$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Screening of flavonoid active components in licorice targeting hepatic fibrosis
Through the TCMSP, 92 active components of licorice were identified, including 68 flavonoid-related active components. Using the UniProt database, the target genes for these flavonoid-based active components in licorice were converted into gene names. After removing duplicates, 211 relevant target genes were obtained. In the GeneCards database, 1171 disease-related targets for liver fibrosis were identified, while the OMIM database provided 113 targets. After removing duplicates, 1252 disease targets were identified. By intersecting the targets of licorice flavonoid active components with liver fibrosis-related targets, 108 common interaction targets were identified (Figure 1A).
Construction of core target PPI networks
The 108 common targets between LTF and liver fibrosis were imported into the STRING database for PPI analysis, resulting in 108 nodes and 2617 edges. The data were analyzed using Cytoscape 3.9.1, and nodes were filtered based on degree > 48.4629629629629, betweenness > 60.8518518518518, and closeness > 0.00611353509051094, resulting in 32 nodes and 487 edges. The 32-core target nodes were visualized using Cytoscape software (Figure 1B). In the network, darker colors and larger nodes indicate stronger protein associations. Key targets closely associated with liver fibrosis include AKT1, IL6, IL1B, MMP9, EGFR, TGFB1, and STAT3.
GO functional analysis and KEGG pathway analysis
GO functional, and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses of the 108 intersecting targets identified 5969 molecular entries and 189 signaling pathways (p < 0.01). Visualization of the top 10 GO terms showed that MF mainly involved transcription factor binding, cytokine receptor binding, and kinase inhibitor activity among the key anti-fibrotic targets of LTF. Biological process (BP) is mainly involved in regulating the apoptosis signaling pathway, negative regulation of cell differentiation, and modulation of inflammatory responses. Cellular component (CC) mainly involved membrane rafts, transcription regulatory complexes, and the extracellular matrix (Figure 2A). KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the key anti-fibrotic pathways mediated by LTF mainly involved the TGF-β signaling pathway, JAK-STAT signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, IL-17 signaling pathway, and AGE-RAGE signaling pathway (Figure 2B). Among these pathways, the TGF-β signaling pathway is a pivotal pathway in fibrosis16. Key molecules in this pathway include TGF-β, TGF-β receptors, Smad proteins (such as SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD4), and other non-Smad signaling molecules.
Molecular docking
Four active components from licorice with a high number of predicted targets were selected as ligands: formononetin, licochalcone A, isoliquiritigenin, and liquiritin. The core target TGF-β1 (PDB:4XCT)/TGF-βR1 (PDB:1VJY) as receptor was performed molecular docking analysis. Analysis using MOE 2019 and PyMOL 2.6.0 software, combined with affinity data shown in Figure 3A–D and Supplementary Figure 1A–D. All binding energy values were below -5 kCal/mol, and the lower the binding energy, the stronger the binding.
Molecular docking simulations
Considering the promising docking outcomes of liquiritin against TGF‑β1 and TGFBR1, molecular dynamics simulations were implemented to further analyze their binding interactions. As shown in Figure 4A, Supplementary Figure 2A, the simulations of Liquiritin with TGF-β1 and TGF-βR1 reached equilibrium at approximately 30 ns, with root-mean-square deviations (RMSD) of 1.74 and 1.54 Å, respectively. It is indicated that high structural stability was maintained by liquiritin-TGF-β1 and liquiritin-TGF-βR1 complexes throughout the simulation. The fluctuations of the residues bound to liquiritin in TGF-β1 and TGF-βR1 are shown in Figure 4B, Supplementary Figure 2B, respectively. The ranges of root-mean-square fluctuations (RMSF) for the residues in the proteins were 1.29-9.02 and 2.80-23.81 Å, with averages of 4.01 and 13.35 Å, respectively. This suggests that the compound's entry during the binding process may have caused subtle changes in the protein receptor's spatial conformation. As shown in Figure 4C, Supplementary Figure 2C, during the simulation, the range of fluctuations in the radius of gyration (Rg) values for the compound liquiritin in complexes with TGF-β1 and TGF-βR1 was 14.80–15.25 Å and 19.53–20.07 Å, respectively, with average Rg values of 15.02 Å and 19.77 Å. Figure 4D, Supplementary Figure 2D show the total number of hydrogen bonds present in the complexes during the 100 ns simulation, which fluctuated in the ranges of 1–6 and 1–9, respectively, with average hydrogen bond counts of 4.01 and 4.49. These results are also consistent with those from molecular docking. Multiple low-energy clusters were observed in Figure 4E–F, and Supplementary Figure 2E–F, which may also explain the high binding affinity and stability of liquiritin with the TGF-β1 and TGF-βR1 proteins.
BLI fishing and LC-MS analysis
The target protein TGF-β1 was immobilized on the surface of an SSA sensor pre-wetted with phosphate-buffered saline-Tween (PBST) and then allowed to bind with LTF. The binding and dissociation curves are shown in Figures 5A and 5B. The eluate obtained after precipitation was analyzed by LC-MS. Chemical compounds exhibiting significant differences were screened based on the criteria of p-value < 0.05 and FC > 1 . The results indicated that 95 flavonoids in LTF may serve as potential candidates for binding to TGF-β1. It contains typical flavonoids of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, including formononetin, licochalcone A, isoliquiritigenin, and liquiritin (Figure 5C).
LTF inhibits TGF-β1- induced fibrosis in LX-2 cells
Based on preliminary experimental validation (Supplementary Figure 3A–B) and previous studies17,18, this study employed 5 ng/mL TGF-β1 to induce LX-2 cell activation. LTF concentrations of 32 and 64 µg/mL significantly reduced LX-2 cell proliferation. Therefore, LTF concentrations of 16, 32, and 64 µg/mL were selected as the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups in vitro experiments. A positive control concentration of 4 µg/mL colchicine induced approximately 50% growth inhibition of LX-2 cells19(Figure 6A). 16, 32 and 64 µg/mL LTF were treated LX-2 cells for 24 h, then the cells were collected for qRT-PCR and Western blot analyses. The results revealed that the mRNA and protein expression levels of α-SMA, Collagen I, and TGF-β1 were significantly reduced in the treated groups compared to the model group, indicating that LTF exerts anti-fibrotic effects (Figure 6B, C).
DATA AVAILABILITY:
All raw data from this study have been uploaded to Figshare (DOI link: 10.6084/m9.figshare.32527209). One more raw data quantification file is submitted as Supplementary File 1.

Figure 1: Potential targets of licorice total flavonoids for anti-liver fibrosis. (A) Venn diagram of overlapping targets. (B) Protein–protein interactions network diagram. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Key pathways of LTF in inhibiting liver fibrosis. (A) Gene ontology functional analysis, enrichment score was -log₁₀p. (B) Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes pathway analysis, enrichment score was -log₁₀p. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Molecular docking of key target transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) with active components of LTF. (A) Formononetin, BE = -6.941 kcal/mol. (B) Licochalcone A, BE = -6.976 kcal/mol. (C) isoliquiritigenin, BE = -6.839 kcal/mol. (D) liquiritin, BE = -8.274 kcal/mol. Abbreviation: BE = binding energy. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Molecular dynamics simulations of the liquiritin-TGF-β1 complex. (A) Root-mean-square deviations. (B) Root-mean-square fluctuations (RMSF). (C) Protein radius of gyration (Rg). (D) Hydrogen bond count curve. (E) Free-form 3D modeling. (F) Free-form 2D modeling. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Bio-layer interferometry, fishing, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data analysis. (A) TGF-β1 binding curve. (B) LTF and TGF-β1 bait-and-switch curve. (C) LC-MS data analysis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: LTF inhibits TGF-β1-induced fibrosis in LX-2 cells. (A) Effects of different concentrations of LTF and colchicine on LX-2 cell viability. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs the control group. LTF, n = 4; Colchicine, n = 5. (B) Effects of LTF (16, 32, and 64 µg/mL) on mRNA expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), Collagen I, and TGF-β1 in activated LX-2 cells. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA. ###p < 0.001 vs control group, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs model group, n = 3. (C) Western blotting analysis of LTF (16, 32, and 64 µg/mL) effects on α-SMA, Collagen I, and TGF-β1 expression in LX-2 cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure 1: Molecular docking of TGF-βR1 with active components of LTF. (A) Formononetin, BE = -6.810 kcal/mol. (B) Licochalcone A, BE = -7.735 kcal/mol. (C) isoliquiritigenin, BE = -6.706 kcal/mol. (D) liquiritin, BE = -8.073 kcal/mol. Abbreviations: BE = binding energy.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Figure 2: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the liquiritin-TGF-βR1 complex. (A) Root-mean-square deviations (RMSD). (B) Root-mean-square fluctuations (RMSF). (C) Protein radius of gyration (Rg). (D) Hydrogen bond count curve. (E) Free-form 3D modeling. (F) Free-form 2D modeling.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Figure 3: TGF-β1-induced fibrosis in LX-2 cells. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of TGF-β1-induced mRNA expression of α-SMA, collagen I, and TGF-β1 in LX-2 cells at different concentrations and time points. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD, statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs control group, n = 3. (B) Western blotting analysis of TGF-β1-induced protein expression of α-SMA, Collagen I, and TGF-β1 in LX-2 cells.Please click here to download this file.
| Gene | Sequence(5'→3') |
| a-SMA | F: CTATGCCTCTGGACGCACAACT |
| R: CAGATCCAGACGCATGATGGCA |
| CollagenI | F: GGCCTCGGAGGAAACTTTGC |
| R: AGGGGGACCTTGGAAGCCTT |
| TGF-β1 | F: CCTGAACCCGTGTTGCTCTC |
| R: GTTGCTGAGGTATCGCCAGG |
| GAPDH | F: CCTCGTCCCGTAGACAAAATG |
| R: TGAGGTCAATGAAGGGGTCGT |
Table 1: Primer sequences. The primer sequences used.
Supplementary File 1: Raw data. Quantification of raw data associated with the study.Please click here to download this file.