Establishing pathogenicity of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations is challenging due to their rarity, heteroplasmy involving variable levels of mutated and wild-type mtDNA genomes in different tissues, diverse pathophysiologic mechanisms, and complex interactions with nuclear genome backgrounds1,2,3,4. For these reasons, trans-mitochondrial cybrid cell lines remain the gold standard method by which to establish pathogenicity of mtDNA variants, where "cybrids" represent the fusion of one cell's nucleus with another cell's mitochondria5,6,7,8,9,10 (Figure 1). Cybrid cell lines contain an isogenic nuclear background and mitochondria with a specified percentage of heteroplasmy for the mtDNA variant under study11,12. In this way, functional assays such as respirometry (by polarography) or electron transport enzyme activity (by spectrophotometry) assays can be performed in cybrid lines ranging between 0% and 100% heteroplasmy levels to determine the potential pathogenic effects of a given mtDNA variant, as well as the relative influence of mitochondrial haplogroups that may differ between cybrid lines1. Other cell types can be used to study pathogenicity and are best used to complement cybrid generation and functional analysis, as every cell type has its own advantages and disadvantages. Patient fibroblasts directly originate from the patient but are limited in the inherited heteroplasmy and lack an isogenic nuclear control to eliminate nuclear gene effects. mtDNA editing is becoming more popular but suffers from off-target editing and limited editable sites in mtDNA13. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be differentiated to study a mutation's effect on different cell types, such as neurons and retinal ganglion cells, but induction of pluripotency may lead to loss of the mtDNA variant of interest or result in additional de novo variants14. Cybrid study involves the generation of a more artificial system that is based on a cancer cell line (classically 143B osteosarcoma) nuclear background, but classically grows well, making it amenable to use in high-throughput screening studies of candidate interventions. Limitations to high heteroplasmy level cybrid generation include platelet quality, starting heteroplasmy, and the selective disadvantages of the mutant mitochondria, which are discussed at length in this protocol.
Although cybrid generation is the gold standard for functional determination of mtDNA variant pathogenicity, few labs generate cybrids for the study of mitochondrial disease9,10,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27. Rather, more cybrids are generated to study cancer and aging28,29. Here, we use a suspected mitochondrial disease patient case study to demonstrate optimization strategies developed to facilitate cybrid generation from mtDNA patient platelets, including selection processes and cell preparations needed to establish cybrid cell lines with high versus low heteroplasmy levels for the target mtDNA variant. Specifically, we demonstrate the methodology to generate cybrid cell lines for a complex I (CI) subunit MT-ND1 variant m.3985G>A, in which we perform biochemical studies that demonstrate the pathogenic nature of this variant. Figure 2 depicts the timeline for cybrid generation, where major methodological steps include fusion, selection, and isolation methods to yield distinct colonies.