A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Research Article

Piezo1 Promotes Scleral ECM Remodeling via Mechanical Strain–Induced Fibroblast Differentiation

121 views

DOI:

10.3791/71340

August 11th, 2026

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

This study combines a rat ocular hypertension model with in vitro mechanical strain, agonist/inhibitor, and siRNA experiments in human scleral fibroblasts to show that Piezo1 expression is elevated during scleral extracellular matrix remodeling and is functionally involved in myofibroblast differentiation.

Abstract

Mechanical strain-induced myofibroblast differentiation is a pivotal mechanism underlying scleral extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling in glaucoma. However, the conversion of mechanical strain into biochemical signals within scleral fibroblasts remains inadequately elucidated. This study sought to investigate the role of Piezo1 in cellular proliferation and differentiation, in the context of mechanical strain-induced myofibroblast differentiation during scleral ECM remodeling. The study design combines in vivo expression observations from a one‑week rat ocular hypertension model with in vitro mechanistic assays using cyclic mechanical stretch (10% at 0.5 Hz for up to 24 h) and pharmacological modulation of Piezo1 (agonist Yoda1, inhibitor GsMTx4, and siRNA knockdown) in primary human scleral fibroblasts (HSF cells). Our findings demonstrate that Piezo1 is expressed in scleral tissue and HSF cells. In the in vivo arm, a significant increase in Piezo1 protein levels was observed in the sclera of ocular hypertensive rats after one week, which coincided with elevated expression of type I collagen (COL1) and α‑smooth muscle actin (α‑SMA). In the in vitro experiments, mechanical stretch (8–24 h) upregulated Piezo1 expression in HSF cells. Moreover, activation of Piezo1 with Yoda1 (24 h) facilitated HSF cell proliferation and enhanced the expression of α‑SMA and COL1. Conversely, knockdown or inhibition of Piezo1 suppressed COL1 expression and hindered myofibroblast differentiation under mechanical strain. Additionally, Piezo1 activation led to an upregulation of Yes‑associated protein (YAP) expression, whereas mechanical strain‑induced YAP expression was diminished upon Piezo1 knockdown or inhibition. In summary, our findings suggest that Piezo1 plays a role in mechanical strain‑induced expression of key ECM components in the sclera in the context of glaucoma and may represent a potential therapeutic target requiring further in vivo validation.

Introduction

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness characterized by progressive degeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and optic nerve head (ONH) axons, affecting 76 million people worldwide in 20201,2. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the greatest risk factor for glaucoma3 and IOP reduction is currently the only available option to delay glaucoma development and progression4. The ONH, the structure where the RGC axons exit the eye, is the principal site of damage in glaucoma. IOP elevation induces mechanical strain and displacement in the ONH, resulting in degeneration of the RGC axons within the laminar cribrosa (LC), eventually leading to glaucomatous optic neuropathy5,6.

The peripapillary sclera (PPS) is the principal load-bearing tissue of the ONH, with the mechanical properties of PPS determining the ONH response to IOP-induced mechanical strain7,8. Finite element modeling and ex vivo studies confirmed that the LC biomechanical strain relies on scleral stiffness, and enhanced PPS stiffness contributes to reduced strain in the LC9,10. Then, the variation in stiffness11,12 and thickness13 of PPS can alter the IOP-related biomechanical properties of the ONH, further changing the susceptibility to glaucomatous optic nerve damage14,15. In biomechanical studies, the ocular rigidity of glaucomatous sclera was greater than normal sclera in postmortem human eyes 16,17, and peripapillary scleral stiffening has been consistently observed in both human glaucoma and experimental animal models18,19,20. These data suggest that stiffening of the sclera may be a protective response through decreased IOP-induced ONH deformation during glaucoma.

The biomechanical characteristics of the sclera tissue are a result of the composition of the extracellular matrix synthesized by fibroblasts21. Recent evidence suggests that mechanical strain arising from increased IOP is capable of activating scleral fibroblasts residing within the sclera22, promote myofibroblast differentiation23 and result in ECM remodeling24,25. The mechanical strain-induced myofibroblast transformation is a key process during scleral ECM remodeling in glaucoma, but it is unclear how the mechanical strain is converted into biochemical signals and cellular responses in scleral fibroblasts.

Piezo1 is one member of a novel distinct nonselective cationic mechanosensitive channel family involved in fibrosis of several organs, including cardiac and lung skin26,27. Mechanical strain can activate the cellular Piezo1 channels leading to increased Ca2+ influx28, thereby calcium-dependent signaling to regulate a variety of cellular activities, including the proliferation, motility, and differentiation of fibroblasts29,30. Recent studies revealed that under mechanical strain, Piezo1 promotes skin fibrotic processes by stimulating fibroblast proliferation, motility, and differentiation31. This study includes two complementary components: a descriptive in vivo study of Piezo1 expression in a rat ocular hypertension model, and a mechanistic in vitro study using primary human scleral fibroblasts under cyclic mechanical strain. We hypothesized that mechanical strain activates Piezo1, which promotes myofibroblast differentiation and ECM component expression in scleral fibroblasts, potentially via YAP signaling.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Male Sprague‑Dawley rats (8 weeks of age) were sourced from the Fudan University Children's Hospital Experimental Animal Center. All rats were ad libitum and housed under SPF conditions at 22±1 ℃ and a 12 h day/night cycle. All animal experiments adhered to the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and were approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Children's Hospital of Fudan University (2022JS-EKYY-019). Human scleral tissues used to derive primary human scleral fibroblasts were obtained from donor sclera in accordance with institutional guidelines, and all related procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fudan University (2024-YS-187).

Experimental design

The present study employed both in vivo and in vitro approaches, conceptually connected by mechanical strain, to examine the contribution of Piezo1 to scleral ECM remodeling. In vivo, we used a rat ocular hypertension model to examine Piezo1 expression under elevated IOP. In vitro, we subjected primary human scleral fibroblasts to cyclic mechanical stretch to model the mechanical strain experienced by the sclera in glaucoma, and we manipulated Piezo1 activity using pharmacological agonist (Yoda1), inhibitor (GsMTx4), and siRNA knockdown.

Experimental chronic ocular hypertension (OHT) model

A total of 18 male SD rats were used. In each rat, the right eye received carbomer injection to induce ocular hypertension (OHT), with the contralateral left eye serving as the control group (NT). Three independent biological replicates of the whole experiment were performed, giving a total of 18 eyes per group. The experimental unit was the individual eye. Investigators performing IOP measurements and Western blot analysis were blinded to group allocation.

An experimental chronic OHT model was generated in rats as previously described25. Briefly, rats were anesthetized with 10% chloral hydrate, and after pupillary dilation by tropicamide, carbomer solution (0.3%, 20 µL) was injected into the anterior ocular chamber. Chlortetracycline hydrochloride was applied to prevent infection. IOP measurements were performed with a rebound tonometer after 3 and 7 days. Tissues from the sclera were collected one week after the model was considered established.

The scleral tissues were isolated as described previously in detail25. Following anesthesia, the rats were perfused transcardially with 4% formaldehyde in PBS. Extraneous orbital tissue was dissected from the globe, and the anterior segment structures (cornea, iris, lens) and the vitreous were carefully removed. The retina and choroid were gently scraped from the inner scleral wall. The posterior sclera tissues were collected and identified by pathological H&E staining.

Cell cultivation

Primary human scleral fibroblasts (HSF cells) were a previously established cell line from human donor sclera32. Three independent biological replicates (cells from three different donors) were used for each experiment. HSF cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin‑streptomycin under standard culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere). Cultures were split every four days, and HSF cells between passages 5 and 9 were employed for all experiments. HSF cells were confirmed by immunofluorescence using collagen type I and α-smooth muscle actin cell markers.

Application of mechanical stimulation

The cyclic mechanical stretch system was used to produce mechanical cyclic stretch. A seeding density of 2×105 cells/mL was used for HSF cells plated in six‑well plates with collagen‑coated flexible bottoms. Stretch group cells were exposed to cyclic stretch at 10% amplitude and 0.5 Hz as described in our previous study32. Cells cultured in stretch plates, but left static served as controls. Piezo1 siRNA knockdown experiment: Cells received a 48‑h transfection of Piezo1 siRNA or negative control siRNA prior to mechanical stretch. After transfection, the cells underwent cyclic mechanical stretching for 24 h. Four groups were included: (A) control siRNA‑transfected cells without stretch; (B) control siRNA‑transfected cells with stretch; (C) Piezo1 siRNA‑transfected cells without stretch; (D) Piezo1 siRNA‑transfected cells with stretch. Piezo1 inhibitor (GsMTx4) experiment: Cells were treated with 5 µM GsMTx4 prior to and during mechanical stretch. Four groups were included: (A) untreated cells without stretch; (B) untreated cells with stretch; (C) GsMTx4‑treated cells without stretch; (D) GsMTx4‑treated cells with stretch (with GsMTx4 present throughout). Piezo1 agonist (Yoda1) experiment: Cells were cultured in the presence of 5 µM Yoda1 for 24 h. Two groups were included: (A) untreated (vehicle) control; (B) Yoda1‑treated cells.

Western blotting

Protein levels were assessed by Western blotting following routine procedures. Briefly, we lysed scleral or cultured fibroblast samples in RIPA buffer. Protein (20 µg) was resolved by SDS‑PAGE and subsequently blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were then blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at ambient temperature, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with the appropriate primary antibodies. The antibodies used included Piezo1, collagen type I, α-smooth muscle actin, YAP and GAPDH. The Piezo1 antibody has been validated by the manufacturer for Western blot and immunofluorescence in rat and human tissues, with knockout/knockdown data available on the product sheet. Following three washes with TBST, we incubated the membranes with appropriate HRP‑conjugated secondary antibodies (anti‑rabbit or anti‑mouse) for 1 h at room temperature. Band intensities were then measured using image analysis software, and each target band’s signal was normalized to the GAPDH signal from the same lane. The resulting data are presented as fold‑change relative to the control condition.

Cell proliferation

Cell proliferation was assessed by a colorimetric viability assay following the supplied protocol. We added a tetrazolium compound (10 µL/mL) to each well and incubated the plates for 2 h under standard culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2). Absorbance was then read at 450 nm.

Small interfering RNA transfection

Piezo1 siRNA transfection was performed as previously described31. The sequences were as follows: Piezo1-siRNA, 5’-AGAAGAAGAUCGUCAAGUATT-3' (sense) and 5’-UACUUGACGAUCUUCUUCUTT-3' (antisense), negative control (NC) siRNA, 5’-GUGAGCGUCUAUAUACCAUTT-3' (sense) and 5’-AUGGUAUAUAGACGCUCACTT-3' (antisense).

Immunofluorescence

For immunofluorescence, cultured cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (20 min, room temperature), permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X‑100 (40 min), and then blocked with 10% BSA. Tissue sections underwent overnight fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature, followed by permeabilization and blocking. Specimens were incubated with primary antibodies against Piezo1 and α‑SMA. Subsequently, we applied fluorescent dye‑conjugated secondary antibodies: green‑labeled anti‑mouse (for α‑SMA) and red‑labeled anti‑rabbit (for Piezo1), each at 1:500 dilution. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI, and images were captured with a fluorescence microscope.

Agonist and inhibitor treatment

HSF cells were treated with 5 µM GsMTx4 and 5 µM of the Piezo1 agonist Yoda1 based on previous studies33.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was carried out in triplicate. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). For comparisons between two groups, we applied a two‑tailed Student’s t‑test. Multiple group comparisons were performed with one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post‑hoc test. The normality of data was checked by the Shapiro‑Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Levene’s test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted with dedicated statistical software.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Piezo1 is expressed in rat sclera tissues and HSF cells

First, we examined Piezo1 expression in both rat scleral tissues (in vivo) and cultured human scleral fibroblasts (in vitro). To interrogate tissue‑specific expression of Piezo1, the BioGPS gene annotation database was used34. BioGPS analysis revealed that Piezo1 is highly expressed in various eye tissues, including retinal pigment epithelium, iris, cornea, and eyecup (Figure 1...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) induces mechanical strain in the optic nerve head and laminar cribrosa, contributing to retinal ganglion cell degeneration38,39. The peripapillary sclera (PPS) is a major load‑bearing tissue that influences ONH biomechanics40. Previous studies have shown that mechanical strain induces scleral fibroblast‑to‑myofibroblast differentiation and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, leading ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82401257).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.3% carbomer solution (Carbomer 940 polymer)Solarbio, Shanghai, China20 μL
10% chloral hydrateMacklin, Shanghai, China3 mL/kg
Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodyThermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA 
Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodyThermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
BioFlex six-well culture plates (coated with collagen I)Flexcell Int Corp, Hillsborough, NC, USA
Chlortetracycline hydrochlorideZhenhua Pharmaceutical, Yunnan, China
COL1 primary antibodyNovus Biologicals, CO, USA
DMEMGibco, Grand Island, NY, USA
FBSGibco Life Technologies, Australia
GAPDH primary antibodyBioworld, MN, USA
GraphPad Prism version 8.4Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
Nikon Eclipse E800 microscopeNikon, Melville, NY, USA
Nitrocellulose membranesPierce, Rockford, IL, USA
Penicillin-streptomycinHyclone, South Logan, UT, USA
Piezo1 primary antibodyNovus Biologicals, CO, USA
Rebound tonometer (TonoLab)Icare, Espoo, Finland
RIPA bufferThermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China
The Flexcell FX-5000 Tension SystemFlexcell International CorporationUsed to apply mechanical cyclic stretch to HSF cells.
TropicamideBausch Lomb Freda, Shandong, China
YAP primary antibodyCell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA
α-SMA primary antibodyAbcam, Cambridge, UK

References

  1. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014;311:1901-1911.
  2. Tham YC, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081-2090.
  3. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:429-440.
  4. Kass MA, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:701-713.
  5. Wang R, Seifert P, Jakobs TC. Astrocytes in the optic nerve head of glaucomatous mice display a characteristic reactive phenotype. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:924-932.
  6. Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, Suh JK, Hart RT. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:39-73.
  7. Sigal IA. Interactions between geometry and mechanical properties on the optic nerve head. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2785-2795.
  8. Nguyen C, et al. Measuring deformation in the mouse optic nerve head and peripapillary sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:721-733.
  9. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR. Finite element modeling of optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4378-4387.
  10. Coudrillier B, et al. Effects of peripapillary scleral stiffening on the deformation of the lamina cribrosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:2666-2677.
  11. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Ethier CR. Factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4189-4199.
  12. Sigal IA, et al. IOP-induced lamina cribrosa deformation and scleral canal expansion: independent or related? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:9023-9032.
  13. Norman RE, et al. Finite element modeling of the human sclera: influence on optic nerve head biomechanics and connections with glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2011;93:4-12.
  14. Thornton IL, Dupps WJ, Sinha Roy A, Krueger RR. Biomechanical effects of intraocular pressure elevation on optic nerve/lamina cribrosa before and after peripapillary scleral collagen cross-linking. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:1227-1233.
  15. Wu HJ, Kuchtey J, Kuchtey RW. Increased susceptibility to glaucomatous damage in microfibril deficient mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:28.
  16. Hommer A, et al. Estimation of ocular rigidity based on measurement of pulse amplitude using pneumotonometry and fundus pulse using laser interferometry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4046-4050.
  17. Ebneter A, Wagels B, Zinkernagel MS. Non-invasive biometric assessment of ocular rigidity in glaucoma patients and controls. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:606-611.
  18. Quigley HA, Dorman-Pease ME, Brown AE. Quantitative study of collagen and elastin of the optic nerve head and sclera in human and experimental monkey glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 1991;10:877-888.
  19. Coudrillier B, et al. Biomechanics of the human posterior sclera: age- and glaucoma-related changes measured using inflation testing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1714-1728.
  20. Downs JC, et al. Viscoelastic material properties of the peripapillary sclera in normal and early-glaucoma monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:540-546.
  21. Boote C, et al. Scleral structure and biomechanics. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020;74:100773.
  22. Oglesby EN, et al. Scleral fibroblast response to experimental glaucoma in mice. Mol Vis. 2016;22:82-99.
  23. Qu J, et al. High-magnitude and/or high-frequency mechanical strain promotes peripapillary scleral myofibroblast differentiation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:7821-7830.
  24. Shelton L, Rada JS. Effects of cyclic mechanical stretch on extracellular matrix synthesis by human scleral fibroblasts. Exp Eye Res. 2007;84:314-322.
  25. Qiu C, et al. The dynamic scleral extracellular matrix alterations in chronic ocular hypertension model of rats. Front Physiol. 2020;11:682.
  26. Poole K, et al. Tuning Piezo ion channels to detect molecular-scale movements relevant for fine touch. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3520.
  27. Coste B, et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 2010;330:55-60.
  28. Li J, et al. Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature. 2014;515:279-282.
  29. Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:11-21.
  30. Ranzato E, et al. Platelet lysate promotes in vitro wound scratch closure of human dermal fibroblasts: different roles of cell calcium, P38, ERK and PI3K/AKT. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:2030-2038.
  31. He J, et al. Mechanical stretch promotes hypertrophic scar formation through mechanically activated cation channel Piezo1. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:226.
  32. Qiu C, et al. Mechanical strain induces distinct human scleral fibroblast lineages: differential roles in cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and differentiation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:2401-2410.
  33. Cinar E, et al. Piezo1 regulates mechanotransductive release of ATP from human RBCs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:11783-11788.
  34. Wu C, et al. BioGPS: building your own mash-up of gene annotations and expression profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D313- D316.
  35. Hu D, et al. Mechanical strain regulates myofibroblast differentiation of human scleral fibroblasts by YAP. Front Physiol. 2021;12:712509.
  36. Bae C, Sachs F, Gottlieb PA. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 is inhibited by the peptide GsMTx4. Biochemistry. 2011;50:6295-6300.
  37. Liu S, et al. Piezo1 impairs hepatocellular tumor growth via deregulation of the MAPK-mediated YAP signaling pathway. Cell Calcium. 2021;95:102367.
  38. Crawford Downs J, Roberts MD, Sigal IA. Glaucomatous cupping of the lamina cribrosa: a review of the evidence for active progressive remodeling as a mechanism. Exp Eye Res. 2011;93:133-140.
  39. Sigal IA, et al. Predicted extension, compression and shearing of optic nerve head tissues. Exp Eye Res. 2007;85:312-322.
  40. Bellezza AJ, Hart RT, Burgoyne CF. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: initial finite element modeling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2991-3000.
  41. Girard MJ, et al. Biomechanical changes in the sclera of monkey eyes exposed to chronic IOP elevations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:5656-5669.
  42. Morozumi W, et al. Piezo channel plays a part in retinal ganglion cell damage. Exp Eye Res. 2020;191:107900.
  43. Solis AG, et al. Mechanosensation of cyclical force by PIEZO1 is essential for innate immunity. Nature. 2019;573:69-74.
  44. Wong TY, et al. Mechanical stretching simulates cardiac physiology and pathology through mechanosensor Piezo1. J Clin Med. 2018;7:410.
  45. Choi HJ, Sun D, Jakobs TC. Astrocytes in the optic nerve head express putative mechanosensitive channels. Mol Vis. 2015;21:749-766.
  46. Morozumi W, et al. Piezo 1 is involved in intraocular pressure regulation. J Pharmacol Sci. 2021;147:211-221.
  47. Watson PG, Young RD. Scleral structure, organisation and disease. A review. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:609-623.
  48. Hinz B. Myofibroblasts. Exp Eye Res. 2016;142:56-70.
  49. Bergmeier V, et al. Identification of a myofibroblast-specific expression signature in skin wounds. Matrix Biol. 2018;65:59-74.
  50. DeLeon-Pennell KY, Barker TH, Lindsey ML. Fibroblasts: the arbiters of extracellular matrix remodeling. Matrix Biol. 2020;91-92:1-7.
  51. Liu L, et al. Matrix-transmitted paratensile signaling enables myofibroblast-fibroblast cross talk in fibrosis expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:10832-10838.
  52. Blythe NM, et al. Mechanically activated Piezo1 channels of cardiac fibroblasts stimulate p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity and interleukin-6 secretion. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:17395-17408.
  53. Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Roderick HL. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:517-529.
  54. Chung CC, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor enhances profibrotic activities through modulation of calcium homeostasis in human atrial fibroblasts. Lab Invest. 2020;100:285-296.
  55. Wada K, et al. Hippo pathway regulation by cell morphology and stress fibers. Development. 2011;138:3907-3914.
  56. Codelia VA, Sun G, Irvine KD. Regulation of YAP by mechanical strain through Jnk and Hippo signaling. Curr Biol. 2014;24:2012-2017.
  57. Hu D, et al. Identification of key genes and pathways in scleral extracellular matrix remodeling in glaucoma: potential therapeutic agents discovered using bioinformatics analysis. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18:1554-1565.
  58. Pathak MM, et al. Stretch-activated ion channel Piezo1 directs lineage choice in human neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:16148-16153.
  59. Fu Y, et al. Targeting mechanosensitive Piezo1 alleviated renal fibrosis through p38MAPK-YAP pathway. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:741060.
  60. Zhu L, Ren S, He S, Liu M, Hou F. Piezo in the eye: expression, distribution and roles in ocular diseases. Front Physiol. 2025;16:1651258.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Piezo1 ActivationMyofibroblast DifferentiationOcular HypertensionCollagen ExpressionYAP ExpressionScleral FibroblastsCyclic Mechanical Stretch