The goal of this presented protocol is to share optimized surgical experience for establishing a non-arterialized rat liver transplantation model, specifically focusing on technical refinements that ensure long-term animal survival beyond 100 days.
Method Article
The goal of this presented protocol is to share optimized surgical experience for establishing a non-arterialized rat liver transplantation model, specifically focusing on technical refinements that ensure long-term animal survival beyond 100 days.
In experimental liver transplantation, the rat model is the gold standard for investigating transplant immunology and metabolic processes; however, reconstructing the exceedingly fine hepatic artery (~0.5 mm) presents a formidable technical challenge. To circumvent this, the simplified non-arterialized rat liver transplantation (NArLT) model is widely utilized. Unfortunately, severe biliary complications—such as bile leakage and ischemic cholangitis—arising from arterial deprivation frequently restrict the long-term survival of recipients. This obstacle significantly limits research on key topics, including long-term host-graft immunocompatibility and chronic rejection. Herein, we present an optimized protocol for the NArLT model that incorporates critical technical refinements to successfully overcome these ischemic biliary injuries. Key improvements include a significantly shortened anhepatic phase, a “no-touch” biliary dissection technique, thorough biliary tract flushing, and an optimized internal biliary stenting method. After implementing this improved procedure, the recipient survival rate exceeded 94% during the 100-day observation period. Ultimately, this optimized protocol provides a highly reproducible and robust platform to investigate the mechanisms underlying long-term transplant tolerance, thereby supporting the development of novel therapeutic strategies in transplantation medicine.
The rat liver transplantation model serves as the most widely utilized experimental platform for basic transplant research. However, its broader application is frequently hindered by a notoriously steep learning curve, which can significantly impede the progress of downstream experimental studies1,2. Furthermore, conventional rat liver transplantation models often suffer from suboptimal surgical success and low long-term survival rates. By critically streamlining the surgical procedures, meticulously refining operative details, and performing vascular and biliary reconstructions under direct visualization, the learning curve associated with this complex microsurgical model can be substantially abbreviated3,4. Liver transplantation remains the sole curative therapy for end-stage liver disease, making the establishment of rat liver transplantation models profoundly significant for scientific research5,6.
The non-arterialized rat liver transplantation (NArLT) model offers significant advantages in experimental surgery: it circumvents the formidable challenge of microvascular arterial anastomosis, shortens the overall surgical time, and reduces the duration of anesthesia for the rats. Despite the deprivation of arterial blood supply, the resulting biliary response in this model offers a unique perspective for investigating ischemic biliary injuries. However, conventional NArLT models are associated with a high postoperative biliary complication rate of up to 30%7, which severely compromises long-term survival. In the traditional classic rat liver transplant model, the long-term survival rate of the recipient is less than 70%–85%8. To address this, this study introduces an optimized protocol utilizing a heparin-treated soft biliary stent. By employing a “no-touch” biliary dissection technique to maximize the preservation of the peribiliary microvascular network, alongside thorough biliary flushing via cold perfusion, this approach aims to fundamentally mitigate biliary complications through physical support and ischemic protection9, ultimately providing a robust and stable platform for long-term immunological monitoring.
Therefore, maximizing procedural success rates and prolonging recipient survival stand as the primary objectives of any technical innovation in rat liver transplantation. Achieving these goals is a critical prerequisite for ensuring the timely and uninterrupted progression of downstream experimental research10.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All animal experiments and surgeries in this study were approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Qingdao University (No. 20260301SD5020260401065). Make all efforts to minimize animal suffering.
1. Preoperative Preparation

Figure 1. Surgical instruments used in the transplant procedure. (A) Stainless steel kidney basin. (B) Micro-needle holders. (C) Micro-scissors. (D) Micro-forceps (straight and curved). (E) Microvascular clips and small mosquito-style bulldog clamps. (F) Standard needle holder. (G) Straight hemostatic forceps (mosquito forceps). (H) Vascular clamp. (I) Standard surgical scissors. (J) Rubber band (fashioned from the cuff of a sterile surgical glove). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. Custom-made surgical cuffs, biliary stent, and planned abdominal incisions. (A) Preparation of vascular cuffs and the biliary stent alongside a millimeter ruler. From left to right: a 6F epidural catheter sheath used for the infrahepatic inferior vena cava (IHIVC) cuff, a 5F sheath used for the portal vein (PV) cuff, and a 5–7 mm biliary stent trimmed from a 22G intravenous catheter. (B) A cruciate incision marked on the donor rat abdomen to maximize surgical exposure. (C) A standard midline laparotomy incision marked on the recipient rat abdomen. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Donor Operation

Figure 3. Key surgical steps during donor liver mobilization and in situ perfusion. (A) Exposure and ligation of the left inferior phrenic vein. (B) Isolation and division of the hepato-esophageal communicating branches. (C) Dissection of the IHIVC, demonstrating ligation of the right adrenal and right renal veins. (D) Insertion of the custom biliary stent into the common bile duct (CBD) using the “no-touch” technique to preserve peribiliary connective tissue. (E) Cannulation of the abdominal aorta to initiate cold in situ perfusion. (F) Fully perfused donor liver exhibiting a uniformly pale appearance, indicating successful blood washout. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Ex Vivo Graft Preparation
NOTE: Perform all ex vivo graft preparation on ice (Figure 4A). Maintain the graft in UW solution at 4°C ± 2°C and monitor temperature periodically to ensure adequate cold preservation.

Figure 4. Ex vivo preparation of the donor liver graft. (A) The harvested liver graft placed in a sterile petri dish containing cold UW preservation solution, positioned on crushed ice to maintain hypothermia. (B) Cuffing of the donor PV by eversion over a custom cuff and fixation with a circumferential ligature. (C) Completed cuff preparation for PV and IHIVC, with the biliary stent in place. (D) Preparation of the suprahepatic IVC (SHIVC) with stay sutures placed at both lateral corners to facilitate subsequent anastomosis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
4. Recipient Operation

Figure 5. Key surgical steps during recipient liver mobilization and hepatectomy. (A) Identification and ligation of the recipient CBD near the hilar bifurcation. (B) Exposure and cross-clamping of the SHIVC. A rubber band is placed behind the SHIVC to provide traction and improve visualization during clamping. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6. Key surgical steps for vascular reconstruction during liver graft implantation. Reconstruction of the SHIVC: (A) alignment using corner stay sutures, (B) posterior wall continuous suturing, and (C) completion of anterior wall suturing. PV reconstruction using the cuff technique: (D) three-point traction, (E) insertion of cuffed donor PV, and (F) ligation securing the cuff. IHIVC reconstruction using the same cuff technique: (G) exposure, (H) insertion, and (I) ligation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7. Verification of graft function, biliary reconstruction, and postoperative recovery. (A) Assessment of early graft function following reperfusion, with visible bile efflux from the donor biliary stent. PV and IHIVC reconstructions are visible. (B) Completed biliary reconstruction with insertion and fixation of the donor biliary stent into the recipient CBD. (C) Representative recipient rat demonstrating full postoperative recovery with normal posture and spontaneous activity. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
To ensure consistent surgical quality and reproducibility across the NArLT models, all procedures were performed by the same experienced microsurgeon. A total of 50 rat liver transplantations were completed during the study period. The mean durations for the surgical procedures were as follows: donor surgery averaged 25.3 ± 2.6 min, ex vivo graft preparation averaged 13.1 ± 2.1 min, recipient surgery averaged 43.0 ± 1.6 min, and the anhepatic phase averaged 15.7 ± 1.2 min.
Recipients undergoin...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The NArLT model is a cornerstone for experimental transplant research due to its avoidance of complex microvascular arterial anastomosis11. However, conventional NArLT methods are historically plagued by high rates of biliary complications—up to 30%—which severely limit long-term survival and hinder chronic immunological studies2. The significance of the proposed method lies in its ability to circumvent these ischemic biliary injuries. In this study, the 100-day...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82370666), Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China (No.2025KJHZ016) and Fujian provincial health technology project (No. 2023CXA014).
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-0 Absorbable Suture | Ethicon | W9109H | Used for closure of musculofascial layer (linea alba) |
| 4-0 Silk Suture | Ethicon | VCP304H | Used for skin closure |
| 7-0 or 8-0 Suture / Silk Tie | Ethicon | Z1711E | Used for ligation of vessels (e.g., left phrenic vein) |
| 22G Intravenous Catheter | B. Braun | 4252098B | Trimmed to 5–7 mm with inclined ends to prepare biliary stent |
| 23G Scalp Vein Needle | Shandong Qinkai Medical Industry Co., Ltd. | MDLSSVS | Used for insertion into abdominal aorta for liver perfusion |
| Buprenorphine | Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | H12020275 | Administered as subcutaneous analgesia post-surgery |
| Cotton Swab | Aoocn | 216-236 | Used to gently elevate liver during dissection |
| Crushed Ice | N/A | N/A | Used to maintain graft temperature during ex vivo preparation |
| Elastic Retractors | N/A | N/A | Used to retract abdominal wall during laparotomy |
| Epidural Catheter Sheaths | Jiangsu Maichuang Medical Device Co., Ltd. | 20173084015 | Sizes 5F and 6F; used as cuffs for PV and IHIVC |
| Gauze | Central Medical Technology Co., Ltd. | CH-1001 | Saline-soaked; used to cover and protect intestines |
| Glucose Solution (5%) | Sichuan Kelun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | H20044307 | Used to flush intrahepatic blood during recipient hepatectomy |
| Heparin Saline | Shenzhen Life Biotechnology Co., Ltd. | H2012003 | 100 IU/mL; used to soak biliary stent |
| Indwelling Needle | B. Braun | 4254074B | Used to flush SHIVC to remove air before completing anastomosis |
| Isoflurane | Jinan Guangshengyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. | 153107015 | 5% concentration; used for anesthesia induction |
| Microvascular Clamps | Shanghai Medical Devices Co., Ltd. | JCZ200 | Used for vessel occlusion during surgery |
| Mosquito Forceps | Shanghai Medical Devices Co., Ltd. | J31010 | Used for fine manipulation and cuff preparation |
| Normal Saline (0.9%) | Sichuan Kelun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | H20044304 | Used for irrigation and gauze soaking (37°C) |
| Pentobarbital (1%) | Shanghai Yuansi Technology Co., Ltd. | P0500000 | 40–45 mg/kg; used for surgical anesthesia |
| Peripherally Inserted Venous Catheter (PIVC) | Covidien | 8888145015 | Used to flush cuffed PV and confirm patency |
| Povidone-Iodine | Shanxi Trinda Biotechnology Co., Ltd. | 41836054 | Used for surgical site disinfection |
| Rubber Band (from Surgical Glove) | Ansell | N/A | Used for SHIVC traction during recipient surgery |
| Sprague–Dawley Rats | Huafukang (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. | 22001A | Adult male rats, 8–10 weeks, 220–250 g |
| Sterile Petri Dish (10 cm) | Shandong Enyou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. | H905001 | Used to hold graft in UW solution during ex vivo preparation |
| Syringe (20 mL) | Shandong Weigao Group Medical Polymer Products Co., Ltd. | 20163141593 | Used for controlled liver perfusion (3–3.5 mL/min) |
| UW Preservation Solution | Bridge to Life | BTL-UW-1L | Maintained at 4°C; used for donor liver perfusion and graft preservation |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission