$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Patients with biliary strictures and concomitant stones after liver transplantation often present with poor physical condition and complex biliary anatomy, typically requiring multiple surgical procedures and resulting in high rates of residual stones. Consequently, minimally invasive approaches for relieving biliary strictures and clearing stones have emerged as a new generation of treatment modalities13. With technological advancements, following open biliary reconstruction, ERCP has become the primary method for treating biliary strictures after liver transplantation. In a study involving endoscopic treatment of 165 patients with post-liver transplantation biliary strictures, researchers achieved initial technical success in 89.1% of patients using ERCP endoscopic intervention. However, for patients with non-anastomotic strictures, the treatment efficacy rate decreased to 29.1%; furthermore, for patients with concomitant hepatolithiasis, ERCP endoscopic treatment showed poor efficacy, leading to prolonged operative time and increased risks14. In the present study, all patients with non-anastomotic intrahepatic biliary strictures and multiple strictures achieved favorable treatment outcomes, with no significant intraoperative complications observed, and no obvious stricture recurrence after treatment.
In this retrospective, single‑center, uncontrolled cohort of 25 patients with post‑liver transplantation biliary strictures complicated by hepatolithiasis who underwent PTOBF, the procedure required multiple sessions but was associated with relatively complete stricture resolution. The mean number of procedures per patient was 2.920 ± 1.956, the mean single operative time was 52.082 ± 18.077 min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 4.027 ± 3.738 mL. Only 1 of the 25 patients experienced an intraoperative complication (bleeding). When contextualized against previously reported outcomes of ERCP and other methods from the literature, the observations in this cohort—including operative time, blood loss, number of procedures, complication rates, stone clearance rates, and stricture resolution rates—appear promising. However, because of the absence of a direct comparator group and the retrospective, uncontrolled design, no direct comparative claims can be made. Notably, in this study, the majority of post‑liver transplantation biliary strictures were successfully treated through conventional PTOBF techniques, including electrosurgical stricture incision, balloon dilation, and combined placement of internal stents or gradual dilation with drainage tubes. However, some challenging biliary strictures remain, including tertiary biliary strictures and complete bile duct occlusion after liver transplantation; anatomical abnormalities may also increase the difficulty of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic catheter placement.
The results from PTOBF in this cohort also included evaluation of liver function biochemical markers. Postoperative levels of DBIL, ALT, AST, and FIB were significantly reduced compared with preoperative values, suggesting an association between PTOBF and improved biochemical parameters in this patient group. Although TBIL, C-reactive protein (CRP), and r-GGT and PT levels showed decreasing trends postoperatively, the differences were not statistically significant. These findings suggest the complexity and diversity of the internal environment in liver transplant patients, where liver function and inflammatory responses are regulated by multiple molecular pathways in vivo15,16. Given the study design, causality cannot be established, and the observed improvements should be interpreted as associations rather than definitive evidence of efficacy.
PTOBF combined with choledochoscopy and endoscopic instruments was associated with favorable stricture resolution and stone clearance rates in this cohort, with good patient acceptance, comfort, and low surgical risk. However, the procedure requires a thorough preoperative understanding of the patient's biliary anatomy and places greater demands on the operator's expertise17,18. During the 73 surgical procedures in this study, to prevent stricture recurrence due to scar hyperplasia after surgery, the same patient often needed to return to the hospital every 3 months for further dilation of the strictured bile duct, which also requires high patient treatment compliance. Additionally, this study is a single‑center study with a relatively limited sample size and lacks a control group; therefore, future multicenter studies with larger sample sizes, more detailed classifications of patient populations, biliary obstruction locations, and stone types in prospective, systematic research are necessary to confirm the safety and effectiveness of PTOBF.
Currently, therapeutic percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy has become a first-line treatment option for common bile duct stones alongside traditional surgery. Furthermore, the Rendezvous technique combines endoscopy and PTC, reaching the same stricture site through two different approaches to achieve convergence19, representing a new direction for individualized treatment of patients with post-liver transplantation strictures in the future20. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy allows detailed observation of intrahepatic bile duct anatomy through the camera and can be equipped with various specialized accessories for corresponding diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, such as guidewires, electrocautery hooks, balloon dilators, and biliary stents. It has become an important tool for diagnosing unexplained biliary strictures and treating refractory choledocholithiasis, and its application in patients with biliary diseases does not increase surgery-related adverse events or risks, with definitive therapeutic effects21,22. The future direction focuses on PTOBF verification, standardized reports, peroral or percutaneous digital cholangioscopy utilizing the SpyGlass system, comparative studies, and multi-center prospective evaluations, which are of great significance23.