This protocol describes a minimally invasive percutaneous technique for inserting anterior and posterior pleural catheters in swine, enabling direct measurement of regional pleural pressure without thoracotomy.
Method Article
This protocol describes a minimally invasive percutaneous technique for inserting anterior and posterior pleural catheters in swine, enabling direct measurement of regional pleural pressure without thoracotomy.
Pleural pressure measurement enables advanced physiologic assessment, including partitioning respiratory system mechanics into lung and chest wall components, calculating transpulmonary pressure, and quantifying regional pleural pressure gradients. This information is essential for optimizing mechanical ventilation, assessing the impact of altered chest wall physiology, and advancing translational research in lung injury. However, current techniques for direct pleural pressure measurement often require open-chest surgical implantation of pleural pressure transducers via thoracotomy, which is time-consuming, high-risk, and may impair chest wall mechanics. To overcome these limitations, we developed a minimally invasive, percutaneous, image-guided technique for pleural catheter placement. The procedure was performed in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated swine. Under ultrasound guidance, a Tuohy needle was advanced into the pleural space, and a small artificial pneumothorax (50–100 mL of oxygen) was created to separate the pleural layers. Over a guidewire, a 9 Fr sheath introducer was placed, allowing advancement of a balloon-tipped catheter into the anterior pleura. The animal was then turned in a semiprone position, and a second catheter was inserted dorsally after increasing the same pneumothorax by an additional 50–100 mL of oxygen. Placement was confirmed by computed tomography (CT) and physiologic tracings. After evacuation of the pneumothorax and lung re-expansion, imaging verified the position. Successful anterior and posterior catheter placement was achieved in 16 of 20 animals (80%), supporting the procedural feasibility of this approach. Unsuccessful procedures were due to unintended pneumothorax during anterior pleural access or anterior catheter malposition outside the target ventral region. This method provides a less invasive and reproducible approach for direct regional pleural pressure monitoring in large-animal models. By avoiding surgical access, this percutaneous, image-guided technique is well-suited for experimental protocols investigating respiratory mechanics, lung and chest wall physiology, and mechanical ventilation in translational research.
Pleural pressure has been widely used in experimental studies as a key indicator of chest wall mechanics, helping to describe the partitioned behavior of the respiratory system and its interaction with the lung during mechanical ventilation1. This variable is essential for calculating transpulmonary pressure, which represents the primary determinant of lung stress2. In lung injury, pleural pressure can also help describe end-expiratory mechanics and provide insight into the superimposed pressure gradient, a phenomenon linked to the load acting on dependent lung regions3,4. This regional pressure distribution creates ventro-dorsal differences in pleural and transpulmonary pressure, which during controlled mechanical ventilation are mainly determined by the gravitational load and the severity of lung injury, whereas during spontaneous or assisted breathing, they may be further amplified by regional inspiratory muscle activity5.
Direct pleural pressure monitoring is not performed in clinical practice because the procedure is too invasive to be considered safe. For this reason, esophageal pressure (Pes) is commonly used as the best surrogate of pleural pressure6. However, Pes is influenced by several factors that can affect its accuracy, including catheter position, pressure transmission assessed by the Baydur ratio, and ventilation mode7. The esophageal balloon sits inside a compliant structure, and its signal is shaped by both the esophageal wall and adjacent mediastinal organs. Even minor shifts in catheter depth or alignment may change the measured pressure or the size of its tidal fluctuations8. Moreover, Pes primarily reflects mid-to-dorsal pleural pressure, making it less representative of ventral regions and the overall pleural environment in heterogeneous lung injury9.
For these reasons, direct pleural pressure measurement remains the gold-standard approach in translational and experimental physiology10. Several devices have been used for direct pleural pressure measurement. Wafer-like pleural sensors are frequently used in experimental models11,12, and in some studies, esophageal balloon catheters have also been introduced into the pleural space to record pleural pressure directly13,14. Despite the availability of different tools for direct pleural pressure measurement, their insertion has traditionally required either open thoracotomy or thoracoscopic access. These approaches are invasive, require advanced surgical expertise, prolong procedural preparation, and disrupt normal chest wall mechanics, significantly altering the physiological conditions under investigation.
In this method article, we present a novel percutaneous technique for placing esophageal balloon catheters into the pleural space of swine for direct regional pleural pressure monitoring. This approach is minimally invasive and does not require thoracotomy or advanced surgical training. Anterior pleural access is performed using a standard ultrasound-guided puncture technique, while computed tomography (CT) imaging is used to confirm placement of the intrapleural guidewire and catheter and to assist in planning posterior pleural access. The method allows placement of catheters in different regions of the pleural cavity for regional assessment of partitioned respiratory mechanics. The technique aims to reduce procedural complexity and risk while preserving high-fidelity pleural pressure recordings for physiological and translational research.
After Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval (2020I000073) at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, experiments were performed from March to November 2025 in 20 healthy Yorkshire pigs weighing 30–40 kg.
CAUTION: This protocol intentionally creates a pneumothorax and uses 100% oxygen. Perform the procedure under continuous physiologic monitoring by personnel trained in large-animal anesthesia and pleural access and eliminate ignition sources during oxygen insufflation.
1. Animal preparation
2. Equipment preparation
3. Anterior percutaneous pleural access
4. Posterior percutaneous pleural access
5. Final positioning and monitoring
Pleural catheter placement using the percutaneous technique was attempted in 20 swine (Table 1). In 17 animals, a total of 34 pleural catheters (17 anterior and 17 posterior) were inserted. Of these, 33 catheters (97%) reached the intended pleural region, whereas one anterior catheter entered the pleural cavity but failed to reach the target ventral location. Correct regional placement of both anterior and posterior catheters was therefore achieved in 16 of the 17 animals in which catheter insertion was performed (94%), corresponding to 16 of 20 animals overall (80%; 95% CI, 56.3%–94.3%).
Representative pleural pressure tracings from successful procedures showed clear and physiologically meaningful differences between the anterior and posterior sensors (Figure 1). The anterior catheter typically exhibited prominent cardiac oscillations, larger than those recorded from the esophageal balloon, reflecting its proximity to the heart and mediastinum. In contrast, posterior pleural signals showed minimal cardiac artifact and smooth respiratory waveforms, consistent with the mechanically quiet dependent thoracic region.
During end-expiratory occlusion, correctly positioned catheters showed a reproducible dorsal-to-ventral pleural pressure gradient. Posterior pleural pressure was consistently positive at end-expiration, while the anterior signal ranged from negative to positive (Table 2). The resulting gradient between 2 and 7 cmH₂O matched the expected gravitational superimposed pressure distribution in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated swine.
Four procedures (20%) were classified as unsuccessful. In three animals, the procedure was aborted after the anterior pleural access and guidewire placement because CT imaging demonstrated an uncontrolled pneumothorax, due to inadvertent puncture of the lung parenchyma, indicating loss of lung–pleural apposition and precluding reliable pleural pressure measurement. Therefore, catheter placement and pressure waveform assessment were not pursued in these subjects. The remaining unsuccessful procedure was due to off-target anterior catheter placement: the balloon entered the pleural space but did not reach the target ventral region, resulting in a waveform lacking the expected anterior–posterior gradient.
CT imaging corroborated the physiological findings. In successful placements, the balloon catheters were visualized in the intended ventral or dorsal pleural regions, in direct apposition to the parietal pleura (Figure 2). In the off-target, unsuccessful case, CT demonstrated an intrapleural catheter position outside the target region. Postmortem examination further confirmed the catheter position and pleural location after completion of the protocol (Figure 3).
Overall, these results demonstrate that the percutaneous technique reliably yields interpretable pleural pressure signals when regional placement is achieved, and that both waveform morphology and CT imaging provide practical indicators of procedural success or failure.

Figure 1: Pleural and airway pressure waveforms after pneumothorax evacuation. Simultaneous airway pressure (red), esophageal pressure (blue), anterior pleural pressure (orange), and posterior pleural pressure (cyan) signals were recorded during volume-controlled ventilation. The shaded region marks the end-expiratory hold used to extract end-expiratory pressure values. The posterior trace shows minimal cardiogenic oscillations and higher end-expiratory values, whereas the anterior trace shows more prominent cardiac oscillations and lower end-expiratory pressure. During the hold, posterior minus anterior pleural pressure represents the vertical pleural pressure gradient. Abbreviation: cmH₂O = centimeters of water. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Computed tomography confirmation of pleural catheter placement. Yellow arrows indicate the anterior catheter in the ventral pleural region, and red arrows indicate the posterior catheter in the dorsal pleural region. Transverse (left and middle) and sagittal (right) computed tomography scans are shown for subjects P1 and P2. Images were obtained after catheter placement and before complete evacuation of the artificial pneumothorax. Recording readiness was subsequently confirmed after drainage by restored lung expansion and stable physiological pressure waveforms. Successful placement was defined as catheter localization within the intended anterior or posterior pleural region with compatible waveform morphology. Abbreviation: CT = computed tomography. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Postmortem anatomical confirmation of pleural catheter placement. Thoracic examination performed at the end of the protocol confirmed the intrapleural catheter's position. Yellow circles indicate the anterior pleural catheter, and the green circle indicates the posterior pleural catheter. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Outcome category | Number of animals (n = 20) | Percentage (%) | 95% CI (%) | Description |
| Successful anterior + posterior placement | 16 | 80% | 56.3–94.3 | Both ventral and dorsal catheters correctly positioned in target regions |
| Intrapleural but off-target placement | 1 | 5% | 0.1–24.9 | Anterior catheter inside pleural cavity but not in the target region |
| Unsuccessful due to uncontrolled pneumothorax | 3 | 15% | 3.2–37.9 | Procedure aborted after guidewire placement because of uncontrolled pneumothorax at CT imaging |
Table 1: Procedural outcomes across 20 experimental subjects. The table reports each outcome category, number, and percentage of animals, 95% confidence interval, and description. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval.
| Subject | Anterior end-expiratory pressure (cmH₂O) | Posterior end-expiratory pressure (cmH₂O) | Vertical gradient (cmH₂O) |
| 1 | -1.2 | 2.5 | 3.7 |
| 2 | -0.2 | 3.1 | 3.3 |
| 3 | -3.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 3.3 |
| 5 | 0.1 | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| 6 | -1.7 | 3.2 | 5.0 |
| 7 | 4.1 | 6.4 | 2.3 |
| 8 | -1.2 | 5.6 | 6.8 |
| 9 | -0.8 | 4.7 | 5.5 |
| 10 | 1.1 | 5.7 | 4.7 |
| 11 | -1.1 | 6.1 | 7.2 |
| 12 | -0.9 | 6.5 | 7.4 |
| 13 | -1.6 | 2.8 | 4.4 |
| 14 | 0.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 |
| 15 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 3.0 |
| 16 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
| Mean | -0.2 | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| SD | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Range | -3.0–4.1 | 2.5–6.5 | 2.3–7.4 |
Table 2: Anterior and posterior end-expiratory pleural pressure values and the resulting vertical gradient. The gradient was calculated as posterior minus anterior pressure. Measurements were obtained during volume-controlled ventilation at a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure of 3 cmH₂O. Abbreviations: PEEP = positive end-expiratory pressure; VCV = volume-controlled ventilation.
| Problem | Likely cause | Recognition criteria | Corrective action |
| Incomplete evacuation of the artificial pneumothorax | Residual intrapleural oxygen after catheter placement and incomplete lung re-expansion | Persistent residual pneumothorax or incomplete pleural apposition on CT; unreliable absolute pleural pressure values despite preserved respiratory oscillations | Reduce FiO2 to 0.25 if physiologically tolerated, place the animal in prone position, and wait 30 min to facilitate oxygen resorption. Repeat CT imaging before pressure recording to confirm pneumothorax reduction and lung re-expansion |
| Uncontrolled pneumothorax | Inadvertent puncture of the lung parenchyma during pleural access | CT evidence of large or uncontrolled pneumothorax; incomplete lung re-expansion; ventilator evidence of leak or unstable mechanics | Do not proceed to pressure recording. If reliable pleural pressure measurement cannot be obtained, classify the procedure as unsuccessful |
| Off-target catheter advancement | Guidewire or catheter advanced laterally or away from the intended ventral or dorsal pleural region | CT shows intrapleural catheter position outside the target region; waveform lacks the expected anterior-posterior differences or vertical pressure gradient | Reposition the catheter if feasible. If the intended region cannot be reached, classify the placement as suboptimal or unsuccessful |
| Abnormal pleural waveform | Catheter malposition, inadequate balloon filling, poor catheter-pleura apposition, connection leak, or transducer/zeroing error | Flat tracing, excessive noise, absent respiratory oscillations, nonphysiological absolute pressure values, or loss of expected anterior/posterior waveform morphology | Check all connections and transducer zeroing. Verify balloon filling volume. Reassess catheter position by imaging and repeat waveform assessment before recording |
| Persistent airway or pleural leak | Lung parenchymal puncture or persistent pleural-airway communication after access | Difference between inspired and expired tidal volumes; unstable plateau pressure; failure of flow to return to zero during inspiratory hold | Stop data acquisition. Reassess ventilator mechanics and imaging. Proceed only if the leak resolves and stable airway and pleural waveforms are restored |
| Catheter displacement after introducer removal | Catheter movement during introducer withdrawal or inadequate fixation to the skin | Change in waveform morphology after introducer removal; loss of expected anterior cardiac oscillations; loss of posterior smooth respiratory waveform; CT evidence of displacement | Secure the catheter to the skin with adhesive tape before introducer removal. Reassess waveform morphology after introducer removal. Confirm position by CT if displacement is suspected |
| Failure to aspirate air | The air within the artificial pneumothorax has migrated away from the tip of the introducer. | No air is aspirated when pulling the syringe plunger, with negative pressure generated during the attempt to aspirate. | Attempt aspiration using a smaller-volume syringe. If this is not sufficient, perform CT imaging to identify the location of the air collection and adjust the animal's position accordingly to bring the air collection in proximity to the introducer tip. |
Table 3: Troubleshooting guide for percutaneous pleural catheter placement and pressure recording. Common problems are paired with likely causes, recognition criteria, and corrective actions. Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography; FiO₂ = fraction of inspired oxygen.
This percutaneous protocol provides a practical and reproducible method to obtain regional pleural pressure measurements without the need for thoracotomy or thoracoscopic access. Several aspects of the procedure are particularly important for ensuring successful catheter placement and high-fidelity pressure recordings.
A key element of the technique is the anterior puncture performed under direct thoracic ultrasound guidance. Ultrasound is used to clearly visualize the pleura and the chosen intercostal space, providing real-time confirmation of the needle trajectory. Because the procedure requires controlled and accurate handling of the needle as it approaches the pleural surface, we employed an ultrasound-enhanced Tuohy needle to improve tip visibility and minimize the risk of inadvertent lung puncture or failure to enter the pleural space16.
Continuous visualization of the needle tip is critical throughout advancement. For this reason, an in-plane ultrasound approach is preferred, as it allows visualization of the entire needle shaft and tip as it advances toward the pleural space, improving procedural accuracy and reducing the risk of inadvertent lung puncture.
Correct timing of needle advancement is also essential. Advancing the needle during an end-expiratory hold minimizes the cyclical movement of the pleural surface associated with tidal ventilation, thereby improving accuracy and reducing the incidence of parenchymal contact.
The pneumothorax was created using pure oxygen to facilitate the resorption of any residual gas not removed by syringe aspiration. This resorption occurs through the oxygen diffusion gradient between the pleural space and the alveoli, because the animal is ventilated at an FiO₂ below 1.017. This approach minimizes the risk of residual intrapleural gas interfering with pressure measurements. The volume of oxygen should be sufficient to separate the pleural layers and facilitate safe advancement of the guidewire and introducer while avoiding unnecessary enlargement of the artificial pneumothorax. Once catheter placement is complete, the insufflated oxygen must be fully evacuated before pressure measurements are performed.
Proper positioning is required to enable posterior access. Rotating the animal into the semiprone position allows the intrapleural oxygen pocket to shift posteriorly, making the dorsal pleural space accessible via a blind puncture using the same Seldinger technique as for anterior puncture. Adequate body rotation is essential to allow dorsal migration of the oxygen pocket. Insufficient rotation may prevent separation of the posterior pleural layers, making guidewire advancement more difficult despite CT-assisted puncture site planning.
After catheter placement, verifying system integrity is mandatory. The absence of airway or pleural leak is confirmed by comparing inspired and expired tidal volumes and performing an inspiratory hold. A stable plateau pressure together with the return of flow to zero indicates that no ongoing leak is present and that the pleural access does not create persistent communication with the airway. In addition, pressure waveform morphology should be assessed to verify correct catheter function and positioning. Anterior recordings are expected to show more prominent cardiac oscillations because of their proximity to the heart and mediastinum, whereas posterior recordings typically display smoother respiratory waveforms with minimal cardiac interference. These cardiac oscillations represent an expected physiological feature rather than a signal artifact and therefore support correct anterior catheter positioning. The catheter should be securely fixed to the skin with adhesive tape before the introducer is removed to minimize the risk of displacement. Following evacuation of the artificial pneumothorax and removal of the introducer, the pressure tracings should be reassessed to confirm that waveform morphology remains unchanged, thereby excluding catheter displacement during the final stages of the procedure. These checks are consistent with fundamental principles of mechanical ventilation, the monitoring18. A concise troubleshooting guide for the most common technical problems, likely causes, recognition criteria, and corrective actions is provided in Table 3.
An important advantage of this method is that pleural access is obtained percutaneously, without opening the thorax. Minimally invasive approaches are generally preferred when they achieve the same experimental objective, as they reduce procedural burden and avoid unnecessary disruption of anatomical structures19. In this porcine model, the percutaneous technique may shorten preparation time, avoid thoracotomy, and help preserve native chest wall mechanics, although no formal comparison with thoracotomy-based approaches was performed.
This method nevertheless has several limitations. Successful catheter placement is operator dependent and requires experience with thoracic ultrasound, percutaneous pleural access, and the Seldinger technique. Inadvertent puncture of the lung parenchyma during pleural access represents the main cause of procedural failure, as the resulting pneumothorax precludes subsequent catheter placement. Reliable pressure measurements also depend on appropriate balloon filling. Both underfilling and overfilling balloons may alter pressure measurements, underscoring the importance of determining the optimal filling volume before data acquisition. As with any direct pleural pressure measurement technique, pleural pressure can be sampled only at the catheter location and therefore reflects regional pleural mechanics rather than the pressure distribution of the entire pleural space. Although the insufflated oxygen is aspirated at the end of the procedure, complete evacuation cannot be directly verified without imaging. Residual intrapleural oxygen may therefore remain undetected and influence absolute pleural pressure measurements. Despite these constraints, the dynamic pleural pressure signals were physiologically interpretable in successful placements.
Overall, this protocol provides a simple, minimally invasive, and physiologically grounded technique for obtaining regional pleural pressure measurements in translational models. Its percutaneous access and regional pressure signals make it suitable for studies investigating transpulmonary pressure, regional pressure distribution, and broader aspects of respiratory mechanics.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
This work was supported by NIH grant R01HL177025 and R01HL171199.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adhesive Tape | 3M Tegaderm | 1624W | Catheter fixation before introducer |
| Animal Clipper | 3M Clipper | 9661L | Thoracic hair removal |
| Atropine (Injectable) | Sparhawk Laboratories inc. | NDC:58005-354 | Intramuscular premedication |
| Computed tomography scanner | NeuroLogica | Omnitom Elite PCD; 1-NL5100-060 | Guidewire/catheter position and pneumothorax assessment; |
| Data acquisition software | ADInstruments | LabChart Pro 8.1.31 | Acquisition Software at 1,000 Hz without digital filtering |
| Data acquisition system | ADInstruments | ML865 | For pleural pressure acquisition |
| Differential pressure transducer | Harvard Apparatus / Hugo Sachs | 73-3882 | Pressure transducer for pleural pressure recording |
| Disposable OR towel | Cardinal Health | CAT 28700-004 | Sterile field preparation (Step 2.1) |
| ECG & pulse oximetry monitor | Mindray | BeneView T5 | Vital Parameters monitoring |
| Endotracheal tube, 7.0 mm | Teleflex Medical | REF 5-10314 | Endotracheal Intubation |
| Esophageal balloon catheter | Cooper Surgical | REF 47-9005 | Used as intrapleural pressure catheter (Step 2.1) |
| Fentanyl (injectable) | Hikma | NDC 0641-6030-01 | IV analgesia |
| Gauze pads (sterile) | Medline | REF NON21430LF | Site preparation (Step 2.1) |
| Guidewire 0.025" × 33 cm | Teleflex Medical | REF AW-04025 | For Seldinger technique (Step 2.1) |
| Infusion pump | Smiths Medical | Medfusion 4000 | Continuous anesthetic delivery |
| Introducer sheath, 9 Fr | Cordis | REF 402-609X | For intrapleural catheter insertion (Step 2.1) |
| Mechanical Ventilator | Maquet – Getinge | Servo-I, Volume-controlled ventilation | |
| Ophtalmic ointment | Lodi Veterinary Care | NDC 17033-211-38 | Corneal protection after anesthesia induction |
| Oxygen 100% (medical grade) | Airgas | N/A | For controlled pneumothorax |
| Pancuronium (injectable) | Selleck. Chemicals | S2497 | Neuromuscular blockade |
| Povidone–Iodine Solution | BICCA | CAT 3955-16 | Skin antisepsis |
| Propofol (injectable) | NorthStar | NDC 16714-977-01 | Induction and maintenance |
| Respiratory circuit (ventilator circuit) | Medline | REF NON026370 | Standard circuit |
| Scalpel No. 11 | Bard-Parker | REF 372611 | For skin incision (Step 2.1) |
| Steril Drape | Medline | REF MDT2168286 | Sterile field preparation |
| Sterile gloves (latex) | Biogel | REF 31280 | Sterile protective gloves |
| Sterile gown | Halyard | REF 95121 | Sterile surgical gown |
| Syringes 10 mL | Medline | REF SYR110010 | For aspiration/injection (Step 2.1) |
| Syringes 50 mL | BD | REF 309680 | For pleural air aspiration (Step 2.1) |
| Tiletamine–zolazepam (Injectable) | Virbac | NADA 71805-06 | Telazol; intramuscular sedation |
| Tuohy needle, echogenic 18G × 100 mm | Pajunk | REF 521185-31C | For pleural puncture (Step 2.1) |
| Ultrasound probe (Butterfly iQ+) | Butterfly Network | 950-20002-00 | Used with Butterfly iQ App for iPad (Step 2.1) |
| Ultrasound software/application | Butterfly Network | Butterfly iQ 2.46; iPad 11 iPadOS 26 | Butterfly iQ app for iPad |
| Xylazine (Injectable) | Cronus Pharma | LLC |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission