$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Given the multifactorial etiology of oligoasthenozoospermia and the limited efficacy of available pharmacologic treatments, acupuncture and EA have gained attention as repeatable, nonpharmacological interventions19. The existing clinical and preclinical literature suggests several plausible mechanisms by which acupuncture or EA may influence male reproductive function, including the modulation of neuroendocrine regulation, improvement of reproductive organ microcirculation, and attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses that compromise spermatogenesis20. These proposed mechanisms offer a translational rationale for evaluating EA in controlled animal studies using semen and testicular histology as primary readouts.
EA is especially suitable for protocol-driven preclinical work, as its stimulation parameters, such as frequency, intensity, session duration, and electrode pairing, can be specified and replicated more consistently than manual needle manipulation21. In rats, parameter-controlled EA has been reported to promote the recovery of spermatogenesis after injury, with improvements in semen-related endpoints observed under defined experimental conditions. Recent clinical studies continue to assess EA for outcomes in male infertility, such as motility and total motile sperm count, reflecting ongoing translational interest while underscoring the need for clearly defined and reproducible procedures in preclinical research.
Compared with the earlier mechanism-oriented work on the same adenine-induced platform16, the present study shifts emphasis to two practical determinants for reliably delivering repeated EA sessions in rodents: (1) the use of inhalational anesthesia to stabilize the stimulation period, and (2) the use of a commonly employed reproductive acupoint set (CV3, CV4, ST36, and SP6) with standardized electrode pairing. This delivery-focused design addresses a persistent technical bottleneck in rodent EA experiments, movement-related needle displacement and intermittent loss of electrode contact, which is especially problematic in setups combining abdominal midline points with hind-limb points, where respiration and cumulative lead-wire traction can compromise effective stimulation delivery during a 30-min session.
The use of isoflurane maintenance is presented here not only as a measure to ensure delivery fidelity but also as a refinement relevant to animal welfare in repeated procedures. Guidelines for laboratory animal anesthesia emphasize selecting appropriate anesthetic regimens, monitoring anesthetized animals, and providing supportive intraoperative care to minimize distress and prevent complications22,23. Inhalational anesthesia permits rapid titration and recovery, which benefits repeated interventions, but it also requires explicit temperature management and monitoring because rodents can rapidly develop hypothermia under isoflurane. Consequently, the protocol incorporates a heating pad and specifies consistent induction and maintenance settings alongside respiratory and reflex monitoring, aiming to maintain the lightest effective anesthetic plane that prevents struggling while ensuring stable needle retention and reliable electrode contact throughout stimulation.
Acupoint selection is a practical design choice, and the present set (CV3, CV4, ST36, and SP6) differs from our previously reported strategy, motivating discussion of its translational and implementation implications. Data-mining analyses of infertility acupuncture prescriptions identify CV4, SP6, ST36, and CV3 among the most frequently used points, supporting the clinical relevance of this acupoint set17. Reviews of acupuncture for male infertility similarly highlight CV4, ST36, and SP6 as core points commonly featured across reported protocols9. Beyond clinical frequency, this particular combination offers practical advantages for a methods-oriented rodent workflow: CV3 and CV4 are easily localized on the abdominal midline using surface landmarks, ST36 and SP6 are readily located on the hind limb, and the pairing scheme (CV3-CV4 and ST36-SP6) enables consistent electrode connections across animals and sessions. Importantly, the abdominal-plus-hind-limb configuration also provides a clear rationale for anesthesia-assisted delivery and explicit delivery quality control, as abdominal needle retention and cable traction become more challenging during respiration and prolonged stimulation. These considerations make the present protocol complementary to prior approaches that employed different point-selection strategies and broader endocrine or mechanistic panels.
Several limitations should be noted. First, because this study was designed as a methodological extension of our previous mechanism-oriented work, no positive-drug control or sham EA group was included. In addition, no generally accepted standardized sham EA instrument or intervention scheme has yet been established for repeated EA in this specific rat model and acupoint configuration. Therefore, the representative results should be interpreted as procedural validation of the establishment of the adenine-induced model and the EA delivery workflow, rather than as definitive evidence of electroacupuncture-specific efficacy. Second, outcome verification was limited to sperm count, sperm motility, and testicular histology. Although these readouts suffice to confirm phenotype induction and treatment-associated changes within this protocol, endocrine markers, such as testosterone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and inhibin B, were not measured, limiting mechanistic interpretation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis. Third, the representative dataset was generated from a small number of animals (n = 3 per group). Accordingly, the findings should be regarded primarily as methodological validation rather than as a fully powered efficacy or mechanistic evaluation.
In subsequent work, this protocol can serve as a practical backbone for design-oriented extensions, including parameter studies that vary stimulation intensity, waveform, and session duration under the same isoflurane-maintained delivery conditions, as well as expanded semen phenotyping beyond sperm count and motility (e.g., additional CASA motion parameters and sperm morphology). Depending on the hypothesis, endocrine readouts and targeted molecular or imaging assays can be added as modular layers to probe neuroendocrine regulation, changes in the local testicular microenvironment, or spermatogenic injury-repair processes. Beyond these technical extensions, the broader implication for reproductive acupuncture research is that explicitly controlling and transparently reporting delivery conditions, anesthesia handling, electrode contact stability, and stimulation “dose” implementation, may help the field accumulate more comparable preclinical datasets and refine hypothesis-driven choices of stimulation parameters and acupoint strategies in male reproductive dysfunction. Alternative reproductive acupoint sets can also be incorporated within the same delivery framework, enabling systematic exploration of how point selection shapes implementation constraints and outcome patterns when other procedural elements are kept consistent.