$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ege University Faculty of Medicine. All peripheral blood samples were collected after written informed consent was obtained from patients or their legal guardians, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This retrospective single-center study was designed to evaluate the frequency of interferonopathy-associated variants among patients undergoing genetic analysis for suspected autoinflammatory disease and to investigate their relationship with vasculitis. Between 2022 and 2025, peripheral blood samples sent to the Ege University Molecular Medicine Laboratory with a preliminary diagnosis of autoinflammatory disease were included. A total of 1,204 samples underwent genetic analysis. CES/WES was used as a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach targeting exons and adjacent intronic sequences. Variants were classified using ACMG criteria and bioinformatics analysis. Benign and potentially benign variants were excluded. Among these, 132 pediatric cases with identified interferonopathy-associated variants who met the inclusion criteria were included in the final study cohort.
Within this pediatric cohort, clinical data were retrieved from a rheumatology clinic database. Overall, 92 unique genetic variants were identified among the 132 patients, including 13 previously reported pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants documented in public variant databases (e.g., ClinVar) and 79 novel variants that were absent from public databases as of February 2026. Most variants were heterozygous and were associated with CAPS-like phenotypes or complex autoinflammatory vasculitis presentations. WES used an NGS approach targeting protein-coding regions (exons) and adjacent intronic sequences to detect splice-site and regulatory variants. Although WES covers approximately 1%–2% of the human genome, it captures nearly 85% of known disease-causing mutations, making it a highly efficient tool for rare variant detection.
The laboratory workflow included genomic DNA extraction from peripheral blood, DNA fragmentation, adapter-ligated library preparation, and exome enrichment using hybridization-based capture probes via biotin-streptavidin pulldown. High-throughput paired-end sequencing was performed on a DNA nanoball sequencing platform, achieving a mean coverage depth of 100–200x to ensure reliable variant detection. Bioinformatic analysis involved alignment to the reference genome, variant calling, and annotation using curated variant databases, with variant classification performed according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Variants were categorized as previously reported or novel. Selected variants were validated by Sanger sequencing.
In addition to standard bioinformatic pipelines, physics-based signal-processing principles and simplified computational modeling were applied to assess sequencing depth, coverage uniformity, and signal-to-noise characteristics, thereby providing an exploratory, supplementary layer for analyzing raw sequencing depth and regional coverage. Furthermore, biophysical modeling concepts were employed to evaluate the cumulative impact of vasculitis-associated genetic variants.
This interdisciplinary framework serves as a preliminary laboratory model to study variant-filtering characteristics in an exploratory research context, particularly to guide anti-interferon therapeutic strategies. Limitations include reduced sensitivity for low-level mosaic variants and the requirement for functional validation of novel findings. Potential applications include early diagnosis of pediatric vasculitis, personalized therapeutic decision-making, and expansion of variant databases relevant to immunology, rheumatology, and vascular medicine.
DNA fragmentation
Twenty microliters of diluted DNA were transferred into new sterile PCR tubes. To each tube, 2 µL of fragmentation/adenylation buffer and 3 µL of fragmentation/adenylation enzyme mix were added; the total reaction volume was 25 µL. The mixture was mixed gently, briefly centrifuged, and the fragmentation program was run on the thermal cycler. Immediately after completion, the tubes were briefly centrifuged and placed on ice. The expected outcome was an average DNA fragment size of 200–300 bp.
Adapter ligation
To each fragmentation product, 2.5 µL of sequencing adapter was added, followed by 10 µL of ligation master mix (without vortexing). The mixture was gently pipetted to ensure homogeneity, briefly centrifuged, and incubated at 20 °C for 15 min with the thermal cycler lid open. After incubation, the tubes were briefly centrifuged and kept on ice.
Bead-based purification
Thirty microliters of magnetic beads were added to each sample and mixed thoroughly by pipetting until a homogeneous suspension was obtained. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 5 min, and the tubes were then placed on a magnetic stand for 3 min. After the supernatant cleared, it was carefully removed. The pellet was washed twice with 100 µL of 80% ethanol, and residual ethanol was removed after the final wash. The beads were then air-dried on the magnetic stand for up to 5 min. Nine microliters of nuclease-free water were added, the pellet was resuspended by pipetting and incubated for 2 min at room temperature. After magnetic separation for 3 min, 7.5 µL of supernatant was transferred to a new labeled PCR tube.
PCR amplification
In vitro transcription (IVT) primers were diluted (20 µL of primer stock + 80 µL of nuclease-free water). For the PCR reaction (total volume 17.5 µL), 2.5 µL of IVT primer 1, 2.5 µL of IVT primer 2, and 12.5 µL of library amplification master mix were added. The mixture was gently pipetted, and the PCR-3 program was performed.
Post-PCR purification
Twenty-five microliters of magnetic beads were added to each PCR product. After 5 min incubation at room temperature and magnetic separation, the beads were washed twice with 100 µL of 80% ethanol. After air-drying for up to 5 min, 11 µL of nuclease-free water was added. Ten microliters of supernatant were transferred to a new tube. Library concentration was measured; target: >25 ng/µL.
Pooling and hybridization (samples per pool)
Libraries were pooled with eight patient samples per pool (93.75 ng per sample, total 750 ng). The volume was adjusted to 12.5 µL with nuclease-free water if necessary. The hybridization mix was preincubated at 65 °C for 15 min. Blocking solution, universal blocking oligonucleotides, exome capture probe, nuclease-free water, and hybridization enhancer were added sequentially. The 16 h hybridization program was initiated (18:00–10:00).
Capture of hybridized targets onto streptavidin beads
Streptavidin beads were washed three times with binding buffer. After the 16 h hybridization, the mixture was added to the beads and incubated at 25 °C for 30 min with gentle mixing every 5 min. Washing was performed with capture wash buffer 1 at room temperature, followed by three washes with prewarmed (48 °C) capture wash buffer 2, including incubation at 48 °C. After the final wash, the pellet was resuspended in 23 µL of nuclease-free water.
Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) preparation
Twenty-four microliters of TE buffer were added, and the mixture was denatured at 95 °C for 3 min, then immediately placed on ice. A master mix containing splint ligation buffer and rapid DNA ligase was added, and the SS-2 program (37 °C, 30 min) was run to circularize the single-stranded DNA. Digestion buffer and digestion enzyme mix were added, and the SS-3 program (37 °C, 30 min) was run. Then, 3.75 µL of digestion stop buffer was added. Eighty-five microliters of magnetic beads were added, followed by standard bead purification. Fifteen microliters of supernatant were transferred to a new tube; the expected concentration was 0.8–2 ng/µL.
DNA nanoball (DNB) preparation
The ssDNA products were used for DNB formation. DNB formation buffer, low-EDTA TE buffer, and DNB enzyme mixes 1 and 2 were added. DNB-1 and DNB-2 programs were run sequentially. After completion, 20 µL of DNB reaction stop buffer was added and gently mixed (5–8x) using wide-bore pipette tips; the expected concentration was 8–40 ng. The prepared DNBs were loaded onto the DNA nanoball sequencing platform for high-throughput sequencing.
Sequencing data processing and signal analysis
Raw sequencing reads were quality-controlled using FastQC (v0.11.9) and fastp (v0.23.1). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold of 20 dB was optimized using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis against a benchmark dataset of known autoinflammatory variants, balancing a false discovery rate (FDR) of <1% with a target sensitivity of >95% for low-frequency variants; reads falling below this 20 dB threshold were discarded. Alignment to the Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 38 (GRCh38) reference genome and initial variant calling were performed using BWA-MEM (v0.7.17) and the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK, v4.2.6).
For the physics-based signal processing steps, nucleotide sequences were converted into binary numerical signals (0 representing purines; 1 representing pyrimidines). To compute the DFT, the binary signal was processed with a sliding window of N = 512 base pairs and a 50% overlap (256 bp step size) to maintain localized genomic resolution. The DFT was defined as:
![figure-protocol-1 Discrete Fourier Transform formula, Σ from n=0 to N-1, X[k], diagram, signal processing.](/files/ftp_upload/71279/71279eq2.jpg)
To filter out high-frequency sequencing artifacts without over-smoothing true single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), which manifest as sharp, high-frequency localized transitions, a low-pass digital filter was programmatically calibrated. The optimal normalized cutoff frequency (fc) was determined iteratively by scanning the range of 0.05–0.25 cycles/base. The optimization algorithm selected fc = 0.15 cycles/base, defined as the inflection point where the signal power spectrum retained ≥85% of the total variance of known true-positive control variants while eliminating background technical noise. DFT-based filtering was applied using custom scripts written in Python (v3.9), specifically utilizing the NumPy (v1.23.0) and SciPy (v1.9.1) libraries, to reduce high-frequency noise while preserving mutation-associated spectral features. Filtering parameters were iteratively calibrated programmatically to prevent over-smoothing of rare variant signals. The integrated workflow for signal processing and biophysical modeling is summarized in Figure 2.
Biophysical and stochastic modeling of interferon signaling
To investigate the functional consequences of identified variants, JAK–STAT pathway dynamics were modeled using ordinary differential equations (ODEs) defined as:

Deterministic ODE simulations were executed using COPASI (Complex Pathway Simulator, v4.36) and corroborated with custom Python scripts using the scipy.integrate.solve_ivp module. Biologically realistic initial conditions were established, and sensitivity analyses were performed on amplification rate constants using the SALib (Sensitivity Analysis Library in Python, v1.4.5). TYK2-mediated IFN-α signaling kinetics were incorporated to simulate gain-of-function–driven STAT2 amplification.
Stochastic effects were introduced using a Langevin formulation:
dX = f(X) dt + g(X)dW
Additionally, Gillespie stochastic simulations were conducted utilizing the GillesPy2 (v1.7.0) Python library to model transcriptional bursting and heterogeneous IFN-β–induced interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) activation. Distributed delay functions represented by gamma-kernel formulations were implemented in Python using numerical integration to simulate delayed transcriptional feedback mechanisms. All computational pipelines, including signal filtering and mathematical modeling, were executed on a Linux-based high-performance computing (HPC) environment.

Figure 2. Integrated framework for signal processing and biophysical modeling of JAK-STAT signaling. 1: Signal processing stage: binary mapping of nucleotide sequences (purines = 0, pyrimidines = 1) followed by DFT-based filtering. Note the critical SNR threshold at 20 dB for accurate variant calling. 2: Biophysical modeling: ODE-based simulation of amplification rates where small perturbations in initial conditions lead to threshold shifts in sustained signaling. 3: Biological phenotype: modeling of TYK2 gain-of-function variants in the IFN-α pathway, leading to amplified STAT2 activation and resultant interferonopathy phenotypes. Abbreviations: DFT = discrete Fourier transform; IFN-α = interferon alpha; JAK-STAT = Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription; ODE = ordinary differential equation; SNR = signal-to-noise ratio; STAT2 = signal transducer and activator of transcription 2; TYK2 = tyrosine kinase 2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2 summarizes the integration of DFT-based signal processing with ODE- and stochastic-modeling components used in the exploratory computational workflow. This comprehensive protocol integrates advanced molecular genetics, high-throughput sequencing technologies, signal-processing algorithms, and biophysical modeling to support the detection and functional interpretation of interferonopathy-associated variants in pediatric autoinflammatory vasculitis.
Statistical framework and signal mapping probability distribution
To formalize the digital mapping of genomic sequences prior to signal filtering, a binary conversion framework was established based on nucleotide biochemistry. For any given structural genomic window of length N, purines {A, G} are mapped to a digital value of 0, and pyrimidines {C, T} are mapped to 1. Under the null hypothesis (H0) of an unbiased, uniform background genomic distribution, this binary conversion follows a Bernoulli trial framework. The probability mass function (PMF) of the mapped signal X is defined as follows
P(X = x) = px(1 - p)1-x for x ∈ {0,1}
where p = 0.5 represents the probability of encountering a pyrimidine residue across an unselected background track. When scaling this conversion across sequential bases for power spectral density (PSD) calculation via the DFT, the cumulative background noise distribution behaves as a random walk, converging to a Gaussian white noise distribution by the Central Limit Theorem. Consequently, the normalized power spectrum of this null distribution follows a chi-squared (χ2) distribution with 2 degrees of freedom. To maintain a strict statistical significance threshold (α = 0.05), the critical power intensity threshold for defining a genuine pathogenic variant signal spike was analytically calculated using the following probability density integration:
Threshold = - In(a) x a2
where σ2 represents the operational variance of the local background genomic noise floor. Any spectral peak exceeding this threshold (p < 0.05, equivalent to an SNR > 20 dB) was prioritized for downstream in silico filtration gates, ensuring that variant calling is data-driven and less affected by stochastic sequencing noise.
Operational efficiency and cost analysis (Figure 3)
From a translational and clinical implementation perspective, the operational efficiency, clinical turnaround time (TAT), and economic viability of this integrated protocol were benchmarked against traditional diagnostic pathways, such as sequential Sanger sequencing or restricted targeted gene panels. While conventional diagnostic odysseys for pediatric vasculitis or suspected type I interferonopathies frequently span 8–12 weeks due to iterative single-gene testing, the streamlined workflow—encompassing high-throughput WES, optimized 16 h hybridization, and parallelized DFT signal filtering on a high-performance computing (HPC) cluster—achieves a reported total clinical TAT of 10–14 days from initial sample receipt to the final molecular report. Furthermore, due to efficient sample multiplexing (pooling eight patient samples per hybridization block), the core reagent and sequencing cost is reported to be approximately $250–$300 per patient, compared with traditional comprehensive panels that often exceed $1,200–$1,800. This compression of both diagnostic timeline and cost frameworks suggests that the proposed physics-inspired bioinformatics workflow may be feasible and scalable for routine clinical genetics laboratories.