A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Vesicostomy in the Rat Model for Low-Pressure Urinary Drainage in Neurogenic Bladder Research

57 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/72631

⸱

August 28th, 2026

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

This protocol provides a standardized method for performing cutaneous vesicostomy and postoperative wound management in rats, enabling continuous low-pressure urinary drainage for preclinical spinal cord injury research.

Abstract

The rat is the primary animal model for preclinical research on spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (nLUTD). Owing to its anatomical and functional similarity to humans, rats closely recapitulate key pathological consequences of SCI. However, a crucial translational gap remains: whereas standard bladder management in humans typically relies on continuous or intermittent catheterization, comparable approaches are not feasible in rodents. The common practice of manual bladder expression generates exceptionally high intravesical pressures, which may introduce methodological bias by independently promoting pathological bladder remodeling after SCI. This protocol describes cutaneous vesicostomy in rats, together with postoperative wound management, to establish continuous low-pressure urinary drainage for preclinical SCI research. Cutaneous vesicostomy—the surgical creation of a stoma between the bladder dome and the lower abdominal wall—enables continuous urinary drainage, thereby maintaining a low-resistance drainage route and bypassing the urethra. In this way, excessive urine retention and high intravesical pressures can be avoided, approximating the concept of continuous low-pressure decompression used clinically during the early post-injury phase with suprapubic or transurethral urinary diversion, while recognizing that normal storage and continence mechanisms are abolished. Therapeutic effects that might otherwise be obscured by repetitive overfilling and high-pressure manual bladder expression may thus be more readily detected. Moreover, vesicostomy offers a conceptual strategy to mitigate sex-related constraints in preclinical SCI research. The considerably greater urethral length in male rodents results in higher outflow resistance, making manual bladder expression substantially more difficult and effectively confining most preclinical studies to female animals, despite the predominance of male patients among clinical SCI cases. As an alternative drainage strategy, vesicostomy has the potential to broaden experimental bladder management paradigms and enhance the translational relevance of future studies, while its feasibility and outcomes in male rats will need to be established in dedicated follow-up work.

Introduction

Healthy bladder function relies on the coordinated function of the bladder muscle and urethral sphincter, achieved through a complex neuronal network involving the brain, central nervous system (CNS), and peripheral nervous system (PNS), which enables conscious control of the lower urinary tract (LUT)1,2. The complexity of these mechanisms and their switch-like circuitry3 renders bladder function susceptible to a wide range of injuries and diseases. Accordingly, following spinal cord injury (SCI), almost all patients experience impaired bladder sensation and control4,5. The term neurogenic bladder encompasses a broad spectrum of dysfunctions affecting urine storage and/or voiding, depending on the characteristics of the injury. In particular, suprasacral injuries lead to detrusor overactivity in combination with sphincter overactivity, often accompanied by loss of coordination between the two—termed detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD)—resulting in excessive urine retention and high intravesical pressures6,7. This can severely damage the LUT, threaten the integrity of the upper urinary tract (UUT), and, if left untreated, result in life-threatening complications8. Intermittent or continuous urinary drainage via catheterization represents the current standard of bladder management in humans following SCI, preventing bladder overfilling through a safe, pressure-free procedure9,10,11,12.

With no effective treatment currently available for SCI and predominantly symptomatic management of associated neurogenic LUT dysfunction (nLUTD), the development of novel therapeutic strategies remains a major research priority. Animal models enable investigation of disease mechanisms at a level of complexity comparable to that in humans while providing exceptional intragroup homogeneity under standardized experimental conditions13. Among these, the rat is the primary preclinical model, with the majority of SCI studies conducted in this species14,15. This preference reflects its anatomical and functional similarity to humans, reproducible pathological response, and widespread availability. Nevertheless, an important translational gap remains that may limit the interpretation and clinical relevance of bladder-related findings derived from rodent models.

Although rats develop nLUTD following SCI that resembles key features observed in humans, bladder management differs substantially between species. Because intermittent catheterization and other permanent urinary drainage approaches are generally not feasible in rats, urine evacuation is routinely achieved by manual bladder expression16. This technique, analogous to the Credé maneuver17, which is generally not recommended in clinical practice, generates markedly elevated intravesical pressures. Consequently, it may introduce methodological bias by independently promoting pathological bladder remodeling after SCI, thereby reducing the translational relevance of experimental findings or obscuring genuine therapeutic effects. An additional limitation arises from sex-related anatomical differences. The considerably greater urethral length in male rodents results in higher outflow resistance, making manual bladder expression substantially more difficult and effectively restricting most preclinical SCI studies to female animals14. Given that the majority of clinical SCI cases occur in males18,19, this discrepancy further emphasizes the need for alternative bladder management strategies in preclinical rat SCI models.

Cutaneous vesicostomy involves the surgical creation of a stoma between the bladder and the lower abdominal wall by advancing the bladder dome to the skin and securing it with sutures. This enables continuous urinary drainage while maintaining a low-pressure drainage route and bypassing the urethra. Primarily used in children with complex medical conditions or when conventional drainage options are unsuitable, cutaneous vesicostomy provides reliable urinary diversion with minimal maintenance requirements and a low complication rate20,21,22. Beyond its clinical application, vesicostomy has also been successfully performed in rodent models23,24,25,26, although not in the context of SCI.

In a recent study16, we addressed the translational limitations associated with manual bladder expression in preclinical SCI models and introduced vesicostomy in rats together with a postoperative wound management regimen that enabled extended follow-up. Direct comparison of the two bladder management approaches demonstrated greater structural bladder alterations following manual bladder expression, whereas vesicostomy animals exhibited values closer to those of healthy controls across several parameters. Most notably, bladder wall thickness increased from a mean of 768.26 µm (SD 28.05) in healthy rats to 1181.94 µm (SD 289.56) two months after SCI with manual bladder expression, with some animals reaching values of up to 1485 µm. In contrast, rats managed by vesicostomy showed a mean bladder wall thickness of 963.08 µm (SD 68.82), and only one animal exceeded 1000 µm.

This study provides a standardized protocol for performing vesicostomy in rats, including perioperative care and postoperative wound management, to enable reproducible continuous low-pressure urinary drainage in preclinical SCI research. The protocol is intended to facilitate reproduction of the technique and assist investigators in determining its suitability for studies in which high-pressure manual bladder expression may introduce methodological bias or in which the inclusion of male animals is desirable. The aim of this project was to establish a standardized vesicostomy protocol for rats with SCI and to evaluate its feasibility and safety over a two-month follow-up period. In addition, a standardized postoperative wound management regimen was applied to minimize skin-related complications and maintain stomal patency through regular calibration.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Three-month-old female Lewis rats were used for this study. Although this protocol was primarily developed to avoid manual bladder expression following SCI, details of the contusion SCI procedure are not provided here but have been described previously. All procedures were approved by the Austrian Governmental Legal Entity on Animal Research (BMWFW-2022-0.062.928 and BMWFW-2023-0.848.340) and were conducted in accordance with local guidelines for animal use and the ARRIVE guidelines. Overall, the vesicostomy procedure requires approximately 15 min.

1. Preoperative Preparation

  1. Prepare a sterile working area, including a microscope or magnification glasses (2.5–3.5× magnification), all required surgical instruments, and a heating pad.
  2. Prewarm the heating pad to 30°C–35°C (hand-warm) and maintain this temperature throughout the surgery. Replace the heating pad if its temperature drops below 30°C during prolonged surgical procedures.

2. Animal Preparation

  1. Anesthesia
    1. Use a general anesthetic regimen appropriate for the surgical procedure.
    2. Prepare a fresh anesthetic mixture containing medetomidine (0.15 mg/kg), midazolam (2 mg/kg), and fentanyl (0.005 mg/kg) according to the provided calculation table (Table 1). Select the anesthetic dose and corresponding final injection volume based on the body weight closest to the animal’s exact weight, and administer the mixture intramuscularly using a 1 mL syringe fitted with a 27G needle.
  2. Surgical Preparation
    1. Once the rat is anesthetized, shave the lower abdomen to the vaginal region.
    2. Wash the surgical field twice with warm soapy water.
    3. Wash the surgical field twice with warm clean water.
    4. Disinfect the surgical field twice with a mixture of 7.5% povidone-iodine and 70% alcohol, including the vaginal region.
    5. Administer 1.5 mg enrofloxacin and 0.2 mg long-acting meloxicam, dissolved in 0.2 mL pre-warmed 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl), subcutaneously.
    6. Administer 3 mL pre-warmed 0.9% NaCl subcutaneously to compensate for fluid loss.
    7. Apply 2% dexpanthenol ophthalmic ointment to both eyes to prevent corneal desiccation.
    8. Position the animal supine on the pre-warmed heating pad and adjust the microscope or magnification glasses.
    9. Confirm an adequate surgical plane of anesthesia by performing a nociceptive withdrawal test on both hindlimbs before beginning surgery.
    10. If the withdrawal reflex is still present, wait 2 min and repeat the nociceptive withdrawal test. Continue this procedure at 2-min intervals until the reflex is absent.
Body weight
(g)
Medetomidine (1 mg/mL), mLMidazolam
(5 mg/mL), mL
Fentanyl
(0.05 mg/mL), mL
Total volume
(mL)
1000.0150.040.0100.065
1250.0190.050.0130.082
1500.0230.060.0150.098
1750.0260.070.0180.114
2000.0300.080.0200.130
2250.0340.090.0230.147
2500.0370.100.0250.163
2750.0410.110.0280.179
3000.0450.120.0300.195
3250.0490.130.0330.212
3500.0520.140.0350.227
3750.0560.150.0380.244
4000.0600.160.0400.260
4250.0630.170.0430.276
4500.0670.180.0450.292
4750.0710.190.0480.309
5000.0740.200.0510.325
5250.0780.210.0530.341
5500.0820.220.0550.357
5750.0860.230.0580.374
6000.0890.240.0600.389

Table 1: Intramuscular anesthesia dosing for rats. Volumes of medetomidine (1 mg/mL), midazolam (5 mg/mL), and fentanyl (0.05 mg/mL) required to prepare the intramuscular anesthetic mixture for rats weighing 100–600 g. The total injection volume represents the sum of the individual drug volumes.

3. Bladder Preparation

  1. To allow a tension-free vesicostomy, make a 3 mm longitudinal midline skin incision using a No. 11 scalpel blade while stabilizing the skin with hooked (Adson) forceps, approximately two-thirds of the distance between the second and third teat pairs (counted from caudal to cranial). This incision corresponds to the level of the bladder dome.
  2. Identify the subcutaneous abdominal muscles and the linea alba. Incise the outer fascia with the scalpel, bluntly dissect the abdominal muscle layers using micro scissors, then carefully incise the peritoneum and open the abdominal cavity using hooked micro forceps.
  3. To identify the bladder within the abdominal cavity, gently elevate both sides of the abdominal muscle layers at the incision to improve visualization and locate the bladder beneath the fatty tissue. If the bladder cannot be identified, perform transurethral catheterization and repeat the localization.

4. Transurethral Catheter Placement

  1. Fill the bladder through a transurethral catheter to facilitate bladder identification.
  2. Apply lubricating gel to a 24G peripheral venous catheter (without stylet) and to the urethral meatus. Lift the periurethral skin with small serrated forceps and insert the catheter at approximately 110° to facilitate atraumatic placement.
  3. Advance the catheter atraumatically through the urethra to the level of the pubic bone. Lower the catheter until it is parallel to the animal’s body and continue advancing it gently into the bladder. If resistance is encountered approximately 1 cm into the urethra, withdraw the catheter completely and repeat the insertion. If the catheter advances smoothly for at least 2 cm, proceed with bladder filling.
  4. Confirm successful catheter placement by slowly infusing sodium chloride into the bladder without resistance. If catheter placement is unsuccessful, the syringe becomes blocked, and slight withdrawal of the catheter results in leakage of sodium chloride from the urethra.

5. Bladder Positioning

  1. Fill the bladder with a maximum of 400 µL of prewarmed 0.9% NaCl. Ensure that filling proceeds smoothly without increased infusion pressure. Visually monitor bladder filling and confirm that the bladder remains centered within the abdominal cavity. Note that the physiological bladder volume depends on the animal’s age, body weight, and strain and may vary. For 12-week-old Lewis rats (LEW/Crl) weighing 200–230 g, the maximum physiological bladder volume is approximately 500 µL. Leave the transurethral catheter in place and refill the bladder if necessary.
  2. Inspect the bladder and identify the planned vesicostomy site below the bladder dome on the ventral bladder wall.
  3. Place two superficial stay sutures using 6-0 coated Vicryl at the 3 and 9 o’clock positions on either side of the planned incision site. Secure the suture ends with clamps to maintain bladder position.

6. Bladder Vesicostomy

  1. Carefully grasp the bladder dome with hooked micro forceps and make a 3 mm longitudinal incision using a No. 11 scalpel blade. Ensure that the incision transects all layers of the bladder wall to allow immediate urine drainage.
  2. Inspect the incision and, if necessary, enlarge it with micro scissors to approximately 3 mm.
  3. Use the stay sutures to position the bladder for suturing. Remove the transurethral catheter.
  4. Begin suturing with 6-0 coated Vicryl at the 12 o’clock position, passing the suture from the luminal side of the bladder wall through the skin while excluding the muscle layer. Place subsequent sutures at the 6, 8, 10, 2, and 4 o’clock positions until the bladder opening is completely approximated to the skin. Remove the stay sutures once the bladder is securely fixed.
  5. Consider the vesicostomy complete once the bladder mucosa is fully apposed to the abdominal skin without visible gaps and the 3–5 mm vesicostomy opening can be readily intubated with a calibration stick.
  6. Place four stainless-steel wire sutures approximately 4–5 mm from the stomal edge to discourage the animal from licking or chewing the surgical site. Pass each wire through the skin using a 20G needle, secure it with two simple overhand knots, and trim the wire ends to approximately 2 mm.

7. Calibration and Wound Dressing

  1. Clean the surrounding skin with clean water, followed by incubation for 10 min with a mucosa-compatible antiseptic agent, such as 0.2% sodium hypochlorite solution.
  2. Insert a sterile calibration stick of approximately 6–11 Charrière (1 Charrière = approximately 0.33 mm diameter) into the vesicostomy to assess stomal diameter.
  3. Use a calibration stick that passes smoothly while filling the stomal lumen without causing inward invagination of the wound edges.
  4. Apply topical skin adhesive generously to the shaved abdominal skin, the tissue surrounding the vesicostomy, and the stomal opening.
  5. Continuously rotate the calibration stick within the vesicostomy until the adhesive has dried (approximately 10 s), preferably with assistance from a second person, to prevent closure of the vesicostomy. Representative images of the vesicostomy immediately after surgery and after healing are shown in Figure 1.

Rodent skin healing process, DPI 0 and DPI 53, wound healing experiment, scale indicators.
Figure 1. Representative appearance of the vesicostomy immediately after surgery and following healing. Representative images of the vesicostomy site immediately after surgery and wound dressing at day post-injury (DPI) 0 (left) and after healing at DPI 53, shortly before completion of the 56-day (2-month) follow-up period (right). The inset shows a higher-magnification view of the vesicostomy immediately after surgery. Scale bars = 1 cm (overview images) and 2 mm (inset). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

8. Antagonism

  1. Antagonize general anesthesia (no earlier than 1 h after anesthetic administration) by administering a mixture of atipamezole (0.76 mg/kg) and flumazenil (0.2 mg/kg) subcutaneously using a 1 mL syringe fitted with a 27G needle according to Table 2.
  2. To allow stress-free recovery, place the animal in its home cage before administering the antagonistic drug mixture. Monitor the animal continuously until full consciousness is regained. Keep the home cage under a heating lamp in a separate recovery room for 3 h.
Body weight
(g)
Atipamezole
(5 mg/mL), mL
Flumazenil
(0.1 mg/mL), mL
Total volume
(mL)
1000.0150.200.215
1250.0190.250.269
1500.0230.300.323
1750.0260.350.376
2000.0300.400.430
2250.0340.450.484
2500.0370.500.537
2750.0410.550.591
3000.0450.600.645
3250.0490.650.699
3500.0520.700.752
3750.0560.750.806
4000.0600.800.860
4250.0630.850.913
4500.0670.900.967
4750.0710.951.021
5000.0741.001.074
5250.0781.051.128
5500.0821.101.182
5750.0861.151.236
6000.0891.201.289

Table 2: Subcutaneous anesthetic antagonism dosing for rats. Volumes of atipamezole (5 mg/mL) and flumazenil (0.1 mg/mL) required to prepare the subcutaneous anesthetic antagonist mixture for rats weighing 100–600 g. The total injection volume represents the sum of the individual drug volumes.

9. Waste Disposal

  1. Dispose of sharps (e.g., syringe needles and stainless-steel wire remnants) in an approved sharps container. Dispose of all biological and surgical waste according to institutional biosafety regulations.

10. Postoperative Management

  1. Postoperative Care
    1. Administer enrofloxacin (1.5 mg, once daily, subcutaneously) and long-acting meloxicam (0.2 mg, twice daily, subcutaneously) for the first 5 days after surgery. Supplement pre-warmed 0.9% NaCl subcutaneously as required to compensate for fluid loss.
    2. Continue low-dose enrofloxacin (0.5 mg, once daily, subcutaneously) throughout the follow-up period.
    3. Resume or intensify antibiotic and/or analgesic treatment if signs of pain or infection are observed during daily examinations. In such cases, administer the same antibiotic and analgesic doses used during the initial 5-day postoperative period.
    4. Initiate a 5-day course of antibiotics at the standard dose if urine characteristics change (e.g., hematuria or cloudy urine persisting for 3 days) and/or if the condition of the skin surrounding the vesicostomy changes (e.g., reddened skin persisting for 2 days without improvement). Resume analgesic treatment during periods of hematuria and/or upon the onset of skin plaque formation, and continue treatment until the symptoms resolve.
    5. Perform vesicostomy calibration daily. Begin with a calibration stick at least one size smaller than the previously documented stomal diameter and apply lubricating gel before insertion. If the calibration stick passes smoothly, repeat the procedure with the next larger size and record the largest size that passes smoothly.
    6. Reduce the calibration frequency to every second day no earlier than 3 weeks after surgery and only if the calibration size has remained stable for at least 3 consecutive days.
    7. Once the skin adhesive begins to detach (typically 3–5 days after surgery), clean the surrounding skin daily with a mucosa-compatible antiseptic agent, such as 0.04% sodium hypochlorite solution, followed by application of an oil-based moisturizing protective film. Assess wound healing according to the wound scoring system and representative wound appearances shown in Figure 2A,B.
    8. Remove the stainless-steel wires 7 days after surgery.
  2. Postoperative Monitoring
    1. Monitor all animals closely throughout the postoperative period.
    2. Examine each animal at least twice daily for signs of pain or discomfort according to the Rat Grimace Scale27, abnormal swelling, bleeding, other changes at the surgical site, and excessive porphyrin discharge. Assess the vesicostomy using the wound scoring system shown in Figure 2A,B and record the calibration size as shown in Figure 2C.
    3. Maintain detailed records for each animal and regularly document the following parameters:
      1. Body weight (relative to the preoperative value)
      2. General condition (fur, eyes, whiskers, ears, and respiration)
      3. Walking behavior (e.g., stilted or unsteady gait)
      4. Urine characteristics (e.g., discoloration or strong odor)
      5. Vesicostomy calibration size
      6. Condition of the skin surrounding the vesicostomy

Wound healing analysis; graphs of wound score and calibration size; injury recovery photos.
Figure 2. Postoperative wound healing and vesicostomy calibration during follow-up. (A) Wound score of the vesicostomy site during the 7-week follow-up period. (B) Representative images of wound scores 1–4, illustrating the progression from normal wound appearance to ulcer formation. Animals with open skin lesions were excluded according to the predefined study criteria. Scale bars = 5 mm. (C) Vesicostomy calibration size measured in Charrière during the follow-up period. Data in panels A and C are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A total of 18 rats underwent vesicostomy. To establish the technique, the procedure was first performed in six animals without SCI to verify its basic safety and feasibility and to evaluate postoperative management in healthy animals. Subsequently, vesicostomy was performed in combination with a thoracic contusion SCI at the T8/T9 vertebral level in 12 animals. Of these, six animals were used to further refine the postoperative wound management protocol for SCI animals. The resulting regimen was then applied to a second ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

This protocol provides the first detailed description of vesicostomy in rodents as a method for continuous, low-pressure urinary drainage following SCI. Beyond describing the operative technique, we provide a comprehensive postoperative wound management protocol, which proved critical for achieving prolonged and successful follow-up. Because the rat is a small animal model and the objective is to create a minimal bladder opening to limit confounding influences and promote wound healing, magnifying glasses (2.5–3.5&...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank wound care specialist Gerlinde Wiesinger for her invaluable contribution to the optimization of the wound management protocol.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.9% sodium chlorideFresenius Kabi, Graz, Austria—Sterile saline
20G hypodermic needleServoprax, Wesel, GermanyREF L1 0201Used for stainless-steel wire placement
24G peripheral venous catheterB. Braun, Sempach, SwitzerlandREF 4254074BUsed as a transurethral catheter (without stylet)
27G hypodermic needleB. Braun, Melsungen, GermanyREF 4657705Used for injections
6-0 coated Vicryl sutureEthicon, Puerto Rico, USAREF V134HUsed for bladder fixation
Actimaris Wound Irrigation Solution forteActiMaris, Appenzell, SwitzerlandREF 303500.2% sodium hypochlorite solution
Actimaris Wound Irrigation Solution sensitiveActiMaris, Appenzell, SwitzerlandREF 303000.04% sodium hypochlorite solution
Atipamezole (Antisedan 5 mg/mL)Orion Pharma, Espoo, FinlandNo catalog number availableAnesthetic antagonist
Bladder calibration sticks (6–11 Charrière)No manufacturer availableNo catalog number availableUsed for vesicostomy calibration
Carbon steel scalpel blade No. 11Aesculap, Tuttlingen, GermanyREF BB511Scalpel blade
Dexpanthenol ophthalmic ointment (2%)Fresenius Kabi, Graz, AustriaREF RA4302436Eye ointment
Enrofloxacin (Baytril 25 mg/mL)Elanco, Monheim, GermanyNo catalog number availableAntibiotic
Female Lewis rats (12 weeks old)Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany—Experimental animals
Fentanyl (50 µg/mL)hameln pharma, Hameln, GermanyNo catalog number availableAnesthetic
Flumazenil (0.1 mg/mL)Fresenius Kabi, Graz, AustriaNo catalog number availableAnesthetic antagonist
Heating padLenric, Littlehampton, UKNo catalog number availableUsed to maintain body temperature
Hooked (Adson) forcepsFine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany11019-12Tissue handling
Hooked micro forcepsMedicon, Tuttlingen, Germany13.71.62Microsurgical forceps
Long-acting meloxicam (Metacam 5 mg/mL)Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, GermanyNo catalog number availableAnalgesic
Lubricating gel (Cathejell C)Montavit, Absam, AustriaNo catalog number availableUsed for transurethral catheterization and vesicostomy calibration
Medetomidine (Sedator 1 mg/mL)Dechra, Aulendorf, GermanyNo catalog number availableAnesthetic
Microscope or surgical magnification glasses (2.5–3.5×)Evident Europe GmbH, Vienna, AustriaOlympus SZ61Used during microsurgery
Micro scissors (Bonn scissors)Fine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany14084-08Microsurgical scissors
Mosquito hemostatFine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany13009-12Used to secure stay sutures
Oil-based moisturizing protective filmPanin, Rovigo, ItalyNo catalog number availablePostoperative skin protection
Povidone-iodine solution (7.5%)B. Braun, Melsungen, GermanyNo catalog number availableSkin antiseptic
Scalpel handle No. 3Fine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany10003-12Compatible with No. 11 scalpel blade
Small serrated forcepsFine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany11050-10Used for periurethral skin manipulation
Stainless-steel wireVömel, Kronberg, GermanyNo catalog number availableUsed for protective wire sutures
Syringe, 1 mLBecton Dickinson, Vienna, AustriaREF 303172Used for anesthetic and antagonist administration
Topical skin adhesiveEthicon, Puerto Rico, USAREF AHVM12Skin adhesive

References

  1. Fowler CJ, Griffiths D, de Groat WC. The neural control of micturition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(6):453-66.
  2. de Groat WC, Yoshimura N. Anatomy and physiology of the lower urinary tract. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;130:61-108.
  3. de Groat WC, Wickens C. Organization of the neural switching circuitry underlying reflex micturition. Acta Physiol. 2013;207(1):66-84.
  4. Taweel WA, Seyam R. Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. Res Rep Urol. 2015;7:85-99.
  5. Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2000;163(3):768-72.
  6. Panicker JN, Fowler CJ, Kessler TM. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in the neurological patient: clinical assessment and management. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(7):720-32.
  7. Panicker JN. Neurogenic bladder: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Semin Neurol. 2020;40(5):569-79.
  8. Savic G, et al. Long-term survival after traumatic spinal cord injury: a 70-year British study. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(7):651-8.
  9. Kinnear N, et al. The impact of catheter-based bladder drainage method on urinary tract infection risk in spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):854-62.
  10. Sartori AM, et al. Summary of the 2024 update of the European Association of Urology Guidelines on neurourology. Eur Urol. 2024;85(6):543-55.
  11. Ong HL, et al. Conservative bladder management and medical treatment in chronic spinal cord injury patients. J Clin Med. 2023;12(5):2021
  12. Abrams P, et al. A proposed guideline for the urological management of patients with spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 2008;101(8):989-94.
  13. Barre-Sinoussi F, Montagutelli X. Animal models are essential to biological research: issues and perspectives. Future Sci OA. 2015;1(4):FSO63.
  14. Ferreira A, Nascimento D, Cruz CD. Molecular mechanisms operating in animal models of neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a systematic review focusing on bladder dysfunction of neurogenic origin. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):3273.
  15. Doelman AW, et al. Assessing neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction after spinal cord injury: animal models in preclinical neuro-urology research. Biomedicines. 2023;11(6):1539.
  16. Bauer S, et al. Translational pitfalls in SCI bladder research: the hidden role of urinary drainage techniques in the rat model. Biology (Basel). 2025;14(8):928.
  17. Chang SM, et al. Urologic status of 74 spinal cord injury patients from the 1976 Tangshan earthquake, and managed for over 20 years using the Crede maneuver. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(9):552-4.
  18. GBD SCI Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of spinal cord injury, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(11):1026-47.
  19. Ding W, et al. Spinal cord injury: the global incidence, prevalence, and disability from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(21):1532-40.
  20. Di Benedetto V, et al. Vesicostomy in childhood: indications and results. Pediatr Surg Int. 1996;11(5-6):348-50.
  21. Vallasciani S, et al. Permanent cutaneous vesicostomy: a pragmatic approach to safely manage lower urinary tract dysfunction in pediatric patients with chronic and life-limiting conditions and neuropathic bladders. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1409608.
  22. Donmez MI, et al. Long-term outcomes of cutaneous vesicostomy in patients with neuropathic bladder caused by spina bifida. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(6):622.e1-622.e4.
  23. Carpenter AR, Becknell B, Hirselj DA, McHugh KM. Urinary diversion via cutaneous vesicostomy in the megabladder mouse. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;886:393-402.
  24. Seyam RM, et al. Penile autotransplantation in rats: an animal model. Urol Ann. 2013;5(4):255-8.
  25. Becknell B, et al. Struvite urolithiasis and chronic urinary tract infection in a murine model of urinary diversion. Urology. 2013;81(5):943-8.
  26. Teimouri A, Wilcox DT, Malykhina AP, Wood D. Structural and functional bladder changes associated with disrupted voiding cycle in a murine model of cutaneous vesicostomy. J Pediatr Urol. 2026;22(1):105675.
  27. Herrera GM, Meredith AL. Diurnal variation in urodynamics of rat. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12298.
  28. Salih EM, et al. Temporary vesicostomy in pediatrics: what are the potential predictors of functional and morphological improvement of the upper urinary tract? J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(6):834.e1-834.e9.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Vesicostomy ProcedureSpinal Cord InjuryLower Urinary TractBladder ManagementPreclinical ResearchUrinary DiversionBladder Remodeling

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon