General information
A total of 86 patients with hip fractures who underwent surgery at our hospital between June 2023 and June 2024 were included in this retrospective cohort study. According to the perioperative treatment strategy, 43 patients were assigned to the control group and 43 to the observation group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups are presented in Table 1. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the assessed baseline demographic and fracture-related characteristics (all P > 0.05; Table 1). The overall study workflow, treatment grouping, outcome assessment strategy, and key findings are summarized in Figure 1.
Incidence of postoperative lower limb DVT
The incidence of postoperative lower limb DVT within 10 days after surgery was assessed using color Doppler ultrasound. The observation group showed a significantly lower incidence of DVT compared with the control group (2.33% vs. 23.26%, Fisher’s exact P = 0.007).
Comparison of postoperative pain and limb swelling between the two groups
Before treatment, no significant between-group differences were observed in FPS-R pain scores (4.08 ± 0.61 vs. 4.10 ± 0.60, P = 0.896) or limb swelling (1.10 ± 0.24 vs. 1.06 ± 0.22 cm, P = 0.397). After 10 days of treatment, the observation group had significantly lower FPS-R pain scores than the control group (1.71 ± 0.45 vs. 2.31 ± 0.50), with a mean difference of -0.60 (95% CI: -0.81 to -0.40, P < 0.001). Limb swelling was also significantly lower in the observation group (0.69 ± 0.18 vs. 0.98 ± 0.20 cm), with a mean difference of -0.29 cm (95% CI: -0.37 to -0.21, P < 0.001). The detailed results are presented in Table 2.
Comparison of coagulation parameters between the two groups
Before treatment, no significant between-group differences were observed in APTT, PT, or D-dimer levels (all P > 0.05). After 10 days of treatment, the observation group had a significantly longer APTT than the control group (37.93 ± 3.22 vs. 35.03 ± 4.21 s), with a mean difference of 2.90 s (95% CI: 1.29–4.51, P < 0.001). PT was also significantly longer in the observation group (15.36 ± 1.08 vs. 13.26 ± 1.28 s), with a mean difference of 2.11 s (95% CI: 1.60–2.61, P < 0.001). Postoperative D-dimer levels were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (4.11 ± 1.14 vs. 4.67 ± 1.28 mg/L), with a mean difference of -0.56 mg/L (95% CI: -1.08–-0.04, P = 0.036). These findings indicate that adjunctive TCM-targeted drug penetration therapy was associated with differences in postoperative coagulation parameters. The detailed coagulation results are presented in Table 3.
Comparison of femoral vein blood flow velocity between the two groups
Before treatment, no significant between-group differences were observed in common femoral vein or superficial femoral vein blood flow velocities (both P > 0.05). After 10 days of treatment, common femoral vein blood flow velocity was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (24.16 ± 4.45 vs. 20.48 ± 4.35 cm/s), with a mean difference of 3.68 cm/s (95% CI: 1.80–5.57, P < 0.001). Superficial femoral vein blood flow velocity was also significantly higher in the observation group (21.81 ± 4.12 vs. 16.06 ± 3.47 cm/s), with a mean difference of 5.75 cm/s (95% CI: 4.12–7.39, P < 0.001). The detailed results are presented in Table 4.
Comparison of serum inflammatory markers between the two groups
Before treatment, no significant between-group differences were observed in serum TNF-α or IL-6 levels (both P > 0.05). After 10 days of treatment, TNF-α levels were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (26.31 ± 7.37 vs. 36.33 ± 7.48 pg/mL), with a mean difference of -10.03 pg/mL (95% CI: -13.21–-6.85, P < 0.001). IL-6 levels were also significantly lower in the observation group (18.27 ± 5.24 vs. 26.55 ± 4.28 pg/mL), with a mean difference of -8.28 pg/mL (95% CI: -10.33–-6.22, P < 0.001). The detailed inflammatory marker data are presented in Table 5.
Treatment-related adverse events
No severe treatment‑related adverse events occurred in either group. Mild reactions, including local skin irritation and transient discomfort during TCM‑targeted drug penetration therapy, appeared in a few patients and resolved without intervention. Minor bleeding events linked to anticoagulation were also recorded, with comparable frequencies between groups. The overall recorded treatment-related adverse-event rates were 67.44% in the observation group and 62.79% in the control group (P = 0.651). Local skin irritation occurred in 14 (32.56%) and 10 (23.26%) patients, transient discomfort in 8 (18.60%) and 7 (16.28%) patients, and minor bleeding events in 7 (16.28%) and 10 (23.26%) patients in the observation and control groups, respectively. No severe treatment-related adverse events were recorded. Taken together, the TCM‑targeted drug penetration therapy was well tolerated over the perioperative period. Detailed safety outcomes appear in Table 6.
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with postoperative DVT
Because postoperative DVT occurred in only 11 of the 86 patients, a parsimonious Firth penalized logistic regression model was used to reduce small-sample bias and the risk of overfitting. Postoperative D-dimer levels and femoral venous blood flow velocities were excluded from the adjusted model because they were measured after initiation of the intervention and could represent intermediate variables rather than baseline confounders.
The adjusted model was restricted to treatment strategy, age, and baseline D-dimer level. In the Firth penalized logistic regression analysis, adjunctive TCM-targeted drug penetration therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative DVT (adjusted OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02–0.68, P = 0.017). Neither age (adjusted OR = 0.99 per 1-year increase, 95% CI: 0.88–1.12, P = 0.891) nor baseline D-dimer level (adjusted OR = 0.95 per 1 mg/L increase, 95% CI: 0.71–1.26, P = 0.706) was significantly associated with postoperative DVT. Given the small number of DVT events, these estimates should be interpreted cautiously and considered exploratory. The results are presented in Table 7.
Summary of principal findings
In this retrospective cohort study, adding Taohong Siwu Decoction‑based targeted drug penetration therapy to standard LMWH prophylaxis was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative lower limb DVT after hip fracture surgery. Patients receiving the combined regimen also showed better coagulation profiles, lower inflammatory markers, faster femoral venous flow, and improved symptom control, with less pain and swelling. The parsimonious Firth penalized logistic regression analysis showed that the association between adjunctive therapy and lower thrombotic risk persisted after limited adjustment for prespecified baseline factors, although the small number of DVT events requires cautious interpretation. The absence of severe adverse events further supports the tolerability of this approach during the perioperative period.
DATA AVAILABILITY:
The de-identified patient-level dataset generated and analyzed during the current study, including baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, coagulation parameters, inflammatory markers, venous hemodynamic measurements, and treatment-related adverse events, is provided as Supplementary File 1.

Figure 1. Study workflow and key findings of the retrospective cohort study. This workflow summarizes patient selection, treatment grouping, outcome assessment, and major findings. A total of 86 patients with hip fractures who underwent surgery between June 2023 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the control group receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alone and the observation group receiving additional Taohong Siwu Decoction-based targeted drug penetration therapy. Outcomes assessed on postoperative day 10 included lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) incidence, pain score, limb swelling, coagulation parameters, venous hemodynamic indicators, inflammatory markers, and treatment-related adverse events. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Characteristic | Control group (n = 43) | Observation group (n = 43) | t/χ2 | P value |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 68.09 ± 5.11 | 67.47 ± 6.37 | 0.493 | 0.623 |
| Sex, n (%) | | | 2.284 | 0.131 |
| Male | 19 (44.19) | 26 (60.47) | | |
| Female | 24 (55.81) | 17 (39.53) | | |
| Smoking, n (%) | | | 0.047 | 0.828 |
| Yes | 19 (44.19) | 18 (41.86) | | |
| No | 24 (55.81) | 25 (58.14) | | |
| Drinking, n (%) | | | 1.675 | 0.196 |
| Yes | 18 (41.86) | 24 (55.81) | | |
| No | 25 (58.14) | 19 (44.19) | | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | | | 0.427 | 0.514 |
| Yes | 26 (60.47) | 23 (53.49) | | |
| No | 17 (39.53) | 20 (46.51) | | |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | | | 0.191 | 0.662 |
| Yes | 17 (39.53) | 19 (44.19) | | |
| No | 26 (60.47) | 24 (55.81) | | |
| BMI (kg/m²), mean ± SD | 23.22 ± 1.49 | 23.43 ± 1.19 | -0.736 | 0.464 |
| Fracture type, n (%) | | | 5.242 | 0.073 |
| Femoral neck fracture | 15 (34.88) | 12 (27.91) | | |
| Intertrochanteric fracture | 13 (30.23) | 23 (53.49) | | |
| Subtrochanteric fracture | 15 (34.88) | 8 (18.60) | | |
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients in the control and observation groups. This table summarizes baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, smoking and drinking status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, body mass index (BMI), and fracture type. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables as n (%). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the assessed baseline characteristics.
| Outcome | Observation group (n = 43) | Control group (n = 43) | t | P value |
| FPS-R pain score |
| Before treatment | 4.08 ± 0.61 | 4.10 ± 0.60 | -0.131 | 0.896 |
| After 10 days | 1.71 ± 0.45 | 2.31 ± 0.50 | -5.847 | <0.001 |
| Limb swelling (cm) |
| Before treatment | 1.10 ± 0.24 | 1.06 ± 0.22 | 0.852 | 0.397 |
| After 10 days | 0.69 ± 0.18 | 0.98 ± 0.20 | -7.015 | <0.001 |
Table 2: Comparison of pain scores and limb swelling between the two groups. This table compares Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) scores and limb swelling before treatment and after 10 days of treatment. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The observation group showed significantly lower FPS-R scores and less limb swelling after 10 days of treatment than the control group. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The t-statistics represent comparisons of the observation group with the control group using independent-samples t-tests.
| Parameter | Observation group (n = 43) | Control group (n = 43) | t | P value |
| APTT (s) |
| Before treatment | 30.24 ± 5.88 | 29.71 ± 6.15 | 0.41 | 0.683 |
| After 10 days | 37.93 ± 3.22 | 35.03 ± 4.21 | 3.591 | <0.001 |
| PT (s) |
| Before treatment | 10.02 ± 1.34 | 10.22 ± 0.98 | -0.781 | 0.437 |
| After 10 days | 15.36 ± 1.08 | 13.26 ± 1.28 | 8.222 | <0.001 |
| D-dimer (mg/L) |
| Before treatment | 5.57 ± 2.25 | 5.87 ± 2.30 | -0.61 | 0.544 |
| After 10 days | 4.11 ± 1.14 | 4.67 ± 1.28 | -2.131 | 0.036 |
Table 3: Comparison of coagulation parameters between the two groups. This table summarizes activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), and D-dimer levels before treatment and after 10 days of treatment. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). After 10 days, the observation group showed longer APTT and PT and lower D-dimer levels than the control group. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The t-statistics represent comparisons of the observation group with the control group using independent-samples t-tests.
| Parameter | Observation group (n = 43) | Control group (n = 43) | t | P value |
| Common femoral vein (cm/s) |
| Before treatment | 19.89 ± 4.90 | 18.60 ± 3.91 | 1.355 | 0.179 |
| After 10 days | 24.16 ± 4.45 | 20.48 ± 4.35 | 3.881 | <0.001 |
| Superficial femoral vein (cm/s) |
| Before treatment | 13.25 ± 2.59 | 12.72 ± 2.53 | 0.969 | 0.335 |
| After 10 days | 21.81 ± 4.12 | 16.06 ± 3.47 | 6.999 | <0.001 |
Table 4: Comparison of femoral vein blood flow velocities between the two groups. This table compares common femoral vein and superficial femoral vein blood flow velocities before treatment and after 10 days of treatment. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Between-group comparisons were performed using independent samples t-tests. After 10 days, both venous blood flow velocities were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group.
| Parameter | Observation group (n = 43) | Control group (n = 43) | t | P value |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) |
| Before treatment | 46.85 ± 8.11 | 45.46 ± 6.91 | 0.853 | 0.396 |
| After 10 days | 26.31 ± 7.37 | 36.33 ± 7.48 | -6.266 | <0.001 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) |
| Before treatment | 31.73 ± 5.63 | 32.35 ± 5.53 | -0.516 | 0.607 |
| After 10 days | 18.27 ± 5.24 | 26.55 ± 4.28 | -8.022 | <0.001 |
Table 5: Comparison of serum inflammatory markers between the two groups. This table compares serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations before treatment and after 10 days of treatment. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Between-group comparisons were performed using independent samples t-tests. After 10 days, both TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group.
| Adverse event | Observation group (n = 43) | Control group (n = 43) | χ2 | P value |
| Local skin irritation | 14 (32.56%) | 10 (23.26%) | 0.925 | 0.336 |
| Transient discomfort | 8 (18.60%) | 7 (16.28%) | 0.081 | 0.776 |
| Minor bleeding events | 7 (16.28%) | 10 (23.26%) | 0.66 | 0.417 |
| Any adverse event | 29 (67.44%) | 27 (62.79%) | 0.205 | 0.651 |
Table 6: Treatment-related adverse events in the observation and control groups. This table summarizes treatment-related adverse events, including local skin irritation, transient discomfort, minor bleeding events, and the overall recorded treatment-related adverse-event rate during the treatment period. Data are presented as n (%). Between-group comparisons were performed using Pearson’s chi-square test. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for individual adverse events or overall recorded treatment-related adverse-event rate.
| Variable | Adjusted OR | 95% CI | P value |
| TCM-targeted drug penetration therapy vs. control | 0.12 | 0.02–0.68 | 0.017 |
| Age, per 1-year increase | 0.99 | 0.88–1.12 | 0.891 |
| Baseline D-dimer, per 1 mg/L increase | 0.95 | 0.71–1.26 | 0.706 |
Table 7: Parsimonious Firth penalized logistic regression analysis of postoperative lower limb deep vein thrombosis. This table presents the adjusted associations of treatment strategy, age, and baseline D-dimer level with postoperative lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-targeted drug penetration therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative DVT. Firth penalized logistic regression was used because only 11 DVT events occurred among the 86 patients. The model was restricted priority to treatment strategy and two clinically relevant baseline covariates to reduce small-sample bias and overfitting. Postoperative D-dimer levels and venous blood flow measurements were excluded because they were measured after treatment initiation and could represent intermediate variables on the pathway between treatment and DVT.
Supplementary File 1: De-identified patient-level dataset. Please click here to download this File.