Three behavior assays were used to observe host-seeking and blood-feeding behaviors in mosquitoes, as shown in Figure 1A. Mosquitoes were reared under a blue-light-dark cycle (14:10 LD; Figure 1B) to synchronize circadian rhythms, allowing experiments to be run during wake periods. Two days before the experiments, mosquitoes were transferred to total darkness and provided with the opsin cofactor ATR. If mosquitoes are asynchronous or not fed ATR, they will show low activity in behavioral assays. The genotypes used for each assay were Gr3>CsChrimson and two genetic controls: the driver line Gr3-QF2 and the effector line QUAS-CsChrimson.
The opto-thermocycler assay (Section 2) allows assessment of mosquito arousal and probing behavior over long periods in response to heat and light stimuli. Heat delivery mimics the mosquito approaching a warm-blooded host, while the 5-second light delivery mimics a long exhalation of breath33. The use of a thermocycler allows for quick surface heating and cooling that is synchronized with optogenetic activation via a thermocouple and microcontroller (Figure 2A, B). The three mosquito genotypes were placed in acrylic plates with isolated wells with mesh bottoms in which they demonstrate walking, flying, and probing behavior (Figure 2C). The position of mosquito body parts was detected using pose-tracking algorithms, such as SLEAP34 and DeepLabCUT35 (Figure 2D, E). Behavior classification algorithms can be used starting from pose tracking (e.g., SimBA36 , A-SOiD37) or video (e.g., FERAL38) input. Figure 2E shows the SLEAP labels during flying, walking, and probing, essential host-seeking and feeding behaviors. These behaviors can be classified by the velocity of the thorax and the distance between the base and the tip of the proboscis. Here, the output of behavior tracking using APT and JAABA is shown39. Mosquitoes were exposed to either a heat increase, a light stimulus, or both heat and light stimuli simultaneously, then a break of 20 min before the next stimulus8. (Figure 2F). When exposed to heat, all three genotypes exhibit a short period of probing (Figure 2G). Importantly, when exposed to a 5-second light stimulus, the Gr3>CsChrimson mosquitoes become aroused or “activated,” showing increased walking and flying behavior that lasts up to 10–15 min. Mosquitoes also exhibit probing, which is defined as the repeated insertion of the proboscis into the mesh bottom of the plates. Data were plotted as individual mosquito behavior (Figure 2G) and proportion of all mosquitoes exhibiting each behavior over time (Figure 2H). The opto-thermocycler enables repeated, precise optogenetic and heat stimulation across multiple individuals, making it a useful tool for studying arousal and probing behavior.
The blood blanket assay (Section 3) is built upon the opto-thermocycler assay but provides a palatable artificial minimal blood meal so mosquito engorgement can be quantified (Figure 3A). A 5-second pulse of red light (~627 nm) was administered to optogenetically activate CO2 sensory neurons, and the thin layer of artificial blood meal was heated from 25 °C to ~35 °C (as measured at the surface by a thermocouple; Figure 3B). The three genotypes were each presented with an artificial blood meal in an aluminum feeding plate (Figure 3C). Gr3-QF2, QUAS-CsChrimson, and Gr3>CsChrimson mosquitoes (n = 10 trials per genetic group, 14 mosquitoes each) were each presented with an artificial blood meal in an aluminum feeding plate (Figure 3C). To measure engorgement of the mosquitoes over time throughout the experiment, SLEAP was used to track points on the body of the mosquito. This was done by creating a skeleton that included 5 nodes on the abdomen of the mosquito (Figure 3D). At the end of each trial, the number of engorged mosquitoes was manually counted. The control mosquito lines, Gr3-QF2 and QUAS-CsChrimson, demonstrated a similar average engorgement (Figure 3E, p = 0.401). In contrast, the Gr3>CsChrimson line demonstrated significantly higher rates of feeding, with an average engorgement rate of 53% (Figure 3E, p = 0.00078 versus Gr3-QF2 and p = 0.00097 versus QUAS-CsChrimson). Data were plotted as violin plots and boxplots (median, interquartile range, and range) and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and a Dunn Test with Holm correction at a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Individual animal engorgement over time was identified as the change in the abdominal area enclosed by 5 nodes (Figure 3F). These results show that the blood blanket assay can be used to assess the effects of optogenetic activation of CO2-responsive neuronal populations on the engorgement behavior of mosquitoes on an artificial blood meal.
The opto-membrane feeder assay (Section 4), where mosquitoes are presented with access to a warm blood meal in a cylindrical arena, allows for the study of mosquito attraction to a blood source and engorgement. To determine if optogenetic activation of CO2 sensory neurons is sufficient to cause attraction to and feeding on a blood source, Gr3>CsChrimson and control mosquitoes (n = 10 for each genotype, where n refers to the number of trials run, with 20 mosquitoes per canister per trial) were presented with access to a warm blood meal in the opto-membrane feeder under exposure to a repeated 1-second pulse of bright red light every 10 s for a duration of 15 min (Figure 4B). To measure attraction to the membrane feeder, a SLEAP model with three points was used to track the head, thorax, and abdomen of landed mosquitoes, counting those within the region of interest (Figure 4D, Figure 4E). Gr3>CsChrimson mosquitoes showed increased attraction to the blood meal region over time compared to the Gr3-QF2 control (Figure 4F, p = 0.027). The Gr3>CsChrimson mosquitoes did not show statistically higher attraction than the QUAS-CsChrimson (Figure 4F, p = 0.310). Significance groups were determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn Test with Holm correction. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05. Data were plotted as the average percent of the mosquitoes attracted to the blood meal, with the shaded region showing the standard error. The control genotypes Gr3-QF2 and QUAS-CsChrimson showed similar engorgement of 26% and 29%, respectively, manually scored as described (Figure 4G, p = 0.351). In contrast, Gr3>CsChrimson mosquitoes demonstrated a significantly higher engorgement rate than either control, at 61% on average (Figure 4G, p < 0.001 versus Gr3-QF2 and p = 0.002 versus QUAS-CsChrimson). Data were plotted as violin plots and boxplots (median, interquartile range, and range) and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and a Dunn Test with Holm correction at a significance threshold of p < 0.05. These results indicate that the opto-membrane feeder assay is a viable means to assess the effects of optogenetic activation of CO2 neurons on mosquito attraction and engorgement on a blood meal.

Figure 1: Assays and rearing for optogenetics in mosquitoes. (A) Schematic of mosquito host-seeking behaviors with characteristics of the behavior assays presented. The steps of host seeking measured by each behavior assay are indicated by gray bars. (B) Timeline of rearing of mosquitoes for optogenetics experiments. Figure 1 was created by the authors for this publication using Adobe Illustrator, and no license is required for its usage. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: The opto-thermocycler quantifies arousal and search behaviors during optogenetic activation. (A) Schematic of opto-thermocycler assay consisting of a plate of mosquitoes on the block of a PCR thermocycler with overhead LEDs and a camera. (B) Circuit diagram for the microcontroller that detects the thermocycler temperature and controls the LEDs. Circuit diagram created with Fritzing under CC-BY-SA 3.0 license (https://github.com/fritzing/fritzing-app/blob/develop/README.md). This license also allows complete reuse of the image, provided proper credit is given. (C) Still image from the assay depicting the acrylic plate that holds up to 14 mosquitoes. The thermocouple is in the bottom-right well. (D) The mosquito skeleton used in the SLEAP model to estimate poses. Points labeled on the body include: the tip and base of the proboscis, used to detect probing behavior (shown in red); the front legs, where they connect to the thorax, where the femur joins the tibia, and where the tibia joins the tarsus (shown in blue); and the tip of the abdomen (shown in yellow). A top-down multi-animal model was used. Pose estimators and behavioral classifiers were used to quantify mosquito arousal and probing behavior. (E) Examples of mosquito walking, flying, and probing, with SLEAP predictions overlaid on top. Walking and flying are used as behavioral metrics for arousal. (F) Output of stimulus delivery. Yellow wavy lines indicate body temperature heat stimuli, and red LEDs indicate red light stimuli. (G) Ethograms of walking, flying, and probing behavior by Gr3-QF2, QUAS-CsChrimson, and Gr3>CsChrimson mosquitoes (n = 22–23 individual mosquitoes per genotype) following stimulus delivery. (H) Long-lasting behavior following optogenetic activation in Gr3>CsChrimson mosquitoes (n = 68–70 individual mosquitoes). Figure panels A–E were created by the authors for this publication using Adobe Illustrator, and no copyright license is required for the usage. Data in (F–H) are reproduced from Sorrells et al, 2022, with CC BY 4.0 license8. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: The blood blanket assay quantifies engorgement to optogenetic activation. (A) Schematic of the blood blanket assay. The mosquito is contained in an acrylic cage where accessible artificial blood is presented beneath a mesh screen. (B) Readout of temperature and red light stimulus from the assay. (C) Schematic of the aluminum blood blanket feeding plate assembly. (D) The SLEAP skeleton used for pose estimation included the points described in Figure 2D in addition to four points along the sides of the abdomen where they meet the thorax and the edges of the thickest part of the abdomen. Engorgement was measured as the area within the five points along the abdomen perimeter using predictions from a top-down multi-animal model. (E) Violin plot depicting the mean percent engorged on the artificial blood meal per genotype (n = 10 trials of 14 mosquitoes per trial for each genotype). Significance was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by a Dunn Test with Holm correction. Different letters indicate a significance of p < 0.05 between groups, where groups with the same letter are not significantly different from one another. (F) Engorgement over time in a Gr3>CsChrimson animal, as measured by abdominal area. The red trendline displays a 30-second sliding window over eight min of the trial, with x = 0 marking time when engorgement begins. All schematics of Figure 3 were created by the authors for this publication using Adobe Illustrator, and a copyright license was not required for their use. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: The opto-membrane feeder assay measures attraction and blood feeding. (A) Schematic of the opto-membrane feeder with individual components. (B) Timeline of experiment trials. The blue line represents dim blue light throughout the acclimation period and experiment. A segment of the experimental stimulus is shown, representing 1-second pulses of red light spaced 10 s apart. (C) Diagram depicting the wiring for the opto-membrane feeder. Circuit diagram created with Fritzing under CC-BY license by the authors. (D) Example frame from the opto-membrane feeder video. Mosquitoes in the red circle are counted to determine the percent attraction. (E) Examples of an unfed mosquito and an engorged mosquito, with the head, thorax, and abdomen labeled by the SLEAP tracking model for the opto-membrane feeder. A bottom-up multi-animal SLEAP model was used to measure attraction to the region of interest where the blood meal is placed. (F) Line graph depicting mean percent occupancy on the blood meal region (which is used as a behavioral metric for landing) over time, by genotype (n = 10 trials of 20 mosquitoes per genotype). Mean is plotted every 30 s. Shaded regions depict standard error. Significance was determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn Test with Holm correction. Different letters represent significant groups; the threshold was defined as p < 0.05. (G) Violin plot depicting the mean percent engorged on a blood meal by genotype. In (F, G), significance was determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn Test with Holm correction. Genotypes listed with the same letter are not significantly different from one another. The significance threshold is defined as p < 0.05. Figure 4 was created using Adobe Illustrator, its data were collected by the authors for this publication, and no copyright license was required for the usage. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.