A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Research Article

Association of MPO Expression with the Immune Microenvironment in Breast Cancer: Insights from Bioinformatics and Single-Cell Analyses

77 views

DOI:

10.3791/71189

August 14th, 2026

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

This article presents a reproducible bioinformatics and single-cell workflow for exploring associations between myeloperoxidase (MPO) expression and immune/myeloid features in breast cancer. Because the analyses are based on public datasets and in silico methods, the findings are interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality, and exploratory computational workflows can help prioritize immune-associated markers for further investigation. Here, we used the cancer genome atlas breast invasive carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) bulk transcriptomic data and the public single-cell dataset GSE161529 to examine associations between myeloperoxidase (MPO) expression, clinical outcomes, immune infiltration, methylation, upstream-regulator annotations, single-cell expression patterns, virtual knockdown sensitivity outputs, drug–gene interaction retrieval, and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) annotation. MPO expression was lower in breast cancer tissues than in adjacent non-tumor tissues. Higher MPO expression was associated with a longer progression-free interval, whereas its associations with overall survival and disease-specific survival were not statistically significant. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis suggested tumor–normal separation within the analyzed public dataset, but this should not be interpreted as clinical diagnostic validation. Immune deconvolution and enrichment analyses indicated that MPO expression mainly tracked with immune- and myeloid-related transcriptional features, rather than establishing tumor-intrinsic regulation of the immune microenvironment. At single-cell resolution, the MPO signal was sparse, with only 85 MPO-positive cells detected before k-nearest neighbor (KNN)-based neighborhood expansion. Detectable MPO signal and MPO-associated scores were interpreted cautiously because they may be influenced by sparse expression, cell-type annotation uncertainty, dropout, doublets, or ambient RNA. In silico virtual knockdown suggested candidate immune- and inflammatory-related transcriptional changes, but these results were considered exploratory and require validation. Drug-gene interaction database (DGIdb)-based drug-gene retrieval and ADMET annotation were used only as preliminary chemical annotations and were not interpreted as therapeutic evidence. Overall, this study provides a reproducible in silico workflow for generating hypotheses about MPO-associated immune/myeloid features in breast cancer, which require external cohort validation and experimental confirmation.

Introduction

Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous immune-related malignancy1. Its disease progression, risk of recurrence and metastasis, and treatment response are closely associated with the composition and functional status of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME)2. Despite ongoing optimization of comprehensive treatment strategies, some patients still experience progression or recurrence, underscoring the urgent need to identify molecular biomarkers that characterize TIME status and support risk stratification, while elucidating their underlying mechanisms.

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is a heme-contain....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Acquisition from the TCGA database

RNA sequencing data and clinical information for the TCGA breast invasive carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) cohort were obtained from the genomic data commons portal14. STAR workflow RNA-seq data in transcripts per million (TPM) format were extracted together with matched clinical annotations. RNA-seq samples lacking corresponding clinical information were excluded. For expression-based analyses, TPM values were transformed as log2(TPM + 1). MPO expression was extracted using the gene symbol MPO and Ensembl gene ID ENSG00000005381.8. For analyses requiring MPO-high and MPO-low gr....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

MPO expression patterns and exploratory survival associations in breast cancer

To describe MPO expression patterns across cancer datasets, we analyzed MPO RNA-seq data from the TCGA pan-cancer dataset and observed lower MPO expression in tumor tissues from bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA), breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), kidney chromophobe (KICH), liver hepatocellular carcinoma (.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

This study presents an exploratory public-dataset and in silico workflow for examining associations between MPO expression and immune/myeloid features in breast cancer. The TCGA-BRCA analyses showed that MPO expression was lower in tumor tissues than in adjacent non-tumor tissues and that higher MPO expression was associated with a longer progression-free interval. However, overall survival and disease-specific survival were not statistically significant. Therefore, MPO should not be interpreted as a robust or establishe.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. An AI-based language editing tool was used only to assist with English language polishing and readability during manuscript revision. The tool was not used for study design, data analysis, figure generation, result interpretation, reference selection, or drawing scientific conclusions. All analyses, results, interpretations, references, and final text were carefully checked, reviewed, and approved by the authors, who take full responsibility for the content of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Scientific Research Fund of Aerospace Center Hospital (YN202530).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
CellChatR package/Open sourcehttps://github.com/sqjin/CellChatCell-cell communication analysis
ChIP-AtlasPublic databasehttps://chip-atlas.org/TF target screening; 2021 update 
clusterProfilerBioconductorhttps://bioconductor.org/packages/clusterProfiler/GO/KEGG enrichment analysis; v4.4.4
CytoscapeCytoscape Consortiumhttps://cytoscape.org/Network visualization and topology analysis
DGIdbWashington University/Public databasehttps://www.dgidb.org/Drug-gene interaction retrieval
GDC/TCGA-BRCANational Cancer Institutehttps://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/Bulk transcriptomic and clinical data source
Gene Expression Omnibus: GSE161529NCBIhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/Single-cell dataset source
GSEA/MSigDBBroad Institutehttps://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdbGene set enrichment analysis and gene-set reference; Version 3.0 
GSVABioconductorhttps://bioconductor.org/packages/GSVA/Gene set variation/ssGSEA-related scoring; Version 1.46.0
GTRDPublic databasehttp://gtrd.biouml.org/TF target screening; 2021 
KnockTFPublic databasehttp://www.licpathway.net/KnockTF/index.htmlTF perturbation resource; Version 2.0 
RR Foundation for Statistical Computinghttps://www.r-project.org/Statistical computing environment
scTenifoldKnkR package/Open sourcehttps://github.com/cailab-tamu/scTenifoldKnkVirtual knockdown analysis
SeuratR package/Open sourcehttps://satijalab.org/seurat/Single-cell preprocessing and clustering
STRINGELIXIR/Public databasehttps://string-db.org/Protein-protein interaction analysis; v11 
SwissADMESIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformaticshttp://www.swissadme.ch/Drug-likeness assessment; 2017 release/web tool 
TIMERPublic web resourcehttps://timer.cistrome.org/Immune infiltration analysis; TIMER2.0 
UCSC Xena or linked TCGA portalUCSChttps://xenabrowser.net/Exploratory data access/validation 

References

  1. Onkar SS, et al. The great immune escape: Understanding the divergent immune response in breast cancer subtypes. Cancer Discov. 2023;13(1):23-40.
  2. Quail DF, Park M, Welm AL, Ekiz HA. Breast cancer immunity: It is time for the next chapter. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2024;14(2):a041324.
  3. Valadez-Cosmes P, Raftopoulou S, Mihalic ZN, Marsche G, Kargl J. Myeloperoxidase: Growing importance in cancer pathogenesis and potential drug target. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;236:108052.
  4. Ohshima H, Tatemichi M, Sawa T. Chemical basis of inflammation-induced carcinogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;417(1):3-11.
  5. Davies MJ, Hawkins CL. The role of myeloperoxidas....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Single-Cell AnalysisBioinformatics WorkflowImmune InfiltrationTCGA-BRCAMyeloid FeaturesImmune DeconvolutionDrug-Gene Interaction