Identification of a key gene module associated with pediatric pneumonia by WGCNA
To identify gene modules associated with pediatric pneumonia, WGCNA was performed on whole-blood transcriptomic data from patients with pneumonia and healthy controls. Sample clustering analysis revealed no obvious outliers, indicating good data quality for subsequent analysis (Figure 1A). PCA further demonstrated a clear separation trend between pneumonia and healthy groups, suggesting distinct transcriptomic profiles between conditions (Figure 1B). To construct a scale-free network, genes were ranked by median absolute deviation, the top 5,000 genes were selected for network construction, and the soft-thresholding power was set to 15 based on the criterion of scale-free topology fit index (R2 > 0.8) while maintaining relatively low mean connectivity (Figure 1C). Using this threshold, hierarchical clustering identified multiple gene modules with distinct expression patterns (Figure 1D). Module–trait relationship analysis revealed that several modules were significantly correlated with clinical phenotypes. Notably, the blue module showed a strong correlation with both disease status (pneumonia vs. healthy) and etiological classification, suggesting its potential role in disease progression and host response (Figure 1E).
Furthermore, scatter plot analysis of module membership versus gene significance within the blue module demonstrated a strong positive correlation (cor = 0.6, p = 2.1e−35), indicating that genes highly connected within the module were also strongly associated with the clinical trait (Figure 1F).
Association of the blue module with bacterial pneumonia etiology
To further investigate gene expression differences across pneumonia etiologies, WGCNA was performed using multiple clinical classifications, including controls (C), definitive bacterial (DB), definitive viral (DV), probable bacterial (PB), probable viral (PV), and unknown (U) groups. Module–trait relationship analysis revealed that several modules exhibited significant correlations with specific etiological subtypes. Notably, the blue module showed the strongest positive correlation with the DB group, suggesting its potential involvement in host responses specific to bacterial infection (Figure 2A).
The gene clustering dendrogram and corresponding module assignment further confirmed the robustness of module construction and the clear separation of gene clusters (Figure 2B). Within the blue module, analysis of module membership versus gene significance demonstrated a significant positive correlation (cor = 0.41, p = 7.8e−14), suggesting that highly connected genes within this module were also strongly associated with the etiological trait (Figure 2C).
Additionally, comparison of module eigengene expression across different etiological groups revealed significant differences in the blue module (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 1.5e−13). Specifically, the blue module exhibited elevated expression in the bacterial pneumonia groups, particularly in the DB subgroup, compared to other etiological categories (Figure 2D).
Eighteen Paeonia-derived compound-related candidate genes associated with pediatric pneumonia identified by integration analysis
To identify candidate genes associated with pediatric pneumonia and potential Paeonia-associated targets, differential expression analysis was first performed between pneumonia patients and healthy controls. Using these criteria, 1,110 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between pneumonia and healthy control samples, including 524 upregulated and 586 downregulated genes. The 524 upregulated DEGs are provided in Supplementary Table S1 (also see Figure 3A). To further refine key genes, pneumonia-related DEGs were intersected with genes associated with the DB phenotype and predicted targets of Paeonia. This integrative analysis yielded 18 overlapping genes, suggesting their potential roles in disease progression and Paeonia-associated responses (Figure 3B).
A compound–target interaction network was constructed to visualize the relationships between active components of Paeonia and the identified candidate genes, revealing extensive connectivity between compounds and targets (Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 3C). To explore the biological functions of these 18 genes, functional enrichment analyses were performed. GO biological process enrichment linked the candidate genes mainly to immune and inflammatory functions, including inflammatory-response regulation, peptide hormone response, positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolism, and regulation of type II interferon–mediated signaling (Figure 3D). KEGG analysis further showed that the genes were enriched in inflammation- and immune-related pathways, such as the IL-17 and NF-κB signaling pathways, as well as metabolic and endocrine-related pathways, including glucagon signaling and steroid hormone biosynthesis (Figure 3D).
Enrichment of candidate genes in neutrophils and alveolar macrophages in single-cell transcriptomic analysis
To investigate the cellular distribution of candidate genes in an experimental pneumonia context, the mouse lung scRNA-seq dataset GSE295484 was analyzed. Quality control analysis was performed to evaluate data reliability. The distributions of detected gene numbers, UMI counts, and the percentages of mitochondrial and ribosomal genes indicated overall high-quality single-cell data in the processed matrix (Figure 4A). Scatter plots showed the reference thresholds for gene detection and mitochondrial content used in quality-control visualization (Figure 4B).
After normalization and dimensionality reduction, cells were clustered and visualized using UMAP. Distinct cell populations were identified, including neutrophils, alveolar macrophages, monocytes, epithelial cells, and other immune and stromal cell types, demonstrating the cellular heterogeneity of the lung microenvironment during pneumonia (Figure 4C). To assess the activity of the 18 candidate genes at the single-cell level, AUCell analysis was performed. The results showed that the gene signature was predominantly enriched in neutrophils and alveolar macrophages, as indicated by higher AUC scores in these cell populations (Figure 4D).
Inflammatory genes associated with Paeonia-derived compound targets in a mouse bacterial pneumonia model
To further investigate immune-cell dynamics in the mouse experimental pneumonia model, the proportions of alveolar macrophages and neutrophils were analyzed across room air, PBS, and E. coli groups at 48 h and 96 h post-aspiration. At 48 h, alveolar macrophages showed a marked decrease under E. coli infection compared to air and PBS conditions, whereas neutrophils exhibited a substantial increase in cell proportion (Figure 5A). A similar trend was observed at 96 h, with neutrophil proportions remaining elevated in response to E. coli stimulation, whereas alveolar macrophages showed comparatively lower levels. These results indicate a prominent expansion of neutrophils during bacterial infection. To explore the functional characteristics of neutrophils, neutrophil marker genes were identified, and functional enrichment analysis was performed. KEGG enrichment associated the neutrophil marker genes with inflammatory signaling, including the TNF, MAPK, and C-type lectin receptor pathways (Figure 5B). GO biological process terms were also concentrated in immune-response functions, such as leukocyte migration, leukocyte cell–cell adhesion, positive regulation of defense response, and response to molecules of bacterial origin (Figure 5B). To identify key genes linking neutrophil activity, pneumonia, and Paeonia targets, neutrophil marker genes were intersected with the previously identified 18 candidate genes. This analysis yielded three overlapping genes: MMP9, PYGL, and GADD45A (Supplementary Table S3 and Figure 5C). Finally, single-cell gene expression visualization showed that these three genes were predominantly expressed in neutrophil populations (Figure 5D), further supporting their potential roles in neutrophil-mediated inflammatory responses.
Predicted binding affinity of catechin to selected proteins in molecular docking
To further evaluate potential catechin-protein interactions, molecular docking analysis was performed between the selected proteins (MMP9, PYGL, and GADD45A) and catechin, a Paeonia-derived active compound. The crystal structures of GADD45A, MMP9, and PYGL were obtained from the Protein Data Bank, and the 3D structure of catechin was retrieved from the PubChem database. Docking results suggested that catechin could bind to sites of all three selected proteins, with binding energies of −6.3 kcal/mol for GADD45A, −7.6 kcal/mol for MMP9, and −8.0 kcal/mol for PYGL (Figure 6). Among these selected proteins, catechin exhibited the strongest predicted binding affinity with PYGL, followed by MMP9 and GADD45A, suggesting a potential preferential interaction with a metabolism-related protein.
At the molecular level, catechin formed multiple hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions with key amino acid residues in each protein. In GADD45A, catechin interacted with residues such as GLN33 and TRP135. In MMP9, stable hydrogen bonding was observed with residues including GLN227, TYR248, and HIS236. Similarly, in PYGL, catechin formed multiple hydrogen bonds with residues such as LYS554 and ASN631, contributing to binding stability. In addition to hydrogen bonding, interaction analysis revealed van der Waals forces and π-related interactions, indicating a multi-mode binding pattern that enhances the stability of the predicted ligand–protein complexes. Collectively, these results suggest that catechin can form stable predicted complexes with MMP9, PYGL, and GADD45A. However, the therapeutic relevance of these interactions requires further experimental validation.
Predicted stable interactions between catechin and selected proteins
Based on the docking poses obtained in molecular docking, 100 ns molecular dynamics simulations were performed to further evaluate the stability of the catechin-protein complexes. RMSD analysis showed that all three protein–ligand complexes reached equilibrium during the simulation period. Among them, the PYGL–catechin and MMP9–catechin complexes exhibited relatively stable RMSD fluctuations, while the GADD45A–catechin complex showed slightly higher fluctuations but remained within an acceptable range (Figure 7A). The Rg analysis indicated that all complexes maintained stable structural compactness throughout the simulation, with minimal variation over time (Figure 7B). Similarly, SASA analysis demonstrated stable exposure levels for all complexes, further supporting their structural stability (Figure 7C). Hydrogen bond analysis revealed persistent interactions between catechin and the selected proteins. The PYGL–catechin complex maintained a higher number of hydrogen bonds over time compared to MMP9 and GADD45A, suggesting stronger and more stable binding interactions (Figure 7D).
Residue-level flexibility was evaluated using RMSF. The results showed that most residues exhibited low fluctuation, with only a few regions displaying higher flexibility, indicating that ligand binding did not induce major structural instability in the proteins (Figure 7E). Collectively, these findings suggest that catechin forms stable predicted complexes with MMP9, PYGL, and GADD45A, with the strongest stability observed in the PYGL–catechin interaction. These results support stable predicted interactions between catechin and the selected proteins, providing computational evidence for further experimental validation.
Data Availability:
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. The bulk RNA-seq dataset is available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE261482 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE261482), and the mouse lung scRNA-seq dataset is available under accession number GSE295484 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE295484). Processed outputs used in the article are provided as Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Table S2, and Supplementary Table S3.

Figure 1. WGCNA construction and identification of disease-associated modules (A) Sample clustering was performed from the gene expression profiles, and the corresponding trait annotations are displayed beneath the dendrogram. (B) Principal component analysis shows the distribution of samples along the first two principal components. (C) The soft-thresholding power was evaluated using the scale-free topology fit index and mean connectivity. (D) Genes were clustered according to topological overlap, and module assignments are indicated by color. (E) Module eigengene correlations with clinical traits are shown as a heatmap. (F) The relationship between module membership and gene significance is shown for genes in the blue module. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. WGCNA analysis based on pneumonia etiology. (A) Module eigengene correlations are shown for etiology groups, including control, definitive bacterial, definitive viral, probable bacterial, probable viral, and unknown. (B) Gene modules were assigned from the topological-overlap-based clustering dendrogram. (C) Module membership and gene significance are plotted for the blue module. (D) Blue module eigengene expression is compared across etiology groups. Abbreviations: WGCNA = weighted gene co-expression network analysis; C = control; DB = definitive bacterial; DV = definitive viral; PB = probable bacterial; PV = probable viral; U = unknown. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3. Identification and functional analysis of candidate genes. (A) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes between pneumonia and control samples. (B) Venn diagram showing the overlap among pneumonia DEGs, definitive bacterial-related genes, and Paeonia target genes. (C) Compound–target interaction network between active components of Paeonia and candidate genes. (D) Bar plots showing Gene Ontology biological process enrichment (left) and KEGG pathway enrichment (right) for the overlapping genes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of pneumonia. (A) Violin plots summarize quality control metrics, including nCount_RNA, nFeature_RNA, mitochondrial gene percentage, and ribosomal gene percentage. (B) Scatter plots showing relationships between UMI counts, detected genes per cell, and mitochondrial gene percentage. (C) UMAP visualization of cell clusters annotated by cell types. (D) UMAP plot showing AUCell scores for the candidate gene signature across single cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5. Neutrophil dynamics and identification of key genes. (A) Boxplots showing cell proportions of alveolar macrophages and neutrophils under different conditions (air, PBS, and E. coli) at 48 h and 96 h. (B) Bar plots showing KEGG pathway enrichment (left) and GO biological process enrichment (right) for neutrophil marker genes. (C) Venn diagram showing the overlap between neutrophil marker genes and shared targets of bacterial pneumonia and Paeonia. (D) UMAP plots showing the expression patterns of MMP9, PYGL, and GADD45A across cell populations. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6. Molecular docking of catechin with selected proteins. Three-dimensional structures of protein–ligand complexes showing the binding of catechin to GADD45A (top), MMP9 (middle), and PYGL (bottom). Enlarged panels show the binding regions and contacts with key amino acid residues. The two-dimensional diagrams present hydrogen bonds and other interactions between catechin and the selected proteins. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7. Molecular dynamics simulations of protein–ligand complexes. (A) Root mean square deviation of the complexes during the simulation. (B) Radius of gyration changes over time. (C) Solvent-accessible surface area during the simulation. (D) Hydrogen bond numbers between catechin and the target proteins over time. (E) Root mean square fluctuation of protein residues in each complex. Abbreviations: RMSD = root mean square deviation; Rg = radius of gyration; SASA = solvent-accessible surface area; RMSF = root mean square fluctuation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Table S1. Upregulated differentially expressed genes in pediatric pneumonia versus healthy control samples, including gene symbols, log2 fold changes, P-values, adjusted P-values, and related limma statistics. Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table S2. Paeonia compound-target interaction table used for network analysis, including compound identifiers, compound names, and associated target genes. Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table S3. Single-cell marker gene table from GSE295484, including P-values, average log2 fold changes, expression percentages, adjusted P-values, cell cluster annotations, and gene symbols. Please click here to download this file.