A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Research Article

Effect of Case-Based Learning Combined with a Workshop Teaching Model on Medical Record Writing Quality Among Residency Trainees

112 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/72033

⸱

August 7th, 2026

 ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This study evaluates whether case-based learning, combined with a workshop-based teaching model, improves the quality of medical record writing among standardized residency trainees.

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of a case-based learning (CBL) combined with a workshop teaching model on medical record writing quality among standardized residency trainees. This single-center, non-randomized controlled educational study included 200 standardized residency trainees, with 100 in the intervention group and 100 in the control group. The intervention group received the CBL combined with the workshop teaching model, whereas the control group received traditional lecture-based learning. Medical record writing scores were compared before and after the intervention. A linear mixed-effects model was used for the primary analysis, and analysis of covariance was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Subgroup and item-level analyses were also conducted. Baseline age, sex, specialty, training year, and pre-intervention total score were comparable between the two groups (all p > 0.05). After the intervention, total scores increased significantly in both groups, from 69.26 ± 9.66 to 85.02 ± 6.86 in the control group and from 68.92 ± 9.65 to 89.87 ± 6.44 in the intervention group (all p < 0.001). Score improvement was greater in the intervention group than in the control group (20.95 ± 6.96 vs 15.76 ± 6.19, p < 0.001). The linear mixed-effects model showed a significant time effect (β = 15.76, 95% CI 14.47–17.06, p < 0.001) and a significant group × time interaction (β = 5.19, 95% CI 3.35–7.03, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis yielded similar results. Greater improvements were also observed in several key items, including diagnostic and treatment planning, treatment adjustment, complication management, surgical/procedural records, informed consent forms, and discharge instructions. The CBL combined with the workshop teaching model was associated with greater improvement in medical record writing quality than traditional lecture-based learning and may represent an effective educational strategy for standardized residency training.

Introduction

Standardized residency training is an essential component of postgraduate medical education1. The quality of such training is directly related to the development of clinical competence among residents and is also closely associated with healthcare quality and patient safety2. During residency training, medical record writing serves not only as a legal documentation of clinical practice but also as an important reflection of residents’ clinical reasoning, information integration, and standardized diagnostic and therapeutic abilities3. High-quality medical records require not only completeness....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This study was exempt from formal ethics review because it was an educational research study conducted among standardized residency trainees and did not involve patients, patient clinical data, biological samples, or any intervention affecting patient diagnosis or treatment. Before the study began, all participating trainees were fully informed of the study purpose, procedures, and intended use of the data, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participation was voluntary, and trainees could withdraw at any time without affecting their training rights or benefits.

Study design and ethical considerations

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Baseline characteristics
A total of 200 standardized residency trainees were included in this study, with 100 in the control group and 100 in the intervention group. The mean age was (26.72 ± 3.44) years in the control group and (25.95 ± 3.23) years in the intervention group. The total medical record writing scores before the intervention were (69.26 ± 9.66) and (68.92 ± 9.65), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in sex, specialty, or training year.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Based on standardized residency trainees' medical record writing score data, this study compared the effects of the CBL combined with the workshop teaching model and the traditional LBL teaching model on the quality of medical record writing. The results showed that the total scores of both groups increased significantly after the intervention compared with before, but the magnitude of improvement was greater in the intervention group. The linear mixed-effects model showed a significant group × time interaction,.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Medical Science Research Project of Hebei Province, China (Grant No. 20230555). The authors would like to thank all standardized residency trainees who participated in this study, as well as the teaching staff and evaluators for their support and cooperation.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Inpatient Medical Record Connotation Quality and Clinical Thinking Ability Evaluation FormThe Second Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityNot applicableInstitutional assessment form used for evaluating inpatient medical record writing quality during standardized residency training.
Microsoft ExcelMicrosoft Corporationhttps://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/excelUsed for data entry, data management, and preparation of table files.
R softwareR Foundation for Statistical ComputingRRID: SCR_001905; Version 4.3.2Used for statistical analysis, including t tests, chi-square tests, linear mixed-effects models, and ANCOVA.
Standardized inpatient medical record templateThe Second Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityNot applicableUsed during Workshop-based medical record writing practice.
Teaching materialsThe Second Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityNot applicableIncluded PowerPoint slides, teaching manuals, instructional videos, representative medical records, CBL case materials, guiding questions, Workshop exercises, and feedback documents.

References

  1. Hu Y, et al. The application of mind mapping in the standardized education of inpatient physicians in nephrology. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):2890.
  2. Wu M, et al. Effectiveness and influencing factors of standardised training for nursing assistants: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2025;15(2):e088644.
  3. Xie H, et al. Application of laboratory-result-oriented modular teaching model in the training of clinical hematology laboratory interns. Front Med. 2025;12:1612934.
  4. Wurster F, et al. Roger's diffusion of innovations theory and the adoption of a patient portal's digital anamnesis collection tool: study protocol for the MAiBest project. Implement Sci Commu....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Residency TrainingLecture-Based LearningLinear Mixed-EffectsSensitivity AnalysisDiagnostic PlanningDischarge Instructions