A total of 88 patients with CAD admitted to Wuhan Xinzhou District People′s Hospital from March 2023 to May 2024 were selected (CAD group), and 88 volunteers who underwent coronary angiography and were judged to be free of CAD were also recruited (non-CAD group). Inclusion criteria: Adherence to the criteria described in the Guidelines for the diagnosis and Treatment of CAD17. No other blood system diseases or immune system diseases. Normal cognitive function without a history of psychiatric disorders. No history of cardiovascular disease. Exclusion criteria: Comorbidity with oncological diseases or other chronic diseases. Comorbidity with severe infectious diseases. Severe heart failure. Withdrawal from follow-up midway. The experimental protocol received ethical approval from the Wuhan Xinzhou District People′s Hospital Institutional Review Board (No. 2023A03), and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to enrollment. All the materials used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials.
Nursing intervention and efficacy grouping
Patients with CAD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were recruited, and using a random-number table, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the HIIT group (n = 44) or the usual care group (non-HIIT, n = 44). To ensure concealment of assignments, the randomization sequence was generated by an independent investigator and placed in sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes. Blinding of subjects and intervention implementors was not possible due to the nature of the exercise intervention, but outcome assessment and data analysis personnel were always blinded. Patients in the non-HIIT group received moderate-intensity exercise training for 1 week after surgery at 60% to 80% of maximal heart rate, as determined by wristband monitoring, for 28 min per session. The training frequency was three times per week, and the patients were free to choose their preferred exercise methods, such as jogging and aerobic exercise. Furthermore, patients in the HIIT group underwent HIIT one week after surgery while receiving postoperative care. Briefly, train at 85% to 95% of maximum heart rate for 4 min, followed by 40% of maximum heart rate for 3 min. A total of 4 groups were performed, which took 28 min at a frequency of 3 times/week18. The patients were examined before training and monitored throughout the one-month training period. The endpoint was defined as an inability to complete the training program due to worsening disease or poor adherence. Calculated the change in 6MWT distance before and after intervention in CAD patients within the HIIT group. Using the median as the cutoff, patients with values above this threshold were defined as the effective group, and the remainder as the ineffective group.
Collection of clinical indicators
Venous blood was collected from participants before, during, and after the HIIT intervention, centrifuged for 15 min (2500 × g), and separated to obtain the upper serum layer, which was stored at -80 °C for examination. The biochemical indices were tested by an automatic blood analyzer. The degree of coronary artery disease in patients was assessed using the Gensini score, with higher scores indicating more severe coronary artery disease19. A pulmonary function instrument and a cardiovascular ultrasound system were selected to monitor cardiopulmonary function. Patients' quality of life is measured according to the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), which includes social relationships, environment, physical health, and psychological health20. Scores on each domain range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
qRT-PCR
RNA in serum samples was extracted. The cDNA samples were prepared using the reverse transcription Kit. PCR mixtures were prepared using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq Kit, and quantitative reactions were performed on Real-Time PCR system. MHRT expression was normalized by GAPDH and calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt method.
Statistical methods
SPSS 26 and GraphPad Prism 9 were used to analyze and process all data. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data distribution. Measurement information was expressed as mean ± standard deviation, count information was expressed as n/%, and comparisons between groups were made by t-test or chi-square test. For multiple comparisons, error was controlled with the use of the Bonferroni correction. The predictive value of MHRT was evaluated using the ROC method. Risk factors for CAD were assessed using Pearson's correlation and logistic regression. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.