A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Research Article

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated HKDC1 Depletion to Assess Ferroptosis and Lenvatinib Responses in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

98 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/73461

⸱

September 25th, 2026

 ,  ,  , 

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

This protocol combines CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HKDC1 depletion with cell viability, pharmacological rescue, apoptosis, glutathione, and malondialdehyde assays to examine regulated cell-death responses in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Abstract

Hexokinase domain-containing protein 1 (HKDC1) has been implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression, but its relationship to regulated cell death remains incompletely defined. This article presents an in vitro workflow that combines public cohort analysis, paired clinical tissues, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HKDC1 depletion, cell growth assays, lenvatinib treatment, pharmacological rescue, and biochemical measurements of glutathione (GSH) and malondialdehyde (MDA). HKDC1 expression was higher in HCC than in non-tumor liver tissue and was associated with poorer overall and disease-free survival in public datasets. HKDC1 depletion reduced growth and colony formation in Hep3B and SNU449 cells. HKDC1 depletion also increased the response to lenvatinib and ML-162. Independent targeting with sg-HKDC1-2 reproduced the ML-162-associated viability phenotype, and ferrostatin-1 restored viability after ML-162 exposure in SNU449 cells. These results support an association between HKDC1 depletion and increased susceptibility to regulated cell-death stress in HCC cells. Because direct lipid-reactive oxygen species, GPX4/SLC7A11 activity, glucose flux, and in vivo efficacy were not measured, the downstream mechanism and therapeutic relevance require further validation.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with a particularly high burden in Asia1,2,3,4. Many patients present with advanced disease and require systemic therapy5,6,7,8. Lenvatinib is a first-line option for unresectable HCC, but primary and acquired resistance limit durable benefit9,10,11. Identifying tumor-cell survival factors may therefore reveal strategies for improving treatment response. Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death driven by phospholipid peroxidation when antioxidant defenses are insufficient12,13,14,15,16. The cystine/GSH/GPX4 system is a central ferroptosis-protection pathway13,16,17. In HCC, ferroptosis intersects with tumor metabolism, oxidative stress, and treatment resistance, making ferroptosis sensitivity relevant to the response to targeted therapies18,19,20,21. However, GSH depletion and MDA accumulation are indirect biochemical readouts and do not, by themselves, establish a specific GPX4-dependent mechanism.

HKDC1 is an atypical hexokinase with low but measurable glucose-phosphorylating activity22,23,24. Experimental studies have shown that HKDC1 expression can alter cellular hexokinase activity, hepatic glucose handling, mitochondrial metabolism, and adaptation to glucose availability25,26,27,28. Increased HKDC1 expression has been associated with HCC proliferation, aggressive behavior, stemness, immune evasion, and poor prognosis25,29,30,31,32,33. Whether HKDC1 modifies ferroptotic stress or the response to Lenvatinib has not been established. Published mechanistic studies nevertheless identify plausible points of convergence. Under hypoxia, HKDC1 binds GSK3β and stabilizes β-catenin to promote HCC stemness31, whereas acquired lenvatinib resistance has also been linked to GSK3β-regulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling and HIF-1α-driven stemness34,35. HKDC1 also supports mitochondrial function and glucose-flux reprogramming25. These overlapping stress-adaptation programs provide a biological rationale for testing whether HKDC1 influences lenvatinib response, but they do not establish a direct interaction between HKDC1 and lenvatinib.

The present study used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HKDC1 depletion to examine cell growth, ML-162-associated viability loss, pharmacological rescue, GSH and MDA, and lenvatinib-associated apoptosis in HCC cell lines. Patient-cohort differential expression and pathway analyses were used to generate correlational context; they were not treated as transcriptional readouts of HKDC1 depletion (Figure 1).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Ethics
The use of six paired HCC and adjacent non-tumor tissue specimens was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (approval no. S067). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. No vertebrate animals were used in this study.

Bioinformatics analysis
Transcriptomic and clinical data for The Cancer Genome Atlas Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (TCGA-LIHC) cohort were collected from the National Cancer Institute Genomic Data Commons. This data was analyzed for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) with the Kaplan-Meier Plotter HCC dataset using the platform's automatically selected best HKDC1 expression cutoff and log-rank tests. For TCGA-LIHC clinicopathological, immune, differential-expression, and enrichment analyses, the authors divided the 374 tumors at the median into HKDC1-high and HKDC1-low groups (n = 187 per group). Differential-expression analysis using DESeq2 with adjusted p < 0.05 and |log2 fold change| > 1 was performed. Entrez Gene identifiers were mapped to official human gene symbols using the Bioconductor human annotation package org.Hs.eg.db. Functional annotation and gene set enrichment analysis were subsequently performed using clusterProfiler and the MSigDB canonical-pathway collection. Then, the immune-cell infiltration using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis implemented in GSVA and a published 24-cell marker set36 was assessed, and the results were visualized using ggplot2. These cohort analyses were treated as associations rather than direct consequences of experimental HKDC1 depletion.

Clinical tissue collection
The authors collected six paired HCC and adjacent non-tumor tissue specimens under the ethics approval described above. They processed paired samples in parallel for immunohistochemistry and protein extraction, recorded the pathological diagnosis, and preserved the tumor-adjacent pairing during analysis.

Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections (4 µm) were prepared. The sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated, followed by heat-induced antigen retrieval in EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) by boiling for 20 min, blocking of endogenous peroxidase with 3% hydrogen peroxide, and blocking of nonspecific binding with 5% bovine serum albumin. The sections were incubated with anti-HKDC1 antibody diluted 1:100 overnight at 4 °C, followed by the appropriate horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary reagent for 30 min at room temperature. Staining was developed with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. For digital quantification, identically sized tissue regions from the six paired main-field images were analyzed using a fixed H-DAB optical-density color-deconvolution workflow. Inset images and non-tissue annotations were excluded. DAB-positive pixels were defined using a DAB optical-density threshold of 0.30 together with fixed chromatic filters (saturation > 0.08, green > 1.03 × blue, and red > 1.10 × blue). DAB-positive area was used as the primary IHC outcome, and mean DAB optical density was used as a secondary intensity outcome. The same region-selection rule and thresholds were applied to all 12 images.

Cell culture
HepG2, Hep3B, PLC-PRF-5, Huh-7, JHH-7, SNU182, SNU387, SNU475, and SNU449 cells were used for HKDC1-expression screening. Hep3B and SNU449 cells were used for functional experiments and were maintained in minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HKDC1 depletion
Hep3B or SNU449 cells (5 × 105 per well) were seeded in six-well plates. A non-targeting CRISPR/Cas9 control construct (sg-HKDC1-nc; sequence 5'-GCACTCACATCGCTACATCA-3') or an HKDC1-targeting construct was introduced using 5 µg plasmid, 1.5 µL Lipofectamine 3000, and 2 µL P3000 reagent per well. The targeting sequences were sg-HKDC1-1, 5'-AATGTTTGCGGTCCACTTGA-3', and sg-HKDC1-2, 5'-CGGAGAGCCGCATGTGATAC-3'. The cells were incubated for 48 h before HKDC1 depletion was validated by Western blotting, and functional assays were initiated.

Cell proliferation and colony formation
For the cell counting kit-8 assay, 5 × 103 cells per well were seeded into a 96-well plate, with three technical replicates per condition and time point. At 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, 10 µL of reagent was added, the cells were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm. For colony formation, 150 cells per well were seeded in 24-well plates, the medium was replaced every 2 days, and the cells were cultured for 14 days. Colonies were fixed with methanol for 15 min, stained with crystal violet for 20 min, imaged using identical settings, and counted with a prespecified threshold. Three independent biological experiments were performed per group; each cell line was analyzed separately, and counts were reported as mean ± standard deviation.

Lenvatinib-associated viability loss and apoptosis
Control and HKDC1-depleted Hep3B and SNU449 cells were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle or lenvatinib for 24 h. For the concentration-response viability assay, lenvatinib at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 15, 25, and 50 µM was used. For the representative Annexin V/propidium iodide assay, vehicle, 20 µM, and 40 µM lenvatinib were used. Both adherent and detached cells were collected, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and resuspended in binding buffer. Samples were stained with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. Samples were acquired by flow cytometry using the same compensation and quadrant gates across conditions, and the combined early- and late-apoptotic fractions were reported.

ML-162 sensitivity and pharmacological rescue
For the ML-162 concentration-response experiment, Hep3B cells were treated with 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, or 20 µM ML-162, and SNU449 cells were treated with 0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, or 10 µM ML-162; viability was measured using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. For rescue experiments, sg-HKDC1-nc, sg-HKDC1-1, and sg-HKDC1-2 cells were exposed to vehicle, ML-162 alone, ML-162 plus ferrostatin-1, or ML-162 plus Z-VAD-FMK, and cell viability was measured.

GSH and MDA measurements
Control and HKDC1-depleted Hep3B and SNU449 cells were treated with vehicle or ML-162. Reduced GSH was measured using the colorimetric kit listed in the Table of Materials. Clarified lysate was mixed with the kit working reagent and incubated for 5 min at room temperature; absorbance was measured at 405 nm, and GSH was calculated from a standard curve. For the MDA assay, cells were lysed, and the lysate was clarified by centrifugation for 10 min. The supernatant was mixed with 600 µL thiobarbituric acid reagent and incubated at 95 °C for 60 min. Aliquots (200 µL) of each reaction were transferred to a 96-well plate in technical triplicate; absorbance was measured at 532 nm, and MDA was calculated from the standard curve and normalized to protein concentration. Three independent biological experiments were performed for each assay.

Western blotting and densitometry
Cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation-assay buffer for 20 min, and lysates were clarified for 15 min at 4 °C using a Heraeus l50i refrigerated centrifuge fitted with rotor 75003436 (maximum radius, 7.9 cm) at approximately 12,718 × g. Protein concentration was measured; one volume of 5× loading buffer was mixed with four volumes of protein sample, samples were heated at 95 °C for 5 min, and 15 µg was loaded per lane. Proteins were separated at 80 V for 30 min, followed by 120 V for 60 min, and transferred to a 0.45 µm polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk for 2 h, washed three times with Tris-buffered saline containing Tween 20, and incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-HKDC1, anti-BAX, or anti-GAPDH antibody diluted 1:1,000. The membranes were incubated with the host-appropriate horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody diluted 1:5,000 for 1 h at room temperature, developed by enhanced chemiluminescence, and imaged within the linear exposure range. Band intensity was quantified after local background subtraction, and HKDC1 or BAX was normalized to GAPDH within the same lane.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise stated. For GSH and MDA, control and sg-HKDC1-1 were compared within each vehicle or ML-162 condition using multiple two-sided unpaired t tests with the two-stage Benjamini-Krieger-Yekutieli false-discovery-rate procedure (Q = 1%). Colony counts were analyzed separately for each cell line by ordinary one-way analysis of variance followed by Sidak's multiple-comparisons test for the prespecified sg-HKDC1-1 versus sg-HKDC1-nc and sg-HKDC1-2 versus sg-HKDC1-nc comparisons. ML-162 concentration-response experiments were analyzed by ordinary two-way analysis of variance. For rescue experiments, genotype effects within each treatment condition were analyzed by ordinary one-way analysis of variance followed by Sidak's multiple-comparisons test; rescue conditions relative to ML-162 alone were evaluated by ordinary one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test. Paired tumor and adjacent non-tumor DAB-positive area fractions and mean DAB optical-density values were compared using two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Exact p values were reported where available, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Bioinformatics analysis
Paired analysis of 50 matched HCC and adjacent non-tumor liver samples showed significantly higher HKDC1 transcript expression in tumors. The paired profiles revealed a broad tumor-associated upward shift, with most tumors expressing higher levels of HKDC1 than their matched adjacent tissues (Figure 2A). These findings demonstrate recurrent transcriptional upregulation of HKDC1 in HCC.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The protocol integrates public-cohort analysis with genetic depletion, pharmacological rescue, flow cytometry, and biochemical readouts to investigate HKDC1-associated cell survival in HCC. HKDC1 was elevated in HCC and associated with poorer survival, while depletion reduced growth and colony formation in two cell-line models. These observations extend previous work connecting HKDC1 to HCC progression, mitochondrial function, stemness, and immune evasion25,

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. OpenAI Codex (GPT-5; accessed August 2026) was used only to assist with the code-based layout of Figure 1, the graphical abstract. The authors specified and verified all scientific content and labels. No AI tool was used to generate or analyze primary data, prepare Figures 2–5, or create, modify, or enhance experimental images.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS:
Jiahao Sun performed formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and software analysis, and drafted the manuscript. Pingyuan Tan was responsible for project administration, resources, and validation. Yuting Shao supervised the study and contributed to visualization. Zhihua Lu contributed to conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, and manuscript review and editing. Jiahao Sun and Zhihua Lu verified the authenticity of the raw data. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Shandong Province Medical and Health Science and Technology Project (No.202304080971) and also supported by the Qingdao Key Medical and Health Discipline Project (grant no. QDZDZK-2025063).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
96-well platesCorning Incorporated3599CCK-8 assay
Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kitDojindo Laboratories Co., Ltd.AD10Flow-cytometric apoptosis assay
Anti-BAX antibodyProteintech Group, Inc.50599-2-IgWestern blotting
Anti-GAPDH antibodyProteintech Group, Inc.60004-1-IgLoading control
Anti-HKDC1 antibodyProteintech Group, Inc.25874-1-APWestern blotting/IHC
BCA protein assay kitYeasen Biotechnology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.20201ES76Protein concentration normalization
BD FACSAria Fusion flow cytometerBecton, Dickinson and Company656700Flow-cytometric analysis
CCK-8 kitVazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.A311-01Cell proliferation/viability assay
ChemiDoc MP imaging systemBio-Rad Laboratories12003154Chemiluminescence imaging
clusterProfilerBioconductorversion 4.4.4Functional annotation and gene set enrichment analysis
CRISPR Scrambled sgRNA All-in-One Lentiviral Vector (with spCas9)Applied Biological Materials Inc. (abm)K010; sgRNA sequence: GCACTCACATCGCTACATCANegative-control CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid transfection
Crystal violet staining solutionMedChemExpress LLCHY-DY2001Stain for colony-formation assays
DESeq2Bioconductorversion 1.36.0Differential-expression analysis
Ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1)MedChemExpress LLCHY-100579Ferroptosis rescue
Fetal bovine serumShanghai BasalMedia Technologies Co., Ltd.S615JYCell culture supplement
ggplot2The R Foundation / CRANversion 3.3.6Data visualization
GraphPad PrismGraphPad Software, LLCversion 10.6.0Statistical analysis and graphing
GSH assay kitNanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering InstituteA006-2-1Intracellular glutathione detection
GSVABioconductorversion 1.46.0Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis for immune-cell infiltration
Hep3BSuzhou Haixing Biosciences Co., Ltd.TCH-C195Functional experiments
HepG2Suzhou Haixing Biosciences Co., Ltd.TCH-C196HCC cell-line expression screening
Heraeus L50i refrigerated centrifugeThermo Fisher Scientific Inc.Heraeus L50i; rotor 75003436Sample centrifugation; rotor 75003436
HKDC1 sgRNA CRISPR/Cas9 All-in-One Lentivector (Human), Target 1Applied Biological Materials Inc. (abm)CL097; sgRNA sequence: AATGTTTGCGGTCCACTTGAHKDC1 depletion
HKDC1 sgRNA CRISPR/Cas9 All-in-One Lentivector (Human), Target 2Applied Biological Materials Inc. (abm)CL097; sgRNA sequence: CGGAGAGCCGCATGTGATACHKDC1 depletion
HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and goat anti-mouse IgGProteintech GroupSA00001-2; SA00001-1Western blot secondary antibodies
Huh-7Suzhou Haixing Biosciences Co., Ltd.TCH-C217HCC cell-line expression screening
Human hepatocellular carcinoma and adjacent non-tumor specimensThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital)6 paired specimens; ethics approval S067Six paired, de-identified surgical specimens; written informed consent obtained
Immobilon-P PVDF membrane, 0.45 umMerck MilliporeIPVH00010Western blot protein transfer
JHH-7Suzhou Haixing Biosciences Co., Ltd.TCH-C460HCC cell-line expression screening
Kaplan-Meier Plotter hepatocellular carcinoma datasetKaplan-Meier Plotterhttps://kmplot.com/analysis/Overall-survival analysis using the platform's automatically selected best expression cut-off
LenvatinibMedChemExpress LLCHY-10981Apoptosis-related cell death assay
Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagentThermo Fisher Scientific Inc.L3000015Plasmid transfection; 1.5 uL Lipofectamine 3000 and 2 uL P3000 per well of a six-well plate for 5 ug plasmid
MDA assay kitNanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering InstituteA003-4-1Malondialdehyde/lipid peroxidation detection
MEM mediumShanghai BasalMedia Technologies Co., Ltd.L550KJCell culture medium
MethanolSigma-Aldrich/Merck179337Fixative for colony-formation assays
ML-162MedChemExpress LLCHY-100002Ferroptosis induction/rescue assay
MSigDB curated canonical pathway collectionMolecular Signatures Databasec2.cp.all.v2022.1.Hs.symbols.gmtCanonical-pathway gene set
Multiskan FC microplate photometerThermo Fisher Scientific Inc.51119000Absorbance measurement
OpenAI CodexOpenAIGPT-5; accessed August 2026Code-based layout assistance for Figure 1 graphical abstract only; no primary data generation, data analysis, or experimental-image modification.
org.Hs.eg.dbBioconductorversion 3.10.0Entrez identifier conversion
Penicillin-streptomycinShanghai BasalMedia Technologies Co., Ltd.S110JVCell culture supplement
PLC-PRF-5Suzhou Haixing Biosciences Co., Ltd.TCH-C298HCC cell-line expression screening
RIPA lysis bufferYeasen Biotechnology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.20101ES60Western blotting
RSL3MedChemExpress LLCHY-100218AFerroptosis induction
SNU182Suzhou Haixing Biosciences Co., Ltd.TCH-C398HCC cell-line expression screening
SNU387Shanghai Stembio Co., Ltd.STM-CL-5322HCC cell-line expression screening
SNU449Suzhou Haixing Biosciences Co., Ltd.TCH-C500Functional experiments
SNU475Shanghai Stembio Co., Ltd.STM-CL-5451HCC cell-line expression screening
TCGA-LIHCNational Cancer Institute Genomic Data CommonsTCGA-LIHCTranscriptomic and clinical analysis
Xiantao Academic Online Analysis PlatformXiantao AcademicWeb-based implementationWeb-based bioinformatics analysis
Z-VAD-FMKMedChemExpress LLCHY-16658BPan-caspase inhibition control

References

  1. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-63.
  2. Feng F, Zhao Y. Hepatocellular carcinoma: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Med Princ Pract. 2024;33(5):414-23.
  3. Chidambaranathan-Reghupaty S, Fisher PB, Sarkar D. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, etiology, and molecular classification. Adv Cancer Res. 2021;149:1-61.
  4. Torimura T, Iwamoto H. Treatment and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia. Liver Int. 2022;42(9):2042-54.
  5. Mandlik DS, Mandlik SK, Choudhary HB. Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(6):1054-75.
  6. Alawyia B, Constantinou C. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review on current knowledge and future prospects. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023;24(7):711-24.
  7. Zhou H, Song T. Conversion therapy and maintenance therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Biosci Trends. 2021;15(3):155-60.
  8. Chen Y, et al. Lenvatinib and immune-checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanistic insights, clinical efficacy, and future perspectives. J Hematol Oncol. 2024;17(1):130.
  9. Kudo M. Lenvatinib may drastically change the treatment landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2018;7(1):1-19.
  10. Kudo M, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1163-73.
  11. Qin Y, et al. Lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: resistance mechanisms and strategies for improved efficacy. Liver Int. 2024;44(8):1808-31.
  12. Dixon SJ, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149(5):1060-72.
  13. Stockwell BR, et al. Ferroptosis: a regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. 2017;171(2):273-85.
  14. Kagan VE, et al. Oxidized arachidonic and adrenic PEs navigate cells to ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13(1):81-90.
  15. Conrad M, Pratt DA. The chemical basis of ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15(12):1137-47.
  16. Jiang X, Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(4):266-82.
  17. Yang WS, et al. Regulation of ferroptotic cancer cell death by GPX4. Cell. 2014;156(1–2):317-31.
  18. Wang Y, Deng B. Hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular mechanism, targeted therapy, and biomarkers. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2023;42(3):629-52.
  19. You Q, et al. Insights into lenvatinib resistance: mechanisms, potential biomarkers, and strategies to enhance sensitivity. Med Oncol. 2024;41(3):75.
  20. Chen R, et al. Regulated cell death in lenvatinib resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Int J Biol Sci. 2025;21(5):2012-26.
  21. Yang M, et al. S100P is a ferroptosis suppressor to facilitate hepatocellular carcinoma development by rewiring lipid metabolism. Nat Commun. 2025;16:509.
  22. Irwin DM, Tan H. Molecular evolution of the vertebrate hexokinase gene family: identification of a conserved fifth vertebrate hexokinase gene. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2008;3(1):96-107.
  23. Wilson JE. Isozymes of mammalian hexokinase: structure, subcellular localization and metabolic function. J Exp Biol. 2003;206(Pt 12):2049-57.
  24. Li GH, Huang JF. Inferring therapeutic targets from heterogeneous data: HKDC1 is a novel potential therapeutic target for cancer. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(6):748-52.
  25. Khan MW, et al. The hexokinase HKDC1 interaction with the mitochondria is essential for liver cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(7):660.
  26. Guo C, et al. Coordinated regulatory variation associated with gestational hyperglycaemia regulates expression of the novel hexokinase HKDC1. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6069.
  27. Pusec CM, et al. Hepatic HKDC1 expression contributes to liver metabolism. Endocrinology. 2019;160(2):313-330.
  28. Liu P, et al. HKDC1 functions as a glucose sensor and promotes metabolic adaptation and cancer growth via interaction with PHB2. Cell Death Differ. 2024;31(12):1595-1610.
  29. Pusec CM, et al. Liver-specific overexpression of HKDC1 increases hepatocyte size and proliferative capacity. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):8034.
  30. Zhang Z, et al. High expression of hexokinase domain-containing 1 is associated with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype in hepatocarcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;474(4):673-9.
  31. Fan L, et al. HKDC1 promotes liver cancer stemness under hypoxia through stabilizing beta-catenin. Hepatology. 2025;81(6):1685-99.
  32. Zhang Y, et al. HKDC1 promotes tumor immune evasion in hepatocellular carcinoma by coupling the cytoskeleton to STAT1 activation and PD-L1 expression. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1314.
  33. Luo X, Peng M, Wang Z, Wu N, Wang Y. HKDC1 in cancer: mechanisms, clinical applications, and future. J Cancer. 2025;16(13):3851-8.
  34. Leung CON, et al. Broad-spectrum kinome profiling identifies CDK6 upregulation as a driver of lenvatinib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):6699.
  35. Shan Q, et al. The p-MYH9/USP22/HIF-1α axis promotes lenvatinib resistance and cancer stemness in hepatocellular carcinoma. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):249.
  36. Bindea G, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intratumoral immune cells reveal the immune landscape in human cancer. Immunity. 2013;39(4):782-95.
  37. Wang B, et al. ROS-induced lipid peroxidation modulates cell death outcome: mechanisms behind apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis. Arch Toxicol. 2023;97(6):1439-51.
  38. Morana O, Wood W, Gregory CD. The apoptosis paradox in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1328.
  39. Galluzzi L, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(3):486-541.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Ferroptosis ResponseLenvatinib TreatmentCell Growth AssayGlutathione MeasurementMalondialdehyde MeasurementColony FormationPharmacological Rescue