This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (approval number: XYFY2024-KL238-01) and was exempt from the requirement to obtain additional informed consent from patients. The reagents and the equipment used are listed in the Table of Materials.
Patients and specimens
This study was a retrospective cohort study. From November 2020 to December 2023, a total of 270 patients undergoing ACI from Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were consecutively recruited. The patient selection process is summarized in Supplementary Figure 1. Eligible patients were identified through daily screening of all new admissions to the stroke unit. Symptom onset within 72 h prior to admission was verified by reviewing emergency medical records and confirmed by a certified neurologist through patient history and family interview. The sample size was calculated based on the ability to detect a significant difference in miR-486-3p levels between groups. Assuming an effect size of 0.5, a two-sided α of 0.05, and a power (1-β) of 0.80, a minimum of 64 patients per group was required. The final group sizes reflect the actual recruitment and the higher prevalence of OSAS in the stroke population, not a predetermined allocation. Patients with ACI combined OSAS were followed up on their prognosis for 1 year.
The inclusion criteria were: (1) Acute ischemic stroke with symptom onset within 72 h before admission, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. (2) The ability to comprehend and complete the study questionnaires and neurological assessments. (3) The severity of the ACI was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission. When the NIHSS score is <5, it is classified as mild ACI; when the NIHSS score is between 5 and 20, it is considered moderate ACI. Key exclusion criteria included a history of malignant tumors, pre-existing severe physical disability or psychiatric disorders, severe cardiac, pulmonary, or renal insufficiency, and major surgery or trauma within the preceding 3 months, active infections or autoimmune diseases; previous stroke within 6 months; immunosuppressive therapy; and prior diagnosis or treatment of OSAS (including continuous positive airway pressure therapy).
For MRI confirmation, all patients underwent standard brain MRI on a 3.0-T system, including the following sequences: T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. Acute infarction was defined as the presence of a hyperintense signal on DWI with a corresponding hypointense signal on ADC. All MRI scans were interpreted by two experienced neuroradiologists who were blinded to the clinical data, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. NIHSS scoring was performed at admission by certified neurologists prior to any thrombolytic or endovascular treatment.
Fasting venous blood was collected between 24 h and 48 h after stroke onset, following an overnight fast of at least 8 h. Blood draws were performed between 6:00 AM and 8:00 AM to minimize circadian variation. A total of 5 mL of peripheral venous blood was collected into EDTA-coated vacuum tubes. Within 2 h of collection, blood samples were centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 15 min at 4 °C using a refrigerated centrifuge. The serum supernatant was carefully aliquoted into 1.5 mL RNase-free microcentrifuge tubes and immediately stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles were strictly avoided; all aliquots were subjected to a maximum of one freeze-thaw cycle prior to analysis.
Patient grouping
Participants were grouped based on their AHI scores from polysomnography. All recordings were performed in the hospital sleep laboratory between 10:00 PM and 6:00 AM for a minimum duration of 7 h. The monitored physiological channels included: electroencephalography (EEG; six channels), electrooculography (EOG; two channels), electromyography (EMG; chin and bilateral anterior tibialis), electrocardiography (ECG; single lead), nasal airflow (thermistor and pressure transducer), thoracic and abdominal respiratory effort (respiratory inductance plethysmography), and pulse oximetry (SpO2). The sleep study technician calculated AHI. Scoring of sleep stages and respiratory events was performed manually by a certified sleep technician according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 2012 scoring manual, using the Somnolyzer 24×7 software. According to the widely accepted diagnostic criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, an AHI of 5 or more events per hour is the standard threshold for diagnosing OSA. Therefore, participants with an AHI < 5 were classified as the ACI group (n = 100), whereas those with an AHI ≥ 5 were classified as the ACI combined OSAS group (n = 170). Among those with AHI ≥ 5 (ACI combined OSAS group, n = 170), patients were further stratified into three severity subgroups based on established criteria: mild OSAS (5 ≤ AHI < 15, n = 60), moderate OSAS (15 ≤ AHI < 30, n = 75), and severe OSAS (AHI ≥ 30, n = 35). This stratification enabled evaluation of the dose‑dependent relationship among hypoxic burden, miR‑486‑3p expression, and inflammatory markers. Patients with prior OSAS treatment (e.g., CPAP) were not included in the study to avoid confounding of the baseline AHI measurement.
Prognosis assessment
The 1-year timepoint allows acute effects to resolve and the cumulative hypoxic burden of OSAS to manifest, providing a robust window to assess its prognostic impact. The clinical prognosis of patients with ACI combined with OSAS was evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after the onset of the disease. All mRS assessments were performed by certified neurologists who underwent standardized training prior to the study, using the structured mRS interview form. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with a kappa coefficient >0.85. The follow-up assessment was conducted through a scheduled outpatient clinic visit. For patients unable to attend in person, a structured telephone interview was performed by a trained research nurse using a standardized script. All assessors were blinded to the patients’ miR-486-3p levels and OSAS status. To maintain consistency between outpatient and telephone assessments, both formats used the same structured questionnaire, and all assessors completed a pre-study calibration exercise. Patients with scores of 0–2 were placed in the good prognosis group, and those with scores of 3–6 were placed in the poor prognosis group. No patients were lost to follow-up. The SAQLI, ESS, TNF-α, and HIF-1α were evaluated as prognostic variables rather than being used to define prognosis groups. The NIHSS, SAQLI, and ESS were administered by trained research staff. The SAQLI and ESS were administered as interviewer-administered questionnaires in a quiet room.
Scoring index
NIHSS is a quantitative scale for stroke11, with higher scores indicating greater severity of ACI. SAQLI is a quality of life questionnaire for OSA on a scale of 1–7, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life, covering daily activities, social interactions, emotional states, symptoms, and treatment-related symptoms12. ESS is used to examine patients' self-reported daytime sleepiness, with a score range from 0 to 24, and a score > 10 indicates daytime sleepiness13.
RNA extraction and reverse transcription
Total RNA was extracted from 200 µL of serum using TRIzol reagent. Briefly, serum samples were mixed with 800 µL of TRIzol, incubated at room temperature for 5 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. Chloroform (200 µL) was added, and the mixture was vigorously shaken for 15 s, incubated for 3 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The aqueous phase was transferred to a fresh tube, and RNA was precipitated with 500 µL of isopropanol, incubated at −20 °C for 1 h, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The RNA pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, air-dried, and dissolved in 20 µL of RNase-free water. RNA concentration and purity were assessed using a microvolume spectrophotometer, with an A260/A280 ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 accepted for downstream analysis. RNA integrity was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Reverse transcription was performed using 500 ng of total RNA with the Reverse Transcription Kit in a total reaction volume of 20 µL, using random hexamer primers according to the manufacturer's protocol. The reverse transcription reaction was carried out at 25 °C for 10 min, 42 °C for 60 min, and 70 °C for 5 min. The resulting cDNA was stored at −20 °C until use.
RT-qPCR
miR-486-3p expression was detected using a SYBR Green–based real-time PCR kit for microRNA quantification on a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) system. The reaction mixture contained 10 µL of 2× SYBR Green Master Mix, 2 µL of cDNA template (diluted 1:5), 1 µL of each primer (10 µM), and nuclease-free water to a final volume of 20 µL. The primer sequences are as follows (from 5'-3'): miR-486-3p-forward: TCGGCAGCGGGGCAGCUCAGU, reverse: CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGA; and U6-forward: CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA, reverse: AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT. The qPCR cycling conditions were: 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s. Each sample was run in triplicate, and a no-template control was included in each run. Specificity of amplification was confirmed by melting curve analysis from 60 °C to 95 °C. The cycle threshold (Ct) was automatically determined by the QuantStudio 6 Pro software (v1.5) using the default threshold setting. miR-486-3p level was calculated with the 2-ΔΔCT method and normalized to U6. U6 was validated as a stable reference gene in our serum samples using the NormFinder algorithm to ensure consistency across groups. Inter-assay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were <5%.
ELISA
The serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), TNF-α, and HIF-1α were detected using the ELISA kit. The experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, serum samples were thawed on ice and diluted 1:2 with the provided dilution buffer. Samples and standards were added to pre-coated 96-well plates (100 µL/well) and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. After washing four times with 300 µL of wash buffer, 100 µL of biotin-conjugated detection antibody was added and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Following another wash step, 100 µL of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin was added and incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the dark. The chromogenic substrate (tetramethylbenzidine, 100 µL) was added and incubated for 15 min at 37°C protected from light. The reaction was terminated with 50 µL of stop solution, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. The concentrations were calculated from standard curves generated with known concentrations of recombinant proteins. Each sample was measured in duplicate, and the mean value was used for analysis. Quality control samples provided by the manufacturer were included in each plate; results were accepted only when QC values fell within the manufacturer's specified range.
Quality control and reproducibility
All laboratory assays were performed in accordance with the MIQE (Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments) guidelines for RT-qPCR and the appropriate reporting standards for ELISA. Major instruments were calibrated according to the manufacturers' schedules. Negative and positive control samples were included in each batch of RT-qPCR and ELISA runs to monitor plate-to-plate variability. All data were recorded and managed using Microsoft Excel, and the corresponding author will provide detailed experimental protocols and raw data upon reasonable request.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 and a statistical and graphing software. Normal distribution was assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD or median (IQR), and were compared by t‑test or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared by the χ2 test. Correlations were examined using Pearson or Spearman analyses based on the data distribution. The predictive value was determined using the ROC curve and verified with 5-fold cross-validation. The optimal cutoff value for miR-486-3p was determined by maximizing the Youden index. Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses were used to assess correlations. For prognostic analysis, patients were stratified by the median miR‑486‑3p expression; Kaplan–Meier curves with the log‑rank test were used to compare survival outcomes between groups. Variables with P < 0.1 in univariate Cox regression were entered into the multivariate Cox model. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.