Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive, highly invasive, and heterogeneous primary malignant brain tumor associated with poor patient survival despite current standard-of-care therapies1. A defining feature of GBM is its profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), which contributes to resistance to immunotherapeutic strategies2,3. Multiple mechanisms drive immunosuppression in GBM, including reduced infiltration of effector T cells and induction of T-cell dysfunction and exhaustion4. In addition, GBM stem-like cells (GSCs), a subpopulation of GBM cells, further promote immune evasion by maintaining an immunologically “cold” TME characterized by limited cytotoxic immune activity5. These features highlight the importance of accurately characterizing tumor-infiltrating immune cell populations and their functional states in the GBM TME.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) remains one of the most widely used methods for evaluating immune cell infiltration within tumor tissues because it preserves tissue architecture while enabling visualization, localization, and semiquantitative assessment of cellular markers in situ6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Previous immunohistochemical and immunoprofiling studies substantially advanced our understanding of the GBM immune landscape and identified immune cell populations associated with tumor progression and therapeutic response12,13,14,15,16. Single-color chromogenic IHC is particularly useful for detecting individual immune markers in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections12,13,15,17,18,19,20. In contrast, dual-color chromogenic IHC enables simultaneous visualization of two markers within the same tissue section, facilitating assessment of cellular phenotype, proliferation, or activation state12,19,21.
Despite these advances, practical and standardized substrate-based chromogenic IHC protocols applicable to immunocompetent GSC-derived GBM models remain limited. Moreover, chromogenic IHC remains more challenging in GBM than in many other solid tumors because of sparse and heterogeneous immune cell infiltration, extensive intratumoral heterogeneity, and the highly immunosuppressive and complex TME, which complicate the accurate visualization and interpretation of multiple cellular populations within the same tissue section2,3,4. Dual chromogenic IHC presents additional technical challenges, particularly when both primary antibodies are raised in the same host species, requiring careful optimization of antibody compatibility, a sequential staining strategy for simultaneous detection of two antigens within the same tissue section, and selection of a chromogenic substrate to ensure clear marker discrimination under light microscopy.
Here, we describe reproducible substrate-based single- and dual-color IHC protocols that successfully detect representative tumor-infiltrating immune cell-associated surface and intracellular antigens in an immunocompetent orthotopic 005 GSC-derived GBM model22,23,24. These substrate-based chromogenic IHC protocols can also be adapted to other preclinical tumor models and potentially to human FFPE tumor specimens. The harvested mouse brain tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin overnight (~12 h) before routine tissue processing and paraffin embedding, as previously described19. FFPE blocks were sectioned (5 µm thickness19) onto positively charged microscope glass slides and stored at room temperature until use. Single-color IHC uses a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-based chromogenic detection system with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as the substrate to generate a brown signal for visualization of individual antigens under light microscopy. This workflow is suitable for detecting both membrane-associated and intracellular antigens in FFPE tissue sections.
Dual-color IHC enables simultaneous detection of two antigens within the same tissue section but requires additional optimization to ensure antibody compatibility and clear chromogenic signal separation. Dual-color IHC staining is relatively straightforward when the primary antibodies are raised in different host species, allowing the use of species-specific secondary antibodies. However, simultaneous detection becomes more technically challenging when both primary antibodies originate from the same host species. To address this challenge, the dual-color IHC workflow described here employs a sequential alkaline phosphatase (AP)-based chromogenic staining strategy using distinct substrates to permit clear visual discrimination between two antigen signals under light microscopy.
Both workflows include tissue deparaffinization, rehydration, antigen retrieval, blocking, staining, dehydration, clearing, and mounting steps. Preparation of reagents is crucial for staining quality and reproducibility (see Supplementary File 1). Likewise, appropriate dilutions of primary antibodies are also critical for a successful staining protocol, which is done immediately before use in 2.5% normal horse or goat serum, depending on the host species of the corresponding secondary antibody (see Table 1). A list of species-specific secondary antibodies used for single and dual-color staining is also presented in Table 2. Single-color IHC uses xylene-based clearing and mounting reagents, whereas dual-color IHC requires xylene-free alternatives (e.g., Histo-Clear), as the substrate is partially soluble in xylene (see the list of substrates in Table 3).