A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

A Treatment and Monitoring Protocol for Tocilizumab in Refractory Macrophage Activation Syndrome with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

228 views

DOI:

10.3791/70988

May 15th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

This protocol describes the use of tocilizumab, combined with glucocorticoids and cyclosporine A, as salvage therapy for refractory macrophage activation syndrome in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Abstract

This study evaluated the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA)-associated refractory macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). A total of 100 patients diagnosed between 2021 and 2022 were included. Patients receiving standard therapy (glucocorticoids plus cyclosporine A) were assigned to the control group (n = 30), while those receiving add-on TCZ were assigned to the study group (n = 70). The treatment protocol included intravenous methylprednisolone pulses followed by oral prednisone tapering, cyclosporine A with trough monitoring, and TCZ administered every 2 weeks. Outcomes included laboratory parameters, cytokine profiles (IL-6, IL-18, IFN-γ, sCD25, sCD163), sJADAS27 scores, clinical response, and adverse events over 24 months. The TCZ group demonstrated faster normalization of laboratory indices and greater reduction in inflammatory cytokines (P < 0.05). Remission rates were higher (71.4% vs. 33.3% at Day 14), with lower recurrence and reduced glucocorticoid exposure. Adverse event rates were lower in the TCZ group (25.7% vs. 46.7%, P < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that TCZ-based combination therapy provides an effective and well-tolerated salvage strategy for refractory sJIA-MAS and support further prospective evaluation of this protocol.

Introduction

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is an autoinflammatory subtype that represents approximately 10–15% of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) diagnoses and is characterized by quotidian fever, a transient salmon-colored rash, and arthritis1. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a life-threatening complication of sJIA, results from excessive T-cell and macrophage activation, leading to a cytokine storm and multi-organ failure2. Approximately 10% of patients with sJIA develop overt MAS, with mortality rates reaching 20%–40% in severe cases3,4. Diagnostic challenges persist, as MAS symptoms often overlap with sJIA flares, and the 2016 classification criteria, despite improved sensitivity, may fail to identify atypical or early-stage cases5.

Current treatment strategies for sJIA-associated MAS (sJIA-MAS) center on high-dose glucocorticoids (GC) combined with cyclosporine A (CsA) as first-line therapy6. The standard regimen consists of intravenous methylprednisolone pulses (15–30 mg/kg/day for 3 days), followed by oral prednisone (1–2 mg/kg/day), administered concurrently with oral CsA (4–6 mg/kg/day) with trough concentration monitoring7. However, this conventional approach has significant limitations. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond adequately to first-line therapy, and prolonged immunosuppression increases the risk of severe infections, nephrotoxicity, and growth impairment8. In patients with an insufficient response, second-line options include etoposide, anakinra, and emerging agents such as emapalumab (an anti-interferon-γ monoclonal antibody) and rapamycin (an mTOR inhibitor), although clinical experience in pediatric MAS remains limited7,9.

Tocilizumab (TCZ), a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor, is a cornerstone in sJIA treatment10. Its role in sJIA-MAS remains controversial, as some studies report potential precipitation or exacerbation of MAS11,12. However, emerging evidence suggests therapeutic benefit in selected populations13,14. The concept of “inflammatory load stratification,” proposed in a Chinese multicenter study (ChiCTR2300070171), supports early TCZ intervention to prevent an interferon-γ- dominated immune imbalance, although the results remain pending8. A recent case report demonstrated that sequential targeted blockade, including ruxolitinib following TCZ failure, achieved rapid remission15. Long-term follow-up studies further indicate that TCZ can sustain control of inflammation, reduce glucocorticoid exposure, and improve growth outcomes16.

Significant gaps remain in the management of sJIA-MAS. Reliable predictors of TCZ response or MAS recurrence are lacking. Biomarkers such as soluble cluster of differentiation 25 (sCD25) and soluble cluster of differentiation 163 (sCD163) correlate with disease activity; however, their role in dynamic monitoring remains unclear. Furthermore, interleukin-1 inhibitors, recommended as first-line therapy in Western countries, appear to show limited efficacy in Asian populations17,18. Ruxolitinib demonstrates therapeutic promise but requires further evaluation of pediatric safety. In addition, even after successful control of MAS, patients may develop sequelae including osteoporosis, growth retardation, and cardiovascular complications, necessitating comprehensive rehabilitation and metabolic management19.

Based on this background, this retrospective analysis of 100 refractory sJIA-MAS cases comprehensively evaluates the therapeutic effects and safety profile of tocilizumab. Unlike previous studies that focused primarily on single clinical endpoints, this study provides a multi-dimensional evaluation incorporating serial laboratory parameters (hematologic, biochemical, coagulation, and inflammatory markers), dynamic cytokine profiling (IL-6, IL-18, IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, sCD25, and sCD163), disease activity scoring (sJADAS27), and long-term clinical outcomes including glucocorticoid tapering and recurrence rates. The addition of TCZ to standard therapy (GC + CsA) is evaluated for its potential to improve fever control, accelerate normalization of laboratory indices, and facilitate reversal of organ dysfunction. By systematically tracking the temporal dynamics of inflammatory markers and cytokine networks, this study aims to address the existing evidence gap in targeted therapy for pediatric refractory MAS in China and to inform stratified, precision-based intervention strategies to improve long-term survival and prognosis in this high-risk population.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This retrospective study, which analyzed anonymized clinical archives, was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuangdao (Approval No.: QFY000286) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to the study's retrospective nature and the use of pre-existing anonymized clinical data, the ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. The reagents, chemicals, and software used are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Patient selection and cohort formation

  1. Screen the electronic medical record system to identify all children diagnosed with sJIA between February 2021 and December 2022. Select patients with a documented complication of MAS.
  2. Apply inclusion criteria sequentially:
    1. Confirm the sJIA diagnosis according to the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2004 classification criteria20.
    2. Verify the MAS diagnosis using the 2016 sJIA-MAS classification criteria21. Require documented fever plus serum ferritin > 684 ng/mL and any two of the following: platelet count ≤ 181 × 109/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 48 U/L, triglycerides > 1.76 mmol/L, or fibrinogen ≤ 3.6 g/L.
    3. Identify patients with insufficient response to initial therapy. Add tocilizumab only in patients who demonstrate an inadequate response to standard first-line therapy.
    4. Define insufficient response as persistent fever (temperature >38.5 °C) and a reduction in serum ferritin of <50% from the pre-treatment peak after ≥7 days of standard therapy.
    5. Define standard therapy as intravenous methylprednisolone pulses (cumulative dose ≥30 mg/kg) combined with oral CsA ≥5 mg/kg/day22.
    6. Initiate tocilizumab immediately after confirming insufficient response, typically within 24–72 h after Day 0 assessment.
      NOTE: Anakinra (an interleukin-1 inhibitor) was not used in this cohort due to limited availability in China during the study period (2021–2022) and lack of regulatory approval for pediatric use in this indication. Consequently, CsA and tocilizumab represented accessible second-line options for the management of insufficient response.
    7. Ensure patient age is between 2 and 16 years and disease duration is ≥3 months at the time of insufficient response.
  3. Apply exclusion criteria:
    1. Exclude patients with active documented infections, including bacterial (positive blood culture), viral (positive Epstein–Barr virus or cytomegalovirus PCR), fungal infections, active tuberculosis, or human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity.
    2. Exclude patients with malignancies, congenital immunodeficiency disorders, severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III–IV), or liver cirrhosis (Child–Pugh class B or C).
    3. Exclude patients with severe cytopenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.0 × 109/L or platelet count <50 × 109/L) or severe hepatic injury (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or AST >10 × ULN).
    4. Exclude patients who received biologic agents (e.g., anti-interleukin-1, anti-interleukin-6, or Janus kinase inhibitors) within 3 months prior to refractory MAS onset.
    5. Exclude patients with >20% missing critical data (e.g., serial ferritin measurements, glucocorticoid dosing records).
  4. Form treatment groups:
    1. Categorize patients into two groups based on treatment after fulfilling refractory MAS criteria.
    2. Define control group: patients receiving only glucocorticoids and CsA.
    3. Define study group: patients receiving tocilizumab in addition to glucocorticoids and CsA (Figure 1).

2. Administration of combined immunomodulatory therapy

  1. Initiate high-dose glucocorticoid therapy23:
    1. Administer intravenous methylprednisolone 15–30 mg/kg/day (maximum 1 g/day) for 3 days.
    2. Transition to oral prednisone 1–2 mg/kg/day in 2–3 divided doses (maximum 60 mg/day).
  2. Initiate and monitor CsA therapy:
    1. Administer oral CsA at 4–6 mg/kg/day in two divided doses.
    2. Monitor trough concentrations regularly.
    3. Adjust dosage to maintain 100–200 ng/mL.
  3. Prepare and administer TCZ.
    1. Initiate TCZ within 24–72 h after confirmation of insufficient response.
    2. Calculate dose: <30 kg → 12 mg/kg; ≥30 kg → 8 mg/kg.
    3. Dilute in 100 mL sterile 0.9% sodium chloride.
    4. Infuse intravenously over ≥60 min.
    5. Repeat every 2 weeks.
  4. Establish monitoring schedule:
    1. Perform weekly monitoring of complete blood counts, ALT, AST, and renal function.
    2. Reduce monitoring to every 2 weeks after stabilization.
  5. Implement glucocorticoid tapering:
    1. Initiate tapering after MAS control (no fever for ≥72 h and ferritin reduction >50%).
    2. Reduce prednisone by 0.2 mg/kg/day every 7–10 days until 0.5 mg/kg/day.
    3. Further reduce by 10% every 2 weeks.
  6. Manage toxicity:
    1. Hepatotoxicity: Reduce TCZ by 50% if ALT/AST 3–5× ULN; suspend if >5× ULN; restart at half dose after recovery.
    2. Hematologic toxicity: Suspend TCZ if neutrophils <1.0 × 109/L or platelets <100 × 109/L; resume at reduced dose after recovery.
    3. Infection: Suspend TCZ during serious infection; restart after resolution.
  7. Define treatment duration and failure:
    1. Administer ≥4 infusions unless toxicity occurs.
    2. Continue therapy to 12 weeks if response is achieved; consider maintenance every 4 weeks thereafter.
    3. Define failure: persistent fever, no ferritin decline, or organ deterioration after 4 weeks.
  8. Definitions of laboratory normalization and remission thresholds:
    1. Define normalization and remission thresholds based on the institutional reference ranges of the Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Qinhuangdao.
    2. C-reactive protein (CRP): normal range < 0.8 mg/dL; remission threshold defined as ≤ 0.8 mg/dL.
    3. Serum ferritin: normal range 20–200  ng/mL; remission threshold defined as < 500  ng/mL based on consensus criteria for MAS resolution.
    4. Fibrinogen: normal range 2–4 g/L; remission threshold defined as > 2 g/L.
    5. Platelet count: normal range 150–450 × 109/L; normalization defined as ≥ 150 × 109/L.
    6. AST and ALT: normal range < 40 U/L; remission threshold defined as ≤ 2 × upper limit of normal (ULN) for resolution of hepatic involvement.
  9. Adherence to tocilizumab dosing protocol:
    1. Administer tocilizumab strictly according to the weight-based protocol described in section 2.3.
    2. Permit dose adjustments or treatment interruptions only in the setting of predefined toxicity criteria (hepatotoxicity, hematologic toxicity, or infection) as outlined in section 2.6.
    3. Document all deviations from the protocol, including dose reductions, delays, or premature discontinuation.
    4. Report protocol deviations in the Results section.

3. Data collection and outcome measurement

  1. Define Day 0:
    1. Study group: first TCZ infusion.
    2. Control group: eligibility for salvage therapy.
  2. Perform baseline assessment:
    1. Conduct assessments prior to Day 0.
    2. Collect demographics, clinical data, laboratory parameters, cytokines, and scores.
  3. Schedule follow-up: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24.
  4. Collect blood samples:
    1. Collect fasting venous blood.
    2. Process serum samples for cytokine measurement.
      1. Collect blood into serum separator tubes.
      2. Allow samples to clot at room temperature for 30 min.
      3. Centrifuge at 1,500 × g for 15 min at 4 °C within 2 h of collection.
      4. Aliquot separated serum into cryovials and immediately store at −80 °C until analysis.
      5. Do not permit freeze–thaw cycles prior to cytokine measurement.
    3. Process samples for complete blood count and coagulation parameters.
      1. Collect blood into EDTA-containing tubes for complete blood count.
      2. Collect blood into sodium citrate tubes for coagulation parameters (fibrinogen, D-dimer).
      3. Analyze within 4 h of collection.
    4. Analyze hematologic, inflammatory, liver, coagulation, and metabolic markers.
  5. Measure cytokines:
    1. Measure using ELISA kits.
      NOTE: IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, IFN-γ, sCD25, and sCD163 assays were performed according to manufacturer instructions. All cytokine measurements were performed in duplicate for each sample.
      NOTE: To minimize inter-assay variability, serum samples from all time points for each patient were analyzed in the same assay batch whenever possible. For samples that could not be batched, the inter-assay coefficient of variation was maintained below 10% by running quality control standards on each plate. The mean of duplicate measurements was used for statistical analysis.
    2. Quantify IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, IFN-γ, sCD25, and sCD163.
  6. Assess disease activity:
    1. Calculate sJADAS27 scores24 at each time point.
  7. Record outcomes:
    1. Record glucocorticoid dose, remission, fever resolution, and recurrence.
    2. Define remission using all criteria25 (fever absence, ≥90% joint improvement, normalized labs).
  8. Document adverse events:
    1. Record all events.
    2. Categorize infections, liver dysfunction, cytopenia, allergic reactions, hypertension, and gastrointestinal events.

4. Sample size calculation

  1. Perform power analysis using statistical software.
  2. Set parameters: d = 0.65, α = 0.05, power = 0.8.
  3. Calculate minimum sample size: 88 (26 control, 62 study).
  4. Confirm final cohort: 100 participants.

5. Statistical analysis

  1. Perform analyses using statistical software.
  2. Generate flowcharts using diagram software.
  3. Assess distribution: Shapiro–Wilk; Levene’s test.
  4. Analyze continuous variables.
    1. Present normally distributed data as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compare means between two independent groups using the independent samples t-test. Compare means within the same group across time points using a paired-samples t-test.
    2. Present non-normally distributed data as median with interquartile range (IQR) and compare distributions between two independent groups using the Mann–Whitney U test. Compare distributions within the same group across time points using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
  5. Analyze categorical variables.
    1. Present categorical data as counts and percentages [n (%)].
    2. Compare proportions between groups using the chi-square (χ2) test. Use Fisher’s exact test when any expected cell count is <5.
  6. Summarize longitudinal data per time point.
  7. Handle missing data.
    1. Exclude cases with missing data on a variable-by-variable basis when missing data are <5% for all key variables. Do not perform data imputation.
  8. Define statistical significance.
    1. Consider results statistically significant when the two-sided P-value is <0.05.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A total of 100 children with sJIA-MAS were included in this study, divided into 30 cases in the control group and 70 cases in the study group according to treatment modality. Baseline comparisons demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the two groups in demographic variables (age, sex, body mass index), clinical features (fever, rash, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, liver dysfunction, encephalopathy, pulmonary edema, circulatory failure, arthritis), laboratory indices (PLT, WBC, NEU, LY...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

This retrospective controlled analysis demonstrates that tocilizumab (TCZ) combined with glucocorticoids provides significant therapeutic benefit in refractory sJIA-MAS, accelerating normalization of laboratory parameters, promoting clinical remission, and reducing the risks of glucocorticoid dependence and long-term recurrence. A multidimensional evaluation integrating serial laboratory parameters, dynamic cytokine profiling (IL-6, IL-18, IFN-γ, TNF-α, sCD25, sCD163), disease activity scores, and long-term out...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Medications
TocilizumabShanghai Roche Pharmaceutical Co., Shanghai, ChinaS20130020Recombinant humanized anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody; 80 mg/4 mL per vial
MethylprednisolonePfizer Manufacturing Belgium NV, Puurs, BelgiumH2013030140 mg per vial; used for intravenous pulse therapy
Cyclosporine ARoche Pharma (Schweiz) LtdS20130020Immunosuppressant; 80 mg/4 mL oral solution
Blood Collection Materials
Serum separator tubesBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA3679835 mL, with clot activator and gel separator
EDTA tubesBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA3678553 mL, K2 EDTA for complete blood count
Sodium citrate tubesBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA3630833 mL, 3.2% buffered sodium citrate for coagulation tests
CryovialsCorning Inc., Corning, NY, USA4306592 mL, sterile, for serum storage at −80 °C
Cytokine Assay Platform
ProcartaPlex Human Cytokine Panel 1B 25plexInvitrogen (Thermo Fisher Scientific), San Diego, CA, USAEPX250-12166-901Luminex-based multiplex immunoassay; detects IL-6, IL-18, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and 21 other cytokines; requires 25 µL serum
Luminex InstrumentLuminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USALuminex 200For multiplex cytokine detection; xMAP technology
ELISA Kit for sCD25Boster BioEK0400Sensitivity: 5 pg/mL
ELISA Kit for sCD163R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USADC1630Sandwich ELISA; detection range: 1.6–100 ng/mL; sensitivity: 0.613 ng/mL; for human serum
ELISA Equipment
Microplate readerShanghai Kehua Laboratory System Co., Ltd., Shanghai, ChinaST-3608-channel absorbance reader; filters at 405, 450, 492, 630 nm; reading speed: 5 s/96-well; for ELISA detection
Automatic plate washerShanghai Kehua Laboratory System Co., Ltd., Shanghai, ChinaST-36W96-channel plate washer; residual volume ≤1 μL/well; adjustable dispense volume 0–3000 μL; with bottom wash function
IncubatorShanghai Xin Nuo Instrument Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai, ChinaEHP-55KForced-air convection incubator; temperature range: Amb+5–70 °C; temperature fluctuation ≤±0.2 °C; for ELISA incubation at 37 °C
Adjustable pipettesDlab Scientific (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, ChinaHiPette/TopPette seriesSingle-channel pipettes; volumes: 0.5–10 µL, 10–100 µL, 100–1000 µL; for reagent and sample dispensing
Clinical Laboratory Instrumentation
Automated Hematology AnalyzerMindray, Shenzhen, ChinaBC-6800PlusFor complete blood count (CBC) including PLT, WBC, NEU, LYM
Chemistry AnalyzerSiemens Healthineers, Erlangen, GermanyADVIA 1800For CRP, ESR, liver enzymes (ALT, AST), triglycerides, fibrinogen, D-dimer, ferritin
Coagulation analyzer
ESR measurement system
Statistical SoftwareIBM SPSSVersion 25.0Used for all statistical analyses
Diagramming SoftwareLucidchartOnline versionUsed for generating study flowchart
G*Power SoftwareHeinrich-Heine-Universität DüsseldorfVersion 3.1.9.7Used for sample size calculation
CentrifugeThermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA75007201Sorvall™ ST 8 benchtop centrifuge; for serum separation at 1,500 × g; 4 °C capable
Ultra-low temperature freezerThermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USAForma™900−80 °C freezer for long-term serum storage
Software
Statistical softwareIBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USASPSS Statistics version 25.0Used for all statistical analyses
Sample size calculation softwareHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyG*Power version 3.1.9.7Used for power analysis and sample size calculation
Diagramming softwareLucid Software Inc., South Jordan, UT, USALucidchart (online version)Used for generating study flowchart

References

  1. Davidson, N., et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and macrophage activation syndrome. Case Rep Rheumatol. 2021, 9323141 (2021).
  2. Chellapandian, D., Milojevic, D. Case report: emapalumab for active disease control prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis complicated by macrophage activation syndrome. Front Pediatr. 11, 1123104 (2023).
  3. Lee, J., et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in children: update on diagnosis and treatment. Children. 11 (7), 755 (2024).
  4. Shakoory, B., et al. The 2022 EULAR/ACR points to consider at the early stages of diagnosis and management of suspected haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome (HLH/MAS). Ann Rheum Dis. 82 (10), 1271-1285 (2023).
  5. Cortes, M., Nudelman, B. G., Rouse, M. J., Frost, M. D. Prolonged fever in a pediatric patient: a case of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis complicated by macrophage activation syndrome. Cureus. 15 (9), e46083 (2023).
  6. Fautrel, B., et al. EULAR/PReS recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Still’s disease, comprising systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult-onset Still’s disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 83 (12), 1614-1627 (2024).
  7. Baldo, F., et al. Current treatment in macrophage activation syndrome worldwide: a systematic literature review to inform the METAPHOR project. Rheumatology (Oxford). 64 (1), 32-44 (2025).
  8. Rogowska, J., et al. Characterization of patients with macrophage activation syndrome secondary to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 44 (5), 2023-2029 (2025).
  9. De Benedetti, F., et al. Emapalumab in macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 382, 1811-1822 (2020).
  10. Adrovic, A., et al. Biologics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: main advantages and major challenges. Arch Rheumatol. 36 (1), 146-157 (2021).
  11. Naniwa, T., Uehara, K., Yamabe, T., Ohmura, S. I. Reintroduction of tocilizumab elicited macrophage activation syndrome in a patient with adult-onset Still’s disease with a previous successful tocilizumab treatment. Mod Rheumatol Case Rep. 5 (2), 360-364 (2021).
  12. Yamabe, T., Ohmura, S. I., Uehara, K., Naniwa, T. Macrophage activation syndrome in patients with adult-onset Still’s disease under tocilizumab treatment: a single-center observational study. Mod Rheumatol. 32 (1), 169-176 (2021).
  13. Ravelli, A., et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with tocilizumab. Arthritis Rheumatol. 66, S83-S84 (2014).
  14. Shimizu, M., et al. Tocilizumab masks the clinical symptoms of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated macrophage activation syndrome: the diagnostic significance of interleukin-18 and interleukin-6. Cytokine. 58 (2), 287-294 (2012).
  15. Li, J., et al. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in adult patients with refractory rheumatic disease-associated macrophage activation syndrome. Front Immunol. 16, 1604648 (2025).
  16. Li, C., et al. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in Chinese patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a multicentre phase IV trial. Clin Rheumatol. 43 (11), 3457-3467 (2024).
  17. Kostik, M. M., et al. Standard and increased canakinumab dosing to quiet macrophage activation syndrome in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Front Pediatr. 10, 894846 (2022).
  18. Charlesworth, J. E. G., et al. Continuous intravenous anakinra for treating severe secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome in critically ill children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 68 (9), e29102 (2021).
  19. Caorsi, R., et al. Long-term efficacy of MAS825, a bispecific anti-IL-1β and IL-18 monoclonal antibody, in two patients with systemic JIA and recurrent episodes of macrophage activation syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 64 (3), 1528-1533 (2024).
  20. Yokota, S., et al. Inflammatory cytokines and systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 14 (1), 12-17 (2004).
  21. Ravelli, A., et al. 2016 classification criteria for macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 68 (3), 566-576 (2016).
  22. Eloseily, E. M. A., et al. Ferritin to erythrocyte sedimentation rate ratio: simple measure to identify macrophage activation syndrome in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. ACR Open Rheumatol. 1 (6), 345-349 (2019).
  23. Zhou, W., Li, J., Tang, X. M., et al. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (2019 edition). Chin J Pract Pediatr. 34 (12), 969-976 (2019).
  24. Tibaldi, J., et al. Development and initial validation of a composite disease activity score for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 59 (11), 3505-3514 (2020).
  25. Consolaro, A., et al. Clinical outcome measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 14 (1), 23 (2016).
  26. Briassouli, E., Syrimi, N., Ilia, S. Hyperferritinemia and Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Septic Shock: Recent Advances with a Pediatric Focus. Children. 12 (9), 1193 (2025).
  27. Ulu, K., et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis on anti-interleukin-1 or -6 therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford). 63 (Suppl 2), Si167-Si172 (2024).
  28. Grom, A. A. Natural killer cell dysfunction: a common pathway in systemic-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, macrophage activation syndrome, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Arthritis Rheum. 50 (3), 689-698 (2004).
  29. Di Nisio, M., et al. Interleukin-6 receptor blockade with subcutaneous tocilizumab improves coagulation activity in patients with COVID-19. Eur J Intern Med. 83, 34-38 (2021).
  30. Put, K., et al. Cytokines in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: tipping the balance between interleukin-18 and interferon-γ. Rheumatology (Oxford). 54 (8), 1507-1517 (2015).
  31. Shimizu, M., et al. Distinct cytokine profiles of systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated macrophage activation syndrome with emphasis on interleukin-18. Rheumatology (Oxford). 49 (9), 1645-1653 (2010).
  32. Ng, S., et al. Recognition of subclinical macrophage activation syndrome in an adolescent systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis patient receiving tocilizumab. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 4 (Suppl 1), rkaa054.003 (2020).
  33. Yokota, S., et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis under treatment with tocilizumab. J Rheumatol. 42 (4), 712-722 (2015).
  34. Chandran, S., et al. Interleukin-6 blockade with tocilizumab increases Tregs and reduces T effector cytokines in renal graft inflammation. Am J Transplant. 21 (7), 2543-2554 (2021).
  35. Herrero-Fernandez, B., Gomez-Bris, R., Somovilla-Crespo, B., Gonzalez-Granado, J. M. Immunobiology of atherosclerosis: a complex network of interactions. Int J Mol Sci. 20 (21), 5293 (2019).
  36. Marocco, R., et al. Role of tocilizumab in downregulating sCD163 plasmatic levels in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. Front Immunol. 13, 871592 (2022).
  37. Jarrell, J. A., et al. Neutralizing anti-IL-1 receptor antagonist autoantibodies induce inflammatory and fibrotic mediators in IgG4-related disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 149 (1), 358-368 (2022).
  38. Vastert, S. J., Kuis, W., Grom, A. A. Systemic JIA: new developments in pathophysiology and therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 23 (5), 655-664 (2009).
  39. Li, C. F., et al. Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in China. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 61 (2), 142-156 (2022).
  40. Nigrovic, P. A. Is there a window of opportunity for treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis?. Arthritis Rheumatol. 66 (6), 1405-1413 (2014).
  41. Nada, D. W., et al. Short-term outcomes and predictors of effectiveness of tocilizumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Front Med (Lausanne). 8, 665028 (2021).
  42. Baris, H. E., Anderson, E., Sozeri, B., Dedeoglu, F. Impact of biologics on disease course in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 37 (12), 3263-3273 (2018).
  43. Barut, K., et al. Prognosis, complications and treatment response in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients. Int J Rheum Dis. 22 (9), 1661-1669 (2019).
  44. De Benedetti, F., et al. Randomized trial of tocilizumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 367 (25), 2385-2395 (2012).
  45. Nakaoka, Y., et al. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 77 (3), 348-354 (2018).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Tocilizumab TherapyRefractory MASGlucocorticoid TherapyCyclosporine ACytokine ProfilesLaboratory ParametersClinical ResponseAdverse Events