$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The present study indicates that the described synchronization and superstimulation protocol, combined with LOPU, supports ovarian response and efficient in vivo oocyte recovery in alpacas. Animals treated with 200 mg FSH developed a substantial follicular population, with approximately three-quarters of follicles successfully aspirated and a recovery rate exceeding 60%. All visible follicles greater than 2 mm in diameter that could be adequately stabilized were aspirated; however, a proportion of follicles remained inaccessible, likely due to insufficient firmness of ovarian fixation during the procedure, which may have limited complete needle access to all visible follicles. These outcomes nonetheless indicate that the hormonal regimen effectively induces follicular development while maintaining procedural efficiency during follicular aspiration.
GnRH administration at the time of dominant follicle detection has become the preferred synchronization approach in non-mated alpacas, given that during their prolonged follicular phase, dominant follicles repeatedly reach diameters sufficient to respond to exogenous GnRH, enabling reliable follicular wave turnover34,35,36,37. While progesterone-based devices and prostaglandin protocols have been explored in Alpacas, these approaches have yielded inconsistent results due to device expulsion, vaginal complications, and unreliable follicular suppression35, supporting the selection of the GnRH-based protocol used in the present study for its practicality and compatibility with LOPU for consistent oocyte recovery in alpacas.
The predominance of medium- to large-sized follicles (5–6 mm) at the time of collection is consistent with an active follicular response to the superstimulation protocol. In alpacas, follicle size has been associated with in vitro cytoplasmic maturation and developmental potential38, suggesting that the follicular profile observed may favor the recovery of morphologically suitable cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs), as illustrated in Figure 5. However, as the present study was not designed to directly compare FSH dosing regimens and the sample size was limited, future studies with larger animal numbers and comparative treatment designs would be needed to confirm whether the decreasing-dose FSH protocol specifically promotes superior follicular synchrony or oocyte quality in alpacas.
The morphological diversity observed among recovered oocytes reflects the inherent biological variability of superstimulation responses. High-grade oocytes exhibited compact, multilayered cumulus investment and homogeneous cytoplasm, features commonly associated with improved in vitro maturation and embryo development potential. In contrast, lower-grade oocytes displayed partial cumulus loss or cytoplasmic irregularities, which may compromise further developmental competence39. Nonetheless, the overall proportion of recovered oocytes and the consistency of follicular response indicate that the protocol provides a reliable source of in vivo–derived COCs suitable for downstream applications.
Almost 60% of the recovered oocytes were classified as Grade I–II, representing a substantial proportion of morphologically suitable oocytes for in vitro procedures, particularly in settings where slaughterhouse-derived ovaries are unavailable or limited. In contrast, an important proportion of the recovered oocytes were classified as Grade III–IV, characterized by partial or complete absence of cumulus cell investment. This may be partially attributed to the aspiration conditions of the vacuum pump, including pressure settings, needle diameter, tubing length, and turbulence generated during follicular aspiration, as previously reported for oocyte collection procedures in other species29. Optimization of these aspiration parameters may therefore represent an important consideration for improving oocyte morphological quality in future LOPU procedures in alpacas.
The aspiration flow rate represents a critical technical parameter during follicular oocyte recovery, as excessive pump speeds have been associated with mechanical disruption of the cumulus–oocyte complex (COCs) and a consequent reduction in oocyte morphological quality. With a constant-flow pump system to retrieve oocytes from ovine ovaries obtained from slaughterhouse, flow rates exceeding 20 mL/min were reported to be detrimental to oocyte morphological integrity, with an optimal range of 10–20 mL/min recommended to minimize aspiration-induced damage41 . In contrast, earlier LOPU studies conducted across various species have described aspiration rates of 50–70 drops per minute as operationally effective10,12,13,14,15,16 . More recently, an aspiration flow rate of 22 mL/min during OPU with transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration was reported to result in marked morphological compromise of oocytes recovered in alpacas, further supporting the use of lower flow rates to preserve COCs integrity7. There is limited peer-reviewed literature on specific aspiration flow rate parameters for LOPU in alpacas.
In the present study, although a systematic comparison of aspiration flow rates was not conducted, a flow rate of 13–15 mL/min at a negative pressure of 30 mmHg was selected as the operative setting based on preliminary testing of multiple flow rate conditions. This range falls within the optimal interval described for sheep41 and is below the threshold associated with oocyte morphological deterioration in alpacas7. No apparent adverse effects on COCs morphology were detected under these conditions, suggesting that the operative parameters employed were appropriate. Future studies by systematically evaluating a broader range of aspiration flow rates under LOPU conditions in this species are warranted to establish evidence-based standardized protocols. LOPU has been demonstrated in small ruminants, including goats and sheep, to be a safe and repeatable procedure that can be performed multiple times in the same animal without inducing significant pain, postoperative complications, or detrimental effects on reproductive performance23,40. However, in alpacas, the impact of repeated oocyte collection on animal welfare and subsequent reproductive efficiency has not been systematically evaluated. Although the present study was not specifically designed to assess these effects, it is worth noting that LOPU was performed 10 times on each animal over a 10-month period, and no adhesions or morphological alterations of the reproductive organs or abdominal wall were observed throughout the study. These observations are descriptive and were not derived from a study specifically designed to evaluate the long-term effects of repeated LOPU on reproductive performance or animal welfare. Systematic studies are nonetheless necessary to formally evaluate these variables in alpacas and determine whether repeated LOPU adversely affects short- and long-term reproductive performance under the conditions described.
Compared to ultrasound-guided ovum pick-up approaches, LOPU offers direct ovarian visualization and may enhance follicular access in alpacas, whose anatomical characteristics can limit the effectiveness of transvaginal techniques9. OPU in alpacas has been reported to achieve collection rates of approximately 75%, recovering a mean of 3.3 oocytes per ovary, with oocytes classified as Grade I and II representing only 30% of the total recovered7. In contrast, the LOPU protocol described in the present study yielded a collection rate of 61%, while the proportion of morphologically suitable oocytes classified as Grade I and II reached approximately 60% of total recovered oocytes, a substantially higher proportion than that reported with OPU.
Although the collection rate observed with LOPU was numerically lower than that reported for transvaginal OPU, the marked improvement in oocyte morphological quality suggests that LOPU may represent a more advantageous approach for downstream in vitro embryo production applications in alpacas. Both techniques share susceptibility to aspiration-related morphological compromise, likely attributable to vacuum pressure and flow rate conditions during follicular aspiration7,8. Notably, oocyte recovery rates obtained with LOPU in alpacas are comparable to those reported in small ruminants9,10,27, collectively demonstrating that laparoscopic retrieval is both feasible and reproducible in this species when appropriate hormonal preparation and technical expertise are applied. Several technical factors may influence oocyte harvest and quality outcomes, including follicular wave synchronization accuracy, timing of aspiration relative to the final FSH dose, surgeon experience, and aspiration system parameters such as vacuum pressure and flow rate, length of the aspiration line, tubing diameter, needle diameter, and the turbulence generated during the alternating suction and non-suction cycles of the pump41. Standardization of these parameters is essential to optimize oocyte harvest and morphological quality. Additionally, while morphological assessment provides a practical measure of oocyte evaluation, further studies incorporating in vitro maturation, fertilization, and embryo development endpoints would strengthen the functional validation of the protocol and confirm the developmental potential of oocytes recovered through LOPU in alpacas.
In conclusion, the combined application of GnRH-induced synchronization, decreasing-dose FSH superstimulation, and LOPU appeared to represent a feasible strategy for in vivo oocyte recovery in alpacas under the conditions described. The follicular response, aspiration efficiency, and oocyte recovery rates observed suggest that this protocol may be suitable for application in reproductive biotechnology programs in this species. No apparent adverse effects on ovarian integrity or donor health were observed across repeated procedures; however, systematic evaluation of the long-term impact of repeated LOPU sessions on reproductive performance in alpacas is still needed. These findings may contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the application of assisted reproductive technologies in South American camelids and could serve as a preliminary foundation for future investigations into in vitro embryo production, embryo transfer, and related germline-based procedures in alpacas, provided that studies incorporating larger animal numbers are conducted to generate more robust and generalizable data.
Limitations
The present study has limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the relatively small number of donor animals limits the statistical power of the findings and may not fully capture the biological variability inherent to the alpaca population. Second, oocyte quality was assessed solely by morphological classification, without functional validation of developmental competence via IVM, IVF, and IVC. Morphological grading, while practical and widely used, does not necessarily reflect the true developmental potential of recovered oocytes. Future studies incorporating these in vitro endpoints are therefore essential to further evaluate the protocol and to confirm the functional suitability of LOPU-derived oocytes for embryo production and advanced reproductive biotechnology applications in alpacas.