Materials and experimental design
Sugarcane bagasse was used as the lignocellulosic waste source for nanocellulose preparation. Fresh bagasse was washed with tap water and deionized water, dried at 60 °C for 24 h, cut into 1–2 cm fragments, milled, and passed through a 40-mesh sieve. The dried powder was stored in sealed polyethylene bags with silica gel at room temperature and used within 1 month. All the reagents, materials, and equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials file.
Unless otherwise specified, all chemicals were analytical grade and used as received. Sodium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, silver nitrate, sodium borohydride, 4-nitrophenol, methylene blue, lead nitrate, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, sodium chloride, calcium chloride, magnesium chloride, ethanol, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, sodium carbonate, and gallic acid were used for pretreatment, Ag loading, catalytic testing, adsorption, regeneration, and analytical calibration. Silver nitrate (ACS reagent, ≥99.0%), sodium borohydride (≥98.0%), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (1.9–2.1 N), and gallic acid standard specifications are listed in the Table of Materials. Chitosan with a deacetylation degree of 85%–90% was used as the secondary biopolymer. Green tea leaves were used to prepare the aqueous reducing extract for Ag nanoparticle formation, as tea polyphenols can act as reducing and stabilizing agents during AgNP synthesis13. The overall workflow included cellulose extraction, nanocellulose preparation, aerogel fabrication, AgNP loading, structural characterization, and functional testing, as shown in Figure 1. The sample compositions and preparation parameters are listed in Table 1.
Sugarcane bagasse was pretreated by washing, drying, milling, alkaline treatment, and hydrogen peroxide bleaching to obtain cellulose-rich pulp. The pulp was converted into waste-derived nanocellulose through high-pressure homogenization and sonication, then combined with chitosan to fabricate nanocellulose/chitosan aerogels by freezing and freeze-drying. Ag nanoparticles were loaded in situ using AgNO₃ and standardized green tea extract as the reducing medium. The resulting aerogels were evaluated by multimodal structural, chemical, thermal, and mechanical characterization, followed by antibacterial, catalytic, adsorption, regeneration, and Ag-release assessments. Ag-WNC/CS-A-3 was selected as the optimized multifunctional aerogel formulation.
Preparation of cellulose-rich pulp
Dried bagasse powder was treated with 4 wt% NaOH at a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:20 g/mL. The mixture was heated at 80 °C for 3 h under stirring at 500 rpm. The treated fibers were filtered and washed with deionized water until the filtrate reached pH 7.0 ± 0.2, then dried at 60 °C for 12 h.
The alkali-treated fibers were bleached with 3 wt% H₂O₂ at pH 11.0 ± 0.2 and 80 °C for 2 h. The bleaching process was repeated twice. The obtained cellulose-rich pulp was washed to neutral pH and stored in deionized water at 4 °C for no longer than 7 days. Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and ash contents were determined by gravimetric compositional analysis to confirm the removal of non-cellulosic components14.
Pulp yield was calculated as:
(1)
Preparation of waste-derived nanocellulose
Wet cellulose pulp equivalent to 5.0 g dry mass was dispersed in 500 mL of deionized water and pre-homogenized at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The suspension was then processed by high-pressure homogenization: two passes at 300 bar, three passes at 600 bar, and five passes at 900 bar. The outlet temperature was maintained below 35 °C using an ice-water circulation system.
The homogenized suspension was sonicated at 400 W for 10 min under pulse mode, with 3 s on and 3 s off. The vessel was kept in an ice bath during sonication. The final suspension was diluted to 1.0 wt% and stored at 4 °C. Suspensions showing visible sedimentation or phase separation after 24 h were discarded. Nanocellulose preparation was accepted only when the average TEM fiber diameter was below 50 nm, and the absolute zeta potential exceeded 25 mV.
Nanocellulose yield was calculated as:
(2)
Preparation and standardization of green tea extract
Green tea powder, 5.0 g, was added to 100 mL of deionized water and heated at 80 °C for 30 min. The extract was cooled, filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, centrifuged at approximately 7,500 × g for 10 min (equivalent to about 8,000 rpm for a 10.5 cm rotor radius), filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane, and stored at 4 °C for no longer than 48 h.
The total phenolic content was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteu method. Briefly, 0.5 mL of diluted extract was mixed with 2.5 mL of diluted Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 2.0 mL of 7.5 wt% sodium carbonate. After incubation in the dark for 30 min, absorbance was measured at 765 nm. Gallic acid was used as the standard. Only extract batches with total phenolic content within ±10% of the batch mean were used for AgNP reduction.
Fabrication of nanocellulose/chitosan aerogels
Chitosan was dissolved in 1.0 vol% acetic acid to prepare a 1.0 wt% solution and stirred overnight. The solution was filtered through a 100 µm nylon mesh before use.
For WNC/CS-A preparation, 80 mL of 1.0 wt% nanocellulose suspension was mixed with 20 mL of 1.0 wt% chitosan solution at 600 rpm. The pH was adjusted dropwise to 5.5 ± 0.2 using 0.1 M NaOH at a rate below 0.5 mL/min. The mixture was discarded if visible flocculation or phase separation appeared within 30 min.
A fixed volume of 5.0 mL dispersion was poured into cylindrical polypropylene molds with an inner diameter of 20 mm and a height of 20 mm. The samples were frozen at -80 °C for 12 h and freeze-dried at -55 °C for 48 h under a chamber pressure below 20 Pa. Freeze-drying was used to preserve the porous nanocellulose network during aerogel formation15. WNC-A was prepared using the same procedure without chitosan. The dry aerogel was accepted only when it retained a monolithic shape and showed height shrinkage below 20%.
In situ green loading of Ag nanoparticles
Dried WNC/CS-A monoliths were immersed in 30 mL of AgNO₃ solution at 1, 3, or 5 mM for 6 h in the dark. The aerogels were then transferred into 30 mL of standardized green tea extract and reacted at 50 °C for 4 h in the dark. After reduction, the samples were washed five times with deionized water, frozen at -80 °C for 6 h, and freeze-dried at -55 °C for 36 h. The final samples were coded as Ag-WNC/CS-A-1, Ag-WNC/CS-A-3, and Ag-WNC/CS-A-5. Ag immobilization in cellulose aerogels improves catalyst recovery and reduces nanoparticle loss compared with unsupported AgNP systems16.
Ag loading was quantified by Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Approximately 20 mg of Ag-loaded aerogel was digested in diluted nitric acid at 80 °C, diluted to 50 mL, and analyzed using an Ag calibration curve of 0.01–5.0 mg/L. Ag loading efficiency was calculated as:
(3)
The green-process indicators used for yield, reagent use, Ag loading, Ag release, and reuse evaluation are summarized in Table 2.
Density, porosity, water uptake, and dimensional stability
Aerogel density was calculated from dry mass and geometric volume. Samples were dried at 60 °C for 6 h, cooled in a desiccator, and measured with a digital caliper at three positions.
(4)
Porosity was estimated as:
(5)
where ρs was taken as 1.50 g/cm3 for cellulose-based solids.
Water uptake was measured by immersing dry aerogels in deionized water for 24 h. Samples were blotted for 10 s and weighed immediately.
(6)
where Ws and Wd are the weights of wet and dry aerosols. Dimensional stability was assessed by comparing height and diameter before and after immersion. At least five monoliths were tested per group.
Morphological and porous-structure characterization
Nanocellulose morphology was observed by TEM. A 0.005 wt% suspension was dropped onto a carbon-coated copper grid, stained with 1 wt% phosphotungstic acid for 60 s, dried, and imaged at 80–120 kV. At least 100 fibers from three independent suspensions were measured using ImageJ version 1.54.
Aerogel morphology was observed by SEM. Samples were fractured in liquid nitrogen, mounted on aluminum stubs, sputter-coated with gold for 60 s, and imaged at 5–10 kV. At least five fields were recorded per sample. EDS mapping was performed to determine the distribution of Ag, C, O, and N.
Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis was performed at 77 K. Samples were degassed at 60 °C for 12 h before analysis. BET surface area and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution were calculated because pore accessibility directly affects adsorption and catalytic performance in cellulose aerogels17.
FTIR, XRD, XPS, and TGA analysis
FTIR spectra were collected in ATR mode from 4000 cm-1 to 500 cm-1 at 4 cm-1 resolution with 32 scans per sample. Spectra were baseline-corrected and normalized to the cellulose C-O-C band near 1050 cm-1. FTIR was used to evaluate cellulose- and chitosan-related functional groups; Ag formation was confirmed by XRD, XPS, EDS, and ICP-OES.
XRD was performed using Cu K-alpha radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA. Samples were scanned from 5° to 80° at 5°/min. The cellulose crystallinity index was calculated by the Segal method. Crystalline metallic Ag was assigned only when diffraction peaks near 38.1°, 44.3°, and 64.4° were detectable, and Ag formation was interpreted together with XPS, EDS mapping, and ICP-OES rather than from XRD alone.
XPS was used to determine surface elemental composition. Survey spectra were recorded from 0 eV to 1200 eV, and high-resolution spectra were collected for C 1s, O 1s, N 1s, and Ag 3d. Binding energies were calibrated to C 1s at 284.8 eV. Peak fitting was performed using CasaXPS version 2.3.25. Ag 3d fitting was used as supporting evidence for surface Ag species; because Auger parameter analysis was not included, the relative contributions of metallic Ag0 and oxidized Ag species were interpreted cautiously.
TGA was performed under nitrogen from 30 °C to 700 °C at 10 °C/min. Approximately 5–8 mg of dried sample was used for each run. The onset degradation temperature, maximum degradation temperature, and residual mass at 700 °C were recorded.
Mechanical testing
Compression tests were performed using a universal testing machine equipped with a 100 N load cell. Cylindrical samples of 20 mm diameter and 20 mm height were compressed to 50% strain at 2 mm/min. Compressive stress at 50% strain and Young's modulus below 10% strain were calculated.
Cyclic compression was performed for five loading-unloading cycles at 50% strain. Shape recovery was calculated from the recovered height after each cycle. At least five specimens were tested per group. Samples with slipping, edge tearing before 20% strain, or visible defects were excluded. Mechanical testing was used to evaluate handling stability during immersion, recovery, and reuse18.
Antibacterial assay
Antibacterial activity was evaluated against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Bacteria were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37 °C overnight and diluted to approximately 1 × 106 CFU/mL. The concentration was verified by plate counting.
Aerogel discs of 10 mm diameter and 3 mm thickness were sterilized by UV irradiation for 30 min on each side. Sterility was confirmed by incubating treated aerogels in LB broth at 37 °C for 24 h.
For contact-killing assays, sterile aerogel discs were incubated in 2 mL of bacterial suspension at 37 °C for 4 h with shaking at 120 rpm. The suspension was serially diluted, plated on LB agar, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacterial reduction was calculated as:
(7)
Controls included PBS only, sterile filter-paper disc, WNC-A, WNC/CS-A, AgNO₃ solution with Ag concentration equivalent to the measured release from Ag-WNC/CS-A-3, and a commercial antibiotic disc.
For inhibition-zone assays, aerogel discs were placed on agar plates spread with 100 µL of bacterial suspension. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and inhibition-zone diameters were measured. Each assay used three independent aerogel batches with technical triplicates. Both contact-killing and inhibition-zone assays were used because surface contact and released Ag species may contribute differently to antibacterial activity19.
Catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol
Catalytic activity was evaluated using the reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol. A 0.10 mM 4-nitrophenol solution was mixed with freshly prepared NaBH₄ to obtain a final NaBH₄ concentration of 10 mM. NaBH₄ was used within 30 min after preparation. The reaction was protected from direct light.
A 10.0 mg ± 0.5 mg aerogel sample was added to 10 mL of reaction solution at room temperature. At 1 min intervals, 1 mL aliquots were measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy from 250 nm to 500 nm and returned to the reaction vessel. The absorbance at 400 nm was used to monitor conversion.
Controls included a reaction without aerogel, WNC-A, WNC/CS-A, and a parallel adsorption control without NaBH4 to distinguish catalytic reduction from 4-nitrophenol adsorption. The no-NaBH4 adsorption control was treated as a physical-removal blank; only the additional decrease in the NaBH4-containing system was interpreted as catalytic conversion. The pseudo-first-order rate constant was calculated as:

Conversion was calculated as:
(8)
The 4-nitrophenol reduction assay was selected because it is a standard UV-Vis-traceable reaction for evaluating supported Ag catalysts20.
Catalytic reusability
Ag-WNC/CS-A-3 was reused for five catalytic cycles. After each cycle, the aerogel was removed, washed three times with deionized water, immersed in deionized water for 10 min, and freeze-dried at −55 °C for 12 h. Conversion at 15 min and kapp were recorded for each cycle.
(9)
After five cycles, the used aerogel was analyzed by SEM and ICP-OES to evaluate structural retention and Ag loss.
Methylene blue adsorption
Methylene blue was used as the model cationic dye. Dried aerogel, 20.0 mg ± 0.5 mg, was added to 50 mL of 50 mg/L MB solution at pH 7.0 ± 0.2. The mixture was shaken at 150 rpm and 25 ± 1 °C.
At 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min, 1 mL aliquots were collected, filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane, and measured at 664 nm. MB concentration was calculated using a calibration curve from 1 to 50 mg/L with R2 ≥ 0.995.
(10)
Kinetic data were fitted using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models. Model selection considered R2, agreement between calculated and experimental q_e, and residual distribution. MB was selected because nanocellulose aerogels are commonly evaluated for dye removal through electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding, and porous-network diffusion21.
Pb(II) adsorption
Pb(II) adsorption was tested using lead nitrate solution. A 1000 mg/L stock solution was diluted before use. Dried aerogel, 20.0 mg ± 0.5 mg, was added to 50 mL of 50 mg/L Pb(II) solution at pH 5.5 ± 0.2. The mixture was shaken at 150 rpm and 25 °C ± 1 °C for 180 min.
Aliquots were filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane, acidified with 1 vol% nitric acid, and analyzed by ICP-OES. Blank controls without aerogel were run at the same initial pH as the adsorption samples, and controls without Pb(II) were included to check background signals.
For isotherm analysis, Pb(II) concentrations of 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 mg/L were tested for 24 h. Langmuir and the Freundlich models were used for equilibrium fitting. Pb(II) was used to assess binding by oxygen- and nitrogen-containing groups within the aerogel network22. Because Pb(II) speciation and precipitation risk are sensitive to pH and contact time, Pb(II) was interpreted primarily through pH-controlled endpoint and equilibrium/isotherm data; kinetic model parameters are therefore reported for MB only.
pH, coexisting ions, and water-matrix effects
The effect of pH was tested at pH 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, and 9.0 for MB, and at pH 3.0, 4.5, 5.5, and 6.5 for Pb(II). Pb(II) adsorption was not tested under alkaline conditions to avoid precipitation. Initial and final pH were recorded, and adsorption runs were repeated when pH drift exceeded 0.5 units. Same-pH blank controls without aerogel were used to distinguish aerogel adsorption from pH-dependent Pb(II) loss or precipitation.
The effect of coexisting ions was evaluated by adding 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl₂, or 5 mM MgCl₂. A mixed-ion condition containing all three salts was also tested. Simulated wastewater contained 10 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl₂, 2 mM MgCl₂, and 5 mg/L humic acid. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.2 for MB and 5.5 ± 0.2 for Pb(II). These tests were included to evaluate adsorption performance under more complex water matrices23.
Adsorption regeneration
Ag-WNC/CS-A-3 was regenerated for five adsorption cycles. For MB, loaded aerogels were immersed in a 30 mL ethanol/water solution at 50:50 v/v for 2 h. For Pb(II), loaded aerogels were immersed in 30 mL of 0.05 M HCl for 1 h and washed to pH 6.5–7.0. After each regeneration step, samples were freeze-dried at -55 °C for 12 h.
(11)
Aerogel dry mass was recorded before and after each cycle. Samples with visible collapse, fragmentation, or dry mass loss greater than 15% were classified as structurally failed.
Ag release
Ag release was tested by immersing 20.0 ± 0.5 mg of Ag-loaded aerogel in 50 mL of deionized water, 0.9 wt% NaCl solution, or pH 5.5 acetate buffer at 25 ± 1 °C. At 24 h and 72 h, 2 mL aliquots were collected, acidified with 1 vol% nitric acid, and analyzed by ICP-OES. The sampled volume was replaced with fresh medium.
Ag release was reported as µg/L and as a percentage of total loaded Ag:
(12)
This assay was used to evaluate whether increased Ag loading caused unnecessary Ag leaching while maintaining antibacterial and catalytic performance24.
Software and data processing
SEM and TEM images were analyzed using ImageJ version 1.54. FTIR spectra, XRD patterns, UV–Vis kinetic curves, adsorption kinetics, and isotherm plots were processed using OriginPro 2024. XPS spectra were fitted using CasaXPS version 2.3.25. Statistical analysis and graph preparation were performed using GraphPad Prism 10.
For adsorption fitting, models were not selected by R2 alone. Agreement between experimental and calculated adsorption capacity, residual distribution, and physical plausibility of parameters was also considered25.
Quality control and statistical analysis
All experiments were performed using aerogels from at least three independent fabrication batches. Physical and mechanical tests used five specimens per group. Antibacterial, catalytic, adsorption, regeneration, and Ag-release assays used three independent batches with technical triplicates when applicable.
Aerogel batches were accepted only when the dry density variation within the same group was below 15%. Antibacterial plates were accepted when colony numbers were within 30–300 CFU. Catalytic tests were repeated when the initial absorbance at 400 nm varied by more than 10% from the batch mean. Adsorption tests were repeated when pH drift exceeded 0.5 units. ICP-OES and UV–Vis calibration curves required R2 ≥ 0.995.
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Non-normal data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple-comparison test. A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. No outlier was removed unless a documented technical reason was present.