A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Review Article

Barriers and Facilitators to Intensive Care Unit Nurses’ Participation in End-of-Life Decision-Making: A Scoping Review

121 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/71900

⸱

August 21st, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This scoping review summarizes current evidence on the multilevel barriers and facilitators influencing ICU nurses' participation in end-of-life (EOL) decision-making, with the aim of clarifying the persistent gap between role recognition and actual involvement and informing strategies to enhance meaningful engagement in clinical practice.

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses are widely regarded as essential contributors to end-of-life (EOL) decision-making, given their continuous bedside presence, close engagement with patients and families, and central role in interprofessional communication. However, a persistent gap remains between the conceptual recognition of this role and nurses' actual participation in formal decision-making. This scoping review summarizes current evidence on the barriers and facilitators shaping ICU nurses' participation in EOL decision-making and on the present state of their involvement in clinical practice. The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. The Population–Concept–Context (PCC) framework guided eligibility criteria, study selection, and data extraction, and findings were synthesized using an inductive thematic synthesis approach. Eight English- and Chinese-language databases were systematically searched from inception to September 29, 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported on registered ICU nurses or on multidisciplinary teams from which nurse-specific data could be separately extracted. A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria, drawn from North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Latin America, and using cross-sectional, qualitative, and mixed methods designs; no interventional trials were identified. Findings were synthesized across four interrelated levels. Barriers included insufficient palliative care training, low confidence, and moral distress at the individual level; hierarchical power imbalance and ineffective communication at the team level; staffing shortages, heavy workload, and absent protocols at the organizational level; and legal uncertainty and cultural taboos surrounding death at the sociocultural level. Facilitators included clinical experience, role clarity, interprofessional collaboration, structured communication tools, institutional ethics support, and enabling legal frameworks. ICU nurses' participation in EOL decision-making is constrained by a mismatch between role recognition and actual involvement; coordinated multidimensional strategies and further interventional research are needed to enhance meaningful engagement.

Introduction

With continuing advances in life-sustaining technologies and the acceleration of population aging, the proportion of dying patients in intensive care units (ICUs) has increased substantially. End-of-life decision-making (EOL decision-making) generally refers to key decisions made on behalf of patients who are unable to decide for themselves, including withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, transitioning to palliative care, and establishing do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Among patients who die in the ICU, more than one-third are reported to undergo decisions involving the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment1, and the quality....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Review and Perspective

This scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A completed PRISMA-ScR checklist is provided as Supplementary File 1. No formal protocol was registered prior to conducting this review.

Research Questions

Based on a preliminary review of the literature, this scoping review examined the current state of ICU nurses’ participation in end-of-life (EOL) decision-making and identified the barriers and facilitat....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Conclusions

This review systematically mapped the multilevel factors influencing ICU nurses’ participation in EOL decision-making. The available evidence indicates that, globally, ICU nurses commonly face a paradox characterized by high role recognition but low practical involvement. The relevant barriers span the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and sociocultural levels, and these factors interact across levels to create a complex mechanism that continuously constrains nurses’ participation. At the same time, the facilita.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Wuxi Association for Science and Technology Soft Science Research Project(KX-25-C145).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

References

  1. Schefold, J. C. et al. The impact of religion on changes in end-of-life practices in european intensive care units: A comparative analysis over 16 years. Intensive Care Med. 49 (11), 1339–1348 (2023).
  2. Kesecioglu, J. et al. European society of intensive care medicine guidelines on end of life and palliative care in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 50 (11), 1740–1766 (2024).
  3. Liu M, Zhang T, Yu Q, et al. Survey on ICU nurses’ attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment at the end of life and their willingness to participate in decision-making. Journal of Southwest Medical Univ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

ICU NursesBarriers To ParticipationFacilitators To ParticipationPalliative Care TrainingMoral DistressInterprofessional CommunicationHierarchical Power ImbalanceThematic Synthesis