All experimental procedures were examined and approved by the Animal Ethics and Welfare Committee of China–Japan Friendship Hospital (approval No. zryhyy21-23-01-09) and were conducted in accordance with the replacement, reduction, and refinement principles to minimize animal use and suffering. Investigators performing data acquisition and analysis (including echocardiography measurements and histological assessment) were blinded to group allocation.
Preparation of SXQY sample
SXQY is composed of the following herbal components: Astragalus membranaceus (Huangqi) (30 g), Codonopsis pilosula (Dangshen; 20 g), Cornus officinalis (Shanyurou; 15 g), Sparganium stoloniferum (Sanleng; 12 g), Curcuma zedoaria (Erzhu; 15 g), Cimicifuga heracleifolia (Shengma; 10 g), Bupleurum chinense (Chaihu; 10 g), Platycodon grandiflorus (Jiegeng; 10 g), Anemarrhena asphodeloides (Zhimu; 15 g), and Leonurus japonicus (Yimu; 15 g), with a total crude herb weight of 152 g per prescription. All herbal materials were purchased from the Department of Pharmacy of China–Japan Friendship Hospital and authenticated by a chief pharmacist according to standard pharmacognostic identification methods. Clinically, SXQY is administered at a dose of one prescription (152 g) per day. Assuming an average adult body weight of 70 kg, the corresponding human dosage is 2.17 g (crude herb)/kg. Based on body surface area normalization between humans and rats, the equivalent rat dosage was calculated to be 13.67 g (crude herb)/kg. For decoction preparation, one prescription of SXQY was soaked in distilled water at a ratio of 10 mL per gram of crude herbs (w/v, based on the initial solvent volume without adjustment after soaking) for 1 h, followed by boiling using an electric heating mantle and maintained at 100°C under continuous boiling for 1 h. The extract was then filtered through gauze (200–300 µm pore size). The residue was then extracted twice more under identical conditions. The pooled filtrates were concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator at 60°C to a final volume of 111 mL, yielding a concentration of 1.37 g (crude drug)/mL. The concentrated decoction was filtered again through gauze (200–300 µm pore size) and stored at 4°C and used within 24–48 h. For administration, the solution was used directly, and the gavage volume was calculated based on the concentration of 1.37 g/mL, resulting in an administration volume of approximately 10 mL/kg to achieve the target dose of 13.67 g/kg.
Animal Model
Eighteen 8-week-old male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were housed in a standard conditioned environment (23°C ± 2°C, 50 ± 5% relative humidity, and a 12 h light/dark cycle) with free access to food and water. Animals were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 6 per group) using a random number table: a sham-operated group (Sham), a transverse aortic constriction group (TAC), and an SXQY-treated group (SXQY). Rats in the TAC and SXQY-treated groups were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane (induction 4%, maintenance 2%) and placed in the supine position on a thermostatically controlled heating pad maintained at 37°C. Adequate anesthesia was confirmed by the absence of reflex responses to paw pinch, along with a stable respiration rate and the absence of spontaneous movement. Ophthalmic ointment was applied to both eyes to prevent corneal drying. Following endotracheal intubation, animals were connected to a small-animal ventilator with a tidal volume of 4–6 mL per 200 g body weight, a respiratory rate of 70 breaths per minute, and an inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio of 1:1.
All surgical procedures were performed under aseptic conditions. Surgical instruments were sterilized by autoclaving, and the operative area was prepared by shaving and disinfecting with povidone–iodine followed by 70% ethanol. After surgical site preparation, a left thoracic skin incision was made, and the pectoralis major and minor muscles were bluntly dissected to expose the ribs. A horizontal incision of approximately 1.0 cm was created at the second to third intercostal space adjacent to the left sternal border. Blood vessels and fascia were bluntly separated, and the thymus was gently retracted to fully expose the aortic arch.
The aortic arch was carefully lifted between the right innominate artery and the left common carotid artery using sterile curved forceps, and a 2-0 silk suture was passed underneath. A blunt-tipped curved 16-gauge needle (outer diameter 1.6 mm) was manually modified by blunting the tip and bending it to an appropriate curvature before use, followed by sterilization with autoclaving. The prepared blunt-tipped curved needle was then positioned parallel to the aortic arch, after which the suture was tied snugly around both the aorta and the needle. The needle was immediately removed to create a standardized constriction, and the thymus was repositioned. After confirming the absence of active bleeding, the chest wall and skin were closed in layers. Postoperatively, mechanical ventilation was continued for approximately 10 min until spontaneous respiration was restored, as indicated by a stable and regular respiratory rate and the ability to maintain spontaneous breathing without ventilatory support. At this point, the endotracheal tube was removed. Sham-operated animals underwent the same surgical procedures except that the aortic arch was not ligated.
After surgery, the incision site was disinfected, and animals were placed in clean recovery cages to reduce the risk of infection. Rats were then returned to the animal facility for recovery and routine housing. Analgesia was administered using buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg, subcutaneously). Rats were observed every 12 h during the first 72 h for signs of pain, distress, or surgical complications, including reduced mobility, piloerection, abnormal posture, labored breathing, or wound dehiscence.
Three days after surgery, rats in the SXQY-treated group were orally gavaged with 1 mL/100 g body weight of the SXQY decoction for 9 weeks. Meanwhile, rats in the sham-operated and TAC groups received an equal volume (1 mL/100 g body weight) of distilled water by gavage.
Transthoracic Echocardiography
At the end of the treatment period, transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all groups. Rats were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane and placed in the supine position on a dedicated imaging platform. The anterior chest was carefully shaved and coated with a generous layer of ultrasound gel. Ultrasound imaging was conducted using a high-resolution small-animal ultrasound system equipped with a high-frequency transducer (18–40 MHz) in B-mode and M-mode. The transducer was positioned gently on the gel-covered area, with a depth setting of 12.29 mm and a gain of 22 dB; the focus was adjusted to optimize image quality. Images and video loops were acquired for subsequent quantitative analysis. Left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter (LVIDd) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end diastole (LVPWd) were measured, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated using the Teichholz formula based on M-mode measurements. For each parameter, measurements were averaged over 3–5 consecutive cardiac cycles. All echocardiographic acquisitions and analyses were performed by a certified operator with formal training in echocardiography, in accordance with standardized echocardiographic protocols.
Sample Collection and Processing
After the ultrasound procedure, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane. Animals were placed in the supine position, and the thoracic cavity was opened to expose the heart. Hearts were rapidly excised, rinsed in cold phosphate-buffered saline, and sectioned along the sagittal plane. Cardiac tissues were immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 24 h, followed by dehydration through a graded ethanol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100%) for 1 h at each step, during which tissues gradually became translucent without noticeable shrinkage. Samples were cleared in xylene, infiltrated with molten paraffin at 60°C for 3 h, and allowed to solidify at room temperature (RT; 20°C–25°C). Paraffin-embedded heart tissue blocks were trimmed and sectioned at 4–6 µm thickness using a microtome. Sections were floated on a water bath maintained at 45°C, mounted onto glass slides, and dried at 37°C–40°C overnight. Slides were stored at RT under low-humidity conditions and used within 1 week for histological staining.
Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) Staining
Paraffin-embedded sections were processed as follows. Sections were first deparaffinized by immersion in xylene I, II, and III for 5 min each, followed by hydration through a series of anhydrous ethanol I and II and graded ethanol solutions (95%, 90%, 80%, 70%, and 50%) for 5 min each, and finally rinsed in distilled water, with no visible wax residues. The sections were then stained with Harris hematoxylin for 5 min and rinsed under running tap water for 1–2 min. Differentiation was performed in acid alcohol solution for approximately 1–2 s, with the endpoint determined by visual inspection when the background appeared pale while nuclear staining remained clearly defined. This was followed by bluing in water at 37°C–45°C and rinsing with distilled water. Subsequently, the sections were counterstained with alcohol-soluble eosin for 40 s, washed with distilled water, dehydrated through graded ethanol, cleared in xylene, and finally mounted with neutral resin.
Masson Staining
Paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinized sequentially in xylene I, II, and III for 5 min each, followed by hydration through anhydrous ethanol I and II and graded ethanol solutions (95%, 90%, 80%, 70%, and 50%) for 5 min each, and finally rinsed in distilled water. Sections were immersed in 0.5% acetic acid (pre-cooled to 4°C) for 1 s, followed by staining with the fuchsin solution from a commercial Masson’s trichrome staining kit for 10 min, followed by differentiation in phosphomolybdic acid for 5 min and counterstaining with aniline blue for 3 min. All reagents were components of the same commercial kit and were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After staining, sections were rinsed three times in acetic acid pre-cooled to 4°C (approximately 30 s per rinse), dehydrated through graded ethanol, cleared in xylene, and mounted with neutral resin.
Serum Sample Collection for Metabolomics Analysis
Six 8-week-old male SD rats were housed under the same conditions as those in the above in vivo experiment. Animals were randomly assigned to an SXQY-treated group and a vehicle control group (distilled water; n = 3 per group) using a computer-generated randomization method. Rats in the SXQY group were orally administered SXQY at a dose of 1 mL/100 g body weight, while the vehicle control group received an equal volume of distilled water. After seven days of daily gavage, the final dose on the seventh day was doubled. Following the last administration, the animals were fasted for 12 h. Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane until loss of the pedal withdrawal reflex was confirmed as an indicator of adequate anesthesia. Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital venous plexus using sterile capillary tubes and immediately transferred into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes without anticoagulant. The whole blood was then allowed to stand at RT for 1 h and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 15 min at 4°C to obtain serum. When a clear separation between the upper transparent serum layer and the clot appeared, the supernatant serum was carefully aspirated and transferred into clean microcentrifuge tubes. Serum samples were stored at −80°C until analysis of blood-entering components.
Sample Pretreatment for Metabolomics Analysis
Serum samples were thawed on ice after removal from −80°C storage and briefly vortex-mixed (10 s) to ensure homogeneity. An aliquot of 100 µL serum was transferred into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube, followed by the addition of 500 µL of extraction solvent (20% acetonitrile–methanol containing 2-chloro-L-phenylalanine as an internal standard at a final concentration of 1 µg/mL) to induce protein precipitation. The mixture was vortexed vigorously for 3 min and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. A 470 µL portion of the resulting supernatant was transferred to a new tube and evaporated to dryness using a nitrogen evaporator under a low, controlled flow of nitrogen. After reconstitution in 200 µL of 70% methanol–water and vortexing for 1 min, samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and 180 µL of the clarified supernatant was transferred into autosampler vials for liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis.
An aliquot of 200 µL of SXQY sample was then transferred into a pre-labeled 1.5 mL centrifuge tube. The internal standard extraction solution was added to each sample at a volume ratio of 1:1 (v/v). The mixture was vortex-mixed for 15 min and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 3 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was carefully collected and filtered through a 0.22 µm microporous membrane, yielding a transparent filtrate without visible particles. The filtrate was transferred to autosampler vials and stored at 4°C prior to ultra-performance LC-MS/MS (UPLC–MS/MS) analysis.
Preparation of Internal Standard Solutions
The internal standard (2-chloro-L-phenylalanine) stock solution was prepared by dissolving 1 mg of the reference standard in 1 mL of 70% (v/v) methanol–water, yielding a concentration of 1,000 µg/mL. This stock solution was further diluted with the same solvent to obtain a working internal standard solution with a final concentration of 1 ppm, which was freshly prepared, stored at 4°C, and used within 48–72 h.
UPLC–MS/MS Conditions
Chromatographic separation was performed using a UPLC system coupled to a tandem mass spectrometer. Separation was achieved on a C18 column maintained at 40°C, with a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min and an injection volume of 4 µL. The mobile phase consisted of ultrapure water containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (B). Gradient elution was applied as follows: 5% B at 0.0 min; linearly increased to 25% B at 2.0 min, 35% B at 3.0 min, 60% B at 5.0 min, and 99% B at 6.0 min; held at 99% B for 1.5 min; returned to 5% B at 7.6 min; and equilibrated at 5% B until 10.0 min.
Mass spectrometric detection was carried out using a high-resolution mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source operating in positive and negative ion modes. The spray voltages were set to 3500 V in positive mode and 3200 V in negative mode. The sheath gas and auxiliary gas were set to 30 and 5 arbitrary units (instrument-defined), respectively. The ion transfer tube temperature and vaporizer temperature were maintained at 320°C and 300°C, respectively. Full MS scans were acquired over an m/z range of 84–1250 at a resolution of 35,000 with an automatic gain control (AGC) target of 1.0 × 106, followed by data-dependent MS/MS acquisition (top 10) at a resolution of 17,500 with an AGC target of 2.0 × 105 and an isolation window of 1.0–1.5 m/z. Stepped normalized collision energies of 30, 40, and 50 were applied. The top 10 most intense precursor ions were selected for fragmentation with a dynamic exclusion duration of 3 s.
Raw Data Processing
Raw mass spectrometry data were converted to mzML format using ProteoWizard. To ensure analytical reliability, pooled quality control (QC) samples were prepared by mixing equal volumes of all serum samples. QC samples were injected at regular intervals (one QC injection every 5–10 analytical samples) throughout the UPLC–MS/MS analysis to monitor instrument stability, retention time consistency, and signal reproducibility. Reproducibility was evaluated based on the relative standard deviation of peak intensities in QC samples.
Peak detection, retention time correction, and peak alignment were performed using the XCMS package. Features with a missing rate greater than 50% within any group were excluded from further analysis. Signal drift correction was subsequently applied to peak areas using a support vector regression (SVR)-based normalization method implemented in the R statistical software using QC-based modeling to correct signal drift across the analytical run.
Metabolite identification was carried out by matching the corrected features against an in-house reference standard library (containing approximately 5,000 compounds with both MS1 and MS2 spectral data; proprietary and not publicly available), as well as publicly available spectral databases including Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), Metabolite and Tandem Mass Spectrometry Database (METLIN), MassBank, and Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking (GNPS), based on accurate mass matching, retention time alignment, and MS/MS spectral similarity. Mass matching was performed using a tolerance of ±25 ppm for precursor (MS1) and fragment ions (MS2), with a retention time tolerance of ±6 s. For library searching, a tolerance of ±25 ppm was applied to precursor ions (Q1) and ±50 ppm to MS/MS fragments, with a minimum MS/MS matching score of 0.3. Only metabolites with a comprehensive identification score greater than 0.5 were retained for non-targeted identification. The final score was calculated as a weighted sum of fragment (0.1), forward (0.3), and reverse (0.6) matching scores. Data acquired in positive and negative ionization modes were merged at the compound level. For duplicated annotations, the entry with the highest identification confidence and the highest score was selected. The finalized annotations were compiled into a metabolite annotation file.
Criteria for Identification of Absorbed Compounds
Absorbed prototype constituents were defined as compounds detected in the SXQY extract and the SXQY-treated group with matching retention times within a tolerance of ±0.1 min. In addition, these compounds were required to exhibit a peak area in the SXQY-treated group that was at least two-fold higher than that in the vehicle control group or to be absent from the vehicle control samples.
Absorbed metabolites were identified using a different set of criteria. These compounds were not detected in the SXQY extract but were present in the SXQY-treated group. Their mass spectrometric features were required to be consistent with characteristic metabolic transformations, including hydroxylation (Δm/z = +15.9949 Da) and demethylation (Δm/z = −14.0157 Da). Furthermore, the peak area in the SXQY-treated group was required to be at least two-fold higher than that in the vehicle control group based on normalized peak areas after signal drift correction, or the corresponding signal had to be undetectable in the vehicle control samples.
Retrieval of Absorbed Compound-Related Genes
Blood-entering components were interrogated in the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform (TCMSP; https://old.tcmsp-e.com/tcmsp.ph; accessed in January 2026)20. Compounds documented in TCMSP were screened as candidate bioactive constituents based on established pharmacokinetic thresholds of oral bioavailability ≥ 30% and drug-likeness ≥ 0.1821. The putative targets corresponding to the retained compounds were subsequently retrieved, and all target identifiers were standardized to official gene symbols using the UniProt database22.
Retrieval of Disease-Related Targets and Intersection Genes
HF-related genes were collected from the GeneCards database (https://www.genecards.org/; accessed in January 2026) using “heart failure” as the search term, and genes with a relevance score ≥ 10 were selected for further analysis. The HF-related targets were subsequently intersected with compound-associated targets identified from TCMSP using the Weishengxin platform (https://www.bioinformatics.com.cn; accessed in January 2026). The overlapping genes were defined as intersection targets and were used for subsequent protein–protein interaction (PPI) network construction and functional enrichment analyses.
Network Construction and Functional Enrichment Analyses
PPI analysis of the identified targets was performed using the STRING database (http://cn.string-db.org/; accessed in January 2026)23 with the species set to Homo sapiens and a confidence score threshold of ≥0.7. The interaction data were imported into the Cytoscape visualization tool for network visualization. Topological analysis was performed using the NetworkAnalyzer plugin in the visualization tool, and hub genes were identified using the CytoHubba plugin24,25. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed on the intersection targets, including biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF) categories. GO terms with a P value < 0.05 were regarded as significant, and the top 10 enriched terms from each category were selected for visualization26. The intersection targets were further subjected to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis using the clusterProfiler package in the statistical software. Pathways with a P value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and the top 20 enriched pathways were selected for visualization. These pathways were subsequently used to construct a target–pathway interaction network27.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and homogeneity of variance was evaluated using Levene’s test or Brown-Forsythe test prior to analysis. Statistical comparisons among groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test using GraphPad Prism. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.