A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Research Article

Kechuanting Acupoint Sticking Therapy Alleviates Type 2 Airway Inflammation in Mice with Allergic Asthma by Modulating the Number of ILC2s

108 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/71749

⸱

September 1st, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

This protocol describes establishing an ovalbumen (OVA)-induced allergic asthma (AA) mouse model to evaluate the therapeutic mechanisms of Kechuanting Acupoint Sticking Therapy (KAST) on type 2 airway inflammation by modulating pulmonary Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) via the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)/receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) pathway.

Abstract

Kechuanting Acupoint Sticking Therapy (KAST) has been shown to effectively improve airway inflammation in patients with allergic asthma (AA); however, its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic mechanisms of KAST in an AA mouse model from a neuro-immune perspective. An ovalbumen (OVA)-induced allergic asthma mouse model was established, and the mice were treated with KAST. The effects of KAST on pulmonary Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) and type 2 airway inflammation were evaluated using flow cytometry, hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, and immunohistochemistry. Western blotting (WB) and ELISA were used to assess calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) protein levels in lung tissues. Intranasal administration of CGRP or the CGRP receptor inhibitor BIBN-4096 was performed in mice with allergic asthma to investigate the regulatory role of the CGRP/receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) pathway on ILC2s and type 2 airway inflammation. KAST reduced the number of ILC2s and alleviated type 2 airway inflammation, accompanied by decreased CGRP expression in lung tissues. Intranasal CGRP increased RAMP1+ILC2s and total ILC2s in the lungs and exacerbated type 2 airway inflammation. Conversely, intranasal BIBN-4096 decreased pulmonary ILC2s and mitigated type 2 airway inflammation. KAST reduces airway inflammation in allergic asthma, which is closely associated with downregulation of the CGRP/RAMP1 pathway and subsequent suppression of pulmonary ILC2s, as supported by pharmacologic inhibition.

Introduction

Allergic asthma (AA) is the most common asthma phenotype of asthma, accounting for 60–80% of all asthma cases in China1. It is characterized by a high prevalence and suboptimal disease control that severely impairs patients’ quality of life and imposes significant economic burdens2,3,4,5. Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the mainstay of clinical treatment6, some patients show limited responsiveness, and long-term usage is often associated with adverse effects and an inability to halt disease progression7. Thus, the development of safe and effective novel therapeutic strategies remains a priority in both clinical and research settings. Kechuanting Acupoint Sticking Therapy (KAST), a traditional Chinese medicine external application, delivers active compounds transdermally, which potentially avoids the hepatic first-pass effect and minimizes systemic adverse reactions8,9. Clinical studies have demonstrated that KAST can relieve asthma symptoms, restore partial pulmonary function, and enhance patients’ quality of life10,11,12. Concurrently, serum metabolomics, network pharmacology, and animal studies using asthma models suggest that KAST attenuates airway inflammation by reducing serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) levels of inflammatory mediators, including downregulating IgE, IL-4, and IL-13 expression9,13,14. Collectively, these findings provide supportive evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of KAST in asthma. However, its precise mechanisms of action remain unclear.

One core pathological mechanism driving AA recurrence is type 2 airway inflammation, in which group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) play a key role15. Upon allergen stimulation, ILC2s secrete cytokines such as IL-5 and IL-13, thereby driving airway inflammation16,17. Studies have shown that depletion of ILC2s significantly alleviates airway inflammation in asthmatic mice, underscoring their central role in disease progression18. Notably, the activation and function of ILC2s are tightly regulated by multiple mechanisms, with neuro-immune interactions drawing increasing attention in recent years. Emerging evidence indicates that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) can bind to receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) on the surface of ILC2s, inducing their activation and subsequent release of type 2 cytokines, which exacerbates airway inflammation in AA19,20,21. In the present study, our high-throughput RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) screening identified CGRP as a critically responsive neuropeptide heavily modulated by KAST intervention. Therefore, focusing on the CGRP/RAMP1 pathway, we employed KAST as an intervention in AA mice to investigate its potential mechanisms in modulating ILC2 activity and alleviating type 2 airway inflammation.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Academies of Sciences. The protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (approval No. 2023DW-059-01). A comprehensive list of all materials, reagents, tools, and software used in this study is detailed in the Table of Materials.

Experimental animals and grouping

Healthy female BALB/c mice (SPF grade, 8–10 weeks old) were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (license No. SYXK (Su) 2018-0049). Animals were housed under standard conditions with a 12 h light/dark cycle at 24–26 °C. Sterile food and water were provided ad libitum, bedding was replaced regularly, and cages were cleaned routinely. After 7 days of adaptation, the mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 7/group): Normal group, model group, CGRP group, BIBN-4096 group, KAST group, and KAST + CGRP group. Animals were randomly assigned to groups using a computer-generated random number table. Group allocation was concealed from investigators until the interventions were assigned. To optimize tissue utilization, lung samples from the randomized cohort (n = 7 per group) were systematically allocated to different processing pathways, with the exact analyzed sample sizes (n = 5, 4, or 3) for specific histological and molecular assays explicitly indicated in the respective figure legends. No data were excluded from the analysis.

Preparation of KAST formulation

The formulation was prepared by the Pharmacy Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine22. Nine traditional Chinese medicinal herbs were used: Semen Brassicae (2 parts), Rhizoma Corydalis (2 parts), Radix Kansui processed with vinegar (1 part), Asarum (1 part), Ephedra (1 part), Semen Lepidii (1 part), Clove (1 part), Cinnamon bark (1 part), and Gleditsia sinensis (1 part). Each herb was ground into fine powder and passed through an 80-mesh sieve. For every 100 g of mixed powder, 70 mL of fresh ginger juice and 30 mL of liquid paraffin were added, thoroughly mixed, and processed into 0.3 g ± 5% patches with a diameter of 0.5 cm. Specifically, all herbal ingredients and fresh ginger were authenticated by Chief Pharmacist Lin-gang Zhao and stored at 4 °C in a dark, dry environment prior to use9. To guarantee intervention reproducibility and batch-to-batch stability, a rigorous quality control standard was implemented based on our team's established UPLC-Q-TOF-MS and HPLC methods, confirming the consistent presence of major active markers such as sinapine thiocyanate23. In practice, the 0.5 cm patches were secured using 2.5 cm × 5.5 cm medical breathable hypoallergenic adhesive tape to ensure optimal transdermal delivery.

Establishment of the AA mouse model

The AA model was induced according to an established protocol from the literature using OVA sensitization and intranasal challenge24. Except for the Normal group, all mice were sensitized by intraperitoneal injection of 200 µL saline containing 100 µg OVA and 2 mg aluminum hydroxide on days 0 and 12. From days 18 to 23, mice were challenged intranasally once daily with 50 µg OVA in 50 µL saline. From days 24 to 53, OVA was administered intranasally every other day. On day 54, after weighing the mice, euthanasia was performed via cervical dislocation, and tissues were collected. Subsequently, the lung coefficient was determined by dividing the total lung weight by body weight.

Interventions

From days 40 to 53, mice in the KAST group and KAST + CGRP group were shaved over a 3 cm × 6 cm dorsal area. Patches were applied over bilateral Feishu (BL13), Geshu (BL17), Pishu (BL20), and Shenshu (BL23) acupoints, fixed with adhesive tape for 1.5 h once daily for 14 consecutive days. Mice in the CGRP and KAST + CGRP groups received intranasal administration of 10 µL Calcitonin/CALCA solution (1 pg/µL) every other day from day 40 to 53. Mice in the BIBN-4096 group received intranasal administration of 10 µL BIBN-4096 solution (0.3 mg/mL, CGRP receptor antagonist) every other day. Normal and model groups received standard feeding without intervention. KAST was administered from day 40 to day 53, after the establishment of allergic airway inflammation (starting at day 40, which is 22 days after the first OVA challenge on day 18). Therefore, KAST in this study served as a therapeutic rather than a prophylactic intervention.

For skin preparation, hair removal over the designated dorsal region was performed using an electric clipper. Acupoint localization strictly adhered to the standard Nomenclature and Location of Acupoints for Laboratory Animals - Part 3: Mice (T/CAAM 0002-2020) issued by the Chinese Acupuncture-Moxibustion Society. The four pairs of bilateral dorsal sites were precisely marked and defined as follows: Feishu (BL13: between the ribs below the 3rd thoracic vertebra spinous process, 3 mm lateral to the posterior midline), Geshu (BL17: below the 7th thoracic vertebra spinous process, 3 mm lateral to the midline), Pishu (BL20: below the 12th thoracic vertebra spinous process, 3 mm lateral to the midline), and Shenshu (BL23: below the 2nd lumbar vertebra spinous process, 3 mm lateral to the midline). The 3M tape was tightly wrapped to achieve stable adhesion, ensuring no patch displacement or secondary skin erosion during the 1.5 h retention period.

The doses of CGRP/CALCA (1 pg/µL, 10 µL per mouse) and BIBN-4096 (0.3 mg/mL, 10 µL per mouse) were selected based on published studies25. Specifically, for the CGRP intervention, a 0.1% BSA solution was prepared by dissolving 1 mg of BSA in 1 mL of ddH2O, followed by vortexing to achieve a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. Prior to reconstitution, the lyophilized Calcitonin/CALCA protein powder was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 30 s at 4 °C. Then, 20 µL of the prepared 0.1% BSA solution was added to achieve a 1 µg/µL stock solution. The vial was gently inverted several times (without vortexing), spun down for a few seconds, and left at room temperature for several minutes to ensure complete protein reconstitution. To prepare the 1 pg/µL working solution without generating an unmanageably large single-step volume, a standard two-step serial dilution was implemented: 1 µL of the 1 µg/µL stock solution was first diluted in 999 µL of sterile saline to formulate a 1 ng/µL intermediate solution, and then 1 µL of this intermediate solution was further mixed with another 999 µL of sterile saline to achieve the final 1 pg/µL working solution. The working solution was kept at 4 °C, while remaining aliquots were stored at -20 °C for up to 2–3 months. For the BIBN-4096 group, 1 mg of BIBN-4096 powder was dissolved in 333 µL of ddH2O to obtain a 3 mg/mL stock solution, which was aliquoted into 50 µL per vial and stored at -80 °C. To prepare the 0.3 mg/mL working solution, each 50 µL aliquot of stock solution was thoroughly mixed with 450 µL of sterile saline. From days 40 to 53, a 10 µL volume of either the 1 pg/µL CGRP solution or the 0.3 mg/mL BIBN-4096 solution was administered intranasally to each mouse every other day under gentle restraint without anesthesia.

Outcome measures and detection methods

Behavioral testing

On day 53, following the final intranasal challenge, the frequencies of nasal rubbing and sneezing episodes were monitored and recorded using a digital video system for a duration of 10 min. The behavior frequencies in the videos were independently counted by two researchers in a double-blind manner. In cases of a significant discrepancy between their counts, a third researcher re-evaluated the video, and the data with the highest consistency were ultimately selected for statistical analysis.

Bronchial provocation test

Within 24 h after the final challenge, airway responsiveness was assessed using nebulized acetylcholine (ACh) at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/mL (300 µL per concentration, nebulized for 1 min). Enhanced pause (Penh) values, a dimensionless index used to empirically indicate airway constriction and evaluate airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), were recorded for 5 min after each nebulization using a non-invasive whole-body plethysmography. Mice were acclimated to the chamber for 10 min prior to recording. Penh was automatically calculated using the integrated manual storage/streaming system software according to the empirical formula balancing expiratory/inspiratory time and peak flows.

Histopathology (HE staining)

Lung tissues fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde were dehydrated through a graded alcohol series, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin blocks using an automated processor. The blocks were sectioned at a thickness of 4 µm, floated in a 42 °C water bath, and mounted onto glass slides. Slides were baked at 80 °C for 2 h and dried overnight before cooling to room temperature. For staining, sections were deparaffinized in xylene (I and II, 20 min each), rehydrated through a graded ethanol series (100% I/II and 75%, 5 min each), and rinsed with tap water. Slides were stained with hematoxylin for 3–5 min, differentiated with 1% acid alcohol, and blued in a bluing solution. After washing, sections were dehydrated via 85% and 95% ethanol (5 min each) and counterstained with eosin for 5 min. Finally, slides were dehydrated in absolute ethanol (I, II, and III, 5 min each), cleared in xylene (I and II, 5 min each), mounted with neutral balsam, and air-dried. Images were captured from random fields at 200× magnification using a light microscope and the CaseViewer system. Lung inflammation and epithelial thickening were graded blindly on a 0–4 scale: 0, no inflammation; 1, occasional inflammatory cells; 2, few (<3) inflammatory foci; 3, multiple (≥3) inflammatory foci; 4, diffuse infiltration throughout the lung. Epithelial thickening was scored as: 0, normal; 1, visible thickening; 2, partial airway thickening; 3, near-complete obstruction; 4, absent normal structure. For each experimental group, a total of 20 random microscopic fields were imaged and evaluated to obtain the raw histopathological scores. The data from every four fields were averaged to yield a single independent data point, resulting in a final sample size of n = 5 replicates per group for statistical analysis. The scoring was performed in a blinded manner.

RNA-seq

Total RNA was extracted from murine lung tissues using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA purity, concentration, and integrity were evaluated using a spectrophotometer and a microfluidics-based platform. Transcriptome libraries were constructed using a commercial library preparation kit and sequenced on a high-throughput sequencing platform to generate 150 bp paired-end reads. Raw data were quality-controlled using appropriate filtering software to obtain clean reads, which were mapped to the reference genome using a splice-aware alignment tool. Gene expression levels were calculated as FPKM, and read counts were compiled via a read-counting utility. Differential expression analysis was performed using a specialized statistical package, with thresholds set at |log2 Fold Change| ≥ 1 and adjusted p < 0.05.

ELISA

Fresh murine lung tissues were precisely weighed and homogenized in PBS buffer at a strict ratio of 20 mg tissue to 200 µL buffer. The homogenates were centrifuged at approximately 13,400 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to harvest the protein supernatants. For normalization, the raw protein content of the supernatants was calibrated using the BCA method. The ELISA procedure was performed in technical triplicate using commercial kits according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 50 µL of standard dilutions or 50 µL of pre-diluted samples (10 µL protein sample mixed with 40 µL sample diluent, achieving a 5-fold final dilution) were added to the antibody-coated 96-well plates. The plates were sealed and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After washing five times with a 1:30 diluted wash buffer, 50 µL of enzyme-linked conjugate reagent was added to each well (except the blank wells), and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After another five washes, 50 µL of chromogen solution A and 50 µL of chromogen solution B were added to each well, and the plate was incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 µL of the stop solution, which shifted the color from blue to yellow. The absorbance (OD value) of each well was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader within 15 min. Standard curves were plotted using a four-parameter logistic or linear regression model (ensuring R2 > 0.99), from which the target protein concentrations in the lung tissue homogenates were calculated.

Flow cytometry

Lung tissues were excised, minced, and digested in 5 mL of RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS, 50 µL Liberase TM, and 5 µL DNase I at 37 °C for 45 min with shaking at 80 rpm. The digested suspension was passed through a 400-mesh cell strainer and centrifuged at 300 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 2 mL of erythrocyte lysis buffer for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. After washing, cells were resuspended and stained with Ghost Dye Red 780 (1.25 µL per sample) for 20 min at 4 °C in the dark for dead cell exclusion. Following a wash, cells were blocked with 10 µL of FcR Blocking Reagent for 10 min at 4 °C. Cells were then surface-stained with the following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C: FITC anti-mouse CD45 (0.5 µL), PE anti-mouse/human KLRG1 (1.25 µL), BB700 rat anti-mouse CD90.2 (0.5 µL), and a biotinylated lineage mixture containing anti-mouse CD3ε, CD4, CD8a, CD11b, CD11c, CD49b, TER-119, Ly-6G/Ly-6C (Gr-1) (all 0.5 µL each), and anti-mouse CD19 (2 µL). After washing, cells were incubated with Brilliant Violet 605 Streptavidin (2 µL) for 30 min at 4 °C. Data were acquired on a BD flow cytometer platform and analyzed using FlowJo software. Fluorescence spillover compensation matrices were automatically monitored and adjusted by the instrument's calibrated acquisition software. The hierarchical gating strategy for identifying pulmonary ILC2s was sequentially implemented as follows: total lymphocytes were first isolated via forward/side scatter (FSC-A/SSC-A) morphology, followed by doublet discrimination through singlet gating (FSC-H/FSC-A). Viable cells were subsequently identified by dead cell exclusion (Ghost Dye-), and then standard gates were progressively applied to select the CD45+ and Lineage- populations. Within the viable CD45+ Lineage- gating window, pulmonary ILC2s were explicitly defined and quantified based on the subsequent positive sequential cascading gates of CD90.2+ and KLRG1+ clusters.

Immunofluorescence (IF)

Frozen lung sections were thawed at room temperature for 15–30 min and washed three times with PBST (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20) for 6 min each to remove the OCT compound. After blotting excess liquid, a hydrophobic barrier was drawn around the tissue using an immunohistochemistry pen. Sections were incubated in a blocking and permeabilization buffer containing 0.3% Triton X-100 and 5% goat serum at 37 °C for 100 min, followed by overnight incubation (16–20 h) at 4 °C with the primary antibody. The next day, sections were equilibrated at room temperature for 30 min, washed three times with PBST, and incubated with a species-matched fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody at 37 °C in the dark for 60–90 min. After three additional PBST washes, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (diluted 1:1 or 2:1 in PBS) for 8 min at room temperature in the dark. Following a final round of PBST washes (3 × 6 min), sections were mounted with an anti-fade mounting medium, sealed to prevent bubble formation, and stored in the dark. Images were captured using a confocal microscope at 400× magnification. The number of positive cells per field was counted manually using Leica LAS X software. For each experimental group, a total of 15 random microscopic fields were imaged to obtain the raw cell counts. The data from every three fields were averaged to yield a single independent data point, resulting in a final sample size of n = 5 replicates per group for statistical analysis. The counting was performed in a blinded manner.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Paraffin sections were deparaffinized in three changes of xylene (15 min each), rehydrated through a graded ethanol series (100% twice, 85%, and 75%; 5 min each), and rinsed with distilled water. Antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) using a pressure cooker (3 min at high pressure after boiling), followed by cooling and three 5-min washes in PBS (pH 7.4). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% H2O2 for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. After washing, sections were encircled with a hydrophobic pen and blocked with 3% goat serum for 30 min. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies diluted in PBS: anti-IL-4 (1:400), anti-IL-5 (1:300), or anti-IL-13 (1:150). The following day, sections were washed and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-mouse for IL-4; anti-rabbit for IL-5 and IL-13) for 50 min at room temperature. Signals were visualized using a freshly prepared DAB solution under microscopic control and terminated with tap water. Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, differentiated, blued, dehydrated through graded alcohols and xylene, and mounted with neutral balsam for microscopic examination. Mean optical density (IOD/Area) was quantified using an Image analysis software platform at 200× magnification. For each experimental group, a total of 15 random microscopic fields were imaged to obtain the raw values. The data from every three fields were averaged to yield a single independent data point, resulting in a final sample size of n = 5 replicates per group for statistical analysis. The scoring was performed by two blinded observers.

Western blot (WB)

For sample preparation, murine lung tissues (approximately 30 mg) were finely minced and homogenized in 300 µL of pre-cooled RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with 1% protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. Homogenization was performed using a tissue homogenizer at 60 Hz for four cycles (60 s per cycle). The lysates were then centrifuged at approximately 13,400 × g for 15 min at 4 °C to collect the supernatant. Total protein concentrations were determined via a standard BCA protein assay kit. Samples were then normalized, mixed with 5x loading buffer at a 4:1 volume ratio, and denatured at 95 °C for 7 min. For SDS-PAGE, protein samples (20 µg per lane) were loaded alongside a pre-stained protein molecular weight marker, resolved at a constant voltage of 80 V for 20 min, and then adjusted to 120 V for 70 min. Proteins were then wet-transferred to 0.22 µm PVDF membranes under a constant current of 300 mA for 120 min in an ice bath. The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA in TBST for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight (up to 18 h) at 4 °C with primary antibodies against CGRP (1:500) and GAPDH (1:2000). After washing with TBST three times (10 min each), the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:10000) for 1–2 h at room temperature. Following another three washes, the protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL) substrate within a VILBER Fusion FX imaging system. Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ 1.8, and target protein expression was normalized to the GAPDH internal control.

Statistical analysis

All experimental data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data analysis and statistical plotting were performed using a specialized statistical software platform. Prior to inter-group comparisons, the datasets were systematically subjected to normality testing. For normally distributed data with homogeneous variances, ordinary one-way or two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was implemented, followed by Tukey’s, Šídák’s, Holm-Šídák’s, or Fisher’s LSD post hoc tests for multiple pairwise comparisons. When comparing multiple groups against a single control group, Dunnett's test was applied. For datasets with heterogeneous variances, the Brown-Forsythe ANOVA was used, followed by Dunnett's T3 post-hoc test. For datasets that did not conform to normality, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed by Dunn's post hoc test for multiple comparisons. A P value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences. Different significance levels are dynamically denoted as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. All experimental outcome assessments, including histological scoring, flow cytometry analysis, and image quantification, were conducted in a strictly blinded manner.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

KAST reduces pulmonary ILC2s and alleviates type 2 airway inflammation

To investigate the therapeutic effects of KAST, an OVA-induced AA mouse model was established and treated with patches applied at Feishu (BL13), Geshu (BL17), Pishu (BL20), and Shenshu (BL23) acupoints (Figure 1A). After modeling, AA mice showed decreased body weight, whereas KAST mice exhibited significantly increased body weight compared with the model group (

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

AA treatment faces several limitations, including side effects associated with long-term medication use, incomplete symptom control, and frequent relapses. Although conventional pharmacotherapy is effective, it is often accompanied by adverse outcomes such as steroid dependence26,27. In contrast, KAST offers a safe, economical, and convenient alternative for the management of AA. Clinical evidence has shown that KAST can effectively alleviate asthma symptoms by m...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82274632), Jiangsu Province Leading Talents Cultivation Project for Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. SLJ0309), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20231381), Jiangsu Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Development Plan Project (No. ZT202205), and Key Laboratory of Acupuncture and Medicine Research of Ministry of Education at Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (No. AML202304).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
3M Medical Breathable Tape3M, USA1530CPatch fixation
Acetylcholine chlorideSigma-Aldrich, USAA6625Bronchial provocation
Agilent 2100 BioanalyzerAgilent Technologies, USAG2939BARNA quality and integrity evaluation
Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L)Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA(custom order)Immunofluorescence (secondary)
Aluminum hydroxideSigma-Aldrich, USA239186Adjuvant
Anti-CGRP antibody (rabbit)Abcam, UKab81887Western blot / IF
BALB/c mouse (female, SPF, 8–10 weeks, 18–22 g)Sibelfu (Suzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd.B202407260106Animal model
BB700 rat anti-mouse CD90.2 (clone 53-2.1)BD Biosciences, USA566465Flow cytometry
BD FACSCanto II flow cytometerBD Biosciences, USAFACSCanto IIFlow cytometry
BIBN-4096 (Olcegepant hydrochloride)MedChemExpress LLC, USAHY-10095ACGRP receptor antagonist
Biotin-Lineage CocktailBD Biosciences, USA(Customized, clones as described)Flow cytometry
Brilliant Violet 605 StreptavidinBD Biosciences, USA563260Flow cytometry
BSA Albumin Fraction VBioFroxx (neoFroxx GmbH), Germany4240GR100Blocking
Calcitonin/CALCA proteinMedChemExpress LLC, USAHY-P77587CGRP intervention
CD11c/ITGAX antibody (rabbit)Abmart, Shanghai, ChinaMU115408SImmunofluorescence
Citrate antigen retrieval bufferBoster, ChinaAR0024Immunohistochemistry
DAPI Staining SolutionBeyotime, Shanghai, ChinaC1006Nuclear staining
ddH2O (Double-distilled water)Sigma-Aldrich, USA10977015Protein reconstitution and powder dissolution
DESeq2Bioconductor (R package)Version 1.42.0Differential expression analysis software
DNase IRoche Diagnostics, Germany10104159001Lung tissue digestion
Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 555)Abcam, UKab150106Immunofluorescence (secondary)
ECL Substrate (Super Femto)Nanjing Lanken Biotech, China–Western blot chemiluminescence
Enhanced BCA Protein Assay KitBeyotime, Shanghai, ChinaP0010Protein quantification
Eosin Y Staining SolutionSigma-Aldrich, USAHT110216Histology (HE staining)
Ethanol (Absolute, Analytical Grade)Sinopharm Chemical Reagent, China10009218Tissue dehydration and histology
F4/80 antibody (mouse, clone C-7)Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USAsc-377009Immunofluorescence
fastpOpen Source (GitHub)Version 0.23.4RNA-seq raw data quality control software
FITC anti-mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11)BD Biosciences, USA553080Flow cytometry
FlowJoBD Biosciences, USA10Flow cytometry analysis
GAPDH monoclonal antibody (mouse)Proteintech, Wuhan, China60004-1-IgWestern blot
GATA3 antibody (mouse, clone L50-823)Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USAsc-268Immunofluorescence
Ghost Dye Red 780Tonbo Biosciences, USA13-0865-T100Dead cell exclusion
Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary AntibodyThermo Fisher Scientific, USAA11008Immunofluorescence (secondary)
GraphPad PrismGraphPad Software, USA10.1.2Statistical analysis
Hematoxylin Solution (Harris)Sigma-Aldrich, USAHHS16Histology (HE staining)
HISAT2Johns Hopkins University (Open Source)Version 2.2.1RNA-seq reference genome alignment software
HRP-conjugated Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)Proteintech, Wuhan, ChinaSA00001-1Western blot (secondary)
HRP-conjugated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)Proteintech, Wuhan, ChinaSA00001-2Western blot (secondary)
HTSeq-countEMBL (Python utility)Version 2.0.3RNA-seq genomic feature read-counting utility
Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2, 3% Solution)Sigma-Aldrich, USAH1009Endogenous peroxidase blocking
iFluor™ 488 Conjugated Goat anti-rabbit IgG AntibodyHuabio, ChinaHA1121Immunofluorescence (secondary)
IL-4 Monoclonal antibodyProteintech, Wuhan, China66142-1-IgWestern blot
IL13 AntibodyAffinity Biosciences, USADF6813Western blot
IL5 AntibodyAffinity Biosciences, USAAF5123Western blot
Illumina Novaseq 6000Illumina, USA–RNA sequencing
ImageJNIH, USA1.8Western blot quantification
Image-Pro PlusMedia Cybernetics, USAVersion 6.0Image optical density quantification
KAST herbal formulationPharmacy Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine–Intervention
KLRG1 Monoclonal Antibody (2F1)Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA58-5893-82Immunofluorescence
Leica LAS XLeica Microsystems, Germany4.5Immunofluorescence quantification
Leica STELLARIS 8 DIVE confocal microscopeLeica Microsystems, GermanySTELLARIS 8Immunofluorescence imaging
Liberase TMRoche Diagnostics, Germany5401119001Lung tissue digestion
Marker (Prestained Protein Ladder)NCM Biotech, Suzhou, ChinaP9001Western blot
Mouse CGRP ELISA kitAifang Biotechnology, Hunan, ChinaAF2491-AELISA
Mouse IL-13 ELISA kitAifang Biotechnology, Hunan, ChinaAF-02456M1ELISA
Mouse IL-4 ELISA kitAifang Biotechnology, Hunan, ChinaAF-02448M1ELISA
Mouse IL-5 ELISA kitAifang Biotechnology, Hunan, ChinaAF-11729M1ELISA
Neutral balsam mounting mediumSinopharm Chemical Reagent, China10014061Histology slide mounting
Normal goat serum (for blocking)Abcam, UKab7481Immunohistochemistry/IF blocking
OCT embedding compoundSakura, USA4583Cryosection embedding
One-Step PAGE Gel Fast Preparation KitVazyme, Nanjing, ChinaE303-01SDS-PAGE gel preparation
Ovalbumin (OVA)Sigma-Aldrich, USAA5503Sensitization/challenge
Paraformaldehyde (4% in PBS)Biosharp, ChinaBL539ATissue fixation
PE anti-mouse/human KLRG1 (clone 2F1)BD Biosciences, USA564022Flow cytometry
Phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (50×)Beyotime, Shanghai, ChinaP1092Protein extraction
Poly-L-lysine solutionBoster, ChinaAR0003Histology slide coating
Proteinase and phosphatase inhibitorNCM Biotech, Suzhou, ChinaP002Protein extraction
PVDF membrane (0.22 μm)Merck Millipore, USAISEQ00010Western blot
RAMP1 polyclonal antibody (rabbit)Proteintech, Wuhan, China10327-1-APImmunofluorescence
Red blood cell (RBC) lysis bufferBeyotime, Shanghai, ChinaC3702Flow cytometry sample prep
RIPA lysis buffer (Strong)Beyotime, Shanghai, ChinaP0013BProtein extraction
RPMI-1640 mediumThermo Fisher Scientific, USA11875093Tissue cell digestion base
SuperKine™ Enhanced Antifade Mounting MediumWuhan Yakeyin Biotechnology Co., Ltd.BMU104Immunofluorescence mounting
Triton X-100 (Detergent)Sigma-Aldrich, USAT8787Immunofluorescence permeabilization
TRIzol reagentThermo Fisher Scientific, USA15596026RNA extraction
VAHTS Universal V10 RNA-seq Library Prep KitVazyme, Nanjing, ChinaNR605-01RNA-seq library construction
Whole-body plethysmography systemGuangyuanda, Beijing, ChinaWBP-4Lung function (Penh)
Xylene (Analytical Grade)Sinopharm Chemical Reagent, China10023418Deparaffinization and clearing

References

  1. Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic asthma (2019, the first edition). Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019;58(9):636-55.
  2. Huang K, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of asthma in China: a national cross-sectional study. LANCET. 2019;394(10196):407-18.
  3. Zhou J, et al. Characteristics of different asthma phenotypes associated with cough: a prospective, multicenter survey in China. Respir Res. 2022;23(1):243.
  4. Venkatesan P. 2023 GINA report for asthma. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11(7):589.
  5. Schatz M, Rosenwasser L. The allergic asthma phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014;2(6):645-8; quiz 9.
  6. Reddel HK, et al. Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: executive summary and rationale for key changes. Eur Respir J. 2022;59(1).
  7. Smith SG, et al. Increased numbers of activated group 2 innate lymphoid cells in the airways of patients with severe asthma and persistent airway eosinophilia. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(1):75-86.e8.
  8. Mu JX, et al. Effects of fermented white mustard seed plaster on airway immune balance and its inflammatory response mechanism in bronchial asthma rats. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2025;50(3):287-94.
  9. Zhao SM, et al. Anti-asthma components and mechanism of Kechuanting acupoint application therapy: based on serum metabolomics and network pharmacology. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2022;47(24):6780-93.
  10. Hu J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of acupoint application combined with western medicine therapy in the treatment of bronchial asthma. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(11):11473-81.
  11. Hu W, et al. Study on Raman spectroscopy evaluating the contact dermatitis produced by acupoint sticking during treating bronchial asthma. China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy. 2022;37(3):1830-3.
  12. Wang H, et al. Effect of Acupoint Application Induced Contact Dermatitis on Asthma Control and Serum IFN-gamma/IL-4 in Asthmatic Patients. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2018;59(7):582-5.
  13. Yang Q, et al. Modulation of helper T cell 2 cytokines in asthmatic rats by acupoint application with ginger juice hydrogel. China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy. 2024;39(6):3068-72.
  14. Wang Y, et al. Effects of Baijiezi Powder and Its Disassembled Formula on the Ig-E,IL-4,IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha in Allergic Asthmatic Rats. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal. 2019;54(18):1491-6.
  15. Guidelines for the prevention and management of bronchial asthma (2024 edition). Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2025;48(3):208-48.
  16. Boonpiyathad T, Sözener ZC, Satitsuksanoa P, Akdis CA. Immunologic mechanisms in asthma. Semin Immunol. 2019;46:101333.
  17. Klein Wolterink RG, et al. Pulmonary innate lymphoid cells are major producers of IL-5 and IL-13 in murine models of allergic asthma. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(5):1106-16.
  18. Christianson CA, et al. Persistence of asthma requires multiple feedback circuits involving type 2 innate lymphoid cells and IL-33. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(1):59-68.e14.
  19. Kabata H, Artis D. Neuro-immune crosstalk and allergic inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(4):1475-82.
  20. Wallrapp A, et al. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Negatively Regulates Alarmin-Driven Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses. Immunity. 2019;51(4):709-23.e6.
  21. Nagashima H, et al. Neuropeptide CGRP Limits Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses and Constrains Type 2 Inflammation. Immunity. 2019;51(4):682-95.e6.
  22. Shi K, et al. Optimization of acupoint application scheme in the treatment of bronchial asthma based on the orthogonal design method. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017;37(6):571-5.
  23. Hu J, et al. Components of drugs in acupoint sticking therapy and its mechanism of intervention on bronchial asthma based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS combined with network pharmacology and experimental verification. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2022;47(5):1359-69.
  24. Li Y, et al. Kinetics of the accumulation of group 2 innate lymphoid cells in IL-33-induced and IL-25-induced murine models of asthma: a potential role for the chemokine CXCL16. Cell Mol Immunol. 2019;16(1):75-86.
  25. Xu J, et al. Excess neuropeptides in lung signal through endothelial cells to impair gas exchange. Dev Cell. 2022;57(7):839-53.e6.
  26. Patel VH, et al. Current Limitations and Recent Advances in the Management of Asthma. Dis Mon. 2023;69(7):101483.
  27. Farinha I, Heaney LG. Barriers to clinical remission in severe asthma. Respir Res. 2024;25(1):178.
  28. Zhao SM, et al. Repeated Herbal Acupoint Sticking Relieved the Recurrence of Allergic Asthma by Regulating the Th1/Th2 Cell Balance in the Peripheral Blood. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1879640.
  29. van Rijt L, von Richthofen H, van Ree R. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells: at the cross-roads in allergic asthma. Semin Immunopathol. 2016;38(4):483-96.
  30. Cortez VS, Robinette ML, Colonna M. Innate lymphoid cells: new insights into function and development. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;32:71-7.
  31. Thio CL, Chang YJ. The modulation of pulmonary group 2 innate lymphoid cell function in asthma: from inflammatory mediators to environmental and metabolic factors. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55(9):1872-84.
  32. Kubo M. Innate and adaptive type 2 immunity in lung allergic inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2017;278(1):162-72.
  33. Kabata H, Moro K, Koyasu S, Asano K. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells and asthma. Allergology International. 2015;64(3):227-34.
  34. Cardoso V, et al. Neuronal regulation of type 2 innate lymphoid cells via neuromedin U. Nature. 2017;549(7671):277-81.
  35. Xie X, et al. Mediation of the JNC/ILC2 pathway in DBP-exacerbated allergic asthma: A molecular toxicological study on neuroimmune positive feedback mechanism. J Hazard Mater. 2024;465:133360.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Type 2 InflammationILC2 CellsCGRP PathwayRAMP1 ProteinFlow CytometryImmunohistochemistryWestern BlotELISA Assay