This study presents a standardized alkaline-assisted decellularization protocol for fabricating decellularized human peripheral nerve grafts for peripheral nerve regeneration. The protocol integrates donor nerve pretreatment, controlled chemical decellularization, and a peristaltic pump-driven solution exchange system into a clearly defined workflow, enabling efficient removal of cellular and immunogenic components while preserving the native ECM architecture.
A key feature of this method is the integration of alkaline treatment with reduced detergent exposure. Conventional detergent-based protocols, such as Sondell (3% Triton X-100 and 4% SDC) and the Hudson method (sulfobetaine-10, sulfobetaine-16, and Triton X-200), rely on prolonged, multistep detergent treatments to achieve effective decellularization9,10. Although these approaches effectively remove cellular components, prolonged detergent exposure may compromise ECM integrity and contribute to residual detergent-related cytotoxicity19,20,21. In contrast, the present protocol incorporates NaOH to enhance cellular removal while limiting SDC exposure, thereby reducing overall detergent burden and supporting preservation of native ECM architecture.
Another critical aspect of this protocol is the peristaltic pump-driven solution exchange system. Unlike perfusion-based approaches, which can impose internal pressure on the tissue and risk structural disruption21, this system enables continuous, controlled solution exchange within a chromatography column. The effectiveness of this approach is supported by multiple analytical outcomes. Histological analysis and quantification of residual DNA confirmed efficient removal of cellular components, while SEM analysis demonstrated preservation of the native ECM architecture. In addition, low residual SDC levels and favorable cytocompatibility results supported the biocompatibility of the resulting graft. Collectively, these findings suggest that the protocol achieves a balance between effective decellularization and structural preservation.
Several technical steps are critical for minimizing procedural variability and maintaining controlled processing conditions. First, careful handling of the nerve segment during trimming, transfer, and washing is essential. Peripheral nerve tissue is mechanically fragile, and excessive compression, folding, or tension can disrupt internal structure and compromise ECM preservation19,20. Therefore, tissues should be kept moist and handled gently throughout the procedure. Second, uniform solution exchange within the column is a key determinant of process performance. Air bubbles inside the column should be minimized, and the tissue should remain fully immersed and suspended in the solution rather than adhering to the column wall or filter. Tissue adhesion may result in uneven solution exchange, reducing washing efficiency and causing inconsistent exposure to the processing reagents21,22. Third, the peristaltic pump-driven system must operate stably throughout the procedure. Continuous circulation is required for delipidization, decellularization, and washing; therefore, all tubing connections should be securely fastened to prevent disconnection due to pump-induced pressure or vibration. During sample retrieval, complete drainage of the column should be avoided. Maintaining sufficient liquid volume helps prevent tissue adhesion and facilitates gentle handling during collection.
Nerve segments measuring 2–3 cm were processed with IPA, NaOH, and SDC for 1.5, 6, and 6 h, respectively. Segments measuring >3–4 cm were processed for 2, 8, and 8 h, respectively, whereas segments measuring >4–5 cm were processed for 2.5, 10, and 10 h, respectively. Thus, the treatment durations ranged from 1.5 to 2.5 h for IPA delipidization and from 6 to 10 h for each decellularization step. All other processing parameters, including reagent concentrations, solution volumes, and washing procedures, were maintained consistently across the length groups. Depending on the tubing configuration, the flow rate was set within the specified range and held constant throughout each processing run. The length-specific processing conditions are summarized in Table 1. Adjustments based on nerve diameter, thickness, fascicular structure, or cellular and matrix composition were not systematically evaluated and require further investigation23,24. For scale-up applications, a multichannel peristaltic pump system may improve throughput; however, consistent flow conditions across channels should be carefully verified to ensure uniform processing.
Several considerations remain for further optimization. Although this protocol substantially reduces overall detergent exposure, SDC is still included, and future refinements may focus on minimizing or replacing detergent use while maintaining decellularization efficiency and ECM preservation25,26. In addition, peripheral nerve tissue is inherently difficult to standardize due to variation in fascicular structure, diameter, thickness, and cellular and matrix composition23,24. During large-scale manufacturing, these differences, together with variations in tissue loading and flow conditions, may contribute to batch-to-batch variability. However, donor-to-donor and batch-to-batch reproducibility were not systematically evaluated in the present study. Therefore, further validation using tissues from multiple donors and independent manufacturing batches will be necessary to establish appropriate tissue acceptance criteria, standardize processes, and ensure batch reproducibility.
An additional limitation concerns graft length. Regenerative performance decreases with increasing graft length, and this length-dependent limitation may be more pronounced in acellular nerve allografts than in autografts3,27. Because acellular nerve allografts lack resident viable Schwann cells, they depend on the migration and proliferation of host Schwann cells to support axonal regeneration27. Saheb-Al-Zamani et al. reported that limited regeneration in long acellular nerve allografts was associated with increased Schwann cell senescence27.
Nevertheless, a previous in vivo study showed that NaOH-based decellularized human nerve grafts supported functional and structural recovery comparable to that of autografts in a 15-mm rabbit sciatic nerve defect28. Contreras et al. also demonstrated axonal regeneration and functional recovery using a decellularized nerve allograft across a 70-mm peroneal nerve defect in sheep29. These studies support the regenerative potential of decellularized nerve grafts, although further evaluation of grafts prepared using the present protocol across clinically relevant graft lengths is required. Autografts are also limited by donor nerve availability and require an additional harvesting procedure, resulting in a second operative site and donor-site morbidity4. Acellular nerve allografts may therefore provide a clinically relevant alternative when sufficient autologous tissue is unavailable or when donor nerve harvesting is impractical.
In summary, this protocol provides a practical and adaptable framework for preparing decellularized peripheral nerve grafts. Its emphasis on reduced detergent exposure, controlled solution exchange, and process standardization supports both research applications and potential translational use in peripheral nerve regeneration. Future studies should focus on further development of detergent-free approaches, system scalability, and comprehensive in vivo evaluation of regenerative performance.