Research Article

Evaluating Associations Between Nurse Self-Efficacy, Operating Room Performance, and Surgical Site Infection Risk

DOI:

10.3791/71435

June 16th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This prospective observational cohort study, reported according to the STROBE framework, evaluates associations between perioperative nurse self-efficacy and terminal handling performance, including procedural efficiency, protocol compliance, and patient safety indicators in operating rooms.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Terminal handling procedures in operating rooms are critical for patient safety and infection prevention, yet the relationship between nurses’ self-efficacy and terminal handling outcomes remains underexplored. This prospective observational cohort study, reported according to the STROBE framework, examined associations between perioperative nurses’ self-efficacy and terminal handling outcomes, and explored team collaboration and perceived stress as mediators. The study was conducted from January 2023 to December 2024 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, with an analytical sample of 207 perioperative nurses. Self-efficacy was modeled as a continuous Nursing Professional Self-Efficacy Scale Version 2 (NPSES-2) score; median-split high and low groups were retained only for descriptive presentation. Primary outcomes were procedural completion time, protocol accuracy, safety compliance rate, documentation completeness, and equipment readiness time. Secondary outcomes were surgical site infection rates, patient satisfaction, nurse stress, and team collaboration. Higher self-efficacy was associated with shorter procedural completion time (18.3 ± 4.7 vs 26.8 ± 7.2 min, p < 0.001), higher protocol accuracy (94.2 ± 6.8 vs 86.4 ± 9.3, p < 0.001), and higher safety compliance (96.7 ± 3.4% vs 89.2 ± 6.1%, p < 0.001). It was also associated with lower surgical site infection rates (3.2% vs 8.1%, OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.63, p < 0.001) and higher patient satisfaction (8.7 ± 1.2 vs 7.2 ± 1.8, p < 0.001), with interpretation limited by observational case assignment and team-based perioperative care. In continuous multivariable models, the NPSES-2 score was independently associated with procedural completion time and safety compliance after adjustment for nurse, assignment, and case-context covariates, with team collaboration and stress reduction partially mediating this association. Findings support targeted professional-development interventions, including competency-based training, mentorship, and organizational support, while emphasizing that causal effects require prospective interventional confirmation.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The operating room environment represents one of healthcare's most complex and demanding settings, where nursing competence directly influences patient safety, surgical outcomes, and healthcare-associated infection rates1,2,3. Within this high-stakes environment, terminal handling procedures encompassing comprehensive protocols conducted after surgical procedures including terminal cleaning, equipment decontamination, documentation completion, and preparation for subsequent cases serve as critical determinants of sterile environment maintenance and infection prevention

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (2025 Research No. 0660) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and Chinese medical research ethics regulations23. All participants provided written informed consent following a comprehensive explanation of the study procedures, potential risks and benefits, data confidentiality measures, and their right to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. A Data Safety Monitoring Board was established to oversee study conduct and participant safety ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Study Flow and Participant Characteristics

The study successfully enrolled 220 perioperative nurses at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, after 232 eligible nurses were approached and 12 declined participation. A total of 207 nurses completed all required assessments and provided complete outcome data for the analytical sample, yielding a 94.1% completion rate among enrolled participants. The primary reasons for non-completion were voluntary wit.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This investigation provides a comprehensive examination of the associations between nurses' self-efficacy and terminal handling outcomes in operating room environments, revealing consistent relationships between individual psychological attributes and clinical performance indicators6,9,24. The findings suggest that nurses' confidence in their professional capabilities is associated with multiple dimensions of clinical pe.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare that they have no competing interests related to this research.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Not applicable

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
AMOSIBMVersion 29.0Structural equation modeling software
Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions instrumentNot applicableNot applicableTeam collaboration assessment instrument
G*PowerHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfVersion 3.1.9.7Power analysis software
Nursing Professional Self-Efficacy Scale Version 2Not applicableNot applicableNurse self-efficacy assessment instrument
Perceived Stress Scale-10Not applicableNot applicablePerceived stress assessment instrument
SPSS StatisticsIBMVersion 29.0Statistical analysis software

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Nurse Self EfficacyOperating Room PerformanceSurgical Site InfectionTerminal HandlingSafety ComplianceProtocol AccuracyTeam CollaborationPerioperative NursesPatient SatisfactionStress Reduction

Related Articles