A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Review Article

Smart Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: From Microenvironmental Modulation to Personalized Therapy

123 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/71939

⸱

September 8th, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This review summarizes smart biomaterial strategies for bone regeneration, focusing on microenvironmental modulation, stimulus responsiveness, immunoengineering, 3D/4D printing, artificial intelligence-assisted design, and translational challenges in personalized bone repair.

Abstract

The rapid evolution of smart biomaterials has opened new therapeutic avenues for complex bone defects, non-union fractures, and post-tumor resection reconstruction. Conventional bone substitutes often suffer from insufficient bioactivity, mechanical mismatch, and a lack of capacity to modulate the healing microenvironment. In contrast, smart biomaterials can dynamically adjust their physicochemical properties in response to external stimuli (light, electricity, magnetic fields, or mechanical forces) or internal cues (ROS, pH, or enzyme activity), enabling precise control over cellular behaviors and local microenvironmental dynamics. Recent advances in immuno-engineered materials, particularly those designed to polarize macrophages toward a pro-regenerative M2 phenotype, have shown promise in attenuating inflammation and accelerating osteogenesis. Concurrently, 3D/4D printing technologies enable programmable control of scaffold architecture, degradation profiles, and the spatial distribution of bioactive factors, thereby supporting personalized therapeutic strategies. Artificial-intelligence-driven material discovery and structural optimization further expand the design space for next-generation, high-performance bone repair biomaterials. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of recent progress in smart biomaterials for bone regeneration, with emphasis on stimulus-responsive mechanisms, immune-modulatory strategies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and AI-enabled design, and highlights the key barriers and future directions for their clinical translation. In this review, smart biomaterial is used as an umbrella term; stimulus-responsive biomaterial denotes the subclass that responds to an external trigger (light, magnetic, electrical, mechanical, pH, ROS, or enzyme); and intelligent biomaterial is treated as synonymous with smart biomaterial. These terms are not used interchangeably.

Introduction

Large bone defects, fracture non-unions, and post-tumor resection reconstruction remain among the most formidable challenges in orthopedics, imposing substantial morbidity and disability worldwide1,2. Although traditional therapeutic approaches—including autografts, allografts, metal implants, and conventional bioceramics—have improved clinical outcomes to some extent, they are still constrained by donor-site scarcity, immune rejection, infection risk, insufficient bioactivity, and limited capacity to modulate the complex regenerative microenvironment3,

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Review and Perspective

Biological basis of bone healing and microenvironmental regulation
Bone healing is a highly coordinated regenerative process that proceeds through overlapping phases of inflammation, tissue repair, and remodeling. These phases are not independent events but a continuous biological program controlled by immune cells, osteogenic cells, vascular cells, extracellular matrix components, and local biochemical and mechanical cues16,17. In the early inflammatory phase, tissue injury initiates hematoma formation and rapid recruitment of neutrophils and macrophages. These cells remove necrotic tis....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Conclusions

Smart biomaterials are reshaping bone regeneration by moving beyond passive structural support to actively regulate the local repair microenvironment. Stimulus-responsive platforms respond to external cues (light, electrical signals, magnetic fields, mechanical loading) and internal pathological signals (ROS, acidic pH, enzymatic activity), enabling precise spatiotemporal control of therapeutic release and cellular behavior. In parallel, immunoengineered biomaterials guide macrophage polarization and immune-cell recruitm.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work received no specific funding from any public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

References

  1. Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2(9):e580-e92.
  2. Yi Y, He X, Wu Y, Wang D. Global, regional, and national burden of incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for facial fractures from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):435.
  3. Wei H, Cui J, Lin K, Xie J, Wang X. Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration. Bone Research. 2022;10(1):17.
  4. Su N, Villicana C, Yang....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Microenvironment ModulationStimulus-Responsive BiomaterialsImmune ModulationMacrophage Polarization3D Printing4D PrintingAI-Enabled Design