A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Research Article

Serum Expression of Mir-488-3p Serves as a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarker in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

58 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/72346

⸱

August 28th, 2026

 , 

In This Article

Summary

miR-488-3p may serve as a novel non-invasive diagnostic marker for RA. miR-488-3p modulates the biological function of synoviocytes via ROCK1. It exhibited a significant negative correlation with disease severity in RA patients.

Abstract

The diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains challenging because of the limitations of existing biomarkers. The purpose of the study was to investigate the potential of miR-488-3p in serum as a biomarker for RA and to reveal its potential mechanism of action. The study included 135 RA patients, 130 osteoarthritis (OA) patients, and 125 healthy controls. miR-488-3p expression levels were examined by RT-qPCR. The mechanism of action was analyzed by functional tests (CCK-8, flow cytometry, ELISA) and target validation experiments (luciferase reporter gene, RIP). Serum miR-488-3p expression levels were significantly lower in RA patients than in osteoarthritis (OA) patients and healthy controls (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that miR-488-3p had a high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing RA from healthy controls and OA patients. miR-488-3p negatively correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid factor (RF), and DAS28 scores. Functional validation revealed that overexpression of miR-488-3p inhibited the proliferation and inflammatory response of synoviocytes while inducing apoptosis. Mechanistic studies showed that miR-488-3p could directly target Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1), which mediates its protective effects. Serum miR-488-3p holds promise as a novel non-invasive diagnostic marker for RA and protects synoviocyte from injury.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation, joint erosion, and destruction1,2. The global prevalence of RA is about 0.5%–1%3, which seriously affects patients' quality of life and ability to work. The disease has an insidious onset, and early symptoms are often atypical and easily misdiagnosed or missed4. As the disease progresses, it can lead to joint deformity, loss of function, and even increase the risk of complications such as cardiovascular disease5 placing a substantial burden on patients, their families, and healthcare systems..

At present, a combination of clinical symptoms, signs, laboratory tests, and imaging evaluation is required for the diagnosis of RA6. Commonly used laboratory indicators include the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), which are non-specific markers of systemic inflammation, as well as rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies, which are important serological biomarkers for RA7,8. However, these traditional biomarkers have limitations: RF can be positive in some healthy people and patients with other autoimmune diseases (false-positive rate of about 5%); anti-CCP, although highly specific (>95%), has limited sensitivity in the early stages of the disease (about 60–70%)4,9, and some patients with RA remain seronegative10. Therefore, it is important to find more sensitive and specific biomarkers for early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and prognosis assessment of RA11.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of endogenous non-coding regulatory RNA molecules approximately 22–25 bases in length12,13. It has been found that miRNAs act as key regulator in the development of a variety of diseases, and their aberrant expression is closely related with disease pathogenesis13,14,15, making miRNAs promising biomarkers for disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring. In the past few years, the role of miRNAs in RA has received increasing attention16. Studies have shown that multiple miRNAs are associated with dysregulated expression (e.g., miR-146a, miR-155, etc.) in serum, synovial tissues, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of RA patients17,18,19. These miRNAs contribute to RA pathogenesis by regulating inflammatory cytokine production, promoting synovial cell proliferation and invasion, and influencing osteoclast differentiation20. Among them, miR-488 is mapped to the human chromosome 1q25.2 region21, and previous studies have confirmed its neuroprotective effects: it plays a regulatory role in the progression of gliomas22 and neuroblastomas23, and notably, miR-488-3p promotes apoptosis of osteoarthritic chondrocytes in osteoarthritis (OA)24. Although OA and RA are different joint diseases, they share common mechanisms in the pathological processes of synovial inflammation and cartilage destruction25. We hypothesized that miR-488-3p may play a role in RA by regulating similar target pathways. However, the specific role and potential mechanisms of miR-488-3p in RA have not been elucidated.

The study investigated the changes in serum miR-488-3p expression levels in RA patients and its relationship with disease activity and clinical indicators, aiming to evaluate its potential value as a non-invasive diagnostic marker for RA. This study provides a novel insight into the early screening and prediction of disease progression in RA, thereby improving the prognosis of patients with RA.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hefei BOE Hospital (Approval no. 2021–1), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.

Patients and specimens

This study recruited 135 patients with RA (diagnosed according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria) from the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Hefei BOE Hospital, 130 patients with OA from the Department of Orthopedics (diagnosed according to the 2018 Chinese Medical Association OA diagnostic criteria), and 125 age- and sex-matched healthy controls from the same hospital's medical examination center. Participants were aged 30–80 years. Healthy controls were confirmed to be free of autoimmune diseases, joint disorders, and acute infections by a comprehensive history review, physical examination, and laboratory tests. Participants were excluded if they had comorbid autoimmune diseases, a history of infection or trauma within the previous 3 months, malignancy, or were pregnant or lactating.

Sampling and preparation

Fasting venous blood was collected from all study subjects. After coagulation at room temperature for 30 min, serum samples were isolated by centrifugation at 1500 × g for 15 min. Serum was stored at -80°C until further analysis.

Detection of clinical and serological markers

To comprehensively evaluate disease status and inflammatory activity, clinical and serological biomarkers were measured using standardized clinical laboratory methods. ESR was measured using the Westergren method to assess nonspecific systemic inflammation. CRP was quantified using an immunoturbidimetric assay (normal reference value: <10 mg/L) to evaluate the acute-phase inflammatory response. RF was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a normal reference value of ≤20 IU/mL. Anti-CCP antibodies were measured using a second-generation ELISA to provide serological evidence for the diagnosis of RA.

Cell lines and culture

Human fibroblast-like synoviocytes affected by RA (HFLS-RA) cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The cells were maintained in an incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO₂, and cells between the third and sixth passages were used for all experiments.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from serum samples using an RNA extraction reagent. Reverse transcription was performed using a miRNA first-strand synthesis kit for miRNAs and a reverse transcription kit for messenger RNA (mRNA) target genes according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using a real-time PCR system with a SYBR Green-based PCR master mix. The thermocycle program was set to 95 °C pre-denaturation for 30 s; followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95 °C denaturation for 5 s and 60 °C annealing/extension for 30 s). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. U6 small nuclear RNA (U6 snRNA) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) served as endogenous reference genes for miRNA and mRNA normalization, respectively. Primer sequences have been summarized in Supplementary Table 1. The relative expression levels of miR-488-3p and its target genes were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The changes in mRNA levels of target genes after overexpression or inhibition of miR-488-3p were also analyzed to verify their regulatory relationships.

Cell transfection

HFLS-RA cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well. The cells were transfected using a liposome-based transfection reagent following the manufacturer’s instructions. The transfection groups included single transfection and co-transfection groups. The single transfection groups were: 1) control—untransfected cells; 2) mimic negative control (NC)—cells transfected with negative control of miR-488-3p mimic; 3) miR-488-3p mimic—cells transfected with miR-488-3p mimic; 4) inhibitor NC—cells transfected with negative control of miR-488-3p inhibitor; 5) miR-488-3p inhibitor—cells transfected with miR-488-3p inhibitor. Co-transfection groups were: 1) miR-488-3p mimic + overexpression-NC (oe-NC) —cells co-transfected with miR-488-3p mimic and negative control of ROCK1 overexpression vectors; 2) miR-488-3p mimic + oe-ROCK1—cells co-transfected with miR-488-3p mimic and ROCK1 overexpression vectors. All transfection sequences have been summarized in Supplmentary Table 1. The overexpression vector of ROCK1 was established by cloning the coding sequence (CDS) region into pcDNA 3.1 plasmid. Transfected cells were available for the following experiments after 48 h of cell transfection.

Cell function assay

Cell proliferation assay (Cell Counting Kit-8 [CCK-8]): Transfected HFLS-RA cells were inoculated into 96-well plates at 5 × 103 cells/well, with three replicate wells per group. At 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after transfection, 10 µL of CCK-8 solution was added to each well, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 2 h. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm (detection wavelength) and 630 nm (reference wavelength) using a microplate reader. The relative proliferation rate was calculated using 0 h as the baseline.

Apoptosis detection (flow cytometry): Apoptosis was assessed by analyzing with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) apoptosis assay. Cells were transfected with the appropriate plasmids and then collected after trypsinization. Apoptosis rate was determined by flow cytometry.

Inflammatory factor assay (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay [ELISA]): HFLS-RA cells were seeded into 24-well plates and transfected with the indicated miR-488-3p mimic, miR-488-3p inhibitor, or their corresponding negative controls for 48 h. The concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in the cell culture supernatants were quantified using ELISA kits.

Target validation

Target prediction: ROCK1 was predicted to be a downstream target of miR-488-3p using the TargetScan database26. The predicted binding sites between miR-488-3p and the ROCK1 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) were also identified.

Dual-Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay: The wild type or mutant 3′UTR of ROCK1 was cloned into the pGL3 plasmid. The predicted binding and mutant sites are shown in Figure 4. HEK- 293T cells were co-transfected with miR-488-3p mimic or inhibitor with constructed vectors27. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h after transfection with miR-488-3p mimic or inhibitor.

RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP): HFLS-RA cells were incubated with an anti-Argonaute 2 (Ago2) antibody (RRID: AB_2882071, 1:200 dilution) or an immunoglobulin G (IgG) control antibody (RRID: AB_2819160, 1:5000 dilution), followed by RNA extraction and quantitative PCR (qPCR) for ROCK1 mRNA enrichment according as described above.

Statistical analysis

The study was statistically analyzed using SPSS 23.0 (RRID: SCR_002865) and GraphPad Prism 9.0 (RRID: SCR_002798). Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All experiments were performed with three biological replicates, and each biological replicate was analyzed in triplicate. Raw data have been attached in the supplementary material. Data was evaluated using a normal probability (P-P) plot before parametric statistical tests. The independent samples t-test was used to compare continuous baseline variables (e.g., age, body mass index [BMI], etc.) and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables (e.g., gender, etc.). Gene expression levels were compared using an independent-samples t-test. Changes in cell proliferation at different time points were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas one-way ANOVA was used to compare apoptosis rates determined by flow cytometry. Correlation analysis was performed using Spearman (for variables not meeting normal distribution) and Pearson (for variables meeting normal distribution). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity were determined using the maximum Youden index. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Basic characteristics of study participants

This study included 125 healthy controls, 130 patients with OA, and 135 patients with RA for systematic analysis (Table 1). There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the three groups in terms of age (p = 0.191), sex ratio (p = 0.203), and BMI (p = 0.562), which ensured the comparability of the study population. In terms of disease characteristics, ESR (82.63 ±...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

As emphasized by Smolen et al1 in the latest guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of RA, the development of novel biomarkers has significant clinical value. In this study, we confirmed that serum miR-488-3p was significantly downregulated in patients with RA and showed promising diagnostic performance, with relatively satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. Early diagnosis of RA has always been a clinical difficulty, and existing biomarkers are not sufficiently sensitive for the diagnosis ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection KitBD Bioscience556547cell apoptosis
anti-Ago2 antibodyProteintech66720-1-IgRNA Immunoprecipitation
CCK-8 solutionDojindoCK04cell proliferation
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)Thermo Fisher121000146cell culture
Fetal bovine serumThermo Fisher10437028cell culture
Flow cytometerBD Bioscience FACSCaliburcell apoptosis
Human anti-CCP antibody ELISA KitCusabioCSB-E09077h anti-CCP detection
Human RF-IgA ELISA KitFeien BiotechnologyEH4270RF detection
Human rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes (HFLS-RA)Cell ApplicationsHFLS-RA-200in vitro validatio for the function of miR-488-3p
IgG control antibodyAbcamab205718RNA Immunoprecipitation
Interleukin-1β (IL-1β)ELISA KitR&D SystemsDY201-05cellular IL-1β concentration
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) ELISA KitR&D SystemsD6050Bcellular IL-6 concentration
Liposome Transfection Reagent 3000Ingenuity Life TechnologiesL3000015cell transfection
Microplate readerBioTek ELx808ELISA assay
Mir-XTM miRNA First-Strand Synthesis KitNihonbao Bioengineering Co., Ltd.638313reverse transcription
Opti-MEM mediumIngenuity Life Technologies, Inc31985070cell transfection
pcDNA 3.1InvitrogenV790-20overexpression of ROCK1
Penicillin-streptomycinThermo Fisher15140122cell culture
Phadia 250 Laboratory SystemThermo Fisher Phadia 250blood analysis
PrimeScriptTM Reverse Transcription KitNihonbao Bioengineering Co., Ltd.RR037Areverse transcription
Propidium iodide (PI)/ ribonuclease (RNase)BD Bioscience550825cell apoptosis
QuantStudio 5 systemApplied Biosystems, Inc.A28138PCR assay
RNAiso Plus reagentNihonbao Bioengineering Co., Ltd.9108RNA isolation
SYBR Green Premix Ex TaqNippon Poh Bio-Engineering Co., Ltd.RR420APCR amplification
TargetScan databaseTargetScanN/Abinding sites prediction, (https://www.targetscan.org/) 
Tina-quant C-Reactive Protein IVRoche Diagnostics7876033190CRP detection
Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) ELISA KitR&D SystemsDY210-05cellular TNF-α concentration

References

  1. Smolen JS, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18001.
  2. Kook HY, et al. Serum miR-214 as a novel biomarker for ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22(7):1196-201.
  3. Alamanos Y, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, based on the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006;36(3):182-8.
  4. van der Linden MPM, et al. Long-term impact of delay in assessment of patients with early arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(12):3537-46.
  5. Anderson J, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: American College of Rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(5):640-7.
  6. Aletaha D, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569-81.
  7. Yang J, et al. MicroRNA-488: a miRNA with diverse roles and clinical applications in cancer and other human diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;165:115115.
  8. Molendijk M, Hazes JMW, Lubberts E. From patients with arthralgia, pre-RA and recently diagnosed RA: what is the current status of understanding RA pathogenesis? RMD Open. 2018;4(1):e000256.
  9. van Venrooij WJ, van Beers JJBC, Pruijn GJM. Anti-CCP antibodies: the past, the present and the future. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7(7):391-8.
  10. Szodoray P, et al. Anti-citrullinated protein/peptide autoantibodies in association with genetic and environmental factors as indicators of disease outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9(3):140-3.
  11. Filer A, et al. Utility of ultrasound joint counts in the prediction of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with very early synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(3):500-7.
  12. Zuo C, Fan P, Yang Y, Hu C. MiR-488-3p facilitates wound healing through CYP1B1-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by targeting MeCP2. J Diabetes Investig. 2024;15(2):145-58.
  13. Mendell JT, Olson EN. MicroRNAs in stress signaling and human disease. Cell. 2012;148(6):1172-87.
  14. Cai Z, Poulos RC, Liu J, Zhong Q. Machine learning for multi-omics data integration in cancer. iScience. 2022;25(2):103798.
  15. Fabian MR, Sonenberg N. The mechanics of miRNA-mediated gene silencing: a look under the hood of miRISC. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19(6):586-93.
  16. Duroux-Richard I, et al. Circulating miRNA-125b is a potential biomarker predicting response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:342524.
  17. Zakeri Z, et al. MicroRNA and exosome: key players in rheumatoid arthritis. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(7):10930-44.
  18. Pauley KM, et al. Upregulated miR-146a expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(4):R101.
  19. Kurowska-Stolarska M, et al. MicroRNA-155 as a proinflammatory regulator in clinical and experimental arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(27):11193-8.
  20. Pers YM, et al. miR-155 contributes to the immunoregulatory function of human mesenchymal stem cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12:624024.
  21. Fu Q, et al. miR-488-3p alleviates neuropathic pain by regulating target gene ROCK1. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2023;83(3):271-9.
  22. Xue W, et al. PVT1 regulates the malignant behaviors of human glioma cells by targeting miR-190a-5p and miR-488-3p. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864(5 Pt A):1783-94.
  23. Muiños-Gimeno M, et al. Human microRNAs miR-22, miR-138-2, miR-148a, and miR-488 are associated with panic disorder and regulate several anxiety candidate genes and related pathways. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69(6):526-33.
  24. Le TD, Zhang J, Liu L, Li J. Computational methods for identifying miRNA sponge interactions. Brief Bioinform. 2017;18(4):577-90.
  25. Scanzello CR, Goldring SR. The role of synovitis in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Bone. 2012;51(2):249-57.
  26. McGeary SE, et al. The biochemical basis of microRNA targeting efficacy. Science. 2019;366(6472):eaav1741.
  27. Liu X, et al. Impaired AGO2/miR-185-3p/NRP1 axis promotes colorectal cancer metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(4):390.
  28. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023-38.
  29. O'Connell RM, Rao DS, Baltimore D. microRNA regulation of inflammatory responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:295-312.
  30. Bottini N, Firestein GS. Duality of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in RA: passive responders and imprinted aggressors. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9(1):24-33.
  31. Firestein GS, McInnes IB. Immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunity. 2017;46(2):183-96.
  32. Amano M, Nakayama M, Kaibuchi K. Rho-kinase/ROCK: a key regulator of the cytoskeleton and cell polarity. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2010;67(9):545-54.
  33. Peng H, et al. ROCK1 induces endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in glomeruli to aggravate albuminuria in diabetic nephropathy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20304.
  34. van der Meel R, et al. Smart cancer nanomedicine. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14(11):1007-17.
  35. Yin H, et al. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(8):541-55.
  36. Setten RL, Rossi JJ, Han SP. The current state and future directions of RNAi-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(6):421-46.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Serum BiomarkerRT-qPCRSynoviocyte ApoptosisInflammatory ResponseROC CurveROCK1 TargetFlow Cytometry