup analyses of changes in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) following 12 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment. Subgroups were stratified according to age (<60 years vs. ≥60 years), body mass index (BMI; <24 kg/m2 vs. ≥24 kg/m2), and baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP; <130 mmHg vs. ≥130 mmHg). Data are presented as mean changes in UACR with corresponding subgroup P-values. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; UACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Overall, the findings demonstrated that serum CTRP7 levels were elevated in patients with T2DM and DN and were correlated with inflammatory and oxidative stress markers. Dapagliflozin treatment was associated with improvements in renal and metabolic parameters, accompanied by reductions in CTRP7 and inflammatory biomarkers. These results suggest that CTRP7 may have potential utility as a biomarker associated with metabolic and renal dysfunction in DN.
Data Availability:
The fully de-identified raw datasets supporting the clinical findings, biochemical measurements, and biomarker quantifications presented in this study are provided in Supplementary Table 1 accompanying this manuscript submission. The dataset includes participant-level demographic, clinical, inflammatory, oxidative stress, and renal function variables used for the statistical analyses and figure generation described in this study.
Supplementary Table 1. De-identified participant-level clinical, inflammatory, oxidative stress, and renal biomarker dataset used for statistical analyses. This table contains the complete de-identified raw dataset used for cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in this study. Variables include participant demographics, anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, glycemic indices, renal function parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, oxidative stress-related markers, and treatment-group classifications. Data were used for statistical modeling, correlation analyses, nomogram development, subgroup analyses, and figure generation. Please click here to download this file.