The prevalence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) is increasing alongside the global aging of the population and the escalating incidence of metabolic comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease1,2. Physiologically, the accumulation of calcium in the arterial wall typically accelerates after age 40, leading to significant alterations in vascular compliance and cardiovascular hemodynamics2. In the realm of interventional cardiology, moderate-to-severe CAC presents a significant clinical challenge during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)1,3. Heavily calcified, non-compliant plaques mechanically obstruct the delivery of therapeutic devices, damage the protective polymer coatings of drug-eluting stents, and impair local drug elution kinetics2,4. Consequently, failure to adequately modify calcified lesions results in incomplete stent expansion and strut malapposition, which are universally recognized as the primary biomechanical drivers of acute stent thrombosis and long-term in-stent restenosis5. Furthermore, the presence of severe calcific features serves as a robust, independent predictor of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)6,7.
Historically, interventionalists have relied on a variety of plaque-modification strategies to treat severe CAC before stent deployment1,8. High-pressure and ultra-high-pressure non-compliant balloons, alongside specialized scoring or cutting balloons, are frequently utilized; however, these balloon-based modalities often fail to fracture deep or unusually thick calcium rings and carry an inherent risk of inducing severe barotrauma, vessel dissection, or coronary perforation1,3. Alternatively, atherectomy devices, such as rotational and orbital atherectomy, effectively ablate superficial calcium3,4. Nevertheless, these techniques are technically demanding, require a steep learning curve, and are associated with specific periprocedural complications, including thermal injury, guidewire bias, and distal debris embolization that can trigger slow-flow or no-reflow phenomena1,8. Therefore, there remains a critical clinical need for safer, highly effective modalities to optimize PCI in these complex anatomies8.
To overcome the well-documented limitations of traditional ablative technologies, coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel addition to the calcium modification armamentarium3,9. Adapting the fundamental principles of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy used for nephrolithiasis, IVL utilizes a fluid-filled balloon catheter to deliver localized, pulsatile acoustic pressure waves directly to the arterial wall3. These sonic waves selectively interact with high-density coronary calcium, safely inducing multiplanar micro-fractures in both superficial and deep calcium deposits while preserving the integrity of the compliant soft vascular tissues3,9. The landmark Disrupt CAD III prospective, multicenter trial (including its primary endpoint analysis and subsequent follow-ups) firmly established the safety and efficacy profile of IVL, demonstrating a high procedural success rate coupled with a low incidence of periprocedural MACE at both 1-year and 2-year follow-ups9,10,11. Subsequent robust meta-analyses and large real-world retrospective registries have further corroborated these findings, proving that IVL achieves significant acute luminal gain and remains effective across diverse patient demographics, including highly complex subsets such as calcified left main coronary artery disease3,12,13.
While IVL provides the necessary mechanical force to alter plaque compliance, the optimization of this therapy relies fundamentally on precise pre- and post-procedural imaging assessment14,15. Traditional coronary angiography lacks the spatial sensitivity required to accurately quantify the circumferential arc, depth, and longitudinal extent of the calcium burden4. Consequently, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has become an indispensable imaging modality for evaluating calcified lesions15,16. Although optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers superior axial resolution for penetrating and measuring calcium thickness or fracture depth, IVUS was specifically selected as the primary imaging modality for this protocol. IVUS does not require continuous contrast flushing, which is a critical advantage for minimizing the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy in high-risk cohorts with a substantial prevalence of chronic renal insufficiency4,17. Furthermore, advanced IVUS-derived calcium scoring systems have been validated to successfully predict the likelihood of subsequent stent underexpansion5. Crucially, IVUS is instrumental in guiding IVL interventions by facilitating exact 1:1 sizing of the IVL balloon to the reference vessel diameter, monitoring therapeutic efficacy by visualizing discrete calcium fractures, and definitively confirming optimal final stent apposition5,15,18.
Despite compelling individual evidence supporting IVL and IVUS, standardized clinical protocols that synergize both technologies for routine application remain highly variable1,15. The objective of the present study is to systematically present a standardized, step-by-step IVUS-guided IVL protocol. By investigating a retrospective, single-center cohort of patients with severe, highly angulated coronary calcifications, this methodology aims to outline the procedural reproducibility, essential troubleshooting strategies, and objective criteria for lesion preparation. The prespecified observational endpoints focus on achieving adequate calcium fractures (defined as a complete anatomical discontinuity of the echolucent calcium band) and facilitating optimal final stent expansion. The practical applicability of this protocol is most pronounced in high-risk patient subsets, particularly those with chronic kidney disease requiring zero or minimal contrast volume, elderly patients with highly tortuous anatomies, or scenarios involving severe concentric calcium arcs (>180°) where traditional balloon-based modalities are prone to failure. Furthermore, this standardized workflow provides interventional teams with a highly reproducible, algorithmic decision-making tree to mitigate the risks of stent underexpansion, especially in catheterization laboratories lacking rotational atherectomy infrastructure. While the practical applicability of this standardized IVUS-guided approach is highly relevant for safely managing complex calcified lesions, the primary limitation of this study is its single-arm, observational design without a comparative control group (e.g., rotational atherectomy). Consequently, the clinical outcomes reflect procedural feasibility within a specific cohort rather than proving comparative superiority, and broader generalizability requires validation in future randomized controlled trials.